Only warning[edit source]
as you have been warned previously, "do not remove or edit proposals that have been put forward". If I see you doing that again, I will block you. This is your only warning. — revi 05:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
This account will be disabled if you continue to edit other peoples messages.
If you have an issue with another user's comments, take it up with a Steward.
Also you didn't just remove the inappropriate comment about spambots. You edited the message enough to drastically change the tone (imo).
Also, the notice on your userpage is complete and utter bullshit.
Failure to acknowledge staff or otherwise causing problems will result in yet another one of your accounts being locked.
Consider yourself warned.
PS: Just because I know you like doing this to Revi's warnings, if you remove or edit this notice I will lock your account without hesitation.
--NDKilla 01:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fine, I’ll leave the comment as is, but don’t remove the support vote though. It’s necessary when the results are close like they are now. Amanda123 (talk) 01:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
8:54:37 PM <+PuppyKun> Voidwalker https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:Amanda123#Warning 8:54:59 PM <+PuppyKun> Voidwalker: also, can you like really quick check the contents of her ban appeal to make sure i didnt restore content you wanted gone? 8:57:57 PM <+Voidwalker> as long as the support from Smerconish is gone, then it's fine
- @NDKilla: To be honest I think that we should just give proposal 5A a shot and put an end to this drama. As noted clearly in the proposal, after a one month trial we can revisit the issue if the terms and conditions are not working. However, I’m sure that the community has better things to do than argue constantly about this — and I include myself in that statement. Amanda123 (talk) 02:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)