User talk:2600:1008:B04F:F892:88D8:EEA2:887C:4EDE

From Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Your concerning behaviour on stewards' noticeboard

Hi anonymous user,

Please note that I have rolled back these two edits you made on stewards' noticeboard for the following reasons, in order of least important to most or more important.

  1. Your comments did not contain a critical timestamp for our archiving bot. Please make sure you sign your talk page, user talk page, and noticeboard posts, construed broadly, with four tildes (~~~~) rather than three tildes, to include this critical timestamp
  2. Your comments added nothing of value to what was a report, which I previously informed you that, given the span of time involved and that the user you reported had not contributed to wikis where previously locally blocked, was not in violation of user accounts policy. Ideally, yes, it would be wonderful if a previously locked user informed stewards of their plan to begin a clean start and avoid wikis where they had been previously blocked, but I am willing to assume good faith on the part of the user until they show that whatever problems led to their lock are repeating themselves (either on the new wikis or because they returned to previous wikis)
  3. The part I find the most problematic is the fact that you are (attempting to) hide behind the veil of anonymity and secrecy whilst filing grievances (again, without evidence or how the user's clean start runs afoul of user accounts policy). I personally find this to be reprehensible, akin to the next door who makes an anonymous report about the barking dog next door to municipal bylaw enforcement officials. I believe all users have a fundamental right to know their accusers and to refute allegations, regardless of whether such allegations are spurious or legitimate. Indeed, this is right is constitutionally protected in most, if not all, western liberal democracies, such as Canada, the United Kingdom, France, the United States and others

As we don't count votes by anonymous users in RfCs and permissions requests by convention, it logically we holds that we do not take seriously complaints by anonymous users, let alone complaints with little if any evidence. If you have a legitimate complaint, please Special:UserLogin or Special:CreateAccount to either login or create an account, respectively, but I suspect you already know how to do this, and that you already know Miraheze well.

Kindly govern yourself accordingly on Meta.

Regards,
Dmehus (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.