Difference between revisions of "Meta:Requests for permissions"

From Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 141: Line 141:
 
:: {{Done|CheckUser Confirmed Sockpuppet}}  ~ [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] - <sub>[[User talk: RhinosF1|(chat)]]</sub><sup>[[Special:CentralAuth/RhinosF1|· acc]][[Special:Contributions/RhinosF1|· c]] </sup> - ({{User:RhinosF1/sigcol|1=RhinosF1}}) 14:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 
:: {{Done|CheckUser Confirmed Sockpuppet}}  ~ [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] - <sub>[[User talk: RhinosF1|(chat)]]</sub><sup>[[Special:CentralAuth/RhinosF1|· acc]][[Special:Contributions/RhinosF1|· c]] </sup> - ({{User:RhinosF1/sigcol|1=RhinosF1}}) 14:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 
#{{Oppose|Strong}} based on the above, a user who sock puppets on their own RfP doesn't have my trust.  ~ [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] - <sub>[[User talk: RhinosF1|(chat)]]</sub><sup>[[Special:CentralAuth/RhinosF1|· acc]][[Special:Contributions/RhinosF1|· c]] </sup> - ({{User:RhinosF1/sigcol|1=RhinosF1}}) 14:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 
#{{Oppose|Strong}} based on the above, a user who sock puppets on their own RfP doesn't have my trust.  ~ [[User:RhinosF1|RhinosF1]] - <sub>[[User talk: RhinosF1|(chat)]]</sub><sup>[[Special:CentralAuth/RhinosF1|· acc]][[Special:Contributions/RhinosF1|· c]] </sup> - ({{User:RhinosF1/sigcol|1=RhinosF1}}) 14:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 +
#{{Oppose|Strong}} per RhinosF1 Zppix ([[User:Zppix|Meta]] &#124; [[CVT|CVT Member]] &#124; [[User talk:Zppix|talk to me]]) 17:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:11, 18 October 2019

Requests for Permissions

This page is for requesting permissions that can be granted on this wiki.

  • For rights that don't add advanced permissions (like autopatrolled and confirmed) please just leave a note on Meta:Administrators' noticeboard.
  • For rights on another wiki, please take up the matter with the local community.

Here you can leave requests for the following permissions. The community will discuss your request and then a bureaucrat or Steward will close the request, granting rights upon closure of successful requests.

Notes:

  • Rights may only be granted after a request lasted for at least 5 days, and no less than 80% of the votes (only support and oppose are votes) are support votes;
  • Although anonymous users may express their opinions, logging out to leave additional comments or otherwise abusing multiple accounts (including IP addresses), is not allowed
  • CheckUser and Oversight rights will not be granted except under exceptional circumstances. Please leave a note on the Stewards' noticeboard if you would like more information.
Click the appropriate button below to request permissions


Archives:

Examknow (Wiki Creator)

Gustave London (Wiki Creator)

Cy/Aero/Malcolm (Wiki Creator)

PapercutsExist (sysop)

Zppix (sysop)

User: Zppix (contributionsCAblocks logrights logglobal rights log)
Group: sysop
Reason: I'm requesting sysop to further compliment my CVT rights, in expanding my ability in countering vandalism, and spam. As well as help with administration of Meta. Thank you for considering my request.

Additional comments:

Comments/Questions

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.

  1. Strong support A trustworty user. --PaperClipI am also on TCRF 05:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
    @PaperClip: Please keep your signature shorter than a 2-3 lines. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 07:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
    Uh, is there a policy for this? Perhaps you can simply guide the user to use a signature template instead of replacing another user's signature.--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (talk/contribs | global🌎) 08:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
    There's a sense that it definitely shouldn't be that long. 2-3 lines was my idea of a reasonable guideline but using a signature template is of course allowed. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 08:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
    All right, I agree with the fact that the signature was using a very and uncommonly long source code. However, you could've asked the user to fix it by him/herself before forcefully fixing it. A signature is marked to prove who posted the comment, and should not be fixed by others unless it's really necessary due to some serious reasons (such as, containing broken tags or malicious codes).--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (talk/contribs | global🌎) 08:20, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  2. Support--開拓者 (The Pioneer) (talk/contribs | global🌎) 08:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  3. Strong support The user did a good work in the CVT Gustave London (talk) 10:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Ben114 (Wiki Creator)

User: Ben114 (contributionsCAblocks logrights logglobal rights log)
Group: Wiki Creator
Reason: I know I'm farily inactive, but I should be a wiki creator because I have past leadership and web editing experiences. I'm very supportive of what others do, and enjoy helping out the community to help their aspirations become a reality.

Additional comments:

Comments/Questions

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.

# Strong support Okay, okay, I might sound crazy, but they have the enthusiasm and willingness to help others out, and support their hopes and dreams. - JohnT133  :An editor has expressed concern that this account may be a SPA ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 06:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
@Ben114: Do you have any connection to @JohnT133:? ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 06:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes check.svg CheckUser Confirmed Sockpuppet ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 14:30, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  1. Strong oppose based on the above, a user who sock puppets on their own RfP doesn't have my trust. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     around) 14:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
  2. Strong oppose per RhinosF1 Zppix (Meta | CVT Member | talk to me) 17:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)