Community Directors/Election Commission/2019 Election/Vote

Welcome to the community vote for the election of the 2019-2021 Community Directors Election Commission. Listed below are the 4 nominees from the community. There are a maximum of 3 seats on the commission. This page will be used for voting for a members seat. For more information on the election please visit here.

Am I Eligible? You are eligible to vote if you registered your global account before 16:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC). You can check it by entering your username here. It must also list login.miraheze.org before the same date as well. You may only vote once per person even if you have multiple accounts.

When does this vote end

This vote ends when:

Option 1:

• It has been more than 7 days
• 3 Candidates have been passing for more than 48 hours and remained there continually with the other candidate not reaching a passing rate during that time.

Option 2:

• It has been more than 28 days (7 Jan 2020 16:30)

The winners

• The 3 candidates with the most support will be elected.
• To be elected the candidate must:

• Have more than 60% support.
• Have more than 20 users voted either support or oppose for them.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

• Vote open 30 days - No candidates got minimum votes.

• Reception123: 14/14 (2 abstaining) - 100%
• RhinosF1: 8/10 - (3 abstaining) 80%
• Revi: 14/14 - (0 abstaining) 100%
• Dross: 4/5 - (7 abstaining) 80%

~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c  - (WB) 16:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

Voting

Reception123

1. Support Good work on staff. Long time member. No issues here. --EK ● c ● g 17:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
2. Support Excellent help creating the policy and with MH in general. ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (WB) 17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
3. Support friendly and experienced editor, willing to help. Hispano76 (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
4.  Abstain I don't know this user personally, and I want to insure my preferred candidates get in since there are only three seats. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
5.  Abstain as candidate. For what its worth, I do believe the Commission should be a position in which it is without influence of the organization which it assists in process. To me, this would mean that staff members should feel obliged to recuse from such duties so long as they are responsible for other operative portions of Miraheze. Ultimately, this may just be my vision, but it is important to me. dross (t • c • g) 22:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
6. Support He is nice, friendly and always help people with MediaWiki Inven (talk) 02:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
7. Support A long time and experienced member of our community. S/he has been helpful in many ways as well.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 03:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
8. Support Good user and your work is good too. Gustave London (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
9. Support Intelligent person, ressourceful as well. He gets my support. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
10. Support I can't see why not Zppix (Meta | CVT Member | talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
11. Support would be an excellent choice. Bertie (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
12. Support s/he has both experience and knowledge. REIWA (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
13. Support I have seen that this user is capable of handling such things so why not. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
14. Support From this user's profile they appear to have helpful knowledge and experience. SnowyPigeon 18:13 06 January 2020 (UTC)
15. Support John (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
16. Support Paladox (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

RhinosF1

1. Oppose Although I feel that the user has made some useful contributions to Miraheze, however the user has expressed his inability to be active on Miraheze on a regular basis and is stepping down from staff in 4 days time. Additionally I have some issues with the way that the user handled Requests for Comment/Examknow and Requests for Comment/Examknow followup. For these resaons I am voting my oppose. --EK ● c ● g 17:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
2. Support Vote of confidence, willing to help. Hispano76 (talk) 18:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
3. Support Understands how the board of director works and knows all current directors which will be useful in this role. Reception123 (talk) (C) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
4. Support One of the most insightful and hardworking users I have ever known. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
5. Support per above –Aνδρέας ^{talk | contributions} 21:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. Weak support work on your health. –Aνδρέας ^{talk | contributions} 21:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
6.  Abstain as candidate. See comments above. Additional concerns of impartiality and finality of community decision, especially per Examknow. dross (t • c • g) 22:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
7. Weak oppose While I do trust this user and know all the contributions s/he's done so far, I still think his/her health issue is a concern.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 03:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
8.  Abstain I don't know if I should support him or not, he may be a ressourceful person, but he acts very childish at times and the consensus is not in his favor to begin with. The first oppose says he is not active enough. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
9. Support Eager to help on discord and seems friendly. Citronhat (talk) 10:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
10. Support Reading the concerns above I don't think that is important to this role and his relation with the board and knowledge is what will be helpful for his role. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
11. Support John (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
12.  Neutral per Dross Paladox (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Revi

Weak oppose I do not feel comfortable with supporting a user that is "semi-retired" on meta and I would need to see some more activity. --EK ● c ● g 17:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

1. Support The user is active, I just have never been around to see them. --EK ● c ● g 17:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
2. Support a whiz with the code of conduct elections so come join us here. :) ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (WB) 17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
3. Support Experienced editor and active enough. I have nothing more to add Hispano76 (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
4. Support Has prior experience with organizing elections (CoCC for example) so I have no doubt that they will be able in this role. Reception123 (talk) (C) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
5. Support Plenty of experience running these sorts of elections, and I'm glad to see them aboard! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
6. Support Experienced in organizing elections including the CoCC election here on Miraheze.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 03:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
7. Support –Aνδρέας ^{talk | contributions} 21:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
8. Support Intelligent person, he gets my support. He can help the website. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
9. Support Zppix (Meta | CVT Member | talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
10. Support Bertie (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
11. Support そらたこ (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
12. Support Have also seen this user around on the WMF projects and I am sure his great experience with management will help him. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
13. Support John (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
14. Support Paladox (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Dross

1.  Abstain I do not really know this user too well so I probably shouldn't vote. --EK ● c ● g 17:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
2.  Abstain no issue but we've only got 3 seats and I'd like myself to get in :) ~ RhinosF1 - _(chat)^{· acc· c} - (WB) 17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
3.  Abstain I don't know about this user. 「T ҍ C」(_yell / ^earth) ^active 17:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
4. Weak oppose I consider this nomination very soon. I would expect more experience and more interaction with the community before voting in favor. Hispano76 (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
5.  Abstain While Dross has been very helpful around Meta, I feel like the commissioner role is different and that the three other candidates are more able to deal with it at the time, as they have more experience in these matters. Reception123 (talk) (C) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
6.  Abstain I don't know this user personally, and I want to insure my preferred candidates get in since there are only three seats. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
7. Support One of the problems of Miraheze, IMO, is that certain users tend to have multiple powers at a time, and thus the powers aren't fully separated. I think having a non-staff/admin member on the commission is a good way to change this.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (^talk/_contribs | global🌎) 03:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
8. Support Same as @sig. He is pretty active too and I saw him on a few website-wide rules elections and he always had an agreeable and honest opinion. That being said, he could be a little more active. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
9.  Abstain I do not know this user that well. Zppix (Meta | CVT Member | talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
10.  Abstain I think it is great that Dross is helping out on Miraheze, and that is why I do not want to discourage them with an oppose vote. But, I think it is too early to take on such a role and perhaps there is also not enough knowledge about how things work on Miraheze. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
11. Support A step in the right direction that Miraheze needs, less sysadmin influence in positions and no previous connections as well. John (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
12. Support Paladox (talk) 18:31, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section