Requests for global rights

Requests for global rights This page is designed to be a place to organize all requests for global rights. Rights which can be requested: Global Sysop IP block exemption Interwiki administrator NOTE: Steward is requested at Requests for Stewardship only. Notes: New requests should be created via the button below to preload recommended fields. There is no fixed time requirement for requests to stay open, but a 7 day period is often recommended in order to give users time to discuss any potential issues, and the candidate should address any concerns raised by members of the community. To add your request, click the "Add request" button below.

Closed requests for global rights:

• Archive 1 (23 July 2018 - 19 December 2019)
• Archive 2 (20 December 2019 -

Sourav Halder's Request for Interwiki administrator

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closing as  unsuccessful considering that the user is blocked on meta and has abused multiple accounts even after the user is blocked.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 11:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

---

User: Sourav Halder (contributions • CA • blocks log • rights log • global rights log)

Reasoning for request

Hi I'm Sourav Halder.According to the policy, the user is a validate candidate with over 1000 global edits and more than two months old. Interwiki administrator I request you to improve the position.I am sharing the link to my global contribution for your convenience [1]The number of my global contributions 1205,Besides, I have been working Miraheze for three months.The humble request will improve my rank

Questions for candidate

Interwiki admin isn't given because you hit the criteria. It's given out because you've shown trust and requested interwikis often and are able to help users with adding interwikis. @Sourav Halder: Can you explain what you would do with the access and why we should give you it? ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (     offline) 22:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Here is the reason why I would be Interwiki administrators

1. If there is no local Administrator present on the wiki, I will request a community notice board to change the interwiki.
2. When I went to edit any wiki after becoming Administrator for Interwiki administrators, I was able to prevent it from being destroyed here.
3. We help develop the global wiki.
4. As rule I will contribute. ~'Sourav Halder' 02:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

@RhinosF1:You notice that I am making good contributions to Miraheze at a fast pace.~'Sourav Halder' 02:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Support

#Template:Strong Support good User Striked: IP votes are not counted. Reception123 (talk) (C) 06:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC) # Support He is a good users Puja (talk) 05:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

1. Support Ripon (talk) 05:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Above votes struck due to sock puppetry. ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (     offline) 15:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

1. Support They seem good in my eyes. WickyHoney (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Support good User. Struck an invalid vote casted by a sockpuppet.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 11:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC) # Support No comment :) 「ФБ101」(T | G | E) 15:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Striked: Moved to Oppose.

Oppose

1. Strong oppose Doesn’t seem to understand the role, borderline hat collecting and abusing multiple accounts. ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (     offline) 15:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose His actions since he registered have left me in doubt. He seems to be unaware of the basic rules that have been made known to him on his discussion page, this unawareness is more problematic for a permit that should be used carefully. Hispano76 (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
3. Strong oppose Not only to mention that either way I wouldn't see enough qualification for this role (not enough community interaction) but the abusing multiple accounts shows me that this user should definitely not be given any advanced rights. Reception123 (talk) (C) 18:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
4. Strong oppose Using sock puppets on a RfGR is unacceptable; I change my vote for this request. 「ФБ101」(T | G | E) 18:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

Sourav Halder's Request for Interwiki administrator

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

 Request withdrawn See here EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 20:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

---

User: Sourav Halder (contributions • CA • blocks log • rights log • global rights log)

Reasoning for request

Hi I'm Sourav Halder.According to the policy, the user is a validate candidate with over 1000 global edits and more than 2 months old. Interwiki administrator I request you to improve the position.I am sharing the link to my global contribution for your convenience [2]The number of my global contributions 2,323 ,Besides, I have been working Miraheze for 4 months.The humble request will improve my rank.

Additional comments given by user (if any)

Here is the reason why I would be Interwiki administrators

1. If there is no local Administrator present on the wiki, I will request a community notice board to change the interwiki.
2. When I went to edit any wiki after becoming Administrator for Interwiki administrators, I was able to prevent it from being destroyed here.
3. We help develop the global wiki.
4. As rule I will contribute.~'Sourav Halder' 02:39, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose Opposing this based on the fact that the user has been blocked multiple times on Meta and has abused multiple accounts in order to vote for themselves for other permissions requests. This makes it impossible for me to trust this user with any elevated rights at this moment. Reception123 (talk) (C) 07:48, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Reception123: Believe in me and take away my right if I make a mistake. I realized my mistake~'Sourav Halder' 08:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that's not really how the system works. For me, this is just too early after what you did just a few weeks ago. Reception123 (talk) (C) 08:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Reception123: What should i do now. From now on I want to contribute honestly. Please do not deprive me of this right.Give me a chance to correct my mistake.I promise it will never happen again.~'Sourav Halder' 08:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sourav Halder: If you want to seriously contribute you can continue helping out and prove your worth, and in a few months if you are trustworthy I could consider supporting a request. Reception123 (talk) (C) 08:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

1. Oppose Go a little while without any sockpuppetry or bad behavior anywhere on Miraheze and I would be glad to support you. EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 18:47, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I didn't understand your talk.~'Sourav Halder' 19:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

@Sourav Halder: What I mean is: nobody trusts you because you are currently known to be vandal and a sockpuppeteer. That said, if you show that you really are here to contribute, then people will trust you. I am telling you to just behave yourself and come back to request again in a month or so and you will have a better chance at getting the rights that you want. EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 20:09, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks I understand.~'Sourav Halder' 20:27, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

Reception123's Request (Confirmation) for Global Sysop

User: Reception123 (contributions • CA • blocks log • rights log • global rights log)

Reasoning for request

As per the new RfC that just passed, former CVT members are required to have a confirmation vote in order to be transitioned to the Global Sysop role. I have been a member of the Counter Vandalism Team since 7 March 2017 and I would like to continue my work fighting vandalism and cross-wiki spam, but also with the new scope of Global Sysop I will be able to help the community more and also help Stewards. I'm active on Meta and regularly check abuse logs and IRC feeds as well as noticeboards to deal with user complaints, and if I am confirmed as Global sysop I will continue to do so, as well as support different communities on Miraheze. Reception123 (talk) (C) 11:26, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Support

1. Support ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (     offline) 11:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
2. Support Sure!--MrJaroslavik (talk) 11:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
3. Support Was an excellent CVT member, I'm sure they will make an excellent Global Sysop. Sario528 (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
4. Support A trusted and active user.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 15:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
5. Support Without a doubt. Hispano76 (talk) 16:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
6. Strong support --そらたこ (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
7. Support No issues. Amanda Catherine (talk) 16:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
8. Support Trusted user, very active, no problems here. Bonnedav (talk) 19:14, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
9. Support Great CVT member and sysadmin will make for a great GS. Good luck Reception :) -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 19:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
10. Support I have no qualms. WickyHoney (talk) 23:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
11. Support From what I have seen this user is active and has been useful as CVT so I do not have any problems with the transition to Global Sysop to continue to be able to help us. DeeM28 (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
12. Support Per above. Hypercane (talk) 18:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
13. SupportWas an hard-working CVT member. --松 (talk) 03:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
14. Support Sure, why not? 「ФБ101」(T | G | E) 14:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
15. Support he is helpful to everyone and Listens to whatever anyone has to say i think he deserves this --Cocopuff2018 16:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)