User talk:Blubabluba9990

Add topic
From Miraheze Meta, Miraheze's central coordination wiki
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Blubabluba9990 in topic Are you still here?

Frivolous reports on stewards' noticeboard[edit source]

Hi Blubabluba9990,

While you seem to be operating in good-faith, your recent reports about wikis on stewards' noticeboard that contain zero evidence or context as to what the problem(s) are quite problematic. You even acknowledged as to not even looking into worryinguscountieswiki; you just guessed based on the name of the wiki. This is quite problematic, as it wastes everyone's time. So I ask you kindly to avoid starting unfounded, non-evidence supporting, and/or frivolous complaints on stewards' noticeboard going forward, or measures, typically in the form of a partial block from stewards' noticeboard, will have to put into place to prevent further disruption.

Thanks,
Dmehus (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. I think I just, well not panicked but more like was a little worried. However this was a one time thing and it will not happen again. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do apologize for that. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Blubabluba9990 Alright, thank you. Dmehus (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You’re welcome Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello[edit source]

How's it going?--Iron Sword 22 (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are you looking for somewhere to contribute?--Iron Sword 22 (talk) 23:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, I am just not always active. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And I do make edits on other wikis: see Special:CentralAuth/Blubabluba9990. I even have my own two wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 15:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quick deletion of Requests for Comment/Abolishing the Dormancy Policy[edit source]

The page you wrote, Requests for Comment/Abolishing the Dormancy Policy, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am not sure what you mean. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's just that the request wasn't exactly strong enough to convince us that the Dormancy Policy should go. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think it was pretty strong. There are tons of wikis that get left behind. And I am desperate for contributors on both wikis. I said this in the proposal, but The Wow House Wiki is a fork of a FANDOM wiki I made (called The Anti ScumHouse Wiki) which is being kept up by two users. The Fowl House Wiki, on the other hand, is the revival of another FANDOM wiki I made, The ScumHouse Wiki, which, long story short, failed after several mutiny attempts by rogue bureaucrats and vandalized until the wiki got closed. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 14:46, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It's not the remit of 'candidate for deletion' to address requests that are perceived as not strong enough. But there are several options for the dedicated wiki manager to keep their stuff running. Always more opportunities. Keep that in mind, even when you have come to consider all options lost. --Raidarr (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For the record, the quick deletion request was refused. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 14:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well this looks like the end[edit source]

Everybody is against me, everybody is ignoring me, stewards are gone, lies are being spread about me, and nobody cares about my blocks being unfair, and nobody is going to bother trying to help me get unblocked, I will just wait for the inevitable doom. If only there were alternate versions of the reception wikis. There are unfortunately no alternate versions of the tv show wikis. And of course stewards have not been notified of the fact that there is a new version of Horrible Music & Songs Wiki called Worst Music & Songs Wiki which is under Qualitipedia control. Nobody is bothering to tell anybody anything and nobody is even listening to anything. There is something fishy going on in Qualitipedia, and something tells me this is only the beginning… Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

But literally nothing matters because no matter what I say it is just gonna get completely ignored. Has FreezingTNT been notified of the wiki change? Are the admins putting thought into any other members of the community? Even though I thought the rebrand would bring Qualitipedia together, it has just driven us further appart. And now that FreezingTNT was desysopped and MarioMario456 took charge he is steering the rebrand WAY off course and now I have no idea what the heck is going on anymore. The problem with this rebrand is that first it was just a concept, then it was just being discussed behind closed doors, and now the power structure of Qualitipedia is completely messed up since MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge both have complete control over the wikis. And now that they control the wikis, they can do whatever they want. And now everything on the wikis has just become a complete and utter mess. No intervention from stewards, just miscommunication and utter nonsense. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Block from SN[edit source]

Hello,

I am very sorry it has come to this but rather than let us try and resolve this dispute, those at the centre of it seem intent on repeating the same arguments and simply causing drama. Given this is not going to end, I have now closed your thread and blocked from SN.

If you would like to resolve the issues with Mario, you are now being asked to handle them over email.

Thanks, ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. I do apologize for that, though I prefer not to use my email to do this (that is one of the main reasons I hate FANDOM, since they constantly beg people to use Special:Contact. Would contacting them on one of my wikis be a reasonable substitute. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Give them at least a week to actually review the issues first. Then contacting a single steward to nudge them to look at it via a talk page on a wiki that they use once would be fine. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. As long as I am aware Stewards are actually reviewing this issue rather than ignoring it. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No one is ignoring it. They can only do one thing at once though. Telling us three times only slows us down as we have to read it 3 times. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As long as Stewards are handling this issue and attempting to resolve it, this is fine. The main reason I brought it up again is because Mario blocked me again. I just would rather not have this issue go stale, since I do not want to be blocked on Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:17, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They will. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In the meantime I will stay on my wikis and also be on Wikipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@RhinosF1: It has been a week and I am still blocked on the Qualitipedia wikis. Where do you recommend I contact a steward since I am not sure if they contribute to my wikis. Should I contact Dmehus on his talk page here on Meta? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Doug hasn't been active recently. It might be worth trying Void. Please do not make more than one thread and allow him time to respond. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 18:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. I should link to the thread on Steward's noticeboard though. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've talked to RhinosF1 about this on IRC, and shortened your block to 4 September 2021. You and DuchessTheSponge are under an interaction ban until then. I've also changed it to a partial block and added User talk namespace to it, given the number of users you've been spamming about your block. I strongly recommend when your block expires to cease these reports on the noticeboards and just work on other wikis. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 04:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi[edit source]

I have ocd add etc. Just thought you might like to see the wiki i got created, easypedia. I can link you if your having trouble finding it. Thank you. Sperosdurell (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discord[edit source]

Do you think you will make a new account on that anytime soon? BookFandumb1 (talk) 01:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Probably not. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a question[edit source]

Are you still planning on being active on Qualitipedia? Musicismylife (talk) 01:21, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I am still active on Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, are you going to create Marvelous Companies Wiki? Because I think it would be a good idea. FatBurn0000 (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I will. As long as you promise to contribute to it Blubabluba9990 (talk) 14:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I have just requested the wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@FatBurn0000: Marvelous Companies Wiki has been created: Marvelous Companies Wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

mh:lousyvehicles:Lousy Vehicles Wiki[edit source]

Could you please reopen this wiki? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 00:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey[edit source]

I was wondering if you could sign up for Discord so that you could discuss you being unbanned on the QP discord. Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) 16:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You were given talk page access on QP Meta. Moisty (talk) (CentralAuth) 20:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know. I posted on my talk page regarding the ban. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding the obsession with QP and persistent disruptive editing[edit source]

Since you're blocked on Qualitipedia Meta regarding incompetence or being indistinguishable from actual trolls and excessive dependence on reception wikis (the main reception wikis are going to close anyway due to numerous issues). There's nothing wrong with liking and/or falling in love with projects but excessive attachment to it is (but by itself, not disruptive although it tends to be). I'm encourage you to take an extended wikibreak and don't lie about your obsession. TF3RDL (talk | contribs | FANDOM | Wikipedia) 04:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you leaving this message? Authorized operatives like Bukkit locally, a bureaucrat or Agent Isai, a Steward have already left this gist on QP and on Meta respectively. It is already made clear. --Raidarr (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I was meant to be a notice to @Blubabluba9990 about his persistent disruptive behavior regarding excessive attachment/friendship with reception wikis in general and I left this message anyway just in case for continued disruption and lying ("I'm not obsessed" won't cut it). Note that continued disruptive behavior and misuse of alternate accounts will result in your account being globally locked. TF3RDL (talk | contribs | FANDOM | Wikipedia) 10:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Last sentence is definitely not your position to declare. None of this is authorized by an operative. --Raidarr (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question[edit source]

What's your YouTube channel? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 03:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's called B.M. and it has water as the profile. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So this one? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 02:07, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I watched your video and I found out that you sounds like a kid, so you're not a MOAB Glue, but it doesn't change the fact that you done disruptive editing in regards to excessive attachment on reception wikis. TF3RDL (talk | contribs | FANDOM | Wikipedia) 10:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I do sound like a kid, though I am 17. At least I used to sound like a kid but now my voice is changing. Some of those videos were also recorded when I was 9. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great and your voice changing has absolutely nothing to do with your on-wiki behavior, so a forced wikibreak as described on block reasons for you on various wikis should be enough, and all you have to do is wait 6 months or more before appealing a block as outlined in standard offer on English Wikipedia. Also, spoopy month. TF3RDL (talk | contribs | FANDOM | Wikipedia) 01:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
please stop, I don't like him as well, but you are becoming WAY too focused on blocking Bluba. What you said here is not even relevant to the topic. Just ignore him. LovingHaydeL (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You wouldn't have been nine, but it was 2019, so you weren't 17 to say the least. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 01:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Some of the videos were recorded back in 2014, and some were recorded prior to me making my channel. I don't remember the exact date that some of them were recorded. The only one I know for sure was recorded right before I uploaded it (not counting some of my private videos was "Top 5 Best SML Episodes". Blubabluba9990 (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, so you mean you recorded the videos back in 2014, but didn't upload them until 2019? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 02:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:20, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Topic notice[edit source]

There is a discussion at the community noticeboard in which you are a subject. Thank you. dross (tcg) 04:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Currently trying to revive the reception wikis on FANDOM[edit source]

However the edit history will not be imported due to FANDOM limitations of exports being around 2MB, so the pages may not have a big edit history. So this is the best I can do. Here is one I done recently: Awesome Games Wiki [1] Nidoking (talk) 00:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately those wikis won't last very long. The wikis were originally hosted there, and were kicked out in 2018. It will only be a matter of time before the wikis will be forced to close again CRAB-2 (c) 00:32, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Which is why attempting to get NRW to reopen and have the wikis start from scratch. If that doesn't work then we try Whiki, and if Whiki doesn't work then we go independent. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Whiki rejected the wikis, so likely we could try other services that use MediaWiki. The list of them can be found here [2] Nidoking (talk) 00:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The only other wiki hosts that use MediaWiki are either not free or outdated. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
in fact there are about 11 reception wikis in FANDOM that are not yet closed, the list of the ones I know of is here. Juan90980 (talk) 02:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Topic and interaction ban[edit source]

Please note that following the community's expression of views on Community Noticeboard, you are now "forbidden from discussing Qualitipedia on Miraheze Meta, except when requesting technical assistance with existing content on Qualitipedia projects listed at List of wikis or Qualitipedia central." and also from forbidden from interacting with TF3RDL on Meta as described at WP:IBAN. Interactions off Meta which result in conflict should be construed as ban evasion. Reception123 (talk) (C) 16:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Am I allowed to talk about the reception wikis/ Qualitipedia still or does this only apply to him? Nidoking (talk) 16:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Nidoking: The current topic ban only applies to Blubabluba9990 but in the spirit of the community discussion I would strongly encourage you to not repeat the same arguments to a point where they become annoying or even disruptive. If there is a sense that you are constantly repeating the same arguments and it is becoming disruptive, you may also be topic banned as a sysop action (without there necessarily being a community discussion), so do keep that in mind. I'll repeat this once again just to be clear. The Qualitipedia wikis were closed on Miraheze due to the will of the Qualitipedia community and they will not be reopened due to a clear lack of consensus for doing so and nor will any direct forks be accepted until at least when the wikis are permanently deleted. New wikis may be created as long as they comply with the Content Policy, there is no 'ban' on new Reception wikis. I really don't think there is anything more to say or to argue about, everything has already been discussed. Reception123 (talk) (C) 16:31, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Do you have an accurate date when the wikis will be deleted? The Reception Wiki meta said it was going to be deleted in 3 months, but Miraheze usually deletes them off the servers after 6 months. Nidoking (talk) 16:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would like to know what this means I can and cannot discuss. Will I still be able to discuss what was happening on Fatburn0000's talk page (I can't link it for some reason since on my Mac the colon doesn't work). Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pretty sure no LovingHaydeL (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well then where should I discuss it? This is extremely important to discuss so that proposal was an extreme blow. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And what am I supposed to do if someone brings it up? Just ignore them? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Reception123 Please respond to this as soon as possible because this is extremely importantǃ Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
well, you aren't gballed on FANDOM anymore, sooooo... LovingHaydeL (talk) 00:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
But where on Fandom is the question. There are over 250,000 wikis on Fandom, and none of them are Reception Wikis. Also, FatBurn0000 doesn't have an account on Fandom. He hasn't been active on Miraheze lately either, which means I may need to take matters into my own hands. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He changed his username, it is now Money12123. LovingHaydeL (talk) 03:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. But that still doesn't answer my question. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:45, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He is prob still trying to get TNRW up still. LovingHaydeL (talk) 17:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. I have considered making my own version, Receptionpedia, which will be similar but have some differences. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I just requested the wiki Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Frankly, if you're talking about a set of wikis that were closed and you can't find another wiki with a similar scope, don't talk about it on a wiki with a completely different scope. You were blocked on QP for a wiki break, so you should move on. --Zeus (talk|contribs|accounts|email) 14:33, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are still 25 other Reception Wikis on Miraheze. I can contribute to the Characters wikis, and possibly other wikis. Duchess blocked me on Amazing YouTubers Wiki for no reason though. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And how long will this be for? Because I have so much that I need to discuss but that I am not allowed to discuss. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It is likely indefinite. The Goose Named Zeus (talk|contribs|accounts|uploads|email) 17:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well that doesn't mean "infinite". I just need somewhere where I can discuss my plans for a revival with somebody. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's offical[edit source]

Miraheze has infact banned Reception Wikis, as your request got declined for this reason "Declining per Content Policy concerns and per the failed attempt to revive QP on TNRW. Please look for a new wiki host." They do not want the wikis anymore, when they mean "look for a new wiki host". This means later on, they may close and delete the other reception wikis on Miraheze that are still online. Nidoking (talk) 11:45, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

And the only ones that are still available on Miraheze are only a few of them, and there's way more on FANDOM. Not sure how it will work but we could try to use them. Nidoking (talk) 11:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Stewards (and other users) have repeatedly told you this is not true. Otherwise, all other reception wikis would be banned. --Zeus (talk|contribs|accounts|email) 12:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Then explain why they said "look for a new wiki host" when users request a new reception wiki? Nidoking (talk) 12:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It just confuses people to the point of them questioning what will happen later on. Nidoking (talk) 12:17, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The wiki was a duplicate scope of TNRW, which was already closed due to Content Policy violations, not helping that it was a poor man's version of Qualitipedia with little alterations to the formula. I doubt Miraheze Volunteers would like to have the Qualitipedia issue on their hands again, thus the decline of the request. --Zeus (talk|contribs|accounts|email) 14:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also, one wiki decline does not preclude all reception wikis from being approved in the future. An RfC to topic ban reception wikis would. --Zeus (talk|contribs|accounts|email) 14:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I give up. I have officially reached a dead end. I surrender. But there are still 25 other Reception Wikis on Miraheze. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Response Response Could you please provide a link if there are 25 Reception Wikis? Hey Türkiye message? 19:34, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
My user page says there are currently 25 open reception wikis on Miraheze (it is a bulleted list, but if you count there are 25.) Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There are actually 27 since I recently discovered Terrible SML Videos Wiki and Best SML Episodes Wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Response Response so why are those wikis called Reception now banned and now the hot topic on community boards? I expect your reply frankly. Hey Türkiye message? 19:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
They are not banned, that seems to be a misconception. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

October 2022[edit source]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, legal threats; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies will not be tolerated.

Hi there, I have blocked you for a month for repeated disruptions here on Miraheze Meta. Your latest Stewards' noticeboard thread shows a continuing pattern of disruption which you have been asked to stop. I understand you are passionate about the reception wikis but making frivolous threads accusing users of "treason"(?) and of "destroying Miraheze" by supporting an RfC is completely nonsensical and disruptive to the project. Please cease this behavior when you are unbanned. Agent Isai Talk to me! 23:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Some tips[edit source]

Alright, I know that you're blocked now, but I just want to say for future advice: When people don't like, are against, or just don't care about reception wikis (anymore in some cases), respect that. If you have a good argument against it, then feel free to make it, but be civil and understand that some users just don't want to be associated with reception wikis, and there is no problem with that. Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 23:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note[edit source]

  Don't try to accuse someone of doing evil to Miraheze just because they voted to stop creating reception wikis temporarily. It will only fuel the drama more. --The user who loves human heads on alien/animal bodies in cartoons for no reason (talk to me uwu!) 17:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Community autonomy and the limits global intervention[edit source]

Hi there,

I have deleted your request Request for Comments regarding reopening Qualitipedia as it does encroach on the community's local autonomy. Please remember that very rarely will a Request for Comments on Meta override the local will of a community. In this case, Qualitipedia voted to shutdown and it has thus shutdown. If you want to start a vote saying otherwise, do it on Qualitipedia Meta. If you're banned there, ask someone else to start the RfC for you but note that this new RfC would need to have overwhelming support, including the support of most of previous voters on the previous RfC to close QP. Agent Isai Talk to me! 21:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok. I will talk to FatBurn0000 about this since he is the only person who is still on my side. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

November 2022[edit source]

You have been blocked from editing Miraheze Meta indefinitely as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to post an unblock request at your talk page, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, legal threats; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies will not be tolerated and abuse of unblock requests will result in TPA revocation.

Your latest post on the Community noticeboard shows me that you did not learn anything from your previous block. I understand you're passionate about the topic but asking why protests haven't formed is silly and a disruption to the project as users have, time and time over not only here but on other wikis, explained why and have asked you to look for an alternative over suggesting these things. As such, I have no other recourse but to indefinitely block you. I would suggest any other local sysop only entertain an unblock request in over 6 months due to repeated conduct issues not only now but spanning over the course of several months/years now. Agent Isai Talk to me! 18:12, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm really not sure why "competence is required" was cited as a reason for the block because I have not displayed incompetence. It doesn't seem like users even want to talk about it here, so I messaged Money12123 on Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki about where the government in exile will be hosted until Error 141 is over. Blad is probably right, many users just gave up, but I asked Money to at least attempt to get in touch with the other opposers and see if we can at least get them to stand by until CJWorldGame's reboot of the Qualitipedia wikis is finished, so they can contribute there and the reboot can gain a following. I understand that users do not want Qualitipedia to be discussed here but if there was another active wiki to bring this up I would discuss it there. I wish there was even another site where we could help to gain traction for reopening Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • The local Qualitipedia community decided to start an RfC to see if there was support for continuing the wiki.
  • The conclusion was to close it. About the only thing the global community intervened with on that RfC is that bureaucrats asked a Steward to close the discussion.
This is clearly not a matter for the global Miraheze community (which is what the Stewards' noticeboard and the Community noticeboard are for), and you've been already told that, judging by your talkpage. Bringing this stuff up on those places (specially the way you did, by pinging other users and calling for "protests") is disruptive editing. OrangeStar (talk) 19:22, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well if I wasn't banned on Qualitipedia Meta I would bring it up there, I forgot to mention that. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I saw the post. Now I need to bleach my eyes The user who loves human heads on alien/animal bodies in cartoons for no reason (talk to me uwu!) 02:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bluba, can you stop going on about this? There have already been attempts at reviving these wikis elsewhere. We do not need to start protesting, and therefore you do not need to keep causing drama. Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 20:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah it is a good thing the wikis are revived. And I guess the other users did give up. I won't give up on Qualitipedia though. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
you are just proving my points that you are obbessed. Please, get off for now and come back later The user who loves human heads on alien/animal bodies in cartoons for no reason (talk to me uwu!) 04:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
All this added discussion is unnecessary. A Meta admin posted a notice on here. The discussion only needs to be between said admin and the blocked user. Everyone else adding in their two cents is wholly irrelevant and adds nothing productive to the conversation. Thanks - BrandonWM (talkcontribsglobalrights) 04:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I can't give up though, because I made a promise. And I intend to keep that promise. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please do not continue this discussion here, your talkpage access is only for appeal purposes. If you continue discussing this topic, your talkpage access will also be revoked. Reception123 (talk) (C) 20:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. I think it will be better to discuss this offsite since nobody really wants the discussion here anyway. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 02:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Qualtipedia Is Back[edit source]

I know you're banned from discussing Qualitipedia on Miraheze, but I'd like to let you know that Qualitipedia is reborn in a new place with CJWorldGame. The link is below:

newqualitipedia.whiki.online Szczypak2005 (talk) 15:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This user is blocked indefinitely here, so it's unlikely that he'll respond, even if he still has talk page access.
Also, the revival is at newqualitipedia.telepedia.net now, since Whiki changed its name. Tali64³ (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am not banned from my talk page. I am blocked there however, though to be honest I don't really mind, as long as Qualitipedia still exists. This will likely be the last time I mention Qualitipedia here. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ban appeal[edit source]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
An administrator reviewed Blubabluba9990's unblock request and has declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked!

Blubabluba9990 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribs change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

I would like to appeal my ban here as it has been three months and there are a few things that I would like to point out. First, I will no longer be discussing Qualitipedia here as I have no need to, since the website has been revived since my ban and Reception Wikis Wiki is also back. The only reason I was discussing Qualitipedia here is because Reception Wikis Wiki had been inaccessible at the time due to the db141 error. Second, I would like to address some of the claims made in the block summary - First, like I said, "Competence is required" is not a relevant policy regarding the topic of my ban" - Second, I did not "advocate" for protests or riots. In fact, I am glad that there were no riots as that would not have been good. I was simply surprised that there were no protests, given how iconic Qualitipedia and the Reception Wikis are within the Miraheze community. I myself understand that Qualitipedia is not the same as Miraheze, and Qualitipedia's closure is not Miraheze's fault, though there are other users who may not have understood that, which is why I am surprised none of them spoke up. In addition, I plan to make a Request for Comment to re-allow Reception Wikis, but I cannot do that since I am blocked. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Denial reason:

Your appeal does not instill the slightest confidence that you've learned anything from your block. Your talk page is a clear guide of what sorts of behaviors to avoid and shows that you've been warned time and time again for the same issues and I do not believe that you have resolved the issues raised on your talk page over the last year and a half. Your failure to understand why WP:CIR was invoked is very telling. I am not convinced unblocking you will result in any net positive in the local community or that you have matured and addressed issues raised previously on your talk page. Additionally, a recent RfC to allow reception wikis was started and the community voted overwhelming, in a landslide, to keep preventing new reception wiki from being requested. As I said in my original block message, I advised sysops to not entertain any requests for six months and I reaffirm that posture. Agent Isai Talk to me! 17:14, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

Okay, I will wait, as I was unaware of that RfC. Also, CIR is about users who act in good faith but do not know enough about how wikis work to be able to contribute, it is not a policy relevant simply to any disruptive behavior.

Are you still here?[edit source]

Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 01:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not very active on Miraheze anymore as my user profile says, though I do still check in on the wikis occasionally. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 02:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]