User talk:Revi/Archives/2017

From Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning! Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created on 01 January 2017, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index.

Meta:Administrators[edit source]

Sorry! Significantly less sad! -- Cheers, NDKilla ( TalkContribs ) 11:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

저의 위키를 폐쇠하고 동명의 사이트주소가 다른 위키를 다시 차리고 싶습니다. 위키를 폐쇠하는 방법을 알려주세요. Kimwoostv (talk) 10:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Help granting.[edit source]

I have already wiki, but I don't have crat status see thisMurub (talk) 08:49, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

That's stewards' duty. I'll let them know about your situation so they'll handle it. — revi 08:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

thank you[edit source]

Thank you for your recent comment on John's talk page -Robert robert@sterbal.com 412-977-3526 (call/text)Rsterbal (talk) 22:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


Why am i locked[edit source]

My account User:Redtmr1 is locked i want to know why and be unlocked on my wiki nasa.miraheze.org

Your account has been locked for general long term abuse, and trolling Miraheze on Phabricator. That explanation should be enough. Reception123 (talk) (contribs) 14:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

can you unlock me on my wiki please @Reception123 or make llama a bureaucrat

http://publictestwiki.com[edit source]

How i have been blocked for year if it`s test wiki ? 83.31.83.239

Test should be conducted under the limit of common sense and editing other's userpage is beyond the limit. Unblocking, and remember User: and User talk: namespaces are NOT for test. — revi 11:06, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Next block[edit source]

Where was this my block (on test Wiki) approved by Consul ? 83.31.83.239

Bureaucrats can also block people without consuls approval. For what it's worth, I "approve" the block. --Reception123 (talk) (contribs) 15:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Wiki creation change[edit source]

Hi,

Please note that there has been a change to CreateWiki, and now you do not need to notify the users manually, all you need to do is have the "Notify" button checked on Special:CreateWiki, and this will be done automatically. If there is any confusion please read Meta:Wiki creators guide

--Reception123 06:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

CVT Request[edit source]

As you are one of the members of the CVT I invite you to comment on my request to join the CVT over at the Stewards' noticeboard Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs 20:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Drmies[edit source]

FYI that’s not my account, and I don’t think that LP/ILB would be able to create accounts while in jail. I’ve noticed several other LTA’s on English Wikipedia starting to impersonate ILB, as well as several spammers impersonating LP here. ENWP does have a documented LTA who has been known to impersonate other sockmasters - can’t remember who off the top of my head. Amanda123 (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your word alone is not a proof. — revi 14:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
I’m not saying that the account should be unlocked. In fact, I believe that it should be locked for impersonation regardless. However, I’m just stating for the record that I personally did not create that account (why would I?) and that I find it highly unlikely that LP would be allowed to access the Internet while in prison for Internet-related charges. Amanda123 (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
"Your word alone is not a proof" also applies to your claim that "LP" is in prison, imo. — revi 14:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
What I told LulzKiller on the RFC applies. Amanda123 (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Template:Infobox player[edit source]

You deleted this template, which a newbie brought across (and I think an established user edited, perhaps to get it to run here), probably on the assumption that the newbie was trying to create content on Meta. I thought so too, but a possibility (without evidence) is that the guy just brought it over for use to write a user page on Meta. I would have waited to see what he did with it. Spıke (talk)19:08 23-Nov-2017

Meta is usually not for a contents. Especially not a human infobox. — revi 14:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your call. Regarding North Korean movie fan crosses DMZ and your response that you rescinded, you realized that this entire wiki of mine is satire? Spıke (talk)17:12 25-Nov-2017

Well... There was two incident regarding NK border (one being US citizen trying to cross NK border, another being the NK soldier crossing DMZ and shot) so I misunderstood something — revi 17:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Each of my "news" articles at The Mirror includes links to stories in the Real News so readers can see what I was making fun of. The problem is that it took a week after the NK defection before I saw a comedy strategy for it. Spıke (talk)18:51 25-Nov-2017

SpamLog[edit source]

Revi, I think your view of spam is too harsh. When Miraheze is included in a broadcast of advertising independent of relevance, that to me is spam. Some of the emails catalogued as spam are simply someone, perhaps searching for himself on the web, finding a reference here and suggesting a source for more or better information. This might be an attempt to self-promote, but it might be an attempt to offer help, and the only error of the "spammer" might be not understanding that Miraheze is a wiki farm, and the fact that one member is documenting something does not mean that Stewards need more information on it. You are free to proceed as you like, but that's my view. Cheers! Spıke (talk)01:12 21-Dec-2017

They're using automated scripts to send bulk unsolicited SEO emails. If they wrote hand-written emails, sure we would reply them and tell "we don't do that business, go try to find help from $bureaucrats", but I don't think mercy is warranted for automated spammers. — revi 01:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

In that case, you are quite justified. Spıke (talk)01:51 21-Dec-2017

Form 7 issue[edit source]

Form 7 (https://phabricator.miraheze.org/transactions/editengine/maniphest.task/view/7/) has a issue. It currently says" This form should only be used to request extensions and/or configuration changes (such as changing the logo, restricting editing, etc) for your wiki. If you want to report bugs, or your task is not configuration/extensions related at all (e.g. transferring your wiki from another wiki farm), please use this this form.em". It should say "This form should only be used to request extensions and/or configuration changes (such as changing the logo, restricting editing, etc) for your wiki. If you want to report bugs, or your task is not configuration/extensions related at all (e.g. transferring your wiki from another wiki farm), please use this this form.)" Please delete the em from the end of the blue box. Thanks --Sau226 (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done -- Cheers, NDKilla ( TalkContribs ) 05:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)