Talk:Requests for Comment/Examknow followup

Add topic
From Miraheze Meta, Miraheze's central coordination wiki
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Examknow in topic Suggested agreed facts

Suggested agreed facts[edit source]

  • Examknow was a wiki creator (person charged with dealing with wiki requests).
  • He behaved to users in a way that could be interpreted as overly blunt, Special:RequestWikiQueue/9409 Special:RequestWikiQueue/9546 and bellow
  • and has declined a wiki request later approved, Special:RequestWikiQueue/9481
  • and has been accused of hat collecting (getting new rights for the sake of it).
  • There are more serious allegations the evidence of which can not be shared.
  • The policy at the time said that the right "wiki creator" could only be taken away by a steward for violating the content policy or by a system administrator for causing damage (from a technical point of view).
  • The community has specifically rejected removal of wiki creator through RfC. Requests_for_Comment/Future_of_Wikicreators#Community_consensus_1
  • The community supported removal of his wiki creator rights when asked in an RfC.
  • John closed the RfC noting that it has support but can't be conducted because of the aforementioned policy.
  • Additionally the community asked that Examknow's IRC Cloak be removed.
  • John said in the closing note that "a recommendation will be passed along to the group contacts" with regards to the IRC.
  • NDKilla then stated that "group contacts have decided that current behaviour does not advocate removal, following the guidelines in IRC/Group"
  • Group contacts are the people who can ask Freenode to take actions on behalf of the Miraheze IRC group. NDKilla and John are group contacts.

~ El Komodos Drago (talk to me) 20:29, 8 November 2019 (UTC) Could we have agreement from @John:, @NDKilla:, @Reception123:, @Zppix:, and @Examknow: themself. ~ El Komodos Drago (talk to me) 20:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

+1 seems fine. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (on) 23:02, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The facts seem an accurate representation of reality. John (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agreed. Reception123 (talk) (C) 06:17, 9 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Agree per @RhinosF1 and @Reception123 --EKcontribs 18:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]