User talk:RhinosF1/Archive 3

From Meta
Archive This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.


Bot

Hi

How would I like to launch a new user welcome bot on my wiki.How -- Sourav Talk... 16:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need us to do anything for that if it is on your wiki. You would have to run and configure the bot. However, if it's for welcoming there are multiple extensions you can use for that (like HAWelcome). Reception123 (talk) (C) 17:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
like HAWelcome How to use it -- Sourav Talk... 17:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Interwiki table log, How to connect to my wiki interwiki -- Sourav Talk... 19:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand what you’re asking. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 07:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the logo section of the FAQ. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 06:12, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ok,thanks.--Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:32, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
but my logo is not view my wiki, can you help me?--Msnhinet8 (talk) 06:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Msnhinet8: Fixed the logo, you were missing https:// in front. Reception123 (talk) (C) 06:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.--Msnhinet8 (talk) 07:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Public test wiki

Please unblock public test wiki.And I'm asking for bureaucratic and administrative rights. -- Sourav Talk... 06:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Come back in 6 months and you won’t get rights for a while. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 06:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

questions

I can share with another account with my IP by creating a new account -- Sourav Talk... 03:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Creating another account and using it on meta will highly likely get both this and your other account blocked. What is the name of that account? ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 03:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't carete , just advice -- Sourav Talk... 04:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifing. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 07:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Your wiki request );I request to see this discussion on my talk page,Can I get four new wiki?

I will not be accepting them. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 07:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About The Email

Thanks for the encouraging message, and I feel better now because I learned that I am the happiest person they have met. WickyHoney (talk) 19:24, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Miraheze Meetings

Hello RhinosF1. I wonder why was the Miraheze Meetings project canceled? And who made this decision? When I first saw it it looked like a good idea for Miraheze to organise. DeeM28 (talk) 15:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1) Because it was never used. 2) It was a joint discussion on IRC. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 15:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Is there a reason for why it was not used? --DeeM28 (talk) 15:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In addition I want to let you know that there is also a typo on this page you wrote "absoulte" instead of "absolute". --DeeM28 (talk) 15:49, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No massive interest and ok. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yaratıcı Nedir?

Teknolojiyi kullanmak katkı sağlamak hergün, her an, yeni bişeyler keşfetmek gerçekten takdir edilir. Ama asıl sorum şu; insanlar yaratıldıklarını bilirler, ve O'na şükretmesi gerektiğinide.. Toplumların huzurları ve insanlığın genel durumu hakkında ne düşünüyorsunuz? Pencereye sadece kendi etrafınızdan bir model oluşmak yada çizdiğiniz modelin dışına çıkmak istermiydiniz? Sizin gibi insanlarla sadece bu işi yaparken toplumların huzuru için neler yapmak isterdiniz? Gelecekte insanların bilinçli olmasına öncü topluluklarla araştırma ekibi kurmayı düşündünüz mü?

Not: bu soruyu sizin gibi her hangi biri soruyor teşekkürler. OnKoydenKovuldum (talk) 12:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you post this in English? ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 12:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

test

Edit ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 10:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Hello RhinosF1! I am here to just write you a message. I know what I did at the test wiki was wrong. I have taken time to look at rules for both meta and test wiki, and I would like to apologize for my actions. I do realize that they were completely inappropriate, and did not contribute at all to the project. When I get unblocked on August 1st, I will be constructive there, and I will not block users there unless they are posing an immediate threat to the wiki that cannot be waited for a consul to intervine. Again, I apologise, and I would like to eventually come back to the project. With regrets, TFFfan (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test

RC Feed. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2 ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:44, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
3 ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
4 ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
5 ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
6 ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test

test ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 04:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you delete that page

Firstly, Oversighter really sounds like careless mistake makers. I think you need to think further before deleting that pages. ThesenatorO5-2 (talk) at 23:54, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oversighters does not mean careless mistake makers at all in English. It was pointed out by numerous users that it was a waste of time. In fact, one of them was going to ask you to think before starting RfCs and votes. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 06:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is PII?

You said that CU has access to PII at here, but what is it? [ From: ThesenatorO5-2 (talk) Time: 01:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC) ][reply]

Please block Favonian & Tegel

Me and Favonian & Tegel Are in a a Edit war, this is getting out of hand so could you block him.--Μπέλα2006🌎 (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked by MrJaroslavik. @Μπέλα2006:Please do not make a request directly. Please request at AN.--そらたこ (talk) 04:35, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please globally lock RainBoy107

Reason: He said in a YouTube video that he'd be happy if a user died and had the audacity to say that he would celebrate her death. He's also been acting like a pervert towards minors too. Here's a link to where he was acting so heartless: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWFya401z6A&t=49s --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conversation with you

Hi rhinos there is something I been wanting to talk to you about something privately by any chance I can discuss it with you via Irc or Email? Please let me know witch works best I know you're still mad at me for what happens on Discord and if you don't wish to speak to me that is ok but if you are willing to speak with me let me know --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can use this form to contact me once. Please ask again for any future contact. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 08:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

block on discord

hey rhinos, i wanted to ask when you plan to unblock me on discord I am sorry I was arguing about my ban but can i be unblocked please on discord? or when will you unblock me on discord? --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cocopuff2018: Thank you for your good-faith question for @RhinosF1: regarding your Discord Code of Conduct-related sanction. I am replying to your message, per the request of RhinosF1, who is currently indisposed and quite busy with myriad Miraheze and MirahezeBots tasks right now, and I am doing so purely as a member of the Miraheze global community and in no official community capacity. While no sanction is permanent, it was expressed that the timing of your request for a reconsideration of your Discord sanction is not appropriate at this time, and that you should, perhaps, wait several more weeks before requesting a local reconsideration of the sanction, given the many warnings from several system administrators related to your conduct on Discord. Hope this helps. Dmehus (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFP Decline on TestWiki

Hello! You declined my RFP on TestWiki saying that extensions cannot be changed by bureaucrats on TestWiki. I did review the TestWiki:Bureaucrats page before requesting but assumed it was not mentioned because bureaucrats should be able to do this by default. Could you please tell me which user group has this permission? Thank you very much. R4356th (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) R4356th Only Consuls can change settings and add/remove extensions on Public Test Wiki. If you want to test some extensions there or have settings change, maybe you can ask to them. (Although that need sometimes a community discussion before) HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 14:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Thank you very much, @HeartsDo:. R4356th (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@HeartsDo: Thanks for replying to R4356th. Dmehus (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
R4356th Which extension(s) were you wanting to test on TestWiki? I can probably enable them, temporarily or indefinitely. There's only a couple extensions we'd probably rather not enable on TestWiki. Dmehus (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dmehus: I wanted to test the Comments extension. R4356th (talk) 09:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marking pages for translation

Hello there, I saw you changed a link inside a tvar tag on the article Discord. However, for future reference when marking a page for translation, if there are any units that only include spelling mistakes which are not likely to have been reflected in translations such as double spaces or color/colour tex., or changes to content inside tvar tags, the best thing to do is to mark the unit as "Do not invalidate translations", which spares the translators the hassle of having to do that manually. Thank you. --Sabelöga (talk) 14:21, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blah

Test ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 16:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What were you testing? :) Dmehus (talk) 23:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questions at RfGR

Hello RhinosF1, what is the limit of questions per user at RfGR. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no hard limit. Just be sensible. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 12:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki request 19526

special:RequestWikiQueue/19526 أحمد (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A question about your closure

You said in the closure of my post on Steward's noticeboard that I should take this to a "private venue". What exactly do you mean by that? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

stewards(at)miraheze.org, see your talk page ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I do apologize for constantly posting on Steward's noticeboard, but this situation continues and unfortunately there isn't really a way to discuss this locally, since, well, I am blocked on every Qualitipedia wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Telling us every day doesn't change the issue. It's time wasting. Mario has already lost rights on meta for his actions too. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled topic

Hello, My page Dcoker by wiki was deleted. I received thsi message from your side. RhinosF1 left a message on your talk page in " Quick deletion of DockerWiki by RZ ".

I have deleted this now, please request a wiki to host your content and it can be copied there.

View message: <https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:Rz?markasread=150193&markasreadwiki=metawiki#Quick_deletion_of_DockerWiki_by_RZ>

I have just practicing the mediawiki and due to the same page practicing the page was deleted. please undeleted it so I can edit it. Thanks

@Rz: please use TestWiki for testing. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 09:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so how can I get back my page? I working on it very hardly. Rz (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can restore it to TestWiki ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 10:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, restore so I can edit it.
and please can you tell me the backup that how can I download it for myself? Rz (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I copied it from Special:Undelete which you can't access. It is now at mh:test:DockerWiki_by_RZ ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 10:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So I cannot edit this? just seen this ? Rz (talk) 10:15, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You should be fine to edit it. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 10:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DM

I know that the redirect don't exist, but when i tried to create it the abusefilter blocked my action...--アンジェロ先輩 (talk) 21:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry on discord zippix told me that the redirect is ambigous...--アンジェロ先輩 (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I don't think it's useful anyway. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:47, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use the same domain for a wiki and other things

Hello,
I would like to use a custom domain for my wiki, but I would also like to use it for other things. I would like to know if it is possible to use the same domain for both a wiki (example.com/wiki/) and for other topics (e.g. example.com/info) that would be separate from the MediaWiki interface, so that the /wiki/ part is just a topic of the whole site and when you just type example.com, you don't go directly to the wiki, so you have to type example.com/wiki to get to it (I don't know if I'm clear).
I had asked the question on the Community noticeboard but the answers were mixed, some said it was possible and some said it wasn't. Since the answers were pretty mixed, I figured I'd better ask you directly to find out more. Soronos (talk) 08:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Glad you deleted this page. There were already some people complaining about her, but she was in the process of construction. But I didn't understand why the reason for the exclusion was because was nonsense. YellowFrogger (Talk Edits) 22:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was one sentence in that whole page that was correct. The rest was simply going to cause more trouble. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 22:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent emergency actions

Hi RhinosF1,

I'm Doug, a Trust and Safety responder for Miraheze, and I noticed your recent revision deletions in which you cited as "emergency action" concerning the Privacy Policy while concurrently referring the matter to the Trust and Safety team. Intended or not, this can certainly be construed as taking Trust and Safety actions on a team on which you're not apart. While I can conceivably understand your thinking, please also note that having conferred with my supervisor in private channels, it was also not correct. The user in question is now able to legally consent to the disclosure of information provided by them, under their current or former usernames.

Thanks,
Doug (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A follow up email is being sent to T&S and the user. Any official actions are done from my official account not my volunteer one. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 09:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply, but in any case, why cite "emergency actions" or Privacy Policy? Wouldn't it be preferable to be more articulate in citing community-oriented reasons for revision deletion? Doug (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Emergency because it's until Trust & Safety can give a directive to fully remove the logs or do that themselves and Privacy policy is the policy they've breached. I don't think we have any better local policy on outing users who deliberately had their accounts hidden. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 09:13, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I might offer a comment as a fellow Meta sysop, we do have "inappropriate personal information" as a deletion reason. While it's not added to MediaWiki:Revdelete-reason-dropdown, I personally wouldn't have any issues in you adding that as a revision deletion reason. That being said, I know that John has said that he personally doesn't favour revision deleting entries where suppression is required, mainly because the entries are likely to be lost or otherwise not be as noticeable. As to whether suppression is required, I personally don't see the need, speaking as a Steward, as it's only the user's username. Dmehus (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The whole point of the username being changed is to protect the users identity. If so, we should make our best effort to do that. When PII is involved, it should be removed as quick as possible and discretely. I personally dislike the explicit revdel reason that the content needs OS and prefer something like Wikipedia's other authorised deletion option. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 09:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]