User talk:DuchessTheSponge

From Meta

Deletion of one of your wikis[edit source]

Hi, I would like to tell you that I have deleted scumbobwiki, which you requested, because it turned out to be a duplicated request of another wiki requested earlier than yours. Please use it instead.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (talk/contribs | global🌎) 12:40, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI the sling on wiki already exist here --Cocopuff2018 03:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your signature[edit source]

Hi DuchessTheSponge,

I noticed a couple relatively minor issues with your transcluded signature, now at User:DuchessTheSponge/sig, which are itemized in turn.

  • User signature file location. Per established social norms and customs on Meta, users' transcluded signature files are located typically as subpages of their own user space, not in Template: namespace. MrJaroslavik originally moved it to User:DuchessTheSponge/DuchessTheSponge as we weren't yet sure whether or not this template was for a userbox or a user signature. Now that you've signed several talk page, user talk page, or noticeboard posts with it, we know that it is, so I have kindly moved it to User:DuchessTheSponge/sig and updated the transclusions, purging the page caches on each page on which it was transcluded. Please go into your preferences, under the signature section, and update your signature to reference your signature file's new location
  • Talk page, user talk page, and noticeboard signature guidelines. Please remember to sign all talk page, user talk page, and noticeboard threads or posts with four tildes (~~~~), not three tildes, to include a crucial timestamp for our bot. I've made the corrections for your recent posts, and manually added it for you
  • Upcoming signature rule changes with MediaWiki 1.35. When MediaWiki version 1.35 is publicly released as a production, stable build and deployed on Miraheze, Extension:DiscussionTools will be concurrently deployed, too. One of the consequences of that extension is that there will be changes to the signature rules, and your signature will now be required to include an internal wikilink to either (a) your user page or (b) your user talk page. A small number of Meta users will likely be impacted by this change, so I am proactively reaching out to users as on Meta as I see them, and your transcluded signature does not link to either. While it's fine now, you will need to update this once MediaWiki version 1.35 launches and is deployed on Miraheze, along with the DiscussionTools extension.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding either of the above. :)

Dmehus (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you,  The Sponge M·C·E  1:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Adoption of fanfiction.miraheze[edit source]

Hi Freighttrain here, sorry I didn't contact you earlier about this, though there has been no harm done and do not worry this is not an attempt at takeover, I have adopted this wiki due to it's previous closure caused by inactivity, as well as my desire for there to be a place for people to be able to post their fanworks without the hassle that other wikis are known for.

Could you please reply to let me know of your stance on these recent happenings, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, could you please reply so that we can discuss the fanfiction.miraheze wiki, you are still listed as an administrator there and it doesn't feel right either just leaving it like that or altering your user status without having first received your standpoint on the matter, so could you please respond soon, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Freighttrain: This is very thoughtful that you have reached out to @DuchessTheSponge: like this following your successful adoption. Hopefully they will be able to reply to you soon, either here, or on the local wiki. Dmehus (talk) 17:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I was not able to contact DuchessTheSponge beforehand, as editing on that wiki was not possible because it had been closed due to inactivity, and I didn't think to try and find them here to let them know prior to this, but after my successful adoption of the fanfiction.miraheze wiki it did occur to me that they might be here, though I first contacted them on their local talk page there after it reopened, but it does seem they were recently active here so yes hopefully they will reply soon as the current arrangement feels awkward. Freighttrain (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Freighttrain: Okay, thanks for the update. While I am okay with you modifying my comment above, I just thought I should give you a head's up that I do not believe Echo notifications work with MirahezeMagic interwiki wikilinks or even interwiki wikilinks at all. In effect, it just becomes a wikilink to one's user page on another wiki without the {{ping}}/Echo notification. In fact, I'll test this right now. Reception123, did you get this {{ping}}? Dmehus (talk) 12:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what you mean by Echo notifications or ping, I only altered it so that it linked to my only userpage here at the time, but I just made a meta.miraheze userpage and changed back the notation at the beginning of your first message, as it now actually links to a userpage of mine. Freighttrain (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Freighttrain: Echo notifications are when you get notified when your user rights are changed on a wiki, someone thanks you for an edit you made on a wiki, or someone mentions you on a page or in an edit summary or log action (i.e., bell and inbox icons). Most of the mentions in log actions, edit summaries, and pages take the form of the bell notifications, but I believe they're all Echo notifications. Dmehus (talk) 17:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In that case I would ping DuchessTheSponge but I noticed you've already done so here. Freighttrain (talk) 19:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption of fanfiction.miraheze[edit source]

Hello again, Freighttrain here, again could you please reply regarding this because you are still listed as an administrator there, as the current arrangement feels awkward and doesn't feel right either just leaving it like that, or altering your user status without having first received communication from you on this matter, so could you please respond soon, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 09:19, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me on mywikipedia.miraheze[edit source]

I could use more contributors to --Iron Sword 22 (talk) 18:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't know about that. -- The Sponge M·C·E  07:45, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here's the link. --Iron Sword 22 (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey DuchessTheSponge how come you replied to their message and not mine? Freighttrain (talk) 04:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Personally, I don't really care if you own one of my wikis now.  The Sponge M·C·E  05:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, ok well it's just that at the User Rights screen my admin/bureaucrat account is unable to change your user rights as a bureaucrat on the fanfiction.miraheze wiki, I don't know if that is something that only you or a Miraheze admin can do, or if it means you are some kind of Miraheze bureaucrat with those user rights on all wikis. For now I'll just change your administrator user rights there to see what happens, as that option is not greyed out like the bureaucrat one.
    Though if at some point in the future you do become interested in an active role on the fanfiction.miraheze wiki, let me know and I will add administrator to your user rights there. Freighttrain (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Freighttrain: If @DuchessTheSponge: wishes to resign his bureaucrat bit on that wiki, you can request a steward do this on stewards' noticeboard. Alternatively, if your wiki has established local inactivity policies, ideally established through a consensus process, stewards can engaged to remove the bureaucrat bit from inactive bureaucrats in accordance with your local policy. Hope that helps. (talk page stalker) Dmehus (talk) 14:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, I'll have a look at that noticeboard you mentioned since DuchessTheSponge has said they are not interested in the fanfiction.miraheze wiki. Freighttrain (talk) 17:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello again @Dmehus:, it has been a while now and no stewards have gotten around to my request about @DuchessTheSponge:'s bureaucrat rights on my wiki, I've even e-mailed them but still no response yet, btw thank you for continuing to relist my request on the steward's notice board, though are you confident that if you were to directly message a steward on their personal Disccussion page, they would promptly reply and fulfil my request? I'm pretty sure it would only take a few clicks to do so on their side, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 17:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Freighttrain: Thanks for the reminder. I'll message a steward right away to see if they can remove the rights, and link them to this request and the SN request. Dmehus (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok thanks @Dmehus:, a steward has sorted that out for me. Freighttrain (talk) 17:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Batmanpedia[edit source]

Hello! I've been on-and-off contributing to Batmanpedia, but the wiki is now locked. Could you unlock it for me so I can edit more? Thanks! --Amelia (talk) 01:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amelia: First, (Please sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes like this: ~~~~.). Second, to your question, I assume you mean Batmanpedia? Assuming that's the case, this wiki is currently closed per Dormancy Policy, so you have two options. The first is that DuchessTheSponge could reopen the wiki and grant you administrator and/or bureaucrat rights on the wiki. The second is that you could make an adoption request at Requests for adoption, taking care to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). A steward will reopen the wiki in about one week, after which they will give you 1-3 weeks to contribute to the wiki constructively and grant you bureaucrat rights if successful. Hope that helps. (talk page stalker) Dmehus (talk) 01:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need to talk to you[edit source]

About my blocks, I know we discussed this before, but I want to be unblocked on some of those wikis, because well for the reasons we have discussed before and also because of what Dmehus said about local wiki policies. Or at least the ones that I didn’t do anything wrong on, and the ones that I plan to make contributions on:

  • Amazing YouTubers Wiki
  • Best Music & Songs Wiki
  • Delightful Music & Songs Wiki
  • Fresh Websites Wiki
  • Great Characters Wiki
  • Loathsome Characters Wiki

The others I don’t really care much about because I was not planning to make contributions on any of those. And the latter three I have contributed to but haven’t done anything wrong on, whereas the former three I didn’t do anything wrong on and I plan to contribute there in the future.

And again, Remember what Dmehus said about local wiki policies.

Also I prefer that you do not put block summaries like “no” and “get out” as that doesn’t really convey the reason for the block, and for the latter it can be considered harassment.

Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There. I've unblocked you. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 15:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership Request Of Golden Memes[edit source]

@DuchessTheSponge:, seems as of your wiki is closed by SporeShroom2007, but I am wondering if I could receive ownership of the wiki, since the wiki may get deleted. The wiki seems to be amazing, so you can transfer the rights to me. If not, that's fine. WikiJS talk 17:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit source]

I just noticed that you made a proposal to move ESB to Miraheze. Unfortunately, it seems like some users don't know what Miraheze is or are skeptical about the move, so I would recommend trying to win them over by saying the following:

  • Miraheze has many of the extensions that FANDOM has and are beloved by ESB users, such as Chat. And they do have message walls and threaded comments.
  • Miraheze staff are much friendlier and easier to talk too than FANDOM staff.
  • Since ESB has a bureaucrat who is tied to FANDOM, the wiki can be on both FANDOM and Miraheze.
  • Miraheze is actually far superior to FANDOM, the only reason why FANDOM is more well known is because they are basically clout chasers. And FANDOM claims to be better than they actually are.
  • Some users may not have Miraheze accounts, but they can create them easily.
  • Show them this: Comparing Miraheze to Fandom

I really want ESB to move to Miraheze since I actually plan on cutting ties with FANDOM completely, so I really want this proposal to succeed. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Comparing Miraheze to Fandom page offers some really good points and will easily win them over. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:12, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, same DuchessTheSponge (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it looks like it might not be moving here. I am surprised most of the users want to stay on FANDOM, I prefer Miraheze by a long shot, there are far more features and the stewards are friendlier and more helpful than FANDOM staff. The only things that FANDOM has that Miraheze doesn't are Discussions and Badges, though there is a Forums extension, and badges are a very controversial feature. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:02, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying not to read the comments on that propsal. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Social profile has gifts though. InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What comments? InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Go to the propsal and you'll see. It's the one on the FANDOM version of that site, I still love going on that wiki though. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Frick, the website is blocked on my school computer. Lemme try my other chromebook. InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, fandomaboos. There are so many of them. InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:14, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopedia SpongeBobia is still a decent site since there are some good users on there like SpongeTron D and BSpongeSM02 but I admit, there are also some bad users on there too like The gamer 987654321. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it's that it's too large to move. InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
""""""""""""""""""Wikipedia Knock-off"""""""""""""""""" InspecterAbdel (NLW) 19:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, maybe. I mean, Encyclopedia SpongeBobia has been big for a lot of years just by looking at the page number results. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:26, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah a lot of the comments on that proposal were ridiculous. One person called FANDOM a Wikipedia knockoff, and it is unfortunate that people do not see that Miraheze is far superior to FANDOM and offers more customization options. Also, one of the users said that some features would be gone, but the only feature on FANDOM which does not have a Miraheze equivalent is Achivements/Badges, which are a controversial feature anyway. Someone even said that they did not have problems contacting FANDOM staff, even though that is not really true because FANDOM always tells you to ask Special:Contact and often takes hours to respond, while stewards respond within minutes. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
One person said message walls and comments would be missing, even though Message Walls exist as the Structured Discussions extension, and there is also the Comments extension. And there is also forums to replace discussions. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some of those users seemed to have had no idea what they were talking about.
Here is the concerns section of the proposal: Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • One person called it a "Wikipedia knockoff" which just sounds completely ridiculous.
  • People are also saying that Miraheze is not as popular as FANDOM when the real reason is that FANDOM manipulates Google search results to direct traffic to their wikis.
  • Users have also mentioned that it is easy to contact FANDOM staff, which is a bunch of baloney because in order to contact FANDOM staff, you first have to go to Special:Contact, look for the form link, fill out a form, and check your email, and FANDOM staff often take a few hours to respond, whereas Miraheze staff respond within minutes. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at Requests for Comment/Icons and wordmarks[edit source]

Hi DuchessTheSponge,

Regarding this comment at Requests for Comment/Icons and wordmarks, would you mind reverting that and redoing it to re-sign with four tildes (~~~~), to include a critical timestamp with each of your voting arguments?

Dmehus (talk) 18:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Face-smile.svg Thank you for this edit. That's Yes check.svg great and works, too. Dmehus (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Proposal[edit source]

Unfortunately your proposal to move ESB to Miraheze did not pass, meaning that I will have to wait to do anything there. Seriously though, idk why none of the users wanted to go to Miraheze.

I don't want to talk about it. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. There is actually a SpongeBob wiki here on Miraheze anyway. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit source]

Hello will you please define this edit. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 16:58, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, please tell us the purpose of your edit. You changed their vote to a different proposal which they had not voted for. Please refrain from doing this. Thank you. Agent Isai Talk to me! 17:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was sorting out the opposes to the right header but then someone made a edit before I did it so it accidentally caused me to make this edit. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 17:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There was no need to sort out the oppose !votes and they were at the correct place. Please don't perform these type of edits in future. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will and we're all humans anyways so we all make mistakes. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 17:23, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I accidentally made a mistake there, my apologizes. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 17:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About your message to me on Crappy Games Wiki[edit source]

I keep trying to get back to Qualitipedia because I like it there, and I have contributed a lot to some of the wikis, as I have a lot of knowledge, and I want to help out the wikis. I mostly contribute to the movies, shows, and characters wikis, though I can contribute to the others. The main reason I have been on Crappy Games Wiki is because it seems to be the most active. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have made useful edits to most of the Qualitipedia wikis as well. Also, I do contribute to Wikipedia and the Anti-Wikia Alliance, but I contribute to Qualitipedia as well, though like I said, most of my contributions are on the movies wikis, shows wikis, and characters wikis, though I have made some edits on the books wikis and websites wikis. I may edit at the music wikis if I need to correct grammar or spelling or just add some extra knowledge.
I can stop making the blogs, and I do realize that some of the pages may not be worth arguing about. And I am not being treated harshly by most of the users, this dispute is mostly between me, you, and MarioMario456, though it is more with Mario now.
Also, a side note, I noticed you added the original incarnation of TheScumHouse Wiki to the list of bad wikis on the FANDOM page on Rotten Websites Wiki. Since there is no point in arguing about it, and it did severely decline in quality when it got mass vandalized, I guess it could stay. I would recommend leaving old issues alone, since that was almost a year ago. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not to be rude but what you said there is kinda ironic since you hate Encyclopedia SpongeBobia since you got a lot of backlash from that site and you also got backlash from Qualitipedia yet you still like it, which is sorta hypocritical if you ask me. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the fact you said you're not being treated harshly by most of the users isn't true if you read the comments section of that blog out of you. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I think that blog should be deleted though. And my reply below kind of explains it. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, I do not hate Encyclopedia SpongeBobia itself, just the userbase. ESB has great quality control, unlike a lot of other FANDOM wikis. Similar with Qualitipedia, except most of the backlash has come from you and MarioMario456 and it doesn't seem like many people are getting involved. Encyclopedia SpongeBobia was a little different because the whole wiki was pretty much against me. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Almost the whole Qualitipedia hates you too, even Trevor hates you and if you don't believe me, I actually showed him your bad behavior on a Discord server with him and he doesn't approve your behavior either. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well what you have said is bad behavior. I may have made some mistakes but I have said time and time again that my actions you and MarioMario456 have dubbed as "bad behavior" are either not against the rules of Qualitipedia or are gravedigging, and are also rather minor. Additionally, my good contributions mostly outweigh the bad ones. It wasn't until you made the blog that things started to spiral out of control. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So, how can you retire Qualitipedia? I don't want drama but I want you gone since the reception wikis were criticized for allowing toxic users like you off the hook and FreezingTNT already moved on from Qualitipedia and made his own wikis. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:12, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll only delete that blog if you retire Qualitipedia. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I literally said why I do not want to retire from Qualitipedia above. Also, the problem with creating new wikis is that Miraheze does not allow duplicate wikis. Also, the reception wikis have also been criticized for their practices of cross-wiki blocks. And you have ignored what I am saying, my actions that you consider "toxic" are either not against the rules of Qualitipedia listed on the main page of each wiki and are extremely minor, or old drama. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, sorry but this is the only way for the blog to be deleted and we've cross-blocked users before. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the blog does not actually explain why my behavior is toxic. It is either old drama or minor issues, and they do not warrant a cross-wiki block, or even one block for that matter, since they are not against Qualitipedia's rules. Also, most of the minor issues that you expressed in the blog have not even been with anyone but you or MarioMario456. Nobody even noticed or cared until you made the blog. I had no problems with any other users until you made the blog. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The users of Qualitipedia did not hate me until you made that blog. Additionally, all of the points addressed in the blog that you have dubbed as reasons to ban me are either not against the rules of Qualitipedia as listed on the main page of each wiki or are gravedigging. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can this get you to retire Qualitipedia? If you retire Qualitipedia, then I'll delete the blog. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's the only way for the blog to be deleted, if you retire Qualitipedia for good and move on to other sites like Wikipedia or the Anti-Wikia Alliance. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can retire from Crappy Games Wiki, but I will stay on the wikis that I have said that I contribute too. If you can somehow boost activity to all of the Qualitipedia wikis, then it will make it easier. Also, Crappy Games Wiki shouldn't be the place where blogs concerning all of Qualitipedia should be made since there is a meta wiki for Qualitipedia. Cross-Qualitipedia issues can be discussed on the meta wiki, but issues relating to one wiki should be discussed on the wiki that they are on. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's not an option, you have to retire Qualitipedia as a whole, and if you look at FreezingTNT's farmer log he made 2 wikis called "Media of Good" and "Media of Bad" so you can move to those sites. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know. I do have other wikis. However, I would rather you stop considering this as a problem concerning Qualitipedia as a whole, as this issue is and always has been between me and you, and MarioMario456 only intervened recently. None of the other users on Qualitipedia were involved in this or even aware. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's basically impossible to get you to retire Qualitipedia at this point, I even have to add you on the bad users list on the Encyclopedia SpongeBobia page on Fresh Websites Wiki because of this, but FreezingTNT moved on so why can't you too? DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Miraheze does not allow wikis that have the exact same purpose. Also, I would need to guarantee that people actually visit the wikis. I could talk to a Steward about that. But I am not on Encyclopedia SpongeBobia so it was not necessary to add me to that list. I also am retired from that wiki. If I could create wikis that have the same purpose or a similar purpose to the Qualitipedia wikis, and actually guarantee that people will go there, then maybe I could hypothetically retire from Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopedia SpongeBobia is lucky then because now that wiki is peaceful without you but I wish the same can be happening to Qualitipedia. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Qualitipedia is mostly peaceful. And any drama that has happened there is not all my fault. In fact the blog just makes the drama worse. There was no actual drama surrounding me until you made the blog. You say I have "caused drama" and while that may have been true on Encyclopedia SpongeBobia, I haven't caused any major drama on Qualitipedia, since again, this dispute was only between me and you, and later MarioMario456. None of the other users were involved, and there was no drama. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Adding users from Miraheze to a 'bad users list' hosted on Miraheze is a very poor idea, forewarning you regardless of the rest of this conversation. Raidarr (talk) 21:10, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And the problem is currently only on Crappy Games Wiki, I have had no recent problems on other wikis. And just because users have been cross-wiki blocked before does not necessarily make it right. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The problem also happens on the websites and TV show wikis too, so no. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yea, also on Greatest Movies Wiki as well due to you complaining about ''The Lego Ninjago Movie'' on there despite the good reviews. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:32, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
However, those were minor problems, and are not worth a ban. In that case I should be unblocked on every wiki where a major problem has not recently occurred. And I have made a lot of good contributions to the shows wikis (that is actually where most of my contributions are). I could stay blocked on the websites wikis since those wikis were the source of more major problems, and maybe like you had said earlier some of the dead wikis. The only wikis where these problems have been major are Crappy Games Wiki and the websites wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You also complained on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki over Prehibernation Week being on that site and you also annoyed a lot of users on Greatest Movies Wiki too. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have stopped complaining about Prehibernation Week on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki since I am now aware that the episode gets hate. Also, I have not annoyed any users on Greatest Movies Wiki, and if you are talking about my complaints about poorly-received movies being on there, that was minor, nobody was "annoyed", it did not spiral out of control, it was pretty much over as soon as it began, and is now resolved. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then explain this. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I was saying, nobody was annoyed, the argument was very minor, it was over as soon as it began, and it is now resolved since the poorly received movies are gone. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That was hardly a heated debate and it didn't last very long. I even closed the thread and said that it went nowhere. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, would you rather have that blog out of you stay or retire the entire Qualitipedia? These are your only choices. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not going to retire from all of Qualitipedia. You seem to be ignoring most of the points that I am making. You can keep me blocked on the games and websites wikis because those are the only wikis in which any major problems have repeatedly occurred. The blog can stay, but it will probably eventually end up being deleted anyway for beating a dead horse. That or people will stop commenting on it. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a choice. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The blog can stay, because after a while people will probably forget about it anyway. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── And I have stopped complaining about The Lego Ninjago Movie being on Greatest Movies Wiki, and even though I have seen many bad reviews, it is really not something worth arguing and causing tons of drama about. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I ever unblock you which I won't, you would still remain blocked on the games, movies, TV shows, and websites reception wikis. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't caused any major problems on the movies and tv shows wikis though, which is what I have said multiple times. The things you are pointing out are minor and I would hardly call them "drama". I never broke the rules on the main pages of the tv shows and movies wikis, as I was unaware that Prehibernation Week was hated. And that was one minor thing. The only wikis I should he blocked on are the games and websites wikis. All of the other wikis I have not caused any drama on. In fact, I have made many good contributions to the shows wikis and movies wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I literally made a "Would you rather?" question for you and you didn't reply. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So would you rather have that blog out of you stay or retire the entire Qualitipedia? These are your only choices. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just replied. The blog can stay since people will probably stop commenting on it anyway after a while, and it will probably be deleted in a few months for beating a dead horse. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So, Qualitipedia being peaceful is gonna be impossible since you'll never retire, Encyclopedia SpongeBobia is pretty lucky now. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You shouldn't though. Maybe you and Mario will, but other users will probably forget about it, as none of them were involved in this to begin with. I really do not consider my actions as bad as you are making them out to be, and after a while of good behavior people will probably stop hating on me. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, it's official. Qualitipedia will never be as good as Encyclopedia SpongeBobia due to you not leaving it. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, most of the problems on Qualitipedia have nothing to do with me, since I am not even involved in any of the drama on Qualitipedia, so my presence on the wikis will not cause the wikis to erupt into chaos like you think they will. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Qualitipedia is peaceful, and it has been. Most of the major drama there has nothing to do with me. Me coming back will not have any major effect on anything. I can stay blocked on the games and websites wikis, but I have made good contributions on the other wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So the only wikis I should be blocked on are the games and websites wikis, since none of the other wikis have any drama surrounding me. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How can you retire Qualitipedia as a whole? DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will not retire from Qualitipedia as a whole. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I want Qualitipedia to be a place where you aren't there like ESB but you won't let this happen. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Why are you trying to kick me out? I want to contribute to Qualitipedia, and you do not have to like me but please stop saying that you do not want me to be on Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you unblock me on all of the wikis except for the games and websites wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I can say this once and I can say this again, NO! DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are unredeemable at this point. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did not do anything major. All I am asking you to do is unblock me. There is really no reason to treat me like some sort of force of evil. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to close down Qualitipedia at this point, I wish I didn't have to say that but I suppose Grust is right. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for making me want to shut down the reception wikis. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I asked for you to wait politely for a steward not cause as was described to me as a 'dumpster fire'. Please refrain from causing drama and try and act somewhat mature. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I just have anger issues. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, by the way. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RhinosF1 Alright, is it okay if I appeal my ban please? DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See my message below. Until a steward has a chance to deal with this 'dumpster fire', the blocks will remain in place as otherwise the issue is just going to escalate out of control. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit source]


The back and forth between you and various Reception wiki users on meta is simply unsustainable. I understand you have concerns regarding users but there is zero point in every single one of you repeating the same argument over and over again every few days. I have therefore been left with no other option but to use technical measures to allow the dispute to actually settle and be investigated by Stewards. I have read some of your messages above and you are simply using threats to try and coerce users into doing things in a way that you want rather than making any effort to resolve the dispute. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 21:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, is it okay if I appeal my ban here? DuchessTheSponge (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I will get a Steward to review things. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 22:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why not Reception123? I know he's not a steward but he knows how to handle drama. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I'll wait the next week if a steward isn't active. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dmehus has actually been active these past few days, maybe you can stop by IRC and ask him to review the details. Agent Isai Talk to me! 22:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I actually have him friended on Discord so I could DM him there. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would probably be a better idea to PM him on IRC as he's online right now. I know he doesn't check his Discord as frequently which means he might miss your DM. Agent Isai Talk to me! 22:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I'll join the chat, thanks. :) DuchessTheSponge (talk) 22:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Character Wikis[edit source]

I don't know if you've heard about the closure of the character wikis, but anyway, could you please delete the main pages on both wikis? Musicismylife (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit source]

Could you please make First Class Restaurants and Foods Wiki public? I'd like to view the pages, and possibly archive them. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 04:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I make you member instead? DuchessTheSponge (talk) 02:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 21:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please reopen WYTVW[edit source]

DarkMatterMan did indeed make a new wiki; however, he later revived Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki and merged the new wiki into it, so that wiki no longer exists. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 02:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]