User talk:BrandonWM

Add topic
From Miraheze Meta, Miraheze's central coordination wiki
Latest comment: 1 day ago by OrangeStar in topic About MediaWiki:Gadget-MarkAdmins-data.json

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Archive index of this user talk page [e]   

Well...[edit source]

I really want to make a Transcript Wiki, since FANDOM closed it down, due to a violation, but why did you say it was to broad for a scope? Fiona Rocks (talk) 03:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A wiki on transcripts for every single piece of media in existence is incredibly broad. Please focus your wiki's scope a bit more into something more specific as all media is quite broad. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 03:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, but FANDOM closes Transcripts Wiki, because of the violation too. Fiona Rocks (talk) 03:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For my other requests[edit source]

How about How to Make X Things Y Wiki (inspired by Random-ness Wiki) Fiona Rocks (talk) 03:50, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please reply on the request and not on my talk page. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 03:59, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About wiki[edit source]

I not said all science wiki. What you understand able you is???? Gongxiang01 (talk) 02:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You not look for the description, and say stop. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The request you provided said all science. Now, you've changed it and it can be re-evaluated. In the future, please direct communication to the appropriate wiki request and not on my talk page. Thank you. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 03:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I not said! What time I said???
I said it about Fictional Chemical, and you said stop request, how I to comment?
Do I need reopen request? Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I NOT PROVIDED!!! Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, and welcome to Miraheze. I want you to have fun here, so let me explain some things to make it easier for us to understand you. Please don't write messages in all caps. Online, it is usually considered that all caps means shouting, and shouting is not polite. The reason your wiki requests may be misinterpreted is because none of our volunteers are fluent Chinese speakers, so we have to use DeepL and Google Translate to understand your requests. Additionally, your English Babel level is low, so we do not always understand your English messages. Please know this isn't because we have anything against you, it's just what you need to do on Miraheze. Thank you and have a good day. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please review, where I said the all science wiki? Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Can you send a link to the request you want to be reviewed? コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In a previous version of your wiki request, it was in fact mentioned as an "all science fanon". The request, I believe, is #42286? BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 03:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What request do you want to be reviewed? コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
#42286 Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is the contents of request #42286:
-- translation --
This wiki is about material and chemical information. 
Have these topic: elements, isotope and materials, included with planet(for small includes) mineral information.
and this not allowed not understand for Earth man content. But some superscience(likes content for understandable is allowed.
-- reply 1 --
THAT NOT ALL SCIENCE! That is about elements, isotope and materials, included with planet(for small includes) mineral information. Only about original chemical and minerals informations.
DeepL says #42286 translation is meaning this:
This wiki is a fictional wiki, this wiki is mainly about fictional content of materials and chemistry, such as self-made elements, isotopes, materials, etc (refer to similar wiki: And this wiki will also include some uses. But it will not include content not related to materials and chemistry, exceptions are the inclusion of geographic elemental content of planets in the universe, mineral information, etc. But the main content is about elements, isotopes and materials, and related compounds, etc. What we especially do not allow is suprarational information that cannot be understood by earthlings; such information is meaningless. But some suprarational information that violates the laws of physics (that can be understood) such is allowed to be included.
::::::::That's enough of a drop in scope.
Is the DeepL meaning translation accurate? コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But I'm not say all science wiki. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
and where is it? Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In corrent machine translation, it's:
This wiki is a fictional one that mainly focuses on fictional content related to materials and chemistry, such as self-made elements, isotopes, materials, etc. (refer to similar wikis: ). And this wiki will also include some purposes. However, content unrelated to materials and chemistry is not included, with the exception of geographic element content and mineral information of planets in the universe. But the main content is about elements, isotopes, materials, and related compounds. What we particularly do not allow is supernatural information that humans on Earth cannot understand, which is meaningless. But some supernatural information that violates physical laws (which can be understood) can be included.
Has the range been reduced enough.
This wiki is about material and chemical information
Have these topics: elements, iso topics and materials, included with planet (for small includes) minor information
And this is not allowed not understanding for Earth man content But some superscience (likes) )Content for understanding is allowed
--Reply 1--
THE NOT ALL SCIENCE! That is about elements, iso tope and materials, included with planet (for small includes) minor information Only about original chemical and mineral information
This is all science topic unfoundable. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your wiki is intended to be the same as, correct? コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
not complate. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
but is. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think that scope range would be okay allowed acceptable permissible, but it was not understandable from your request #42286, we understand it now from the talk page. I'll ask the wiki creators what they think opinion view of the new explanation reason request that's understandable コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Gongxiang01: BrandonWM says that once your Request permission is not block anymore and you are able to rerequest it can be considered again
I will ask Administrator if they can give you another chance to request コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Gongxiang01: Administrator says the wiki you want already exists made by someone else you can edit wiki here コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
thanks. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About graphs[edit source]

I just fixed timings in graphs. Before it was 20xx.xx, but now its 20xx. Silicona (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding wiki request[edit source]

Can you or any other wiki creators @DarkMatterMan4500, @Agent Isai, @Blad, @Raidarr, please review my request. Please don't mind that I am writing on your talk page like this to review my request, as in past my wiki requests has been reviewed within a few hours but now it's been 3 days it is not been reviewed. I don't if there's any technical issues or not, I'm sorry for that. Thank you. Shaunak Chakraborty (talk) 18:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Going forward, please do not ping wiki creators to review your requests. They'll be handled in due course. I'll take a look now. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 18:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Meta:Translators/Chart[edit source]

I just tweaked the chart to make it more cleaner. The lines were too far apart from each other and it showed 2024.06, so I fixed the issues. Silicona (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixing to show 2024.06 is great, but we're not reverting to months and days - that's meant to be a year-over-year chart. The point is to have it in years and months, not days. Please feel free to fix the .06 as it would be great but please make it to years and months, thanks. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 14:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If the time range is less than 1 year, can it be months and days? Silicona (talk) 15:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Can you commit to changing it on January 1, 2025? But in all seriousness, I'd prefer that not be the case, no. Standardize all timelines. BrandonWM (talkcontributionsglobalrights) 15:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will change on November 1, 2024, since I will change to +2 months, so the graph ends on January 1, 2025. Silicona (talk) 15:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

About MediaWiki:Gadget-MarkAdmins-data.json[edit source]

There's no need to update manually. If you enable the MarkAdmins gadget on your preferences there's a MarkAdmins-updater button on the sidebar you can use. OrangeStar (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]