Requests for reopening wikis/Archive 6
kids.miraheze.org
- Wiki: kids.miraheze.org
- Username: Krishnaheda
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason:
Krishnaheda (talk) 15:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Krishnaheda: Unfortunately, this is
Not done as for multiple reasons. Firstly, the wiki is not closed, so is not eligible for adoption. Secondly, it is a private wiki, so is not eligible for adoption. Your best bet would be to go Special:RequestWikiQueue on Meta, enter
kidswiki
in the database name field, then contact that requestor, as, presumably, the still currentbureaucrat
on the wiki, and ask them to appoint you asbureaucrat
andadministrator
. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
NFDJDS.miraheze.org
- Wiki: NFDJDS.miraheze.org
- Username: NGF
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason:
NGF (talk) 14:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)United japan imperial
- @NGF: If you don't give info of which wiki you want to adopt, we can't help you,
cannot be undertaken HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 14:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
isv.miraheze.org
- Wiki: isv.miraheze.org
- Username: Asank
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
- Reason: The wiki is closed - reason no editing within 60 days. That's sadly not true because the last user was on 1 november and the last edit on 30 October. The wiki is still useful, mainly the Vikisbornik part, there are new texts added in the Sbornik:Negotove teksty article, as a repository of Interslavic texts.
Asank (talk) 16:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Asank: It's possible new user accounts being attached to a wiki aren't counted as eligible activity, depending on if all or most Special:RecentChanges activity counts. Nevertheless, I do see recent page creations as at 15 October 2020 on this wiki, so I will file a Phabricator task. There's something broken in the code. Dmehus (talk) 17:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Asank: I'm going to close this as
Not done as this wiki should not have been closed, and have requested a steward manually reopen the wiki for you. You can track this on Phabricator at T6434. Thanks Dmehus (talk) 17:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Asank: @NDKilla: has reopened this wiki for you. Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Asank: I'm going to close this as
isv.miraheze.org
- Wiki: isv.miraheze.org
- Username: Vogand
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: Interslavic Wiki has been closed due to inactivity in the last 60 days and it would be a pity if it were lost completely.
Vogand (talk) 18:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- This request seems fine to me. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 19:10, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Alright. How many edits should I do? --Vogand (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- You'll have to wait until a steward reopens the wiki (they'll ping you when they do). There's not really a set number, but I would think creating a few pages, categorizing appropriately some other pages, and copyediting some others would be sufficient. Dmehus (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Okay. --Vogand (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Vogand:, I will mark this as
cannot be undertaken because of this. HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 17:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Vogand:, I will mark this as
- Okay. --Vogand (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- You'll have to wait until a steward reopens the wiki (they'll ping you when they do). There's not really a set number, but I would think creating a few pages, categorizing appropriately some other pages, and copyediting some others would be sufficient. Dmehus (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Alright. How many edits should I do? --Vogand (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
athas.miraheze.org
- Wiki: athas.miraheze.org
- Username: Avengium
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No, I'm not bureaucrat on that wiki
- Reason: I want to manage the wiki and add pages. For example Avangion is a creature in Athas I could add. Is not yet included in the wiki.
Avengium (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Avengium: a steward should review your request as soon as they can. However, LGTM. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 13:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Avengium: This wiki is not yet closed, so cannot yet be adopted per Dormancy Policy as it is only inactive. So, while I'm closing this as
Not done, you have a couple options. First, you can wait until it is closed, then rerequest at Requests for adoption. Or, second, you can add that page for that character, which should prevent the wiki's closure, and hold a local election on the wiki. Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC).
batman.miraheze.org
- Wiki: batman.miraheze.org
- Username: R4356th
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: This wiki is closed per Dormancy Policy and I am interested in adopting it to be able to add more content to it.
R4356th (talk) 14:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th This appears to have been closed in error, possibly a lingering result of the recent technical issue. When I look at Special:Log/managewiki, I can see that @DuchessTheSponge: reopened the wiki on 25 October 2020, so it should not be eligible for adoption. You can instead requests rights on that wiki, and either a local
bureaucrat
will grant or a steward can be engaged where the bureaucrat is not active after a reasonable period of time. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)- I see. Does that mean that I am allowed to make a request for adopting it after two months? Thank you. R4356th (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th Yes, if the wiki becomes closed again per Dormancy Policy, absolutely; however, if you look in the history, this wiki has a habit of going dormant and then being reopened by the local
bureaucrat
eventually, so it may not/never happen. Thus, you can contribute to the local wiki and then request local rights on the wiki, sharing joint bureaucrat rights with the existing bureaucrats. Please see the advice I gave to Avengium in the above request on holding a local permissions election, too. Dmehus (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)- @Dmehus: Okay. Thank you very much for your suggestion. It also looks like John reopened the wiki, a huge thank you to him for this. R4356th (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th Yep, it was somewhat technical in nature, so John was able to just reopen the wiki in absence of the local
bureaucrat
. So you can now contribute to the wiki. If you wish to request additional tools on that wiki, you can talk to anybureaucrat
on the local wiki. Dmehus (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th Yep, it was somewhat technical in nature, so John was able to just reopen the wiki in absence of the local
- @Dmehus: Okay. Thank you very much for your suggestion. It also looks like John reopened the wiki, a huge thank you to him for this. R4356th (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th Yes, if the wiki becomes closed again per Dormancy Policy, absolutely; however, if you look in the history, this wiki has a habit of going dormant and then being reopened by the local
- I see. Does that mean that I am allowed to make a request for adopting it after two months? Thank you. R4356th (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
remyth.miraheze.org
- Wiki: remyth.miraheze.org
- Username: Jakeukalane
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: Want to change some things of organization of the wiki and also fix links, categories, etc.
Jakeukalane (talk) 11:39, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jakeukalane: Thanks for your request. A steward will review this request in about week's time (give or take), assess whether the wiki was manually closed (ineligible, by steward convention) or closed pursuant to Dormancy Policy (eligible), and reopen the wiki. After that, you'll have at least a week to contribute to the wiki, after which the steward will review your activity and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 11:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Jakeukalane: Sorry for the delay, the wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Jakeukalane: Rights have now been added to your account. -- Void Whispers 22:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Jakeukalane: Sorry for the delay, the wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
marveloustvshowepisodes.miraheze.org
- Wiki: marveloustvshowepisodes.miraheze.org
- Username: Waldo
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I want to revive the wiki so that anyone can share episodes from television shows they like, in a friendly manner. I know some people may want to use a wiki like this at some point. I will add pages and edit existing ones if my request is accepted.
Waldo (talk) 05:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Waldo: Thank you for your valid adoption request. A steward will review your request within the next week or so, after which they will reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for one or more weeks. Within several weeks, they will review your contributions, and grant you
bureaucrat
rights on the local wiki if successful. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
kakukokka.miraheze.org
- Wiki: kakukokka.miraheze.org
- Username: 日本連邦
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I and others often used this wiki, and I want to use this wiki more.
日本連邦 (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- @日本連邦: This request seems fine to me. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 14:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
hdr.miraheze.org
- Wiki: hdr.miraheze.org
- Username: Superjig
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I'm an assistant developer of the mod and this wiki is needed for documentation purposes
Superjig (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Superjig: This request seems fine to me, as this wiki was not manually closed, and I couldn't find any recent changes in the past 60 days. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 22:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
pokemon.miraheze.org
- Wiki: pokemon.miraheze.org
- Username: IvanTheGreat
- Are you a bureaucrat: no
- Reason: The original owner was compromised/hacked, and I wanna own the wiki myself
IvanTheGreat (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Cannot be undertaken @IvanTheGreat: The wiki is still opened and therefore not eligible to adoption.HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 19:58, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- But the guy was hacked... How rude IvanTheGreat (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @IvanTheGreat: If you really want rights on the wiki, you can always hold a local election on it and ask to steward on Stewards' noticeboard after 7 days minimum. But, you can't adopt it because there are not closed. :( HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 20:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- But the guy was hacked... How rude IvanTheGreat (talk) 20:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
happy.miraheze.org
- Wiki: happy.miraheze.org
- Username: 팰로우 부캐
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: I want to make a wiki about humors and comedy programs In the world. Animations and movies also included. In a word, "It is a wiki about all informations of humor." Thank you. Also I will edit some several things in that wiki I want to adopt.
ㅡ팰로우 부캐 (talk) 00:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: You requested other name. Isn't it? --Gomdoli4696 (talk) 00:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gomdoli4696: Yeah, but he said I should better to request for adoption. ㅡ팰로우 부캐 (talk) 01:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: No, You requested mallnyun.miraheze.org again. And that request is declined by @Dmehus, Please talk to Dmehus first. Thanks. Gomdoli4696 (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: Thank you for requesting to adopt this wiki. I will {{ping}} @Void: to this thread to reopen the wiki, allowing you to constructively edit the wiki for at least a week. After that, Void will assess your editing and, assuming you've made sufficient content improvements or additions to the wiki, grant you
bureaucrat
andadministrator
rights on the wiki. Regarding yourmallnyun
wiki, since it's essentially the same thing ashappy
wiki, my preference would be to see this adoption through, but am not opposed to creating that wiki instead. Dmehus (talk) 01:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)- @Dmehus: umm...thank you for your passion. then can I adopt happywiki if there is no problem, I'm sorry that I'm terrible at English. ㅡ팰로우 부캐 (talk) 02:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: Well, John undeleted your wiki, so now it's just a matter of @Void: reopening your wiki. At that time, you will be able to edit this wiki for at least a week. After at least a week of constructive edits, @Void: will review your edits and grant rights per a successful adoption. Hope this helps. Dmehus (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: umm...thank you for your passion. then can I adopt happywiki if there is no problem, I'm sorry that I'm terrible at English. ㅡ팰로우 부캐 (talk) 02:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: Thank you for requesting to adopt this wiki. I will {{ping}} @Void: to this thread to reopen the wiki, allowing you to constructively edit the wiki for at least a week. After that, Void will assess your editing and, assuming you've made sufficient content improvements or additions to the wiki, grant you
- @팰로우 부캐: No, You requested mallnyun.miraheze.org again. And that request is declined by @Dmehus, Please talk to Dmehus first. Thanks. Gomdoli4696 (talk) 01:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Gomdoli4696: Yeah, but he said I should better to request for adoption. ㅡ팰로우 부캐 (talk) 01:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
- @팰로우 부캐: Sorry for the delay, the wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 01:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
fantendo.miraheze.org
- Wiki: fantendo.miraheze.org
- Username: LeoKids
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
- Reason:
LeoKids (talk) 19:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- @LeoKids: Unfortunately, this is
Not done per steward convention that manually closed wikis are ineligible for adoption. Thus, you will need to reach out to @Wave95:, and see if they will reopen this wiki for you, perhaps granting you local rights on the wiki in keeping with the wiki's locally and community established policies. As to
fantenddiwiki
this cannot be undertaken as the wiki does not exist, so I've assumed it was a typographical error and a duplication of this request, and have removed it. Please advise if in error. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
publictransport.miraheze.org
- Wiki: publictransport.miraheze.org
- Username: General I80
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason: I see that this wiki is not in use, and I feel like rebooting it.
General I80 (talk) 01:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- @General I80: Thank you for your request for adoption. A steward should review your request in the next week or two, and re-open the wiki. At that point, you will have at least a week to constructively contribute to the temporarily reopened wiki, so that a steward can assess your adoption request and, if satisfied, grant you
bureaucrat
rights on the wiki. Dmehus (talk) 03:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC) - @General I80: Sorry for the delay, the wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 01:58, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @General I80: Sorry for taking so long to get back to this, is there still interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @General I80: Unfortunately, I'm closing this as
not done as looking at contributions on the local wiki, I see only two (2) edits, creating two sub-stub pages consisting of a single sentence each. Thus, I'm not satisfied with the activity on the wiki to date. Please reply to this thread if it hasn't been archived yet if there's still interest in adoption; otherwise, feel free to submit a new request. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @General I80: Unfortunately, I'm closing this as
- @General I80: Sorry for taking so long to get back to this, is there still interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
katamarilyrics.miraheze.org
- Wiki: katamarilyrics.miraheze.org
- Username: TouhouForever
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I want to keep this wiki alive.
TouhouForever (talk) 23:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
- @TouhouForever: Thank you for your valid adoption request. A steward will review your request within the next week or so, after which they will reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for one or more weeks. Within several weeks, they will review your contributions, and grant you
bureaucrat
rights on the local wiki if successful. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)- @TouhouForever: The wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @TouhouForever: Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. Is there still an interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @TouhouForever: Unfortunately, I'm closing this as
not done as looking at contributions on the local wiki, I see only one (1) edit, creating a single category page. Thus, I'm not satisfied with the activity on the wiki to date. Please reply to this thread if it hasn't been archived yet if there's still interest in adoption; otherwise, feel free to submit a new request. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @TouhouForever: Unfortunately, I'm closing this as
- @TouhouForever: Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. Is there still an interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @TouhouForever: The wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
templates.miraheze.org
- Wiki: templates.miraheze.org
- Username: Zcook1052
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: Want to change some things of organization of the wiki and also fix links, categories, etc.
Zcook1052 (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Zcook1052: There is no wiki at templates.miraheze.org. Did you mean template.miraheze.org? R4356th (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Zcook1052: As R4356th articulated above, this wiki does not exist. If you mean Miraheze Template Wiki, this wiki is ineligible for adoption as it has been exempted to the policy as one of the main Miraheze community wikis. If there's a specific thing you need, please let me know on my local user talk page on that wiki. If it's a matter of needing a specific user right added to a minor local user group that can be granted, that can likely be undertaken in one of my local capacities. Dmehus (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
rainwatercollab.miraheze.org
- Wiki: rainwatercollab.miraheze.org
- Username: Ianvangiesen
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): yes
- Reason: Attempting to revive my own wiki-page, with hopes of making this somewhat of a companion to the wikiversity section on rainwater harvesting I am also working on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianvangiesen (talk • contribs) 20:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ianvangiesen: Hello, it looks like you have locally reopened the wiki so I have changed this request's status to "Locally handled". You can do this on any wiki you are a bureaucrat on. Thank you. R4356th (talk) 20:52, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ianvangiesen: If your wiki has a sufficient number of content pages, and on looking at Special:AllPages on your wiki, it appears that it does, and you have a need for an exemption to Dormancy Policy, you can make a request at Stewards' noticeboard, and a Steward will review your request (usually fairly quickly) and action it accordingly. Dmehus (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
template.miraheze.org
- Wiki: template.miraheze.org
- Username: Zcook1052
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: Want to change some things of organization of the wiki and also fix links, categories, etc.
@Dmehus: This is the right wiki (template.miraheze.org). Zcook1052 (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Zcook1052: Right, and I get that, but as in my comments above, this cannot be undertaken as the wiki is (a) not closed per Dormancy Policy and (b) not eligible for adoption. I invite you instead to message me either (a) here or (b) here on what it is you're looking to do specifically on Miraheze Template Wiki. If it's a matter of needing to move pages or templates without leaving a redirect or import templates, I can grant you local permissions in my local capacities. Dmehus (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
ideawiki.miraheze.org
- Wiki: ideawiki.miraheze.org
- Username: Jigsaw Vernon
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes
- Reason: I am the creator of the wiki and I want to open it again
Jigsaw Vernon (talk) 05:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jigsaw Vernon: There is no need to adopt this wiki as you are a
bureaucrat
on this wiki. Please go into Special:ManageWiki on your wiki, uncheck "closed," and hit "submit," entering an optional summary. When done, return to Requests for adoption, and update me here that it is been reopened, so I can update the status. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)- I already reopened it, thanks for the help Jigsaw Vernon (talk) 15:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
llengobalear.miraheze.org
- Wiki: llengobalear.miraheze.org
- Username: Chabi
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): YES
- Reason:
I have been quite busy recently but now I have more time to dedicate to this wiki. Chabi (talk) 12:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, you can go to Special:ManageWiki on your wiki to reopen this wiki by unchecking "Closed" yourself since you are a bureaucrat. I hope this helps. Thank you. R4356th (talk) 12:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Chabi: Please advise when you have gone back into ManageWiki and unchecked the closed box. While I can do this for you as a steward, as it is clearly a request from the local wiki to do so, I believe that it is better to give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime, and have you do it, so you will know how to do this in the future. Dmehus (talk) 15:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wiki has been reopened locally by Chabi. Therfore, I will mark this as
Locally handled. HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 13:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wiki has been reopened locally by Chabi. Therfore, I will mark this as
crappypasta.miraheze.org
- Wiki: crappypasta.miraheze.org
- Username: Tali64³
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: The founder of the wiki hasn't made a single contribution to it, and I want to start it up.
Tali64³ (talk) 16:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tali64³:
Cannot be undertaken Wiki is opened, you should engage a local election if you need rights HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 17:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tali64³: As HeartsDo mentioned above, I'll just add the following helpful instructions. Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: There aren't any active users on the wiki, other than me. Tali64³ (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tali64³: Okay, can you create a local election page on the wiki, like this one? Leave it open for at least seven (7) calendar days, then report your local election to Stewards via Stewards' noticeboard and, after several more days, it can be closed by a Steward in absence of a locally active bureaucrat. Dmehus (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: There aren't any active users on the wiki, other than me. Tali64³ (talk) 20:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Tali64³: As HeartsDo mentioned above, I'll just add the following helpful instructions. Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
toxicfandomsandhatedoms.miraheze.org
- Wiki: toxicfandomsandhatedoms.miraheze.org
- Username: Imperator Maximajorian
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I would like to please adopt the Toxic Fandoms and Hatedoms Wiki so that I can keep it from slipping into the ether.
Imperator Maximajorian (talk) 17:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Imperator Maximajorian: It was originally closed for numerous violations of the Code of Conduct and breached the Content Policy after numerous warnings from sysops and stewards to stop with their misbehavior. If you wish to learn more about why it happened, feel free to contact a steward or sysop. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Imperator Maximajorian: this will not be done as its a steward closed wiki. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 18:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Imperator Maximajorian: How do you know what is even on that wiki? You have no local user groups on that wiki, unless you have a prior account. If that's the case, and that's completely fine, I would just remind you to read user accounts policy and to adhere to it. As a best practice, you should self-disclose all prior account(s) you may have had. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 18:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Imperator Maximajorian: this will not be done as its a steward closed wiki. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 18:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
granada.miraheze.org
- Wiki: granada.miraheze.org
- Username: Guirado
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason: I was for a days inactive, but I'm using again this wiki
Guirado (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Guirado: Hi, your wiki is not closed, just marked as inactive. As you are bureaucrat, you can go on Special:ManageWiki and uncheck "Inactive" for remove the notice. Therfore, I will mark this at
Not done HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 19:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
geopolitik.miraheze.org
- Wiki: geopolitik.miraheze.org
- Username: Isle
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No.
- Reason: The person who made this wiki is no longer affiliated with the wiki and has stepped down. We are starting it back up again and would like to get it adopted
Isle (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Isle: First, thank you for your adoption request. However, it was somewhat malformed. Please note that the Miraheze subdomain, not the custom domain should be used for adoption requests, and, additionally, there is no need to add an additional section header. Second, regarding your request, thank you for your valid adoption request, assuming this was the intended wiki. A steward will review your request within the next week or so, after which they will reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for one or more weeks. Within several weeks, they will review your contributions, and grant you
bureaucrat
rights on the local wiki if successful. If that was not the correct wiki, please do advise of the correct wiki. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)- @Isle: The wiki has been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Isle and Isleee: (not sure which of you to ping). Is there still an interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Isle: I'm not sure if @Isleee: is your legitimate alternate account or not, so perhaps you could clarify, ideally with confirmations from both accounts, whether this is the case or not. Apologies for the delay in assessing your adoption request. Anyway, I trust you're still interested in this request, but, presumably, were just busy during the Christmas holiday period. While the edits made were fairly minor, you certainly compensate in terms of quantity of edits. Crucially, you've been an active contributing member of this community going back a full year or more. Accordingly, this LGTM, and so this is
done, with
bureaucrat
andsysop
rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 04:26, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Isle: I'm not sure if @Isleee: is your legitimate alternate account or not, so perhaps you could clarify, ideally with confirmations from both accounts, whether this is the case or not. Apologies for the delay in assessing your adoption request. Anyway, I trust you're still interested in this request, but, presumably, were just busy during the Christmas holiday period. While the edits made were fairly minor, you certainly compensate in terms of quantity of edits. Crucially, you've been an active contributing member of this community going back a full year or more. Accordingly, this LGTM, and so this is
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Isle and Isleee: (not sure which of you to ping). Is there still an interest in this request? -- Void Whispers 22:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Isle: The wiki has been reopened. -- Void Whispers 02:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
realtimefandubgameswiki.miraheze.org
- Wiki: realtimefandubgameswiki.miraheze.org
- Username: CostinTea
- Are you a bureaucrat? No
- Reason: The wiki has been locked as a result of inactivity, and I want to migrate material from there to the Wiki I own on FANDOM.
CostinTea (talk) 13:48, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @CostinTea: This request for adoption seems fine; however, since I note that you aim to migrate material to the Fandom fork wiki of the same name, if it is not your intent to adopt this wiki, would you prefer if I just generated you XML and and image dumps of this wiki that you can import into Fandom? Thanks Dmehus (talk) 15:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dmehus That's a swell alternative and I would appreciate that. Thank you very much for your quick response! CostinTea (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @CostinTea: No problem. I will generate the dumps now. Can you e-mail
stewards
and reference your wiki username CostinTea, so I know where to e-mail it? Actually, better yet, I'll upload them WeTransfer, and post the dump links here. Dmehus (talk) 15:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)miraheze.org
- I'll send my email to you as soon as possible. CostinTea (talk) 15:13, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- @CostinTea: No problem. I will generate the dumps now. Can you e-mail
- @Dmehus That's a swell alternative and I would appreciate that. Thank you very much for your quick response! CostinTea (talk) 15:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
community.miraheze.org
- Wiki: community.miraheze.org
- Username: Justarandomliberal
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: Per my proposal at the Community noticeboard.
Justarandomliberal (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal I do not think this can be adopted just yet. I however am not sure and am therefore leaving it for Stewards without making any status changes. Thank you. R4356th (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- R4356th It's meant for when and if the proposal at the community noticeboard is accepted. Justarandomliberal (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal In that case, I suggest you to wait for the community to share its opinion. R4356th (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- R4356th I'll take your suggestion and put this adoption request on hold, nominator request. Justarandomliberal (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal In that case, I suggest you to wait for the community to share its opinion. R4356th (talk) 15:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- R4356th It's meant for when and if the proposal at the community noticeboard is accepted. Justarandomliberal (talk) 15:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
terrifictvnetworks.miraheze.org
- Wiki: terrifictvnetworks.miraheze.org
- Username: Waldo
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I think people may find this wiki good, so I think reopening it to be fine. I intend to be active in editing it.
Waldo (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Waldo: The wiki has been reopened for you to actively contribute to the wiki over the next two weeks, after which a steward will assess your activity level quantitatively and qualitatively and grant rights if successful. Please make sure you make an edit on this wiki within the next hour or two, otherwise I will need to make an edit to prevent the wiki from being reclosed the next time the inactivity script is run. As a reminder, too, that per Dormancy Policy, you should not adopt every wiki, but seeing as this would only be your second adopted wiki because this would be a sister or brother wiki to your recently adopted wiki, it should be fine. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 01:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
- Update: I know I am not an admin but I have noticed he has made several edits there so he might be able to have rights now. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Blubabluba9990: Please refrain from commenting on others' requests and let Stewards deal with these. Thank you. Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ok sorry. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- No problem. Please just keep this in mind from the next time. :) Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 20:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ok sorry. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Blubabluba9990: Please refrain from commenting on others' requests and let Stewards deal with these. Thank you. Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Update: I know I am not an admin but I have noticed he has made several edits there so he might be able to have rights now. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 16:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
franchise.miraheze.org
- Wiki: franchise.miraheze.org
- Username: Akryvonos
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes
- Reason: we do not have time to make changes in time, sorry
Akryvonos (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Akryvonos: Hi, you are bureaucrat on this wiki so you can reopen it by visiting Special:ManageWiki on your wiki. HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 13:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Akryvonos: HeartsDo is correct that as a local
bureaucrat
on this wiki, you can reopen it at Special:ManageWiki on your wiki. Nevertheless, as it's been over a week with no follow up from you, I have gone ahead andlocally reopened it for you. Should your wiki ever become either inactive or closed in future, though, there's no need for you to request to adopt this wiki, please just go into ManageWiki on your wiki and reopen it as I have done for you this time. Dmehus (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Akryvonos: HeartsDo is correct that as a local
ovostoke.miraheze.org
- Wiki: ovostoke.miraheze.org
- Username: Kshatriya Drum
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes
- Reason: I was the only author of this wiki and I would like to continue editing it.
Kshatriya Drum (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Kshatriya Drum: You are a bureaucrat on this wiki, you can reopen it by visiting Special:ManageWiki on your wiki! :) HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 11:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Kshatriya Drum: HeartsDo is correct that as a local
bureaucrat
on this wiki, you can reopen it at Special:ManageWiki on your wiki. Nevertheless, as it's been over a week with no follow up from you, I have gone ahead andlocally reopened it for you. Should your wiki ever become either inactive or closed in future, though, there's no need for you to request to adopt this wiki, please just go into ManageWiki on your wiki and reopen it as I have done for you this time. Dmehus (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Kshatriya Drum: HeartsDo is correct that as a local
roblox.miraheze.org
- Wiki: roblox.miraheze.org
- Username: FunctionalMetatable
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: I would like to own the wiki to manage it and update it regularly as it doesn't look like it is..
FunctionalMetatable (talk) 16:43, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- @FunctionalMetaltable: This
cannot be done as the wiki is not closed. Please reach out to PepperoniJustin to request any rights you require on the wiki to help build the wiki. If there's no response from them, you can also hold a local election, following the procedures on the prescribed page. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
openanarchywiki.miraheze.org
- Wiki: openanarchywiki.miraheze.org
- Username: LJKMagic
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason: I would like to adopt this wiki, I play on the MC server that the wiki is talking about and I would like to revive the wiki.
Thanks LJKMagic (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- I did one last time but i forgot i sent it LJKMagic (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- This request seems fine to me. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- @LJKMagic: I'm not really satisfied with the level of activity on this wiki since it was reopened nearly two months ago. In any case, in the intervening period, existing bureaucrat(s) are now active on the local wiki, so I'd suggest reaching out to them locally to request any rights you may require. If the don't respond to your request, you can also hold a local election on the wiki and request Stewards to assess it in local bureaucrats' stead. Accordingly, I'm going to mark this as
not done. Dmehus (talk) 23:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
4b4t.miraheze.org
- Wiki: 4b4t.miraheze.org
- Username: Naughtasulawesi
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No I am not
- Reason: The wiki is eligible for adoption at https://4b4t.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page/
Naughtasulawesi (talk) 17:09, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- This request seems fine to me. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Thanks for the reminder!
@Dmehus Thanks for the reminder! ~~~~— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naughtasulawesi (talk • contribs) 20:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Thanks for the reminder!
- @Naughtasulawesi: Sorry for the delay. The wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 22:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Not done No activity by Naughtasulawesi since the wiki was reopened nearly three months ago. Dmehus (talk) 23:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
2020.miraheze.org
- Wiki: 2020.miraheze.org
- Username: Justarandomliberal
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: This is a wiki dedicated to an interesting year, to say the least, and I would like to maintain it.
Justarandomliberal (talk) 09:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal Interesting and good choice for a wiki to adopt, given the circumstances and events of 2020. This request seems fine to me, as this wiki was not manually closed, and I couldn't find any recent changes in the past 60 days. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks (quite possibly sooner), reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 16:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal This
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
- Justarandomliberal This
- @Justarandomamerican: I only see five (5) edits making minor changes or creating sub-stub pages less than one line long. As such, I'm not satisfied with the level of activity since the wiki has been reopened, so going to mark this as
not done. Please continue editing the wiki and either (a) reply to this thread to request a reassessment, (b) open a new thread (if this one has been archived), or (c) hold a local election on the local wiki, requesting Stewards to assess your election in lieu of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
foss.miraheze.org
- Wiki: foss.miraheze.org
- Username: R4356th
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I am a big fan of open source and would like to add content to this wiki. It currently one has one page (which is Main Page).
R4356th (talk) 12:42, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th This
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC) - R4356th Similar to the above request by Justarandomamerican, I only see five (5) edits making minor changes or creating sub-stub pages less than one line long. As such, I'm not satisfied with the level of activity since the wiki has been reopened, so going to mark this as
not done. Please continue editing the wiki and either (a) reply to this thread to request a reassessment, (b) open a new thread (if this one has been archived), or (c) hold a local election on the local wiki, requesting Stewards to assess your election in lieu of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
railrover.miraheze.org
- Wiki: railrover.miraheze.org
- Username: Alex40138
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: To take ownership of Wiki to prevent deletion
Alex40138 (talk) 17:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Alex40138: This
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 18:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Done Alex40138 Though you've only made about twenty, mostly minor, edits to this wiki since it was reopened by Stewards last month, you have more than 80 edits on the wiki, so while edits may be small in byte size, there are plenty of them. Crucially, too, is that you've been a regular or semi-regular contributor to this wiki going back nearly four years (or more). Accordingly, I'm going to mark this as
successful, with
bureaucrat
andsysop
rights being added to your account. As a new bureaucrat and administrator on this wiki, please remember that all wikis must adhere to Content Policy; wiki users, administrators, and bureaucrats must adhere to the Code of Conduct (including in their edit and block summaries); and the development of local wiki policies, content style guidelines, and the like should reflect the prevailing consensus of the local community. Dmehus (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
spectrobes.miraheze.org
- Wiki: Spectrobes.miraheze.org
- Username: Dominic DeVito
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason:
Dominic DeVito (talk) 14:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Dominic DeVito: please complete the request format or else this won’t be done. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 14:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Dominic DeVito: While I agree with Zppix above that you should've also completed this adoption request for procedural expediency and efficiency, it would be rather bureaucratic to decline this request on that basis alone. As such, this
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a Steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- I should of worded it better... i meant like for it to come off as a possibility. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 16:33, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Dominic DeVito: While I agree with Zppix above that you should've also completed this adoption request for procedural expediency and efficiency, it would be rather bureaucratic to decline this request on that basis alone. As such, this
Not done No contributions in more than a month since the wiki was reopened. Dmehus (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
wvsc.miraheze.org
- Wiki: wvsc.miraheze.org
- Username: VictorE21
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: I want to keep it as an archive of something that once happened.
VictorE21, 16:15 GMT, 9 January 2021
- @VictorE21: This
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2021 (UTC) - VictorE21
Not done as there's been contributions on the local wiki since it was reopened more than two weeks ago. However, as I can see you've been active on the wiki prior to this, it seems like rights themselves may not have been needed, and you just wanted the wiki reopened and weren't a
bureaucrat
andsysop
. At any rate, the wiki has been reopened. Should the wiki become inactive or closed in the future, you may rerequest to adopt this wiki, ask at stewards' noticeboard for a Steward to reopen the wiki in lieu of active bureaucrats, or hold a local election and request a Steward assess in your election in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
splatoonwiki.miraheze.org
- Wiki: splatoonwiki.miraheze.org
- Username: Rocke
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: Thanks to Miraheze for providing a platform to splatoonwiki.
I am just a Chinese Splatoon2 player, hoping to build a splatoonwiki on the network. As far as I know, this WIKI was moved from FANDOM, and the Chinese material of this wiki is very important to us!
I hope the administrator can understand us and restart it.
(Forgive my poor English) Rocke (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Rocke: Hi, this wiki was deleted by Dormancy Policy but not dropped for the database now. If a steward (@Dmehus: or a other one) can review this when there have time HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 16:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Rocke: The wiki has been
undeleted. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 23:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help, I will work hard. Rocke (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Rocke No problem. If you ever see this wiki as either inactive or closed in future, you can just go into Special:ManageWiki on your wiki, uncheck the applicable boxes, and your wiki be restored to full activity again and reopened. Dmehus (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help, I will work hard. Rocke (talk) 07:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
womenintech.miraheze.org
- Wiki: womenintech.miraheze.org
- Username: R4356th
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: I am a feminist and would love to add content to this wiki. It does not have any page without Main Page (which has never even been edited) at the moment.
R4356th (talk) 12:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- R4356th This
LGTM also, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
(indeed, it was barely even edited, if at all). Though a user should not request to adopt every wiki, as far as I'm aware, you have not successfully adopted any wiki yet. Plus, since this and the above wiki are related, broadly, to the topic of free and open source software for which this wiki will include a focus on women software programmers, it would make sense for you to potentially adopt and build out both wikis, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:29, 5 December 2020 (UTC) - R4356th This is very much an edge case, as you've only made about 15 edits on this wiki. However, I do see some more substantive content writing than in the above two adoption requests. This suggests to me this is the wiki around which you want to focus your efforts. I considered marking this as not done, as that would be the more likely outcome here; however, I can see you're interested in maintaining and developing this wiki, so am going to mark this as
done. Bureaucrat and administrator rights will be added to your account. Dmehus (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies for the really little number of edits. I have been busy. I will start editing the wiki soon. :) Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 07:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
minecraft.miraheze.org
- Wiki: minecraft.miraheze.org
- Username: RealKnockout
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: The wiki is closed and has no admin, I would like to revive it and import pages to it, and eventually gain adminship on it.
RealKnockout (talk) 22:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @RealKnockout: This request seems fine to me, as this wiki was not manually closed, and I couldn't find any recent changes in the past 60 days. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Thanks! RealKnockout (talk) 17:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- @RealKnockout: Sorry for the delay, the wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 22:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Are there any plans to actually look at this request? RealKnockout (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @RealKnockout: Firstly, please remember that we're all volunteers here, and requests are managed alongside other activities. Please take care not to be too demanding. Secondly, I had a look at your request in the past week, but wasn't satisfied yet with the activity thus far, as edits were quite small and inconsequential (i.e., adding or removing categories to pages). I would rather see you write a couple of new content pages before granting rights. Would you be able to set that as your personal goal for the next week? Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Are there any plans to actually look at this request? RealKnockout (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Relisted to prevent archiving. Aim to handle this in the next week. Dmehus (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- RealKnockout Though you've been a little bit impatient with Stewards above, this
LGTM. Accordingly, I'm going to mark this as
successful, with
bureaucrat
andsysop
rights being added to your account. As a new bureaucrat and administrator on this wiki, please remember that all wikis must adhere to Content Policy; wiki users, administrators, and bureaucrats must adhere to the Code of Conduct (including in their edit and block summaries); and the development of local wiki policies, content style guidelines, and the like should reflect the prevailing consensus of the local community. Additionally, should you have a local discussion on your wiki to remove any local bureaucrats, you may request for Stewards to be dispatched to your local wiki to assess your local wiki community'sbureaucrat
deselection process at stewards' noticeboard. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)- Thank you! I'm sorry if I was rude, yes I was getting a bit impatient. I will try my best to be respectful next time. Thank you for the rights. RealKnockout (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
spongebob.miraheze.org
- Wiki: spongebob.miraheze.org
- Username: SpongeBobFan99
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason: I am a big fan of SpongeBob and unfortunately it's closed.
SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- SpongeBobFan99 Since users should generally not adopt every wiki, please decide which wiki you're most interested in adopting (this one or the one above), and reply in the thread for the wiki you're most interested in adopting. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:12, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, I see Cocopuff2018 is the bureaucrat on this wiki, so they may be able to reopen this wiki at Special:ManageWiki, and you can contribute to the wiki, requesting any right(s) you may require for your editing. This would allow you to still adopt the above wiki, potentially. Dmehus (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- SpongeBobFan99 Hi, sorry for the late reply I will go ahead and reopen it for you, and if you want to request user rights on it I would be more then glad to grant you rights...just leave me a message on my talk page and sorry I have been inactive on it been busy -- Cocopuff2018 (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. And user rights would sound good. SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- SpongeBobFan99 Make sure you request local rights at here. Dmehus (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. And user rights would sound good. SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 19:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- SpongeBobFan99 Hi, sorry for the late reply I will go ahead and reopen it for you, and if you want to request user rights on it I would be more then glad to grant you rights...just leave me a message on my talk page and sorry I have been inactive on it been busy -- Cocopuff2018 (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Actually, I see Cocopuff2018 is the bureaucrat on this wiki, so they may be able to reopen this wiki at Special:ManageWiki, and you can contribute to the wiki, requesting any right(s) you may require for your editing. This would allow you to still adopt the above wiki, potentially. Dmehus (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
SpongeBobFan99 I have granted you admin and if you do a good job I will promote you to crate, I will also try to work on the wiki this week as well, so we do got a lot of work to do! If you got any extension request let me know and I will enable it --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
abysmalthetoptennersandlists.miraheze.org
- Wiki: abysmalthetoptennersandlists.miraheze.org
- Username: KalloFox34
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
- Reason: I believe that the wiki has genuine potential, and it's probably for the best that it gets a new owner instead of dying off.
KalloFox34 (talk) 21:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm going to mark this request as
not done, mainly because this wiki has essentially zero content, and its sole contributors, essentially, deleted/anonymized users. Moreover, from a procedural standpoint, given how near this wiki is to deletion per Dormancy Policy, you would be better off requesting a wiki, taking care to define a clear purpose and scope for your wiki. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 01:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
goodsoftware.miraheze.org
- Wiki: goodsoftware.miraheze.org
- Username: Ice cake 2543
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: The reason why I want to adopt the wiki is because I think it has a bright future and I will take good care of it and try to promote the wiki as well. I also make to make a page on this wiki. I hope you understand and let me save this wiki thanks
Ice cake 2543 (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- This request seems fine to me. A steward should review your request in the next 2-3 weeks, reopen the wiki, allowing you to contribute constructively for at least one week, and then assess your contributions to the wiki and grant rights if successful. Dmehus (talk) 14:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- I have the ability to wait 2-3 weeks Let me know if the wiki is reopened thanks :) Ice cake 2543 (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I have the ability to wait 2-3 weeks Let me know if the wiki is reopened thanks :) Ice cake 2543 (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)- There the a glitch that caused the same message to be sent twice sorry about that Ice cake 2543 (talk) 21:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Sorry for taking so long to get to your request. The wiki has now been reopened. -- Void Whispers 22:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- So I did some edits and there is this message, so are stewards on this wiki? The message says pending review my edit is sent to moderation so are you one of the mods? Ice cake 2543 (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- I feel like it is something I should know because I am thinking about making a new page for this wiki Ice cake 2543 (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Ah, okay, it looks like that wiki is using Extension:Moderation, so if there are no active bureaucrats, a steward will have to either (a) disable the extension, (b) approve your edits, which would be quite tedious, or (c) add you to the
automoderated
group. I will {{ping}} @Void: to this thread to decide on which course of action to take, since you do need to be able to edit the wiki in order to have your adoption request assessed. I personally would probably favour either of option A or option C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmehus (talk • contribs) 01:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)- I'm giving the benefit of the doubt here and just adding the automoderated and moderator groups. This makes it possible for the user to be able to contribute to the wiki, and also allow others to contribute. Just be sure to keep an eye on goodsoftware:Special:Moderation. -- Void Whispers 01:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Ah, okay, it looks like that wiki is using Extension:Moderation, so if there are no active bureaucrats, a steward will have to either (a) disable the extension, (b) approve your edits, which would be quite tedious, or (c) add you to the
- I feel like it is something I should know because I am thinking about making a new page for this wiki Ice cake 2543 (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- So I did some edits and there is this message, so are stewards on this wiki? The message says pending review my edit is sent to moderation so are you one of the mods? Ice cake 2543 (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not satisfied with the level of the activity on this wiki since it was reopened in nearly two months. There's been little more than 10 edits, all of which have been very minor. Additionally, while @Space0720 and DuchessTheSponge: may not be active on that wiki, they are active on other Miraheze wikis, so I'd perhaps suggest reaching out to them at User talk:Space0720 and/or User talk:DuchessTheSponge locally. You may also wish to hold a local election on the local wiki, which local bureaucrat(s) or Stewards, in their stead, can assess. Accordingly, I'm making this is
not done to finalize this adoption request. Dmehus (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Related discussion moved from wrong section
-
- Thank you Ice cake 2543 (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wait I tried to edit and it says to wait to be approved by mods does it mean the mod for this wiki because I am not sure if they are active Ice cake 2543 (talk) 23:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Ah, okay, it looks like that wiki is using Extension:Moderation, so if there are no active bureaucrats, a steward will have to either (a) disable the extension, (b) approve your edits, which would be quite tedious, or (c) add you to the
automoderated
group. I will {{ping}} @Void: to this thread to decide on which course of action to take, since you do need to be able to edit the wiki in order to have your adoption request assessed. I personally would probably favour either of option A or option C. Dmehus (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)- Hmm? This appears to be the wrong section? The wiki listed here (minecraftwiki) does not have any mechanisms in place to hold edits for review. -- Void Whispers 01:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Void: Good point. I was a bit confused as I noticed @Ice cake 2543: replied to you thanking you, and yet RealKnockout was the user that requested adopting this wiki. So perhaps it's just the other wiki then. Dmehus (talk) 01:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- It is the other wiki I mixed up this section with the good software section I think the Extension moderation should be gone which is why I chose option A Ice cake 2543 (talk) 02:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry of the confusion Ice cake 2543 (talk) 02:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Okay, well once your adoption request is successful and you have
bureaucrat
rights, you can choose to disable the Moderation extension, if you wish. In the meantime, Void has addedautomoderated
for you on the wiki while you edit. You can also moderate others' edits on the wiki using the above special page. Dmehus (talk) 03:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)- I've forgotten about that wiki for a while now, I may come back to the site but I dunno. For now, I might choose to hire more admins/bureaucrats to the wiki. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- DuchessTheSponge Oh, that's great, thanks for your reply. Ice cake 2543 has been fairly active on that wiki, mainly with small-ish WikiGnome-type edits. Expressing my personal opinion as a community member, they could likely due well to have
autopatrolled
androllbacker
, as those tools may help with their editing contributions and reverting vandalism. Dmehus (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- DuchessTheSponge Oh, that's great, thanks for your reply. Ice cake 2543 has been fairly active on that wiki, mainly with small-ish WikiGnome-type edits. Expressing my personal opinion as a community member, they could likely due well to have
- I've forgotten about that wiki for a while now, I may come back to the site but I dunno. For now, I might choose to hire more admins/bureaucrats to the wiki. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Okay, well once your adoption request is successful and you have
- Sorry of the confusion Ice cake 2543 (talk) 02:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- It is the other wiki I mixed up this section with the good software section I think the Extension moderation should be gone which is why I chose option A Ice cake 2543 (talk) 02:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Void: Good point. I was a bit confused as I noticed @Ice cake 2543: replied to you thanking you, and yet RealKnockout was the user that requested adopting this wiki. So perhaps it's just the other wiki then. Dmehus (talk) 01:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm? This appears to be the wrong section? The wiki listed here (minecraftwiki) does not have any mechanisms in place to hold edits for review. -- Void Whispers 01:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Ice cake 2543: Ah, okay, it looks like that wiki is using Extension:Moderation, so if there are no active bureaucrats, a steward will have to either (a) disable the extension, (b) approve your edits, which would be quite tedious, or (c) add you to the
- Wait I tried to edit and it says to wait to be approved by mods does it mean the mod for this wiki because I am not sure if they are active Ice cake 2543 (talk) 23:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you Ice cake 2543 (talk) 22:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
bestepisodes.miraheze.org
- Wiki: bestepisodes.miraheze.org
- Username: SpongeBobFan99
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: It's inactive.
SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @SpongeBobFan99: could you please share a better reason? Thank you. :) Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 19:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Though I share R4356th's concern above, This
LGTM as the wiki was not manually closed by a local
bureaucrat
, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Please ensure you make an edit to the wiki before of the end of the day to prevent it being reclosed. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)- Aw, man, I didn't see that. SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 20:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- SpongeBobFan99 Okay, I'll reopen this wiki again, since you missed the message, but I have my doubts as to whether you will generate sufficient contributions on both this wiki and the SpongeBob wiki (see below). Since users should generally not adopt every wiki, please decide which wiki you're most interested in adopting (this one or the one below), and reply in the thread for the wiki you're most interested in adopting. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Aw, man, I didn't see that. SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 20:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Though I share R4356th's concern above, This
fantastictoys.miraheze.org
- Wiki: fantastictoys.miraheze.org
- Username: DarkMatterMan4500
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No.
- Reason: The reason why I am making this request is basically 2 things: For 1, it has been entirely inactive with no local sysop to take care of the wiki, and as for reason #2, I figured this wiki would have much potential for a revival, and a new look for it. So, I'd like you to consider my adoption request in advance. Thanks.
DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- @DarkMatterMan4500: I have
closed this request as locally handled as @DuchessTheSponge: has reopened the wiki and granted you
bureaucrat
andsysop
rights. Good luck with this wiki! :) Redmin Contributions CentralAuth (talk) 07:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
ith.miraheze.org
- Wiki: ith.miraheze.org
- Username: IdleDiscovery
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
noyes - Reason: I wish to adopt the ith. I was the original creator of that wiki, and ended up being inactive on it. I wish to try again.
IdleDiscovery (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- IdleDiscovery As you are a
bureaucrat
on this wiki, can you please go into Special:ManageWiki, uncheck "inactive" and "closed", so your wiki will be reopened? When that's done, I'll update this request's status. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2021 (UTC)- Thank you. I am so very new at this, that I was not able to find Special:ManageWiki at first. I have now unchecked the "inactive" and "closed" boxes as per your instructions, and submitted that. IdleDiscovery (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- IdleDiscovery
Great, and that's no problem at all. I've now marked this as locally handled. You can learn more about ManageWiki at ManageWiki. You may also find FAQ helpful. You can ask specific questions on either Discord, IRC, or community noticeboard, and someone should be able to answer them. Dmehus (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thenk you very much for the help IdleDiscovery (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- IdleDiscovery
- Thank you. I am so very new at this, that I was not able to find Special:ManageWiki at first. I have now unchecked the "inactive" and "closed" boxes as per your instructions, and submitted that. IdleDiscovery (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
alternatehistory.miraheze.org
- Wiki: alternatehistory.miraheze.org
- Username: Emperore
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: The website's administrators are very inactive and permissions on the website are limiting. You cannot add/edit templates, create your own user page, or even edit the sandbox. I want to adopt the website to improve it and fuel activity since it seems that the strict permissions are a deterrent and there are many missing templates that are necessary for an alternate history wiki.
Emperore (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- Emperore It looks like Sapphire Williams, the only (sort of) recently active
bureaucrat
on this wiki has protected certain namespaces onalternatehistorywiki
atautoconfirmed
. So, while this wiki isn't eligible for adoption, you have a couple of options, which I'll itemize in turn:- Request
confirmed
permissions from Sapphire Williams on their local user talk page. If they don't reply after a few days to week, then you can either return to this thread or message me in some other venue (i.e., at User talk:Dmehus or stewards' noticeboard) requesting theconfirmed
permission be granted in lieu of local administration; or, - Hold a local election for the position(s) you require, whether
sysop
and/orbureaucrat
, following the tips and best practices at User:Dmehus/local election.
- Request
- Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 16:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Emperore See my reply on Sapphire Williams' user talk page on that wiki. While I could grant you
confirmed
permissions in lieu of locally active administration, as you only need one more edit on that wiki, the very act of you replying to my reply on that user talk page will make youautoconfirmed
. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Emperore See my reply on Sapphire Williams' user talk page on that wiki. While I could grant you
protoromana.miraheze.org
- Wiki: protoromana.miraheze.org
- Username: Flaviu
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: My own site
Flaviu (talk) 16:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Flaviu: Hi, your reasons says "My own site" but the only bureaucrat/sysop on the wiki is User:Saturnian. Is that an alternate account of yours? If so, please use that one to log in and and then you can go to Special:ManageWiki and uncheck the "closed" box to reopen it. Reception123 (talk) (C) 16:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
arda.miraheze.org
- Wiki: arda.miraheze.org
- Username: Dread
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
- Reason: I would like to repurpose the wiki for a possible world-building community project.
Dread (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dread
Not done as the purpose of Requests for adoption is to take over management and administration of existing wikis, not usurp another wiki's subdomain. This wiki has not been edited in approximately five months, and should be deleted in a little over a month from now. So, I'd suggest either (a) waiting until then and requesting a wiki or, if you cannot wait, (b) requesting a wiki with a different subdomain, then monitoring for when this wiki's database is dropped, and then filing a task on Phabricator to rename your wiki. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
hbcpraise.miraheze.org
- Wiki: hbcpraise.miraheze.org
- Username: Hbcpraise
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No answer given
- Reason: I am the bureaucrat, but when I got Special:ManageWiki everything is greyed out and I cannot uncheck "closed"
Hbcpraise (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hbcpraise I've
reopened the wiki for you. Looking at this special page, it looks like Jim-ng is the only
bureaucrat
on the wiki. I noted you are amember
on the wiki, which usually indicates a private wiki. It looks like it was a private wiki until this log action made by the local wiki bureaucrat made the wiki public. So, my question would be mainly for Jim-ng as the wiki bureaucrat, did you guys want all users to view your wiki's pages? With private wikis, if you want users to be able to view pages, you just need to add themember
group to the user(s) you want to have access. So, clarification there would be helpful. In addition, do you still want to adopt the wiki, by contributing to the wiki over the next several weeks in order to obtainbureaucrat
andsysop
rights on the wiki, or did you just want it reopened? If the latter, this is nowdone. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hbcpraise Though you've made significant contributions to this wiki prior to your requesting adoption, I haven't seen any contributions since the wiki was reopened. As well, seeing as Jim-ng is again active on the wiki, I'm closing this as
not done. Please reach out to Jim-ng to request
bureaucrat
rights on the wiki or, failing that, to holding a local election, which a Steward can assess in absence of locally active bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 23:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
uesrpg.miraheze.org
- Wiki: uesrpg.miraheze.org
- Username: Dawnstar
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
- Reason: interested in preserving and updating the information
Dawnstar (talk) 13:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Dawnstar This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've
locally reopened in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and
bureaucrat
andsysop
user groups may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC) - Dawnstar No activity since the wiki was reopened more than two weeks ago, so I'm closing this as
not done. In any case, wiki is active and open, so you can always hold a local election on the local wiki, and request a Steward to assess your election in absence of locally active bureaucrats. Dmehus (talk) 23:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
terriblenicheaudienceshows.miraheze.org
- Wiki: terriblenicheaudienceshows.miraheze.org
- Username: SpongeBobFan99
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
- Reason: Recently, niche audience shows were banned on TTSW. I found this wiki and made a few edits there.
SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 23:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Not done as the wiki is not closed. Please see my response here. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, I have no idea what I am doing. I'll just follow your guidelines. I am running for bureaucrat, the candidates are me, and, now, I'm so confused, SpongeBobFan99 (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
veg.miraheze.org
- Wiki: veg.miraheze.org
- Username: MarijusV
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
- Reason:
MarijusV (talk) 10:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- MarijusV I think you made a typographical error in this request as
svegwiki
has never existed on Miraheze, based on my searches. You have, however, requested and createdvegwiki
, which is both open and active. Can you please visit that wiki and let me know if you're able to access it? Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
earth98.miraheze.org
- Wiki: earth98.miraheze.org
- Username: Re.min.a
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
Lukaz taroNo - Reason: The wiki has been inactive for two months and the bureaucrat has constructed another wiki (terra-98) that is the same as earth-98. No one has used the wiki, and I would like to adopt it, if that's okay.
Re.min.a (talk) 03:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Re.min.a This
cannot be done as the wiki is not closed per Dormancy Policy. However, as I do see all bureaucrats and administrators on this wiki are indeed inactive, what you can do is hold a local election by creating a local election page, as described below. If you want a Steward to add a local sitenotice to the wiki advertising your local election, in lieu of active bureaucrats, this can be done. Hope that helps.
- Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 03:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)