Difference between revisions of "User talk:Zppix"

From Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 37: Line 37:
 
::I only would assume reminding one such as you to be evaluating simple comments in good faith and not immediately assuming it is targeted phrasing to be fine. That is indeed offensive and not in good-faith of you to not feel empathy towards us users and understanding the situation is good and morally correct. Please have a sense of understanding and calm your impulses. [[User:Danner|Danner]] ([[User talk:Danner|talk]]) 07:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 
::I only would assume reminding one such as you to be evaluating simple comments in good faith and not immediately assuming it is targeted phrasing to be fine. That is indeed offensive and not in good-faith of you to not feel empathy towards us users and understanding the situation is good and morally correct. Please have a sense of understanding and calm your impulses. [[User:Danner|Danner]] ([[User talk:Danner|talk]]) 07:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 
:::You told me to keep my comments to myself, theres no good faith in that. Zppix ([[User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[Tech:Access|Sysadmin]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 07:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 
:::You told me to keep my comments to myself, theres no good faith in that. Zppix ([[User:Zppix|Meta]] | [[Tech:Access|Sysadmin]] | [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 07:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
  +
::::That was bad wording on my part. You win that segment of the argument, but at least acknowledge to be kinder and more understanding. [[User:Danner|Danner]] ([[User talk:Danner|talk]]) 07:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:32, 18 December 2020



Wiki created[edit source]

Hello, I would like to tell you that I have created your wiki. You can now access it at https://proxybot.miraheze.org. You should automatically have been granted administrator and bureaucrat rights, if that's not the case then please leave a notice on Stewards' noticeboard so we can fix it immediately. Do not hesitate to ask questions if your question was not answered in our FAQ. Also, if you want a extension, gadget, or anything else, please ask us here. Thank you for choosing Miraheze, and we wish you good luck with your wiki! -- Void Whispers 20:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

On wiki creation template[edit source]

You don't need to post it on the requester's talk page anymore, because a notice will be generated to him/her automatically.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (talk/contribs | global🌎) 13:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your email you sent me[edit source]

@Zppix: Hello, zppix you sent me an email via Special:Email I did get a notification however got no email Via gmail nor was I able to open the email could you please email me the Message you sent me On behalf of miraheze staff via my gmail please I really would appreciate that my email is koareba[at]gmail[dot]com --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 18:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Sent Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 01:48, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Requesting a Wiki[edit source]

@Zppix: Hi! When I requested a wiki to be made, it was declined, and your comment was "Info on content not provided". What does that mean? I can provide information if necessary, but there was nothing indicating that I was supposed to include that in any of the pages relating to requesting a wiki *or* the dormancy policy. You can add to my talk page to respond, or email me at meowchant at gmail[dot]com. Thank you for your cooperation. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sicktrus (talkcontribs) 22:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

After exploring a bit, I think I understand, and you don't have to reply to this. But I do think it would be beneficial to add a sentence like "include information about the wiki you want to create" to the "Reason" section of the request form, so it's clearer. I'll edit my request accordingly. Thank you! Sicktrus (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
@Sicktrus: Thank you for amending, and expanding on, your wiki request, which I've now approved as your proposed wiki now has a clearly articulated purpose, scope, and topic. I think your suggestion to Zppix is reasonable that his responses could provide a little more detail on what is needed. I'd be happy to share with him some of my canned decline responses, if he wants to use them. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks (not really)[edit source]

Thank you for assuming I never read any of the policies. I did in fact read them before you told me to, sir. End of discussion. Danner (talk) 07:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Great, then you know being civil is required. And making comments like you did on the sectipn about the report extension are infact not so. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 07:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
I only would assume reminding one such as you to be evaluating simple comments in good faith and not immediately assuming it is targeted phrasing to be fine. That is indeed offensive and not in good-faith of you to not feel empathy towards us users and understanding the situation is good and morally correct. Please have a sense of understanding and calm your impulses. Danner (talk) 07:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
You told me to keep my comments to myself, theres no good faith in that. Zppix (Meta | Sysadmin | talk to me) 07:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
That was bad wording on my part. You win that segment of the argument, but at least acknowledge to be kinder and more understanding. Danner (talk) 07:32, 18 December 2020 (UTC)