- You are viewing all request pages combined. Click the blue link in each section's header to go to the request page.
Status: Done
 Done by NotAracham Silicona (talk) 08:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Both usernames are offensive and second one (on the CountryHumans Wiki) talks about what they "do". Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 21:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thanks for the report, both locked. Reception123 (talk) (C) 11:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Per wikibooks:User talk:Kittycataclysm#Miraheze, there is a possible impersonation of Wikibooks administrator Kittycataclysm. Silicona (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- But I'm not an impersonator! Kittycataclysm (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Per the Username Policy, this account should be locked. The accounts are confirmed to not be the same operator and this isn't a common name that a user would just choose. Additionally, they appear to have been flaunting their fake identity when opening a request for stewardship and a request for global sysop. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 13:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Locked by Reception123. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 14:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Given this is and will remain ongoing, I recommend merging these to one section and notifying via Discord directly which is how I've been tuned in so far. --raidarr (💬) 15:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Merged, additional accounts locked, attempt made to curb this venue of alt creation, likely to persist until stewards have salted the responsible connections. Please append new examples to the list above and remove the done bit so we don't have too many sections on the same affair, though a new impersonation should be expected and kept an eye out for. I'll easiest respond to a direct discord ping to curb new attempts asap. --raidarr (💬) 16:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Already locked by Raidarr, marking as done. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Status: Done
Note: The sockpuppet is the reduplicated name. CrazySpruiker2001 (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Eliminated --raidarr (💬) 08:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Status: Done
- Locked by Void --raidarr (💬) 01:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
I'd like to request my account to be locked as soon as possible. Thank you! UranianUmbra (talk) 00:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done --raidarr (💬) 01:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Lock all:
spambot.--Ama-ryu (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for letting us know. Spam accounts that aren't actually making edits are likely harmless and don't need to be reported. Please report only if they manage to bypass the abuse filter and make edits that become public. However, if the creation is too continuous, please report it to us for IP blocking.
- I did CU on loginwiki and confirmed that all IPs are blocked. --1108-Kiju/Talk 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
A sock puppet that impersonates TheSun42 and keeps vandalizing the music and character Wiki's. 339Breakingoof (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Locked. Can stewards also add TheSun42 and similar to blacklist? Silicona (talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Reception will be investigating later today, this has been brought this to his attention. --raidarr (💬) 18:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This vandal made another account right after the previous was locked and same reason as the last one. 339Breakingoof (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- 339Breakingoof: in this case please append new reports to this section and update the status flag to keep the noticeboard cleaner, this alt has been eliminated and stewards have been notified directly of ongoing abuse. --raidarr (💬) 18:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- ok then thanks I never use this meta area much so I don't know most of the stuff and how they work here. 339Breakingoof (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- No problem at all, thanks for letting us know. --raidarr (💬) 18:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Vandalism-only account. Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 04:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done --1108-Kiju/Talk 06:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
- oh, yes that would be good as well. please do this for the other account too. thanks! Godsam (talk) 21:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
- that would be a good alternative. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godsam (talk • contribs) 21:15, 18 April 2024
- thank you. please delete this account along with Godsam0201. Godsam (talk) 21:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I do not have the ability to modify global accounts; only Stewards and Global Sysops can do so. Tali64³ (talk | contributions) 21:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oh. Ok. So do I just wait for a Steward or Sysop to do this? Godsam (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Pretty much. Tali64³ (talk | contributions) 21:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Note that only Stewards can issue a vanish. --raidarr (💬) 00:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Instructions/Read before making a request
|
|
Use this section to request Stewards grant you administrator or bureaucrat rights on a wiki without any active bureaucrats (or unwilling bureaucrats if they refuse to certify a successful vote) following a local election. We normally don't grant permissions without a local election for advanced rights like this so you'll need to make a local election unless you accidentally demoted yourself.
If you accidentally removed your own permissions, you can also use this section to request re-addition.
To make a request, press "edit" next to the "Administrator/Bureaucrat access" section header, copy the following code and place it at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:
=== Username@<subdomain>wiki ===
{{Permission request
|status = <!-- Do not remove this! -->
|wiki = <!-- Replace with subdomain of wiki -->
|user name = <!-- Replace with username -->
|discussion= <!-- Replace with link to discussion, if any -->
}}
Include any comments here ~~~~
|
The bureaucrat and wiki founder has been inactive since May 2023. As for me, I've been a regular contributor for many weeks. I've also created several templates and several pages. I've also started a local election on the discussion page of the homepage detailing my background on the wiki and my intentions. So I'm asking for bureaucrat rights and if that's not possible, at least administrator rights. Thank you in advance. Darkrai18 (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Hi @Darkrai18. In accordance with the Local policy, recommend that you first contact the bureaucrat Bawitdaba. They are currently active in Mariopedia, so I think you'll get a reply. --1108-Kiju/Talk 03:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @1108-Kiju: I already tried to contact him some time ago here: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/User_talk:Bawitdaba#Can_we_talk? and here: https://mariopedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bawitdaba#The_Nintendo_Wiki, also on Discord, but he never replied. Darkrai18 (talk) 10:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 On hold until get a reply. --1108-Kiju/Talk 15:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- What if he never replies, or refuses me rights and still doesn't contribute to the wiki? Darkrai18 (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Note: Completed by local crat. --1108-Kiju/Talk 02:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello I'm the community lead for a mobile game called top heroes, and I'm looking for a place to start my game wiki. This is where I came across Miraheze. However upon looking into this further, I noticed that the name Topheroes not available for use.
In fact it is an inactive, and deleted wiki. The founder has no contribution history and left it to die. Since then I have already gotten an approval to undelete the wiki. This request to gain administrator and also bureaucrat over that wiki so i can have full autonomy and control in maintaining the wiki for myself, and remove all existing users from before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopHeroes (talk • contribs) 17:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Reviewing, wiki has literally no prior edit history, so approving per request. Rights granted. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi! I am a googology lover. I want be an admin in a wiki. I see there is a googology wiki on Miraheze here! But I seems it is inactivity(do not understand to Miraheze's Wiki inactivity (will deleted).). I want be an admin and change the wiki now. Can I accept to this wants?
I'll makes edits on Googology wiki now.Gongxiang01 (talk) 12:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Requirements have not been met for appointment, there is already an active, extant community that has made edits within the last few days. Please follow the rules outlined in Local elections to hold a local election and reopen this request when criteria have been met.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 15:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Funfacterdroid@neworderwiki[edit | edit source]
I imported around 17 pages after trying to move from Wikitide, the domain ended up being already used but deleted (and in Polish, which I cannot read). So I had to make the request to undelete it, which just went through. There were no other editors on the original Wikitide wiki and there doesn't appear to be any other pages that I didn't import. I don't even know the username of the original founder.
- This is now Done, thanks --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 02:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
BettaCallSoul@loonathewikiwiki[edit | edit source]
I (stupidly) used a disposable email service to create the account I created my wiki with (User:Chuuniversal Studios) and am now locked outside of it after I couldn't recover the password. After wrestling for some time over how to get back in, I decided to just create another account (this one, linked to an actual retrievable email) and continue my wiki journey from here. However, when I created a few pages and made a few edits, I got messages afterwards saying they're 'pending' and were sent to moderators, i.e. my old account I can't access. So I'm humbly asking to have admin, bureaucrat, and interface admin status, basically all the permissions gained by default when a wiki is created.
My old username is the same as my Reddit username in case there's doubts or questions about identity. :)
Thank you very much, have a good day, and stan LOONA! BettaCallSoul (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Related reading for Steward reference --raidarr (💬) 00:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Sufficient confirmation was able to be gleaned from logs + other sources, granting local rights per request.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Speckswiththejunior@kugelnio2wiki[edit | edit source]
So, there's a wiki that isn't considered inactive because it keeps getting vandalized, and the only admin has left Miraheze and left the community this wiki is supposed to be about. I want to moderate it to remove the vandalism and try to bring it back, add more stuff. The only other people who could be in a election are the vandalizers that could ruin it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Speckswiththejunior (talk • contribs) 13:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Speckswiththejunior: If an election is attempted in good faith and is vandalized, Stewards may be brought in to eliminate the vandals and let the election proceed normally. Otherwise it would be best to try and deal with the troublemakers if they appear. --raidarr (💬) 00:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Side note, comments like "Get the fuck out of the wiki, you immature kid." even to vandals is highly frowned upon, having given the wiki a cursory glance. --raidarr (💬) 00:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- On hold, wiki is under investigation for content policy violations, including fork of existing wiki not approved by stewards that may result in shutdown. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello. I found out there was a wiki for Battle For Dream Island a few months earlier. However, the only administrator on the wiki has been inactive since November 2023, and the wiki is currently severely disorganized with almost no templates present. If BFDI was not a popular fandom, the wiki would have most likely been closed, again due to the lack of organization. I was wondering if it was possible for you to give me administrator and bureaucrat for the BFDI wiki on Miraheze, as I would like it to flourish much more than it currently is. Person16384 (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Person16384: In order to take command on the wiki, a local election must be filed per the linked page. After 5-7 days the conclusion can be brought here and this request can proceed on the Steward end; otherwise Stewards generally do not just give rights on request even with rationale such as this unless the process is done. --raidarr (💬) 00:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Raidarr: Okay, I have started a local election on the wiki here. Let me know if I also need to do something else in order to make the election valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Person16384 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Person16384: great! in 5-7 days feel free to stop by and Stewards can take a look & finalize. The 'onhold' mark can be taken off then as well. --raidarr (💬) 11:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Raidarr: Okay, so I have waited for around 6 days, and here are the results for the election. Person16384 (talk) 12:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Request is off hold and forwarded to Steward attention. --raidarr (💬) 14:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello It's me Nexovia I am working on the Olympics Wiki but it's founder and the whole community is inactive so I have the Sysop rights but I couldn't perform all actions needed so could you provide me the crat rights and I have tried conducting local elections but the community is also inactive so could I get the rights.Nexovia (talk) 09:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Nexovia: the election should proceed for 5-7 days and I would recommend you do the following to spruce it up:
- Add a signature to your request so it is clear who you are if someone such as the founder takes a peek
- Give your request a title so it has a clear section, and a discussion subsection for anyone if they do appear to leave feedback
- After that period please come back and let us know: you can remove the 'onhold' piece of the status then. --raidarr (💬) 11:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Do I have to make another request or this one will be ok. @Raidarr Nexovia (talk) 12:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Nexovia: the request as it is now will suffice, Globe has made the adjustments. --raidarr (💬) 12:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- So as tolded I have held elections so could I get rights now. Nexovia (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Request is off hold and pending Steward attention; Talk:Main Page <- link for review. --raidarr (💬) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey there,
we held a 5 days vote like you told us. Can you please grant the following users following roles:
- Skywalker1453 -> Bureaucrat
- G Utopia -> Administrator, Interface administrator
- Skinwalker ranch -> Bureaucrat
- SandrosTNO -> Bureaucrat
- Ededen -> Administrator, Interface administrator
G Utopia (talk) 22:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Update: The burechrat Tunity reappeared and did this. So no action needed anymore.
G Utopia (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello,
The wiki massotis.miraheze.org has been deleted after a period of inactivity, and has been reopened through a steward request. It looks like I lost bureaucrat permission, which I held before, in the process. Would it be possible to fix this? Thanks a lot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Massotiwe (talk • contribs) 18:53, 14 April 2024
- I have reset default permissions on the wiki, which has recreated all missing groups. Please let us know if issues persist. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Everything's fine now, thanks! Massotiwe (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello! I want to be a bureaucrat for this wiki so I can expand it and make it at the level of other Polandball wikis in other languages. You see, I see a great opportunity in this wiki, since it could make several French-speaking users learn about the Polandball community and in turn contribute to the wiki. One of my biggest contributions was creating an Infobox for most of the articles on the wiki.
The wiki for now does not have many active users, it only has 2 Spanish-speaking users that I invited to contribute by creating articles, so I need a requirement to be a bureaucrat, but I think this is optional when wanting to be a bureaucrat of a wiki with few taxpayers. That would be all from me, I hope you can read this and accept me as a bureaucrat of this wiki São tome (talk) 22:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Hi São tome. If you wish to gain crat rights on/adopt a wiki with no active crats to contact, please see the Local Elections page. ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 01:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Marking as On hold until the election has been created. Courtesy ping @São tome as they appear to have not seen PixDeVl's message above. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 14:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Instructions/Read before making a request
|
|
Use this section to request Stewards grant you minor local access such as autopatrolled, confirmed, or rollbacker on wikis without any active bureaucrats.
You may also use this section to request a Steward grant you a Global IP block exemption.
To make a request, press "edit" next to the "Other access" section header, copy the following code and place it at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed (change <subdomain>wiki to global if requesting an IP block exemption):
=== Username@<subdomain>wiki ===
{{Permission request
|status = <!-- Do not remove this! -->
|wiki = <!-- Replace with subdomain of wiki -->
|user name = <!-- Replace with username -->
|discussion= <!-- Replace with link to discussion, if any -->
}}
Include any comments here ~~~~
|
My local voting has been completed,so I need interwiki rights for this wiki, thank you. --Honglan233 (talk) 08:54, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Confirmed. This is a delicate case. It is one step away from meeting the active user count requirement, so it may be acceptable depending on the status of the election. Please reopen the election and give the community an opportunity to voice their opinions for at least two weeks. Sorry, We cannot accept it at this time. Therefore, this is not done.--1108-Kiju/Talk 13:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- OK, I've moved the closing date of this poll to March 3rd and re-open the election Honglan233 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Honglan233: Note, however, that there is currently a plan to give interwiki permissions to local crats (Requests_for_Comment/Omnibus_rights_RfC#Proposal_1:_Elimination_of_Interwiki_Administrators) --1108-Kiju/Talk 12:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Instructions/Read before making a request
|
|
Use this section to request Stewards remove rights from a user (such as bureaucrat) following a local revocation or resignation, or to request they remove user rights only they may modify for any reason as defined by group revocation policy. You can also use this section to request bureaucrats remove your own rights on a wiki or on all wikis (including global rights).
To make a request, press "edit" next to the "Removal" section header, copy the following code and place it at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed (change <subdomain>wiki to global if requesting a Steward remove your rights on all wikis or global rights):
=== <username@wiki> ===
{{Permission request
|status = <!-- Do not remove this! -->
|wiki = <!-- subdomain of wiki -->
|user name = <!-- user -->
|discussion= <!-- Replace with link to discussion, if any -->
}}
Add additional comments here.
~~~~
|
Jph2 (talk) 03:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done Agent Isai Talk to me! 03:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 15:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @MacFan4000: a user's 2c on this. While it's unfortunate to hold the hat and have no local capacity (I'd personally err towards shedding if I'm just absent), some consideration should be given to the fact agent is at least accessible imo. His activity is hardly unusual in a list with 6 bureaucrats, of whom only you and reception have made any edits that can possibly be considered recent. On the other hand dmehus in particular has been rarely sighted around the platform in a long time, and further has no particular global function which commons access makes convenient to perform (commons being an official miraheze project which imo should invite a different train of thought than the 'usual' wiki). A similar argument could be made for Hispano though he might still be conveniently reachable given his recent edits on some wikis. I'm not saying there's no basis for this, but how to resolve the wider problem should be discussed. Perhaps there should be a cleanup of how commons is locally run to encourage proactive local admins & bureaucrats, formally endorse stewards to act as admins/bureaucrats given it is a miraheze project, and otherwise see if there are options to clean up commons as a support wiki for the platform. --raidarr (💬) 17:23, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Pinging @Agent Isai as they had plans to revisit an overhaul of commons post-merger... --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Raidarr, I plan on resuming more regular activity on Miraheze Commons, which, incidentally, were part of my original plans when I joined Miraheze, but got sidelined due to other global responsibilities at the time. That being said, Miraheze Commons is one of those wikis where I think it's useful to have both active local bureaucrats and administrators, but also at the same time allowing Stewards and Global Sysops to act on the wiki without the usual "waiting period" for local interference, so I like your latter suggestion. ;)
- Also, welcome back. Glad to have you back! :) Dmehus (talk) 21:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Note: User has returned to activity. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 10:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 Not done per above --1108-Kiju/Talk 10:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Resigning from Wiki Creator. OrangeStar (talk) 16:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for your help! --Blad (t • c • g) 16:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Sad to see you resign, thank you for your service. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 17:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for your service! ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk Board ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 17:16, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Sad to see you go so soon after appointment. Rights removed. Reception123 (talk) (C) 17:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete right for the Wiki creator, because it is a bad understandable, I not said it's ALL SCIENCE WIKI, but he understand to it and close it. Gongxiang01 (talk) 03:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- That isn't a valid demotion reason. Bad understandings can happen, we aren't trying to be difficult for you, it's just that most of us don't speak Chinese so we can't always understand your wiki requests. There aren't many human translators available that speak Chinese fluently and also fluently speak a language like English or Spanish that wiki reviewers can understand. I've responded to your message on BrandonWM's talk page about this to explain why there was a misunderstanding, but escalating conflict to this level is considered inappropriate behavior on Miraheze, and if we reach a severe situation (which I hope we don't), you may be blocked from participating in some parts of Miraheze due to violations of the Miraheze rules. Please try to resolve disputes as politely as possible without escalating issues unnecessarily. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not done --1108-Kiju/Talk 04:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
FjattarRefreshment@mockupediawiki[edit | edit source]
FjattarRefreshment is an admin on Mockupedia, but he vandalized my userpage for no reason (if my userpage looks not vandalized, thats mean I had revert that, see the page logs please for evidences). I had to revert that but he reverted it again, causing reverting war between I and FjattarRefreshment. The userpage should be written by user itself tho. I'm also an admin on Mockupedia and i tired to revert it back again. So the wiki need to remove FjattarRefreshment from administrator, but the only bureaucrat, Vladislav Fesko is inactive enough to do that. Also he even delete my bureaucrat local election on Mockupedia talk:Community Portal.
HoloCraft (talk) 11:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- (Non-steward comment) As an additional note of conduct, The portal (mockupedia:Mockupedia_talk:Community_portal, case sensitive) was also deleted entirely back in Nov 23, and renamed to 'Poor protesters' objects'. I am not familiar with Steward polices on local permission revocation and will not pretend to be, I just include this for clarification and ease of finding the typo linked page(although I don't in any way think it would be incorrect to say this is in no way conduct becoming of a local sysop, I leave all judgments of the matter to Stewards). ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 12:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is a case that has been bounced on the SR for some time and the issues reported during the 'dark age' continue to be taking place. Stewards know where to find me if they'd like further background on this long-running mess. Imo the key here is the local election being subverted which ensures no transfer of power to a more pro/active top management can take place. If Fjattar is not cooperative upon intervention to ensure an election can take place then a sysop removal is probably warranted. Attempts have been made to contact the bureaucrat who just doesn't seem to care, ever. --raidarr (💬) 12:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Btw, the user TLE940mrhz is also an admin and not a sockpuppet of FjattarRefreshment, but he involve of defending FjattarRefreshment, which is also responsible for the local election attacks on mockupedia, so consider to demote him too. (Also please demote them now, there are 41 attacks about my user page and still counting).HoloCraft (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- User:HoloCraft: Perhaps decide that using a user page from login.miraheze.org is a better way, and delete it on your local wiki? Then the problem is solved. Your user page will be shown on all the wiki's you visit.
- Now I agree that a user page is private space, and others shouldn't interfere with it. But if there is no agreement, then perhaps taking it outside of the wiki is the way to go forward.
- Think about that. A steward would delete it from your local wiki, and that would be the final word.
- You can request that on this page as well (I think) Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits
 Auth → 15:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I'm an admin on there, so i can delete that page HoloCraft (talk) 15:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Then ask a Steward to lock your user page, so no admin can edit it. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits Auth → 15:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Warning issued, please let us know if further problems arise. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Changing status to not done, this can be reopened if further meaningful incidents occur. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done, continued election interference after several warnings was deciding factor, insufficient cause for removal of other administrator --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 15:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
<Acnh Player@blookipediawiki>[edit | edit source]
- User groups were sufficiently trashed that I have reset to default user groups and re-assigned permissions that would normally be given on creation. Please do not delete major administrative groups without ensuring that at least one group still has these permissions. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oh thank you. You are a hero Acnh Player (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Bukkit@imaginationlandwiki[edit | edit source]
-- Bukkit[cetacean needed] 23:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Silicona (talk) 11:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Isn't that a bit soon? When his computer goes to sleep, and he is asleep, it can be restarted later in the day again. But hey .. I am only observing. :) Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits Auth → 11:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not really something that needs to be policed, @Agent Isai: is a trusted user and will remove if/when their work is done. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): I have been extremely busy with work-related issues (this wiki is a personal project) and was unable to give any attention to it. I would like to resume the project and the hundreds of hours of work that went into it would be a shame to waste. EdwardW76 (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): Though this is a low edit wiki, the residents of Bohlman Road do find the information on it very useful. Could we have it undeleted, or if that's not possible, at least a dump of the contents? Arnoha (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
I would like to cancel this request as this wiki seems redundant. DemKnux (talk) 21:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): I am currently a student and have not been able to work on this project (personal project) due to my schedule. If undeletion is not possible, I would appreciate potentially having the files so I can work on it on my own time. Thanks! Jom the Squid (talk) 17:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): For personal rason I had to suspend the maintenace of the site for too long. Nevertheless I am still interested in the project and I would restart working on it if restored. Thanks in advance. Lucamauri (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): I've been working on a local instance of this wiki using XAMPP, and I'd like to have this domain open again for eventual porting over - I also have more time available to give it the proper upkeep. Thank you! Whiz (talk) 06:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): It was paused for a while due to other life events, and while I was trying to figure out how to create it and gathering the information needed to enter on it, and I didn't realize there was a time limit, but I would like to start work on it again now.CastlesAndCalamities (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): Was deleted for inactivity, I now have time to develop the wiki further, and to get enough pages to lodge a request to make the wiki immune from inactivity related closures/deletions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WAGRC1 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 14 April 2024
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 05:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 09:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): The wiki was deleted for inactivity as I was only active contributor and I became inactive for while the Wiki was deleted for inactivity so I want the Wiki be restored as I have so hard work and time on it.
Nexovia (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)```Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): 17:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC) I created this wiki for a LARP project that was, during the time of wiki creation, still in its infancy; Now, much more information has been publicized about various aspects of the project, leaving me with actual information to document, and others to help maintain the project, which should result in a more active moderation pattern. Sigea (talk)
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 20:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Reason(s): Actually I had request for permissions in this Wiki cause I had no other wiki but I have my own wiki back there is none active in this wiki it's defunct so I request this wiki be deleted. --Nexovia (talk) 02:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This wiki does not appear to be deleted. Are you requesting permissions on it? This is not the proper venue if so. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 04:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) request is fine コレイReply[reply]
- They are requesting the deletion of a defunct wiki that they want to re-create. Remarking as cannot be undertaken. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 17:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Misread the request. Restoring it because this definitely can be undertaken. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 00:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This wiki is not Nexovia's to be deleted, that right lies with the Dormancy Policy if the wiki is left completely unattended for long enough or with TwitterX, the wiki's sole bureaucrat and requestor. Cannot is the appropriate flag in this circumstance. --raidarr (💬) 01:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I misread the request again, sorry about that, very tired lately. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 04:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Status: In progress
- Reason(s): The game has been on hiatus for a while, but is planned to pick back up this summer--we'd like the wiki to be undeleted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by VFDan (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 April 2024
Status: In progress
- Reason(s): My wiki was deleted for inactivity. The wiki is for a worldbuilding project that I only get to work on sporadically. I try to submit changes to it within the activity window but I missed it this time. --Iinasini (talk) 18:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
- Reason(s): I was very busy with private life so i was not able to contribute much time into this project. But i have more time now and want to contribute to the wiki again. --Jf920 (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Status: In progress
- Reason(s): I would like to recover the wiki (which has gone dormant) as, even if the Rhynia project itself has slowed down, it would be a good place to add things pertaining to its extended universe, with other connected projects we are working on. Thanks a lot! --Quark-Nova (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- @Exsedol Regex Fun is not currently deployed on Miraheze, as such, you would need to open a Phorge task for SRE to handle using this form(this page is for requesting stewards to enable restricted extensions. Phorge is for requesting new ones). I note however that the extension appears to be unmaintained for some time now, so I'm not sure it would pass a security review. ╚pixDeVl╝ (T|C) 03:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Marking as cannot do, as mentioned by PixDeVl these are not supported extension and appropriate path forward is requesting SRE review via issue-tracker.miraheze.org. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Enabled, pinging SRE team for final setup. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Cannot be undertaken, SMW conflicts with WikiBase. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Hello, I'm an Dungeon Rampage administrator. I'd like to apply for an exemption from the dormancy policy. The wiki serves as a useful store of information on the game, but has been finished as most information has already been documented and any new information regarding the game is non official one. I believe it fulfills the criteria for "Wikis made to be read, where a lot of information is already on wiki and doesn't need to be actively edited.". - User:Rushuby 8:12 PM Saturday, February 17, 2024 (UTC)
- @Rushuby: this is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 23:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Hello! I'm the sole admin of the Murder Fabrication Wiki, which I requested. This is a Wiki for a personal project, which is meant to be read by the (current and potential) readers of a story I'm writing and for which I am the only possible contributor. The Wiki is largely complete in regards to what is publicly available. This is a story (and by extension a Wiki) I've been writing for years and am continuing to write, but my public updates are bound to be irregular, which is why updates to the Wiki could at times be few and far between despite very much being up-to-date. I think my Wiki could fit the "Wikis made to be read, where a lot of information is already on wiki and doesn't need to be actively edited" criteria. Thank you for your consideration! Ninjan (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I am unable to grant an indefinite exemption, but will grant a one-year exemption that will expire in 2025. In the interim, our new dormancy policy should come into effect soon which will massively extend dormancy/deletion windows. Thank you for your continued dedication to your project. :) --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 23:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you! I'll do my best to stay up to date with the changes to the Dormancy Policy. Ninjan (talk) 10:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
I would like to make a Dormancy Policy Exemption Request for the wiki Cholecalciferol.
While I will keep updating the wiki the data that is collected there is valuable for future readers and researchers. I also refer people to the resource as required. The pace of updates has slowed down but may pick up again if other parts of the project get reactivated. Should I loose access to it I would be distressed if all the hard work were to evaporate.
The basis for the request is
- Wikis made to be read, where a lot of information is already on wiki and doesn't need to be actively edited.
The bulk of the data is collected on the medical research page
DOI
and on my personal biography page
Bio
Thank you
KalleMP (talk) 21:12, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Current body of content does not qualify for a dormancy exemption, but I am happy to report that our Dormancy Policy will soon be amended to extend the minimum time between start of inactivity and a wiki being eligible for deletion to a full year. I hope this will meet your needs once implemented . --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 23:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The expected changes to extend the time make the situation less onerous but does not resolve the problem of preserving access to knowledge if I should happen to no longer be able to maintain it.
- Please indicate where I can examine what is required for a body of content to qualify to see if I am able to comply.
- KalleMP (talk) 12:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): We are a sub-group that is migrating from the Fandom No Man's Sky wiki to our own wiki here. On the Fandom wiki, Cargo was utilized in many places and we have hundreds of pages which utilize the Cargo extension. It would be a tremendous task to reformat our pages that utilize Cargo if we are unable to use this extension. ApexFatality93 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Enabled, pinging SRE team for final setup. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done --1108-Kiju/Talk 01:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you --Tokinohiroba (talk) 06:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done Agent Isai Talk to me! 17:10, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Enabled, pinging SRE to complete setup. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
{{Information
|description =
|source =
|author =
|date =
|permission =
|other_versions =
}}
- Sorry, Moving this to Admin board. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits 👀 Auth → 22:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not done per above. --1108-Kiju/Talk 02:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): The wiki is made to be read, adding to the fact that the wiki was developed and raised almost by a lone woof. It would be gradually updated as new informations has been available to me. Pisces (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Wiki has sufficient content to qualify as made to be read. Exemption granted. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Enabled, please be aware this extension may cause problems when large number of categories/content pages, don't hesitate to reach out to get it disabled if you encounter problems... --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:49, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- I don't think that here is possible, wait for the admins to say if they can do that EmicraftNoob (talk) 00:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Emicraftnoob:, This was actually a relatively recent addition thanks to our SRE team, another example of a WT innovation making it back to MH. :D --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- Reason(s): Dot-Zip is still a "small" project with limited new info + The sole editor sometimes suffers from burnout and the wiki may not be updated for extended periods of time because of these reasons Shouganai (talk) 01:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This wiki unfortunately does not meet the criteria for exemption per Dormancy Policy, however I am happy to report that our dormancy and deletion times have now been substantially expanded thanks to a recent RfC and deletion no longer occurs for a period of up to a year of inactivity. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:15, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 07:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): Generate dynamic tables based on attributes
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 07:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): This is a private wiki where the sole contributor is myself, I am using categories to organize content and would like any categories I link on a page to be auto-created rather than having to create the pages manually. I am aware of the risks. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sillyvizion (talk • contribs) 05:44, 13 March 2024
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 07:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- Semantic Forms is not a restricted extension, however Semantic MediaWiki, which this extension relies on, is. Does your wiki have Semantic MediaWiki enabled, and, if not, do you want us to enable it for you? Alex (Miraheze) (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @John Morris: SMW is enabled on this wiki, you can enable it yourself on ManageWiki by first enabling PageForms (which Semantic Forms Select depends on), then enabling Semantic Forms Select. Let us know if you have any issues. Alex (Miraheze) (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Well of course I can! Thanks for the headsup Alex, appreciate it much and all your work and time here, thanks. John Morris (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- You can mark this as complete, thanks again Alex :) John Morris (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 08:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Done Alex (Miraheze) (talk) 11:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 02:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This has been enabled, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
- Reason(s): Setting up a species template for the wiki so the information of the species can be clearly seen. Already got the Cargo Tables plugin for this, but I believe I also needed this one for it to truely work. OviraptorFan (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This can be done by any bureaucrat on the wiki via https://evosystem.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:ManageWiki/extensions#mw-section-parserhooks and does not require Steward intervention. Closing as Redundant. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Reason(s): The auto archive feature comes into effect too often. While the wiki is meant to have no new content or information on it until the next game (relating to the wiki) releases, And can be documented here. CuteFame (talk) 17:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- If you're referring to our dormancy policy, this wiki unfortunately does not qualify for such an exemption given the limited body of work currently hosted. However, our Dormancy Policy has recently changed to be substantially more generous, only triggering an inactivity notice after 2 months, closure notice at 4 months, and deletion eligibility only after a full year of no edits. We hope this better-meets your needs given the infrequent need for editing. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Status: Done
- Could you specify a reason please? --Blad (t • c • g) 17:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I attempted to, I guess it didn't go through. The wiki itself is mostly done, and the only edits are for minor grammar/spelling fixes, and whenever the game has a major update, which is quite rare. Miracrab (talk) 01:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Approved, wiki meets requirements of substantial body of work + limited need for updates given game's development state.
Status: Done
- Done --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 02:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
- Reason(s): This wiki has no active administrators or bueraucrats, and it lacks almost all of the extensions it tries to use, making the wiki's pages very broken. As I would like to edit this wiki, I am requesting that templatestyles and PortableInfobox be enabled so that the wiki is actually functional. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 17:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Status: Done
Yes, this is not the first time this wiki gets reported. However, previous reports - one by BrandonWM, and another by Buzzfan120 on Raiddar's talk page, lacked any real substance: they were made with an obvious bias - personal dislike of the subject of the wiki (which doesn't breach Content Policy by itself), and based on assumptions (cartoon stylization and authors' general drawing abilities). I decided to investigate the place by myself (oh well) and I haven't found any proofs of previously reported pages containing underage characters, in fact - none of articles on this wiki contain such.
But two users uploaded a lot of images in March and April, without tying them to any article on the wiki. These images contain some characters which are officially or widely stated to be under 18 - Hatsune Miku, Kagamine Rin and Pit. Images can be seen in wiki's Special:NewFiles, users' contributions pages: one, two.
Also, during my investigation, I managed to find numerous breaches of Code of Conduct - one admin makes mocking edits and leaves plain bad comments @ users, including previously mentioned uploaders: one, two, three, four (I haven't delved for more, but I guess that's enough for some sanctions).
P.S.: as you might notice by my comment on Raiddar's page, I actually first checked the wiki back in April, but was hoping Buzzfan120 will make a proper report here and I'll expand on it. He didn't, and then I just forgot about the topic until now. Checking the wiki again showed me that nothing has changed + revealed the CoC case.
KatozzKita (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- "She", actually. I'm actually a girl. But that's not important right now. I have something to say that's more important: I'm sorry I didn't include enough evidence in my report. I incorrectly assumed that all files on the wiki were Content Policy violations. You, on the other hand, have found plenty of evidence, and based on the evidence you provided, I would have to agree that something needs to be done about this. Buzzfan120 (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This wiki is truly bad for the reputation of Miraheze. This wiki needs to be deleted, and I'm kinda disappointed that we can allow this kind of wiki. This clearly has abuse of minors and harassment. Please get rid of the Wiki ASAP. Also reopening topic. Commetian Empire (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Includes unintentional controversy. Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 21:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC) Reply[reply]
- And that's why you can't be a steward, you put bias at the top, and it doesn't seem like you actually read the report. The users who bulk uploaded images need to be sanctioned and the images deleted, of course, and I suppose wiki administrators have to do this (it seems like they aren't aware of this whole deal). As for the admin acting immature, a steward will know better how to handle this. If neither of those issues will be fixed then the wiki is eligible for shutdown? Checking the wiki again, it seems like nothing has changed. Legroom (talk) 16:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Going to second this that activity has continued and I am putting forth the recommendation for immediate shutdown in compliance with Miraheze Content Policy Section VI. BrandonWM (talk • contributions • global • rights) 05:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
Miraheze administrators:
I will report @原批维基 from the perspective of name and content.
The "批" in "原批维基" is an insult in Chinese language.
- Comment: 「批」in Chinese is a insultive name for a group, in this case, it refers to the players of Genshin Impact. Atom studying itself (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
According to Miraheze's code of conduct , "原批维基" should not be approved.
From this matter, it can be concluded that @原批维基 has violated Miraheze's Code of Conduct violations.
In the https://wiki.yuanpi.eu.org/wiki/高笑坤专题报道 , @原批维基 Publicized the personal information of a citizen of the People's Republic of China named Gao Xiaokun, who did not obtain the consent of Gao Xiaokun.
- Comment: As well as other violations, like 黄俊龙，naming him a "idiot of the year" Atom studying itself (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
From this matter, it can be concluded that @原批维基 has violated Miraheze's Content Policy.
All in all, @原批维基 has violated Miraheze's Content Policy and Code of Conduct violations. I hope the Miraheze administrators can take action on this. Thank you!
--Honglan233 (talk) 17:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Void This report has been filed for two weeks. Can stewards handle it? Honglan233 (talk) 20:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Examples provided are insufficient grounds for closure, though I have removed the personal attack/personally identifying information pages that do violate content policy. Closing this request as not done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotAracham (talk • contribs) 18:16, 14 April 2024
Status: Done
Wiki One was originally requested with the stated intent to "create an encyclopedia with curiosities about emerging artists, singers, actors and include details that others would not include". It appears to have few, if any, articles that meet this scope. It has several articles that are outside the scope, some of which also appear to be directly copied from Wikipedia. For example, Deezer, Giulio Donati, Mysophobia, and digital object identifier. – Jph2 (talk) 16:45, 27 November 2023 (UTC
Status: Not done
Hello, Miraheze,
I am reporting the Polcompball and Polcompball Anarchy Wiki to let you know that this wiki that is rather large has a huge amount of content policy violations.
For starters, this should be obvious, but there are many users on the website that still condone political extremist ideologies and sometimes even violence against certain groups on this wiki, which violates Rules 5 and 7 of the Content Policy. WARNING: Many of these links contain explicit content.
- Exhibit A - This rather prevalent page on Polcompball Anarchy supports a wide array of extremist ideologies, such as eugenicism and totalitarianism, and also supports certain controversial individuals, such as Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin. Additionally, this page also seems to condone violence, as the title contains a gun and mafia hat.
- Exhibit B - This page condones many controversial topics, such as violence and anarchism.
- Exhibit C - Like the last two pages, this page endorses extremist ideologies, some which had caused the deaths of millions, such as communism and anarchism. Additionally, this page endorses an ideology called the "Communization Theory" that Polcompball themselves describe as advocacy for violence to achieve communism.
Additionally, many people have characterized Polcompball to be a toxic community, due to many of these reasons. I highly suggest the Stewards should investigate this wiki and take action neccessary as soon as possible. CincoColinas (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I don't think that we're going to remove wikis due to extreme ideologies, but the pages in question, particularly Exhibit B, show a clear acceptance of violence or some form of removal of humans from Earth. I would second this report and advise Stewards undertake investigation. BrandonWM (talk • contributions • global • rights) 01:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Regarding the "anarchy clause" that simply refers to wikis that don't have a set of policies (whether written or unwritten) or that don't care about enforcing our own Content Policy within Miraheze, it doesn't refer to wikis discussing or even condoning anarchy in general. In the meantime, the Exhibit B page has been deleted. Regarding the others examples, I would agree with what BrandonWM has said in that discussing extreme ideologies isn't something that is banned per se. I would say that unless there's specific examples of encouraging violence and/or other illegal behavior or instances of hate speech towards certain groups there's no cause to remove a page simply for discussing what certain political ideologies are about in general terms. It's not possible for Stewards to fully read the entire pages cited so if you have any specific concerns along the lines of what I said, please do quote them as the pages are very long. Reception123 (talk) (C) 20:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Okay, I suppose. Just keep the wiki in check to make sure it doesn't spill out of control.CincoColinas (talk) 05:11, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Not sure if these are all violations but better safe than sorry:
https://selfemploymenttaxcredit.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page (main page used to be and only other page currently is an advertisement for https://setc.me and according to setc.me: Please be advised that MY SETC is an independent entity and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or in any way officially connected with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) or any government agency, nor any of their subsidiaries or affiliates. The official IRS website is located at www.irs.gov. The name “IRS” and any other related names, marks, emblems, and images are registered trademarks of the IRS and are used only for descriptive and informational purposes.)
https://aitoolsdirectory.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page
https://wikisauce.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page
For more context, read up from https://discord.com/channels/407504499280707585/443926951292567562/1212146966512017449
Collei (talk) (contribs) 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Collei: Thanks for this report! I've closed the first two wikis for commercial activity. As to the last one, it's not very clear to me where the violations are but if there are individual pages that violate the Content Policy there too, please let me know. Reception123 (talk) (C) 06:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The last one is okay now, it doesn't seem to have any pages left because Momoshisha's spam was deleted, but that guy has been spamming across other wikis, maybe warn him to stop advertising whatever "air.ai" is on every wiki he visits. Collei (talk) (contributions) 03:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Also, can pages like this be removed from the wikis that were closed?
- https://selfemploymenttaxcredit.miraheze.org/wiki/SETC_Tax_Credit Collei (talk) (contributions) 03:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
chadsofa is supposed to be documenting various memes from dragon ball, but it does not appear to be doing that.
Examples: (Click Expand; Warning: highly offensive language)
That is not documenting memes. It has wholly diverged from its original purpose (12), taking to insulting others with profanity (3, 5, 7). AmberWing1352 (talk) 09:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for your report. The wiki has been closed for systemic violations of the Content Policy that could not have been remedied within the scope of that wiki. Reception123 (talk) (C) 20:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I notice that the message displayed at the top of the wiki is the same one as the message for inactivity. Won’t they be able to just simply unclose it? AmberWing1352 (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- We have locked managewiki settings, preventing reopen. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
This wiki is duplicate of this. AlPaD (talk) 19:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Forking rules generally only apply to two wikis hosted by Miraheze or if it's clear there's an attempt to 'spite-fork' a wiki from another group by an ousted member. However, this wiki's already fallen into closure due to dormancy, what are you requesting happen in this case? --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The globally banned founder has found me on Discord and he messaged me to ask for the wiki to be deleted for another reason, but he told me that most of the Wiki's pages are duplicates from the other one which I also found out and closed the Wiki (it didn't closed for inactivity, but I've undone it for now). The same user also had another wiki that was deleted and the other wiki isn't hosted by Miraheze too. AlPaD (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Deeply strange, but as you're a bureaucrat on the wiki it's within your rights to request closure. Deleting wiki per request... --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: On hold
This wiki was established at wiki request #34574. The request and the initial establishment of the wiki were used to chat with users on other wikis and to appeal blocking. However, it seems to have been closed by a user since it was taken over by Discord. (Reference)
However, this wiki is now a rejected 変なウィキ (#40997) requested by the user who requested this wiki. This is evident from the site name, main page and Sitenotice, and requester's speech. This would be inappropriate because the scope has been radically changed (and it is a replacement for a request that has been declined by the wiki creator and steward). Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 08:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Warning has been issued, closure will occur in 15 days if not reverted. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
This wiki is against to Content Policy, it too broad scope. Gongxiang01 (talk) 10:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Adding in my 2c as a wiki creator here, the scope is fine-ish in my view. I don't think one sentence is enough to take action on a report as well, though should a more complete report be filled out (cough toxicity cough) in the future, then it should be something to consider. BrandonWM (talk • contributions • global • rights) 15:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- As BrandonWM mentions, wiki reports must contain more information that a single vague sentence, and usually specific examples of pages that demonsthongrate either systemic or individual violations of the Content Policy. Stewards can't be expected to look through an entire wiki to see where the alleged violations took place. Reception123 (talk) (C) 10:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Locally handled
The wiki bettytroyatv.miraheze.org is owned by a different person and not the creator himself which is Betty Troya, me and a friend found out about this since on a page there was a list of banned episodes (which are random streams that are still public) with a reason of the wiki creator saying that one person that are in the streams isnt allowed in the streams when the person said they are taking a 1 year break of joining the livestreams (which according to the creator they think its illegal) The creator has also been harrasing me and my friends (not on the wiki but in email and discord), And some pages (aboiut people that are in the streams and the page Betty Troya TV) were basically copy and pasted from another wiki which is a closed wiki called Mario Player PL Wiki on fandom, Please take this wiki down. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeonChannel (talk • contribs)
- It seems that a bureaucrat on the wiki decided to close it and make it private, presumably as a result of this report. Therefore, since it's been voluntarily closed, no further action is necessary. Reception123 (talk) (C) 16:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
This wiki uses words like "shit" and "ass" all the time. This is so inappropriate, and also this wiki isn't even good. Acnh Player (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for your report. Does this wiki violate the Content Policy? Agent Isai Talk to me! 04:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Nothing in Miraheze's Content or Conduct Polices is prohibitive of the use of low profanity, especially in a humorous and non WP:PA way. Weather it is becoming to use such words in a wiki is a separate matter that in general is not something stewards enforce, but since the wiki is a humorous parody, I can't see any issues. ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 11:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- but shit and ass is not mild profanity. Mild profanity is like "hell" and "damn". Shit is very offensive. Plus, it does say it numerous times. On the sidebar, it says "latest shit" and "my ass voice". On the recent changes, one of the filters are "shit on the pages". This is so rude, and therefore, should lead to wiki closure. Acnh Player (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is a matter of opinion and upbringing. I for example do not consider damn mild or even really low profanity, but I respect if you and others feel differently(I called it low profanity with high profanity meant to be things like racial slurs). Regardless, this is not a matter covered in Miraheze policy. I fully understand and respect if you are offended by the content, but that is not grounds to delete the wiki. I advise you to simply ignore it. ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 16:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- They might have a crude, dare I say potentially shitty choice of words, however to reinforce pixdevl that is not inherently against any Miraheze policy. Miraheze avoids moral guardianship as far as possible to the degree there are wikis which may offend in content, in this case, language. A report is not valid unless it specifically draws upon policy. --raidarr (💬) 20:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The wiki uses very rude words, though. Acnh Player (talk) 04:47, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Oh well. --raidarr (💬) 08:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I found the word "fuck" on a page. They took it way too far. Here: [1] Acnh Player (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I've said worse. Cursing doesn't warrant action on it's own. If it was directed towards a specific person or group of people (ex. "I fucking hate Blad"), then a case may be made here. Otherwise, this is largely harmless and doesn't warrant Steward action. Also, I'll note that quality regarding a wiki is also irrelevant; I'd bet that more than 50% of wikis on here would be gone by now if that was a policy. --Zeus (t • c • g) 18:43, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I would also like to say that wikis such as the polandball wikis (when I last checked) use high amounts of profanity in pages. I think like Zeus/Blad said, as long as it's not targeting certain people or groups is okay. (Like if I openly said Kazakh~Dasai is a fucking loser) I've seen some pretty high amounts of profanity in wikis before. Oh and Blad, your link doesn't seem to work Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 21:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Fixed --Zeus (t • c • g) 22:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- It also said "dickheads", which is offensive to males. This page says it: https://nonciclopedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_aiuto:Aiuto Acnh Player (talk) 00:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- It also says "What the fuck are you doing", and "you do not have permission to shit this page". Acnh Player (talk) 00:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I think there is nothing wrong with using foul language as long as it does not involve discrimination against a particular race, religion, etc. Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 00:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not really??? See previous comments. --Zeus, aka Blad (t • c • g) 02:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Acnh Player Now this is ridiculous. You've been told several times that the sole use of strong language isn't content policy breach/not enough for wiki to get shutdown. Continuing to "develop" this "report" further won't bring you anything but other volunteers getting annoyed by you abusing the (otherwise very important) reports page. One might also suspect that you just personally want the wiki to be shutdown and decided to go with weakest reason imaginable. Or you're just trolling. So please, stop, move on and find another wiki to actually enjoy. Legroom (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- If this spree continues the entire report and matter will be closed because grasping for invalid straws does not make a legitimate report and the request has already been refused. I recommend such poor examples are not replied to further tbh. --raidarr (💬) 09:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: On hold
Forking of Wikipedia: The wiki has 25 articles. Five checked pages yield the following results:
– Jph2 (talk) 17:20, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for the report. I'll give the local bureaucrats a warning and a chance to rectify the violations. Reception123 (talk) (C) 19:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
Around 2 days ago, the Wikicord's founder Ropentiumal Filitrus blocked a user named (LMWIU)Mr.Flame for a dispute happened the day before in the Flame's discord server.
Basically, Ropentiumal raided his server (flooding chats) for personal fun and later Rope banned Flame from Wikicord with the reason "breakdown of relationship" because Ropentiumal was probably afraid of a Flame's revenge (like ruining the wiki pages).
Despite that reason, Flame didn't provoke Ropentiumal in any way.
Until yesterday, we discussed the situation in the Wikicord Discord server but nothing has been risolved yet. For all this day, Ropentiumal wasn't online and a user contacted him by the talk page of Rope, he still hasn't responded.
Flame's got already unlocked by an admin by the way.
- YvinciY 17:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- DrPizzaIV (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- No clear pattern of on-wiki behavior established, no steward action is warranted at this time beyond warning @Ropentiumal Filitrus: against arbitrary/excessive use of bans for handling off-wiki interpersonal grievances. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 20:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, thanks.
- YvinciY 5:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Status: Done
Link to the request. This has been open for way over 7 days by now. OrangeStar (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done by Reception123. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 17:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Not only is it snowing, but it appears that there is also some badgering and other unwanted behavior. Nothing further productive is going to come from this discussion and the community has already spoken. I suggest a speedy closure. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 10:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done by Reception123. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 00:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Laronpigford (talk) 03:24, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Incorrect venue, but intent to request undeletion is clear. This is now Done, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
- MichaelTen (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
please restore this. why was it deleted? https://csx.miraheze.org/
thank you. MichaelTen (talk) 08:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This has already been addressed via an undeletion request on the SR board, closing as redundant. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- Momoshisha (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Closing request, this wiki is not eligible for reopening as it was closed by stewards due to violations of content policy (commercial clause). --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- DBS Historian (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The wiki in question was closed for Content Policy violations (log action); please discuss a potential reopening with the Steward who closed it. Tali64³ (talk | contributions) 23:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- It entirely454 (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The wiki is active and still needed and I don't know the reason it was closed for.
- Please provide the URL of the wiki you want reopened; if you're referring to chadsofa.miraheze.org (which you have the most contributions on), see the above request. Tali64³ (talk | contributions) 23:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Closing as malformed due to no response to Tali's comment about no wiki being specified. Feel free to reopen this if you are genuinely requesting that a specific closed wiki be reopened. If you are requesting undeletion of a wiki (i.e. to remove the "Wiki deleted" notice from a wiki), please go to Steward requests/(Un)deletions. Collei (talk) (contributions) 02:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Stedef (talk) 10:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Stedef: Hi there. The wiki in question appears to have been
 soft-deleted by Miraheze. This means that while the wiki isn't accessible to the public, the content and data stored has not been deleted yet. Please go to Steward requests and submit a request for the wiki to be un-deleted under the Wiki (un)deletions tab. Please let me know if you have any questions. Collei (talk) (contributions) 22:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- @Nairrata: Hi there. The wiki in question appears to have been soft-deleted by Miraheze. This means that while the wiki isn't accessible to the public, the content and data stored has not been deleted yet. Please go to Steward requests and submit a request for the wiki to be un-deleted under the Wiki (un)deletions tab. Please let me know if you have any questions. Collei (talk) (contributions) 02:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- TopHeroes (talk) 15:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Assuming this is geelum from discord, I've notified them there about paying a visit to SR/P and requesting an appointment per the local elections guidelines as the wiki was never edited by its requestor. --raidarr (💬) 16:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Permissions have been granted, user @Tophereoes: is now fully empowered with control of this wiki. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- BNKdesigns (talk) 07:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @BNKdesigns: Hi there. The wiki in question appears to have been soft-deleted by Miraheze. This means that while the wiki isn't accessible to the public, the content and data stored has not been deleted yet. Please go to Steward requests/(Un)deletions and submit a request for the wiki to be un-deleted. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 08:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- Dudejensen24 (talk) 09:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This wiki was closed due to a determination of incompatibility with content policy and will not be reopened. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 15:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Aka Manko (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The wiki has been deleted permanently; it cannot be restored. Please request a new wiki here. Tali64³ (talk | contributions) 21:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- Pasmorade (talk) 12:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Allpedia, a free-editing wiki without a defined wiki topic, is not compatible with our content policy and as such this request cannot be undertaken. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 03:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Reason(s): I have to add more episodes, characters, templates, etc to give the Wikia more information. It's been a while since I haven't worked on this wiki. And yes, im the creator and bureaucrat of this wiki. CRAJ (talk) 05:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, should you need to undelete a wiki, going forward please utilize the Steward_requests/(Un)deletions board for a timely response. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- TiberianEuan (talk) 01:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes, but the site has been deleted
- @TiberianEuan: Hi there. The wiki in question appears to have been soft-deleted by Miraheze. This means that while the wiki isn't accessible to the public, the content and data stored has not been deleted yet. Please go to Steward requests and submit a request for the wiki to be un-deleted under the Wiki (un)deletions tab. Please let me know if you have any questions. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 17:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
work has been stopped.
- יוסף בן מלמד (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Already handled via the deletions page, closing as redundant. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 15:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
- EvilScientist3 (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @EvilScientist3: This wiki was closed deliberately. Its founder, ImJustNes should be contacted to hand over control if possible. --raidarr (💬) 23:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
- Vacci (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Redundant, handled via SR/undeletions page. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeathInABottle (talk • contribs) 17:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Closing as redundant, the notice is no longer appearing on any key page I can identify. Please leverage the Purge action under the Tools menu or make a minor edit to the relevant page if you're still seeing this banner. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
- Zennicai (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This has been Done, please ensure an edit is made in a timely fashion to avoid reclosure --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
I'm requesting a Dormancy Policy exception for our wiki (unfortunately the CAPTCHA doesnt let me post links). Our wiki is designed as a stable, read-only repository for fans of the mod, providing insights into the lore behind countries, individuals, wars, parties, etc. Also, it's important to note that the only contributors to the wiki are individuals actively involved in the development of the mod. And as our mod is our primary focus, and the wiki, while valuable, is a secondary project, we may not be able to dedicate frequent attention to it, but we do strive to maintain the wiki. Updates might occur within large periods of time, due to the nature of our development schedule.
For all the aforementioned reasons, I do believe that our wiki should be under a dormancy policy exception.
Führerredux (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Declining request, limited content/viewers and private wiki, does not meet dormancy exemption criteria.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
Requesting Dormancy Exception for https://gladiators.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page due to it holding alot of info about Gladiators TV Show that would be read by the public so wouldn't need alot of activity unless updating stuff. DinoDude (talk) 10:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Content is largely duplicative of Wikipedia content on same topic, does not meet requirements for dormancy exemption. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: On hold
Hello there,
I had edited on about Windows XP under that username seen in that edit. Is it possible to link that username with my email NOW? I would like to link that account with my email address. It was my editing. Please also locate all the edits under that username.
Thank you for your time and understanding and help. -- Cybernarses (talk) 05:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- One email can be used for more than one different MediaWiki account; you can just add the email to the account if you still have access to it. If you have lost access to that account, it is pretty much a given that SRE will not manipulate that account unless there are exceptional circumstances that mean you can prove that the account in question is yours (such as a committed identity, etc). Are you asking for the two accounts to be merged so that the edits are reattributed to your new account, or are you just asking for a list of the edits made under that account? If the former, that is also probably going to be a no unless you can prove that account is owned by you. Original Authority (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Actually both. For the later, "are you just asking for a list of the edits made under that account?", I cannot see any contribution even though I can log on to [2] with cybernarses account.
- As for the former, what proof do you need? -- Cybernarses (talk) 03:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Pinging to confirm as this seems to have gotten missed, is this request still needed? --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
I am currently the sole bureaucrat and editor of the following 2 wikis.
- Vale's Ultimate Archive Project (Private) - A personal archive project covering several communities I've been involved with online, and their history. Primarily used by me, though I will allow others that I trust in later on (there is 1 person I currently have in mind). This wiki is currently my priority, though I anticipate it will have periods of inactivity in the future, especially due to the amount of editors.
- Project Exonaut Wiki (Public) - A wiki about the defunct online game, Project Exonaut. With the game having shut down years ago, and most needed information already being on the wiki after moving from Fandom, my activity will likely be inconsistent. I don't see other editors being interested in it for the forseeable future, and the wiki will also reach a state of relative completion in the future, at which point edits will be minimal.
Because of the reasons listed above I'd like to request indefinite exemptions for both wikis. I can elaborate further if needed, though. Thank you.
ValeOfVoid (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Status was not preserved, per original response both wikis do not meet requirements for exemption. Marking not done. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Resolved
Hello, I am requesting the unblocking of the Nintendo Wiki (https://nintendo.miraheze.org/wiki/) home page, as I intend to start a local election on this wiki and in accordance with the rules, I need to leave a message in a prominent place to explain my approach.
Thanks in advance. Darkrai18 (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Seeing as a local election was held on the main talk page without any interaction from the remaining community, I have appointed you to Bureaucrat on the wiki. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:44, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you very much. Darkrai18 (talk) 23:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Hello, I'm an Assault Android Cactus wiki bureaucrat. I'd like to apply for an exemption from the dormancy policy. The wiki serves as a useful store of information on the game, but has not been updated in a while and is unlikely to be updated very often in future since most of the important information is already there and the game itself is not being updated. I believe it fulfills the criteria for "Wikis made to be read, where a lot of information is already on wiki and doesn't need to be actively edited.". Thank you 🙂 Seajay (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- On review, substantial documentation with no external alternative. Approved for dormancy. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
Hello, so for the past 3 or 4 years, there's this bug that when creating a blog, there's this error code that says "Error: There is already a blog post with that title. Please choose a different title for your blog post." even though there never was another blog with the same title a new one is made beforehand, and this has been confusing other users into thinking that they DID already make blogs that already got made, often causing them to create duplicate blogs by accident, and this issue has been going on for 3 or 4 years, so I'm wondering if this can be fixed or if it's just flatout beyond repair. Thanks. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Yeah, i noticed that a while ago. I would think making a task on Phabricator would help fix it. Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 23:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- How does making a task on Phabricator work, though? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I could do it if you want me to, I've done multiple tasks before. Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 17:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Sure you can do that. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Alright, i have now put up a task on Phabricator for it. Hope it gets fixed soon! Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 20:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Is the extension named BlogPage? Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 01:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I haven't tried to make a blog yet because of other things on LCW going on right now, but I'll try to check out this BlogPage thing in a moment. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Okay. Im asking because people (on Phabricator) are wanting to know which extension it is, since there are multiple. I have had that problem before on my own wiki. Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 13:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The other issue is that there is a high chance it's something upstream and if it is, it totally depends on the original extension developers and there's little Miraheze can do. Either way you're at step nothing if it's not clear which blog extension it even is. --raidarr (💬) 09:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Okay. The extension is BlogPage. I get that same problem on my wiki that uses it. Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 15:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Closing as cannot be undertaken, phorge:T11866 has been filed and is the appropriate venue for further support as this is not a steward matter. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Resolved
It's me, Zenko/Vos. I had this account for a while and I want to abandon it for good by globally locking it because, as said those years ago, I don't want to be targeted nor harassed by any dangerous trolls or communities. I would appreciate if you would globally lock my Fox account like you did before with my other ones. I have moved on to be anonymous and live a peaceful, happy life now that no other user knows and I want to live safe from now on. Thank you, and good bye. Fox (talk) 20:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done by either Zippix or Void Commetian Empire (talk°•◇•°CentralAuth) 20:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Resolved
Hi there,
Would you be able to reinstate maiasongcontest.miraheze.org and avalon.miraheze.org please? Think they went inactive but wanted to get these back up.
Many thanks,
Josh AuroraBorealis (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- See Requests for reopening wikis. Thank you, Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Globe, RfRW is not the correct venue for wikis that have already been deleted and fully removed from our databases, that is only appropriate when wikis are closed/inactive and a user would like to take over when there is no active crat to resume work.
- @AuroraBorealis, as these wikis are fully gone, the next step would be to file a new request for a wiki, you can choose to request the same subdomain or a new one as you see fit.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I apologize for the confusion. When the author said they "went inactive" I thought that mean't that the wiki hadn't been fully deleted yet. Thank you for your correction. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 11:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Is there no way of restoring previous content for this? -AuroraBorealis (talk) 15:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Resolved
This user has blocked many users (including me) on his wiki and speaks with many derogatory comments ([3], [4], [5]). AlPaD (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
@Reception123: Thank you for your help! Could you remove all blocks from this wiki (except the oldest) please? AlPaD (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- We do not, as a rule, remove blocks that local administrators have done on their personal wikis unless there's a clear and compelling reason to do so. Is this in regards to a block on Meta or their personal wiki? --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 21:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Should also be noted that, the user mentioned has been locked for conduct policy AmberWing1352 (talk) 22:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The wiki should be deleted in accordance with the statements on the user's talk page on Meta "You can delete the wiki as far as I'm concerned", especially as it's a personal project and the author saw himself out. The blocks will resolve themselves when the wiki inevitably drops. --raidarr (💬) 22:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Ah, yep. I just saw that more clearly stated on a further talk page message. Deleted.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- OK, thank you for your help! AlPaD (talk) 05:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
- Per Dormancy Policy, a body of work must exist first before requesting a dormancy exemption. Marking this as Not done. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
Currently, the Project namespace is "Meta", but the Project talk namespace is "Miraheze Meta talk", which does not match. Please change in Special:ManageWiki/namespaces/4#mw-section-namespacetalk. Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 14:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This would make more sense to request on Meta:Administrators' noticeboard. Collei (talk) (contribs) 07:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Moved.-- Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 14:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
See the long list of growth service spam pages at https://wm-bot.wmflabs.org/libera_logs/%23miraheze-cvt/20240227.txt. The spam pages need to be deleted. Thanks. Collei (talk) (contribs) 04:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- All identified ranges blocked, majority of matching pages identified have been deleted. Due to the challenges of cross-wiki IP contributions, please provide specific links if more are discovered.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by NotAracham (talk • contribs) 19:46, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I found a few more and posted them on the CVT Discord channel. Collei (talk) (contributions) 19:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
A couple of days ago I made a wiki request for miraHow and Redmin declined the request for being too broad. But - half a year ago - I made a request for The Miraheze Cookbook and Tali643, which was a wiki creator at that time, accepted that request. Lots of people including Imamy are interested in The Miraheze Cookbook.
I clearly explained how broad miraHow is and Redmin still declined again.
Let's compare The Miraheze Cookbook vs miraHow:
| Type |
miraHow |
The Miraheze Cookbook
|
| Recipes |
|
|
| Art and craft projects |
|
|
| Scientific projects |
|
|
| DIY projects |
|
|
| Technical projects |
|
|
| Health projects |
|
|
| Ingredients |
|
|
| Culsines |
|
|
| Nutrition |
|
|
| Equipment |
|
|
In summary, miraHow would have similar in broadness to The Miraheze Cookbook.
I would like stewards to look at this wiki request and determine if the wiki request is approved. If not, I'll create a RfC about broadness thresholds of wikis.
See Special:RequestWikiQueue/41834. Silicona (talk) 18:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- All I have to do is look at your table to see that the wiki creators made the correct decision in both cases. Your miraHow proposal is obviously too broad. A wiki that combines recipes and ingredients, cuisine, and nutrition is all obviously on the same topic. A wiki that combines recipes, DIY home repair, and scientific research is obviously a free-for-all. This "controversy" makes less sense than Gamergate, even. Labster (talk) 19:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Steward adding my two cents here:
- Tali was self-admittedly rushing through requests to clear the queue and wasn't adhering to review standards 100% of the time, the original cookbook request is not one I would have approved as-is for a few reasons...
- Both wiki names convey an officiality that shouldn't have been/isn't permissible to approve
- The guiding principle of request review is that a wiki must have a clearly defined topic and scope to be approvable.
- the cookbook arguably has that (topic and scope limited to cooking)
- The MiraHow request does not, as you may have infinite articles on infinite topics, verging on a WMF-like project.
- This concept of defined topic and scope has always been a piece of the review process since I started as a WC, the difference is that we now have sufficient WC volunteers (and veterans to provide guidance) to properly apply review standards. While I don't personally see a need for an RfC on this topic, I would *strongly* encourage you to use the drafting process before launching one.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Not to pile on here, but I agree with NA, Labster, and Redfin on this. The scope of your wiki to too broad. Comparing it to the Miraheze cookbook is meaningless. I'd ask you to, again, stop creating (or threatening to create) pointless RfCs. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 20:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Silicona: I would like to add a comparison.
- When you go to town for shopping for dinner, you go into a grocery store around the corner who provides you the ingredients. It's limited what you can get there. You won't find a chainsaw there.
- When you want to create a dollhouse for your little girl, you go to the hardware store. But you won't find a cookbook there.
- Now you could go to a Shopping center with a hardware store, a bakery, a supermarket, a book store etc. That's what a WikiHow is compared to our other wiki's with a limited scope like a bakery, a hardware store, a book store, etc.
- I do like your idea, but the scope is too broad as mentioned above. As such it was declined. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits 👀 Auth → 10:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
There is a current X account, but it has no edits and was created many years ago. I'd like to request a usurpation for that account so I can claim that username. I use it on many wikis like TestWiki, The Test Wiki, MakeaWiki, etc. If usurpations aren't allowed, please let me know. Thank you. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 15:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- There is no policy to allow for usurpation of inactive accounts by unrelated users, closing this as cannot be undertaken, thanks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 18:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- There have been cases where this has been done in fact, especially where there are 0 edits and the user has been contacted via their talkpage but has not replied. In this case however, I don't think it's particularly fair for a user to adopt such a generic username as "X" since there could clearly be multiple "contenders" for such a username. Reception123 (talk) (C) 13:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I am willing to reach out to them via talk page as is done on Wikipedia. Every other wiki(farm) I am on I use the username X. Miraheze is the only one where I am not named as such. While I understand it is generic, I think the fact that I use it on many other wikis does make up for that aspect. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 13:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- But what if Elon Musk wants to sign up? Collei (talk) (contributions) 17:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good point Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 18:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Special:Contributions/134.255.243.2 (which tried to make a spam page, see their abuse log) is an open proxy.
IP range: https://ipinfo.io/AS25369/134.255.243.0/24 Collei (talk) (contributions) 08:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Perhaps a global block request to Steward requests/Global would be more appropriate. Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 09:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Since you've reported this I'll be blocking the range but please do note that unless edits actually get through (i.e. if they're stopped by AbuseFilter) there's no need to report them as it would create too much unnecessary work for CVT and isn't needed unless they act. Reception123 (talk) (C) 15:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
In my submission, it was described as a cyclical fantasy world. Now it is a site focusing around correcting the errors by a group of hobbyists called battleboarders- not by insulting them, but by refuting their philosophy and making accurate character pages. VSBW (Vs Battle Wiki) is one of the biggest battleboarder sites- this is made to counter their misinformation.
Avinselavinz (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Approved for scope change please ensure that you follow all Content Policy rules and best practices on factual contents/neutral point of view when discussing real people. You can update site tagline information via Special:ManageWiki/core on your wiki. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 17:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
I would like to request a dormancy exception for my wiki https://ukwxp.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page. It is setup to be a resource on how to competitively play the now abandonware PC arena fighter Ultimate Knight Windom XP. There are some strategy sections that could be filled out and edited over time but there isn't anything that needs to be actively edited as the game has not been updated since 2009. Most of the info on the wiki was personally tested by myself including character specifics, mechanics and a short-hand guide to setting up netplay. I've taken precautions to make sure the wiki can't be vandalized in-case I go prolonged periods without checking it.
Pompadude (talk) 04:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Done Reception123 (talk) (C) 12:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: On hold
Html has kept re-opening their wiki request after having been declined and told to not resubmit no less then 10 times now. This is now a CIR issue as clearly the user has abused the wiki request system. See Special:RequestWikiQueue/40997#mw-section-comments. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 10:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Thank you for the suggestion. It makes sense, but I issued a warning to him first. I hope this solves the problem, but if it doesn't I will block his wiki request. --1108-Kiju/Talk 11:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Cannot be undertaken
Currently, I have two wiki reqeusts (TerraWorld; SuperFeral Wiki). While I understand that Stewards are not like robots to make reviews fast (after all, they're volunteers and might be busy in real life), I would like to see the process being sped up; I remember it took me less than an hour for my prior wiki requests to be reviewed, but nowadays it takes much longer. I would also like to see my further wiki requests by me having overall faster reviews. PiSoda (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- No. All of the stewards and wiki creators are volunteers. They donate their time, effort, and resources to help Miraheze continue to grow. To insist they work faster, or to request an expedited review causes unnecessary pressure on our volenteers. As for previous requests taking less than an hour, that was a previous wiki creator who has since acknowledged that he was reviewing at an unsustainable rate. Globe - (Talk • Contributions • CA) 23:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- About the wiki requests being approved in an hour, the fast speed of reviews led to sometimes denying genuine requests and approving bad requests, creating unnecessary work for Stewards, this is why we don't expect volunteers to approve them at such a fast speed now. コレイ (talk) (contributions) 03:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Redundant
Wiki: lemmingmediawiki.miraheze.org
If it isn't possible, then i understand. <div style="color: blue;">Lemming</div> (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- SR/RC is much better place.-- Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 03:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Already resolved in SR/RC so I close this request as redundant.-- Waki285(talk|contrib|log|CA|Target) 11:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
This will need to be in several parts. In the first part, User:Doug will need to be usurped as Doug. Note that the user is a 7 year old user accounts with zero global edits, as the edits on rosettacodewiki were not that user's edits, but rather were attributed to the user as the user had the same username as a user on the former rosettacodewiki (which was imported to Miraheze)
In the second part, you will need to globally rename me to Doug (without leaving redirects).
As part of the second part, SRE will likely need to run an SQL command to update my username from Dmehus to Doug in the global block table, as I believe a bug exists that that is not updated with the global rename
In the final part, can you create a new user Dmehus, and e-mail the password to my personal e-mail address (message me on IRC if you do not have it), to prevent impersonation?
Finally, I also own User:Doug on WikiTide, so this will make a much smoother transition and integration.
Cheers,
Dmehus (talk) 17:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
Hi, I was told that I can't change the topic of my wiki so this is my approval submission
I'd like 2 change the topic of my wiki stardom.miraheze.org (Original topic was here bt i'd like 2 change the topic 2 to be an informative site about my books on Wattpad. the topic of my stardom wiki is already about one of my Books so I think it would be a good starting point for this new reflection. Also, i am good w/ keeping up activity on my wikis as can be seen at my oblasia.miraheze & outwit.miraheze wikis ! Ok ty sorry for the brief lettering Kimoraaa (talk)
- Approved, thanks for reaching out first! --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 03:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
I wanted to change my username from Drocsid0217 to DrC 9990 only to realize that underscores would become spaces. I do not want spaces in my username. I now want my username to be changed to DRS9990 instead of DrC 9990. Plus it sounds like I am saying "don't really care" when I say DrC 9990. Drocsid0217 (talk) 01:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is now Done, thanks. Please allow a few minutes for global renaming to complete. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 16:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: On hold
Please change the wiki database 'mathematicswiki' to 'fanonpediavnwiki'.
my wikis: https://mathematics.miraheze.org/wiki/Trang_Ch%C3%ADnh Liên minh Dư Công (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- @Liên minh Dư Công: when I advised this page through Discord, I did so for the purpose of authorizing the scope change. Are you intending to change the wiki from mathenatics to fanonpedia, and have you gotten/are you seeking authorization to do so? When this is cleared up/if approved, the database change can be requested on Phorge. --raidarr (💬) 16:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- But I want to change my wiki to Vietnamese fanonpedia and fanonpedia only has one language which is English and I change my wiki to Vietnamese fanonpedia. Liên minh Dư Công (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- If I'm understanding this correctly, if you wish to ask for a scope change, you should ask for it here first. Afterwards, I believe you should request a subdomain change. --Zeus (t • c • g) 18:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Now, I'll wait but can you change it?
- Database: fanonpediavn
- fanonpediavn.miraheze.com Liên minh Dư Công (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This is not the correct avenue for database renames. Get confirmation from stewards to change the scope, then open a task on Phorge ╚pixDeVl╝ (Talk ✦ Contributions ✦ CentralAuth) 17:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Per above, please provide more context on the planned scope and contents of the wiki following the change in topic. We only have a new name at the moment, and more context is needed before we can sign off on the change.
- --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- FYI: That request was denied by me.
- I suggested: TIP: While working on "mathematics", you can start working on content for another wiki in your User Name space. This way you are not limited to this wiki's topic. You can than - when ready - request a new wiki and show what you have made. If approved, you can copy the pages over to the new wiki.
- I still stand by that, but he wants to have two wiki's, not explaining why. Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 Talk ✉️ Email 📝 Edits Auth → 00:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Done
I am User:LazyLucyFan but I cannot access that account (which was recently renamed) - the global rename got stuck on something called "undictionary" and now I can't get back in. Can a steward finish up the rename of my main account for me? Thanks! LLFbackup (talk) 01:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Now I need 2 other deleted wikis "wikich" and "wikilouco" dealt with. LLFbackup (talk) 01:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- This appears to have already completed, my apologies, the queue is automated and sometimes may take a bit to complete tasks. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 02:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: Not done
It seems that the username Re.min.a may violate the Username Policy, particularly the following:
- Usernames that are deliberately similar to other usernames in the possible scope of impersonation (i.e. user a is called "Example", user b is called "Examplee")
Re.min.a may be confused by Redmin, who is a wiki creator.
Let's take a look at the username and determine if there is any confusion:
Re.min.a
Redmin
Can stewards review the username? Silicona (talk) 18:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Per comments elsewhere, this has been reviewed and found permissible. Marking as done, but if you'd like another steward to weigh in, please feel free to reset to 'in progress'. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- I don't see a problem with it either. The names are somewhat similar, but I believe they fall in the category of unintended similarity. This degree of similarity on its own is not a sign of (attempted) impersonation, especially given the users' tenure and good faith contributions to their projects. -- Void Whispers 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Status: In progress
Due to stewards being the de facto bureaucrats on Meta (and that even historically, bureaucrats didn't hold ManageWiki permissions), I wish to have the Citizen skin as an option on Meta. It was used on WikiTide Meta, and is a very good looking skin and I believe that a few other users would like to have such a skin enabled. -- Bongo Cat[cetacean needed] 22:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
|
Steward requests
