User talk:QwertyMan'65

Add topic
From Miraheze Meta, Miraheze's central coordination wiki

i want to plead innocent on my charge of mistakes in discord server the outcast network and the toxic fandom and hatedom wiki. why i was blocked forever in atrocious youtubers wiki and the unfavorable wikis and users wiki despite being an inexperienced user, and i will trying my best not commit bad deeds as of now. I want to work with my trustable user, and avoid any abusive admin as i can. help unban me on miraheze discord server of the outcast network and the toxic fandom and hatedom wiki. whats wrong with the word "shitpost". --QwertyMan'65 (talk) 02:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We're not unblocking you at all. No exceptions. You're being annoying in general, you better be improving your grammar, you are very poor at political satire, you whiteknighted a person being a threat to society, you once had a malnourished kid as your pfp, made George Floyd memes and even posted an offensive Beirut explosion meme on Discord. This is why I can't trust insensitive people like you acting like you are a funny person. --Hookuai (Talk to Nuclear Jaws) 17:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Hookuai:, please fix your signature, as it is breaking discussion talk pages. And I would just remind you to be civil on Meta. QwertyMan'65 is simply looking to amends for his past local actions on those wikis. You don't have to respond positively to his request, but civility is required. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 17:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

i am not annoying person as now, i learned my mistakes[edit source]

yes, exceptions is exist for me to unblock in discord servers of reception wiki family in miraheze community, how i do pardon my past actions in the discord and comment section in miraheze wiki, like george floyd, beirut explosion, malnourished kid as pfp, inkster, and political satire. i need some people to work with me, while avoiding bad deeds to the future. i can pardon my failed comedy in discord server. If you want to be trust by new people, then you're fair to be social. Also, never giving criticism too far by blocking me. QwertyMan'65 (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm grateful to you towards Dmehus[edit source]

Please pardon my grammar please because I'm from Indonesia. My native language is Indonesian while English is my language.

Thank you very much Dmehus for helping me to defend these uninvolved third-party people, because I'm very kind to you, and become an altruistic user in the community, I love your reply towards the third-parties how you can deal these peanut-gallery users, and i hope that they need some lessons to be civil toward the others. Portrock1566 needs some advice from stewards not to false block forever to me, and from my humble beginning i was complete nobody (2019) until i became a failed comedian (humorous, hilarious, and joke) while trying to post funny images. (what's wrong with word "shitposting"?) I don't want to be disliked by many users in receptions wiki families. My political satire gone awry and I need to learn my mistakes by giving advice from volunteers, and need some work of lighthearted fun by truted users around the communities.

Your sincerely, QwertyMan'65

QwertyMan'65 (talk) 04:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Removed largely out of scope topic, but good-faith question from stewards' noticeboard[edit source]

Hi QwertyMan'65,

I noted your good-faith question on stewards' noticeboard, but have removed it for a couple reasons, namely that the request is largely out of scope of stewards, but also because your section header was insanely long and posed readability and accessibility problems for readers and users using smaller (i.e., mobile) devices. Plus, more simply, I thought it would be more friendly to address your question in the more personalized environment of your user talk page, free of unsolicited commentary of others.

Firstly, the wikis' you cited as having been locally blocked have been locked and made private by stewards for unremediated, systemic Content Policy and serious Code of Conduct violations. While the blocks will still show in your listing of attached global accounts until the wikis are deleted in a few months' time, the reality is this does not prevent you from engaging in constructive behaviour on wikis on which you are not locally blocked. Secondly, regarding your other question about those now effectively closed, and soon to be permanently deleted wikis', Discord servers, please note that is completely out of scope of stewards, and you would have to address any local sanctions as may be in place on you with those local Discord server owners. If you want my best advice, put it past you, don't patronize those Discord servers, don't contribute to any remaining wikis focused on users, and contribute constructively to one or more of the other 3,850-3,900 wikis we host not focused on users. To make the best start on whatever wikis' you choose to help out on, you can use Special:ListUsers on any wiki to reach out to any local administrator who is reasonably active to point you to any local content or conduct rules.

Hope this helps, and happy editing! :)

Dmehus (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your interactions with DarkMatterMan4500 and the reception wikis[edit source]

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that it would probably be a good idea to limit your interactions with DarkMatterMan4500 globally, first, and especially on Meta. In addition, it seems that you have not been using edit summaries, and your edits on "Reception wikis" are being seen as vandalism. As a result of this, this is leading to local blocks, some of which may or may not have been "unfair" and perhaps not enough to amount to global action. Therefore I would encourage you to engage with the local sysops and other local wiki users and enquire what the local policies are rather than immediately edit pages. Reception123 (talk) (C) 14:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@DarkMatterMan4500: Here, you must remember that my interaction above; you should know why they are blocked unfair. Then you just seek to get a new lifestyle, so that you could be impressed by others. And you cannot false blocked me :@QwertyMan'65: at aint it funny wiki for being cross wiki vandalism, because im so freaking innocent by pleading to the blockers. Also that you must be remain civil while doing task around wikis you admin it, and then try to socialize with troubling user not block them, remember that nothing to false block me, before i edited first time on certain wiki (aint it funny wiki). QwertyMan'65 (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@QwertyMan'65: That reason has nothing to do with why you were blocked to begin with. And I had a conversation with @Reception123: on Discord yesterday, and we both agreed to just give you a warning, but you blew that warning. This is your final warning. Continue to start up with me, and you're just totally asking for it. Now please leave me alone. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Both of you, I must reiterate my previous recommendation that you two stop interacting with each other. If you ignore said recommendation and continue these arguments an official interaction ban may be decided between the two of you. I hope that is however not necessary and that you will take my recommendation seriously. Reception123 (talk) (C) 10:40, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@QwertyMan'65 and DarkMatterMan4500: I concur with @Reception123: above completely, but I would just note @DarkMatterMan4500: that are you seem to be ignoring part of Reception123's cautionary note, the portion about assuming good faith. Indefinite blocks are never meant to be permanent blocks, and I am willing to assume good faith that @QwertyMan'65: is willing to change his editing behaviour and instead engage in discussions and to more frequently use edit summaries on/in local Reception wikis. As Reception123 also noted, I would also reiterate that blocking users for conduct on other wikis to which the user has never contributed may, in fact, violate the Code of Conduct. So, how about this...if both of you acknowledge the errors in your past actions and if @QwertyMan'65: agrees to wait between fifteen (15) and thirty (30) calendar days without asking to be unblocked (on Meta or elsewhere), will you be willing to consider conditionally unblocking from wikis where you are an administrator (per the terms I described and any additional term(s) as deemed appropriate) and to at least discussing the possibility of allowing him to make an apology to the Discord server so described? This seems like a very workable, doable, and pragmatic compromise solution that requires both parties to assume good faith and also to demonstrate their capability to understand and comply with requests. Dmehus (talk) 12:44, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]