Stewards' noticeboard

From Meta
Jump to navigation Jump to search
You are currently logged out. Please note that if you are having problems with your wiki, you need to login.

If you are looking to make a report regarding a specific user, in addition to being required to provide a thorough and complete report, you should also know that reports by anonymous or logged out users are not taken very seriously for a couple reasons, namely that:

  1. We cannot ascertain who is making the report; and,
  2. Western liberal democracies enshrine in a citizen's fundamental, constitutionally-enshrined legal rights the right to know and face one's accuser, and Miraheze is no different.

Accordingly, please kindly login. If you are unable to login, please e-mail tech(at) with your username and the specific error message you are receiving, and they will assist you, or direct you to other global functionaries where appropriate.

Stewards' noticeboard
This noticeboard is only requests that require Stewards', or, in a limited number of circumstances, Global Sysops', intervention. If in doubt, please try community noticeboard first, and you will be directed here if the matter requires a Steward

On Stewards' noticeboard (this page), you can:

  • Request a steward or Global Sysop to lock a spam only or vandalism only account. Note that for vandalism only accounts, the vandalism must meet the global standard definition for vandalism and to be a vandalism only account, there must be no or almost no constructive editing behaviour and, additionally, this behaviour should be occurring on multiple wikis
  • Report a Username Policy violation (whether in good-faith or bad faith)
  • Report a user suspected of abusing multiple accounts per user accounts policy. You must link to specific revisions from both the suspected master and illegitimate alternate account(s)
  • Request additional permissions on your wiki(s) that can only be granted by a steward, such as local interwiki administrator
  • Request a page requiring the bigdelete user right (more than 1,000 revisions) be deleted on your wiki
  • Request a Dormancy Policy exemption for your wiki
  • Report systemic Code of Conduct problems occurring by one or more user(s) on one or more wiki(s) and/or systemic Content Policy violations on one or more wiki(s). In either case, your report must link to specific revisions and, in the latter case, your report must be both thorough and comprehensive

If you would like to:

Please remember to:

  • Sign your request using ~~~~
  • Stay respectful
  • Give us enough details regarding your problem
To add your request, type in a title and click the "Add Topic" button below.

Archives of Stewards' noticeboard [e]   

I want back in SephSpace

A month ago, I was banned from SephSpace because one of Inkster's sock accounts manipulated one of the admins into thinking I did some bad things that cost me my access to the wiki. However, I gave a full explanation on what I really did on the Reception Wikis, thus debunking Inkster's lies about me. Plus, that sock account of Inkster is banned now, so do you think you can convince the admins of SephSpace to let me back at that wiki? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you should contact a local bureaucrats to unblock your account, but this may need steward intervention. Bukkit 19:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SuperStreetKombat: As Bukkit pointed out, the local bureaucrats handle that, not the Stewards. Stewards cannot intercede for you with the bureaucrats on that wiki. With that being said, you'll have to build up a case on your own devices to convince the bureaucrats that those were lies spread about you, Stewards can't help with that. So sorry for the inconvenience. Agent Isai Talk to me! 20:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SuperStreetKombat I was also falsely banned too, mainly due to EijiZeBoi's bullshit. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your best bet is to get in contact with the local administrators through a Meta talk page, I think. Unless you have their Discord/alternative contacts you know are easier. If you can't find them on any, perhaps a Steward (or, and preferably, an existing member) can drop a subtle pointer to see your case on Meta. --Raidarr (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
i can help i have acces to that wiki Gilimaster69 (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know any SephSpace admin I can talk to via Meta? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 18:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I know seph and DuccesTheSponge Gilimaster69 (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ort maybe wage i will get him here @SpangusSus Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
let me try it again
@SpangusSus Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
can you give @SuperStreetKombat his rights back Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
they unblocked you and gave your rights back Gilimaster69 (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SuperStreetKombat: There appears to be a list of admins on the public main page of that wiki. You contact one of those users on meta to request an unblock. — Arcversin (talk) 01:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please lock my account?

I'd rather not use it anymore. It's been dead for a few months now. Goodbye to Miraheze! Trashanimal (talk) 01:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Trashanimal: We're sad to see you go! Regardless, to help accelerate the process, please specify if you want your account locked only (which disables it but can be recovered later on if you wish so by Stewards) or locked and vanished (which disables it and cannot be recovered later on). Thanks! Agent Isai Talk to me! 02:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Locked and vanished please. Trashanimal (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Trashanimal Can you please clarify whether you want your personal information removed from your account, thus rendering your account unrecoverable, or if you just want your account to be renamed in an anonymized fashion and globally locked (technically still recoverable if you know your password or have a confirmed e-mail address)? Dmehus (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Trashanimal Is there still interest in this request? If so, your clarification is required. Dmehus (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trashanimal: That action is handled by Trust and Safety, I will make sure to forward this to them. Please allow a few days before any action is taken. Thank you. Agent Isai Talk to me! 04:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello stewards,

Can someone please lock the about 20 spambots ive blocked on meta over the last day and see if you can find any underlying IPs to block?

Ty, ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     online) 14:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please.
And please, post the IP ranges publicly. I am considering making my own DNSBL and include this spam network in it. this issue has been affecting so many MediaWiki operators which include Wikimedia and Wikifur lately, not just Miraheze. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think that’s really possible, as IP addresses are PII.
—[ Bukkit ][ Talk | Contributions | Barnstars
15:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't know what "PII" mean, but the spammers use proxies like colocation and web hosting solution, so since this website already blocks the tor network and often cracks down on VPN abuse, then I don't see why that issue should be made less apparent. As a matter of fact, if you use a website called domain tools you can find their ranges and then range block them, so they cannot come back via another IP address. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the reason why I asked for their IP addresses was to blacklist them since they are not broadband addresses, they are proxies. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MarioSuperstar77 That is still sensitive information, and that would be an invasion of their privacy, so to speak. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This a proxy IP address, this is not their real address. How is that an invasion of privacy? Do you think open proxies like VPNs and the tor network are sensitive information too?
I got plenty of these spambots and absolutely all of them were coming from web hosts like ServerMania, B2NETSOLUTIONS and EONIX just to name a few examples.
Hell, some whataboutism, but what about all the IP addresses you block. You folks invade their privacy each time you let them edit here or whenever you block them for vandalism. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 12:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just recently I got a spambot who used the VPN service IPvanish to spam on the wiki and I am not afraid to share the IP address because it is a Virtual Private Newtwork. You may want to check the IP here for more detailed information:
I swear if I ever get reverted or blocked for posting the IP address belonging to an open proxy that's used exclusively used for vandalism or spam. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 12:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
MarioSuperstar77, from what I can tell you, per No open proxies policy, proxy addresses are generally blocked by CVT members whenever they discover any. So, if the CheckIUser shows that the IP used by those spambots (listed by RhinosF1) are proxies, stewards can take care of it. There is no need to publically post those IP's. And yes, IP address is still the personal identifiable information, one should not be asking users or anyone about it and only stewards, in case of miraheze, should have access to knowing IP and if it appears to be a proxy, they can block it. So, users like me and you should not be landing into someone's work. Yes, in your wiki if you encounter a proxy IP, better is to post here and ask a CVT member for the Global block, other than blocking locally. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Mazzaz is right. A steward will never publicly link a user with an IP address regardless of what the user does, that is private information and that would be against global policy. It being a proxy doesn't matter, the fact is a user will not be identified by their IP if they are logged in. If they choose to edit logged out that is their choice and they should be aware that their IP will be visible. And yes, we publicly ban IP addresses but that's not explicitly identifying which user edited from which IP. I don't think it's necessary to continue pursuing this discussion, the point is: Stewards do CUs and globally block IPs as necessary but they will not tell you which IP belonged to which user. Reception123 (talk) (C) 19:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was tricked by a user on the RequestWikiQueue:

A user in question made this request for a wiki on Nasty Food and Drinks Wiki, but when I approved it (unknowingly), it turned out to be a revival of the Atrocious YouTubers Wiki. Just look at the main page. Furthermore, I was under the impression that it was going to talk about nasty food and drinks, but was ultimately deceived by the wiki requester. Any comment on that? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A steward (I’m assuming) closed the wiki. Thanks!
—[ Bukkit ][ Talk | Contributions | Barnstars
15:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if there’s a policy for that, but they should be warned.
—[ Bukkit ][ Talk | Contributions | Barnstars
15:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Ignore the above message. “Please be advised that if your wiki deviates too much from this approval, remedial action can be taken by a Steward, if necessary”.
—[ Bukkit ][ Talk | Contributions | Barnstars
15:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Ballsy little bugger, wasn't he... --Raidarr (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DarkMatterMan4500 Please be careful in approving wikis too quickly, particularly where the subdomain, does not match the sitename and/or description. That being said, this requesting user was quite duplicitous in requesting this wiki with the deliberate attempt to deceive a wiki creator into creating the wiki. Though no content was restored, the fact that this was so flagrant and blatant as stated on the wiki's Main Page and since the user, perhaps in response to this report or to your local user talk page advisory on the wiki, closed the wiki, I'm willing to assume good faith the user realized the error in their ways. Nevertheless, there's no need to keep this, so this has been Yes check.svg done. Dmehus (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dmehus Yeah, I will be extra careful from here on out. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks, and sounds good. :) Dmehus (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dmehus This month's kind of been shit for me on Miraheze, mainly due to a lot of stupid stuff happening. Your absence kinda did worry me for quite a while until a certain thing stopped me. Sorry if I sound snobbish or feel like a broken record at this point, and for possibly disturbing you while you were away for a while. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally made 2 extra accounts while creating my account

I accidentally made 2 extra accounts while creating this account, as I wasn't redirected while making the first 2, which was something I thought was going to happen. I thought maybe the usernames were already taken and that's why I hadn't been redirected. The 2 accounts are (Jakess) and (Jakesmithispiff) Jakes (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jakes, it's ok! You can use one of them for testing administrative tools on Public Test Wiki. And leave the other one as it is. :) ~ Mazzaz (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jakes As you created Jakess and Jakesmithispiff while logged out, without you posting a reply here from each of those two accounts stating they're your legitimate alternate accounts and whether you prefer they be merged into your main account or globally locked, there's not much we can do here. If, however, you login and post said confirmation edits from each and state your intention clearly, then there a couple options here. As to your latter point, that's perhaps something we should see if an interface message exists to redirect the user away from Special:CreateAccount after creating an account, then we could deploy that interface message globally. Dmehus (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lock these spambots

If you need the proof:

<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * AnthonySroka *  AnthonySroka が [[Keuntungan Akses Permainan Slots Online Lewat Gadget]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/1|フィルター 1]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/346|詳細]])
<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * AnthonySroka *  AnthonySroka が [[Keuntungan Akses Permainan Slots Online Lewat Gadget]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/2|フィルター 2]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/347|詳細]])
<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が [[The Ease Given Through The Very Best On-line Wagering Webinternet Web Sites In Participating In Is Actually Our Principal Target]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/1|フィルター 1]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/351|詳細]])
<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が [[The Ease Given Through The Very Best On-line Wagering Webinternet Web Sites In Participating In Is Actually Our Principal Target]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/2|フィルター 2]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/352|詳細]])
<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が [[3 Cara Langkah Untuk Mendapati Jekpot Poker Online]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/1|フィルター 1]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/356|詳細]])
<MirahezeBot> torunitaranwiki * [[特別:Log/abusefilter]] hit  * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が [[3 Cara Langkah Untuk Mendapati Jekpot Poker Online]] で「edit」操作を行い、 [[特別:不正利用フィルター/2|フィルター 2]] が作動しました。対処操作: 警告 ([[特別:不正利用記録/357|詳細]])
MarioMario456 23:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reporting it here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes check.svg Locked. I would like to note however that unless spambots are spamming logs quite a bit individually there's not a huge need to individually report them. Reception123 (talk) (C) 11:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel Violated by MarioMario456

He asked for my IP on Awesome Games Wiki, please global him. I have done nothing wrong on the wiki. I am crying and scared in rl, I feel like he's going to doxx me if I send it to him. Proof is here: Captain (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no interest in doxxing you. By behavior alone, it seems similar that you are Willg8686. He gives IPs in public which are confirmed to be VPNs. I redact IPs from public for privacy reasons MarioMario456 01:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No you clearly wanted to doxx me sir. And if I gave you my IP, you would have done something bad with it. Captain (talk) 01:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just because someone asks for someone's IP doesn't mean they want to dox them. It's starting to get obvious that you're a lock evasion of Willg8686, so I'll ping @Void: for locking. MarioMario456 02:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
... I just told you that I am not giving my IP to you since are sus. And Void is not going to block me unless he checks my IP. In which it will not be same as that user. Captain (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And you might get locked instead so... Captain (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And Also DarkMatterMan4500 is a admin abuser, he is falsely blocking people. I just joined Miraheze to check out the wikis, and he was a rude person. Captain (talk) 02:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And he is also impersonating as a Steward too Captain (talk) 02:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Technical evidence here is inconclusive. It might also just be me, but the behavioral evidence seems a bit shaky too. In any case, I'm going to leave this to local administrators to determine whether or not the user's behavior/edits are welcome or not on any particular wiki. Oh, and @MarioMario456: can we please not ask users for their IP addresses. It's still private information, and access to it should be limited accordingly. -- Void Whispers 20:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Void Sorry to interrupt here, but last night, when Captain here was blocked, he resorted to telling me to grow up, in quite a rude manner on Awful Movies Wiki. And I apologize on behalf of MarioMario456, as I told him several times to not do stuff like this. That should also be looked at too. And even after that, he resorted to stalking me on a few more wikis by throwing random foe requests at me over me blocking him. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Void: Can I have a word with you? probably on Discord or somewhere related. Ugochimobi (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to DM anytime. -- Void Whispers 21:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
UPDATE: Captain and Scifi are now Yes check.svg locked for obvious abuse of multiple accounts. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible checkuser request for possible sockpuppets:

I'm concerned that these 2 might be the same person, as Jones321 was locked as a vandalism-only account. I do know that they have a habit of blanking multiple pages on multiple wikis, and another thing that I've noticed is that both Foodisgood and Jonesgotswag were created a couple of minutes from each other before Jones321 was created. This makes me want to ask this question: If they were being constructive at first, then why resort to vandalism later on? I'm not sure if this needs an investigation, but please do look into them if necessary. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, the page blanking could be anyone, but then again, it depends. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, Jonesgotswag has been Yes check.svg locked, but will still wait for Pictogram voting wait.svg a review from a Steward if possible DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete my wiki

My wiki URL is:

Thanks. Toyrit (talk) 06:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Toyrit Yes check.svg Done. Dmehus (talk) 02:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help.

Delete Encyclopedia Conpactia/Naveria

The conpact wiki went inactive and the focus of its "successor" has been dissolved. I no longer have any interest in running it.  ConpactCasper (talk) 03:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ConpactCasper Yes check.svg Done. Dmehus (talk) 23:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MarioMario456 power abuse case

Recent spambots detected on our Qualitipedia wikis:

Please check our recent abuse logs on our wikis. Look for the ones that have the spambot whipper abuse log as it's really been sufficient ever since I activated it. Feel free to also nuke more from here as well. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DarkMatterMan4500: Excuse me if I am confused but I have a question. Why is it necessary for these accounts to be locked? Unless I am wrong (I only looked at 3 of them) they have not been able to edit once as they have been prohibited by the Abuse Filter so why do they need to be locked? --DeeM28 (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DeeM28 Simple: Because they have been triggering the abuse logs more than 3 times, and there's a reason why they need to be locked, and that reason is exactly why. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the abuse filter catches them, they are outed as accounts explicitly made for spam. They would be blocked to a) clean up logs and perhaps reduce server access by their logged-in spams, and b) ensure they cannot 'wisen up' and use a method that counters the filter. Better eliminated without quarter than allowed to be smart. --Raidarr (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarkMatterMan4500: @Raidarr: In theory your arguments make sense, spambots need to be locked so they can not continue to spam. In practice however I do not think this argument works based on the evidence. I have looked at the Abuse Logs for a few of these spambots and I have not seen a single one that has attempted to spam after the initial attempt. To me it looks like the spambots try to spam once and afterwards they stop. I understand that locking may be useful as a precautionary measure but my personal opinion is that with Stewards not being very active lately it would be more useful for them to focus on other tasks (for example there are a few Dormancy Policy requests that are unhandled) rather than to focus on proactive measures for something that is very unlikely to happen based on the current abuse patters of the spambots that I have observed. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My argument is not a matter of them spamming after the initial attempt. It is the basic principle that an account created exclusively for spam has no need to remain available. This is humoring based on a will to help you understand what is already a standard procedure executed (in good time) by global staff and has been for quite some time. Naturally it is not the highest priority, but neither is it in any way particularly difficult to do when they have a spare moment or would like distraction. It takes considerably more review and thought to consider one's Adoption request than to snipe a routine list. All said, you make a good case why we should have more Stewards or Global Sysops in general, even if I do not feel I am yet appropriate for the task personally. --Raidarr (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes check.svg Done. Reception123 (talk) (C) 17:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your points but I still think that if Stewards had to lock every single spambot then they would not have time for anything else so then why lock these random ones? Anyway this matter is not worthy of an argument of any sort so if Stewards or Global Sysops think it is necessary to do this I am fine with that. --DeeM28 (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ideally this is where we get more Global Sysops in. It's best practice to perform the task, but obviously the current resources are a little strained. --Raidarr (talk) 20:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I think that User:Il nonciclopediano divertente is a sock of User:Il nonciclopediano umoristico because they have almost the same nick umoristico=divertente. They created vandalism pages. And they don't edit at the same moment.--Angelo Pisani (talk) 15:50, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To add to what Angelo Pisani has said, this user seems to have a habit of blanking articles, not to mention their first edit was on their user page, which is kinda suspicious, similar to a locked user with a trolling message that has since been deleted by Reception123, making nonsense pages, strangely similar to not only this log right here, but also this type of nonsense. Oddly enough, these strange edits seem pretty odd to me. One thing that caught my eye was this strange blanking of the page. I think this should be investigated too. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Angelo Pisani All 3 of them are now Yes check.svg locked by MrJaroslavik. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global Ban and Checkuser request for cross-wiki abusers

Here are some names of vandal which show similar patterns. All of these accounts have appeared in libertygame and osaindex, showing dozens of documents being replaced with specific content by each account. Please ban on all three accounts globally before damaging other wikis, and checkuser considering the similar behavior patterns of each user. 재미재미 (talk) 09:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, THAT is suspicious. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The first one was already locked by Dmehus. I've locked the other 3 as VOAs. Reception123 (talk) (C) 11:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge user on

Maybe I'm late for request merge account as other user after Nonciclopedia move from wikia to Miraheze. 8 years ago, I was using User:Bhenry1990 at old Nonciclopedia and other Uncyclopedias hosted by Wikia. Then I quitted for several years. Now I return to Uncyclopedias. I cannot login as Bhenry1990 here, nor create account as Bhenry1990 at Miraheze. I guess my old account was created here when Nonciclopedia moved, but community says someone has used it here on Miraheze. I need Steward's help to merge my old account into my new account then rename back to Bhenry1990, if the old account is actually not in use. Thanks. Bhenry2021 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay, I'll take a look at doing this tomorrow. For clarification of process, we'll merge the old username into the new username (to preserve the login information), and then rename the new name to be the same as the old name. -- Void Whispers 00:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I confirm the identity and that he/she had an account within Nonciclopedia… I also had the same problem ;)
--Executive2 (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like request for a Global Block

Excuse me, I'd like request for a Global Block on Special:CentralAuth/取るに足らない, who are for vandalism, adding {{#css: *{display:none} }} and <nowiki><nowiki>. Regards. 閲覧者 (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already Yes check.svg locked by Reception123. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you deal with YukariWayne?

YukariWayne has been pestering me with private messages full of false accusations of the so-called "wrongdoings" of DuchesstheSponge and MarioMario456 on Awesome Games Wiki, and the admins there (except for Allistayrian, sort of) can't do a thing to stop him, so I was wondering since not only is he blocked on AGW, BTSW, and (possibly) RWW for 6 months, but was also giving me shit with his accusations, can you do something about this, like, maybe, global him or something? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Private messages do not exist on MH unless you are talking about private wikis. As for messages on your user profile, you can tell him to stop and if he does not he can be subject to local moderation action. There is no cause for a global block and the crime of irritating the Qualitipedia administrators is not grounds for a global block unless it is an account with a clear intent exclusively for vandalism or the like. In short, just about nothing for the Stewards to deal with. --Raidarr (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is no reason for him to be globalled unless he uses sockpuppets or is a sockpuppet of someone else. I've cross-wiki blocked him indefinitely due to his hate blogs on me on BS&EW, his heavy disrespecting of the dead and heavily annoying you with my "wrongdoings". MarioMario456 12:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global lock request 07/28

Cross-wiki abuse. SchwarzTalk / ウソペディア 23:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes check.svg Locked. Reception123 (talk) (C) 05:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser request for 2 accounts:

Okay, I am requesting a CheckUser on these 2 accounts for the following reasons: I've noticed they've uploaded the exact same NSFW pictures on 2 wikis, with CaillouRocks doing it on the Garbage Roblox Games Wiki, and DiaperFan doing it on the Perfection Roblox Games Wiki. I also noticed that one of the files on 2 wikis that were uploaded by 2 users are exactly the same as the one that CaillouRocks has uploaded on the Garbage Roblox Games Wiki. These logs and the amount of overwhelming evidence was enough to convince me that they are the same person, and I'd like to request a Steward to perform a CheckUser on those 2 accounts. Thanks for reading this. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dmehus or Void could maybe look as they're both active. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes check.svg Socks locked. Dmehus (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, also there is also another case to look into, but I'll put that on another thread. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dormancy policy exemption

We kindly request that you exempt the following wiki from the Dormancy Policy. Thank you in advance!

Wiki: (or

Reason: The wiki is an encyclopedia and a database; this means that it may not be edited for long periods of time, but it should remain active continuously in order for our readers to be always able to access it and use the materials that have already been uploaded. Publisher (Archiopedia) (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spambot in Nonciclopedia

Hello could you please ban Osso.Buco? Angelo Pisani (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Pisani I wouldn't call that a spam-bot, but rather a vandalism-only account. I'm still trying to get in touch with the Stewards like Void to investigate this. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DarkMatterMan4500: no, he's clearly a spambot. He spams his products and website...--Angelo Pisani (talk) 23:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of classification, blocked and reverted. -- Void Whispers 00:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Void Thanks, but however, there was more today. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Encuesta anual Miraheze 2021 / Miraheze 2021 annual survey

Hola. A mediados del mes de julio respondí la encuesta anual de Miraheze. En ella respondí que me agradaría que establezcan contacto conmigo para tratar dos temas. Aún no he recibido mensajes vía correo electrónico. Consulto:

  • ¿Recibieron mis respuestas?
  • ¿Establecerán comunicación?

Desde ya, muchas gracias. Saludos cordiales. Hugo Ar (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translated by Google Translator

Hello. In mid-July, I responded to the annual Miraheze survey. In it I replied that I would like to be contacted to discuss two issues. I have not received any messages via email yet. I consult:

  • Have you received my answers?
  • Will they establish communication?

From already thank you very much. Kind regards. Hugo Ar (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hugo Ar: ¡Hola! Yo también respondí la encuesta y ya se han comunicado conmigo. Es posible que el correo electrónico conteniendo la respuesta a tus preguntas se haya ido a la carpeta spam de tu cliente de correo electrónico, trata de revisar allí. También es posible que los que estén respondiendo a las preguntas de la encuesta estén muy ocupados. Los resultados de la encuesta ya fueron publicados aquí (en Inglés). Si no lo encuentras por ningún lado y si te sientes cómodo, puedes tratar de preguntar aquí y alguien le dará respuesta a tus preguntas/seguimiento a cualquier sugerencia. Gracias! Agent Isai Talk to me! 03:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(translation) Hello! I also replied to the survey and have received a reply back. It's possible that the email containing the answer to your questions may have ended up in the spam folder of your email client, try checking there. It's also possible that the people who are replying to the surveys are currently very busy. The results to the survey were published here. If you still can't find it and if you feel comfortable, you can ask here and someone will answer your question/follow up on your suggestions. Thanks!
Muchas gracias Agent Isai por la amable respuesta y el enlace a los resultados de la encuesta.
Respondí la encuesta a través de especial:MirahezeSurvey. ¿Estaré incluido en los resultados finales de la encuesta?
Entre los comentarios que acabo de leer no aparecen los temas que he planteado. De los que leí allí, estoy de acuerdo con el lento almacenamiento en caché de las actualizaciones.
Mi propuesta es mejorar el posicionamiento SEO. Similares páginas wiki de otras granjas están mejor posicionadas que las de Miraheze en los motores de búsqueda. En mi experiencia, las páginas se indexan más rápidamente a los motores de búsqueda introduciendo las URL en Google Console, por ejemplo. Es una labor bastante tediosa porque hay que hacerlo manualmente porque las wikis no tienen sitemap para que el motor indexe las páginas desde allí.
Y esa es mi solicitud: añadir la extensión sitemap: mw:Extension:AutoSitemap en ManageWiki para tener la oportunidad de que los motores de búsqueda rastreen las páginas directamente desde cada sitemap, en vez de hacerlo manualmente página por página. ¿Se podrá hacer? Gracias. Saludos cordiales. Hugo Ar (talk) 04:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translated by Google Translator
Thank you very much Agent Isai for the kind response and the link to the survey results.
I answered the survey through special:MirahezeSurvey. Will I be included in the final results of the survey?
Among the comments I have just read, the issues I have raised do not appear. From the ones I read there, I agree with the slow caching of updates.
My proposal is to improve SEO positioning. Similar wiki pages from other farms rank higher than Miraheze's in search engines. In my experience, pages are indexed faster by search engines by entering the URLs in the Google Console, for example. It is quite a tedious task because you have to do it manually because wikis do not have a sitemap for the engine to index the pages from there.
And that's my request: add the extension sitemap: mw:Extension:AutoSitemap in ManageWiki to have the opportunity for search engines to crawl pages directly from each sitemap, instead of manually page by page. Can it be done? Thanks. Kind regards. Hugo Ar (talk) 04:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hugo Ar: Miraheze ofrece sitemaps automaticos, por ejemplo, este es el sitemap de este wiki (Miraheze Meta). El sitemap está incluido en el robots.txt de tu wiki y debería ser detectado automáticamente por Google. Si no lo es, simplemente ve a /robots.txt en tu wiki (p. ej. y encontrarás un enlace a el sitemap. Agent Isai Talk to me! 05:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(translation) Miraheze offers automatic sitemaps, for example, this is this wiki (Miraheze Meta)'s sitemap. The sitemap is included in your wikis robots.txt and should be automatically detected by Google. If it isn't, simply go to /robots.txt on your wiki (e.g. and you will find a link to the sitemap.
Gracias por el enlace, Agent Isai. Me refiero a un «sitemap» con todas las páginas URL del wiki para que el motor de búsqueda rastree desde allí todas las páginas. Google console enseña cómo hacerlo, pero se requiere de una página .xml y la inserción de cada URL es manual. ¿O hay algo que no entiendo bien? Hugo Ar (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translated by Google Translator
Thanks for the link, Agent Isai. I mean a «sitemap» with all the URL pages of the wiki so that the search engine crawls all the pages from there. The Google console teaches how to do it, but it requires an .xml page and the insertion of each URL is manual. Or is there something that I am not understanding well? Hugo Ar (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Hugo Ar: Si, el enlace al que me refiero a es un archivo .xml. El enlace que incluí en mi último mensaje era el enlace para el sitemap de este wiki, Miraheze Meta, en forma de pagina .xml. Si tienes problemas localizando el sitemap de tu wiki, puedes dejar el enlace a tu wiki aquí y yo te daré el enlace para el sitemap en forma .xml. Gracias. Agent Isai Talk to me! 22:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(translation) Yes, the link which I am referring to is an .xml file. The link which I included in my last message was the link to the sitemap of this wiki, Miraheze Meta, in .xml format. If you have trouble finding the sitemap to your wiki, you can leave a link to your wiki here and I will link the .xml sitemap file for you. Thank you.
Hola Agent Isai, he leido en tu página de usuario que conoces muy bien el idioma español. Intentaré explayarme un poco más sobre el asunto.
Sí, pude comprobar los enlaces que me pasaste. Uno es .txt y el otro es xml. Pero lo que encuentro allí no es el sitemap con todas las páginas del wiki, sino solo la página principal.
A los pocos días de la creación del wiki que administro activé´a través de ManageWiki la extensión WikiSEO. Luego, mediante la configuración auxiliar, agregué la clave de verificación para Google y Yandex (lamentablmente aún no logro conseguir una clave para Bing). En uno o dos días la página principal del wiki ya aparecía en esos motores de búsqueda. Aguardé varios días más para ver si las restantes páginas se iban añadiendo a los buscadores, pero no ocurría. Decidí, pues, ingresarlas una a una a trevés de Google Console y de Yandex Webmaster.
En muy poco tiempo las páginas comenzaron a aparecer. Como comprobación de que la aparición en los buscadores no es automática, sino que es a través del pedido de indexado página por página, dejé muchas páginas sin añadir, a fin de ver si el motor de búsqueda las añade por sí mismo (aunque sea más tardíamente). Hasta este momento (luego de tres meses) no hay caso: solo aparecen en el motor de búsqueda aquellas páginas de las que solicité la indexación.
Aquí puedes ver:
Para no lidiar con la indexación manual de cada página del wiki solicito que se tenga en cuenta incorporar la extensión mw:Extension: AutoSitemap. «La extensión AutoSitemap crea automáticamente un archivo "sitemap.xml" en cada evento de creación / edición / eliminación de página. El archivo de mapa del sitio ayuda a los motores de búsqueda a observar las páginas de su sitio. Esta extensión se basa en la extensión ManualSitemap.»
Miraheze podría aparecer mejor posicionada en los buscadores si se implementara esta extensión, ya que ahora, si comprobamos cualquier wiki, incluso este (que es el principal) no tiene todas sus páginas indexadas. Con esto no pretendo que cada vez que se cree una página aparezca de inmediato el resultado en cada motor de búsquesa, pero sí, aunque sea, al cabo de tres, cuatro o cinco días. Si las páginas no aparecen en los buscadores, nadie las podrá encontrar. De allí mi interés por este tema. Un cordial saludo. Hugo Ar (talk) 08:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translated by Google Translator
Hello Agent Isai, I have read on your user page that you know the Spanish language very well. I will try to elaborate a little more on the matter.
Yes, I was able to check the links you passed me. One is .txt and the other is xml. But what I find there is not the sitemap with all the wiki pages, but only the main page.
A few days after the creation of the wiki that I manage, I activated the WikiSEO extension through ManageWiki. Then, using the helper settings, I added the verification key for Google and Yandex (unfortunately I still can't get a key for Bing). Within a day or two, the main page of the wiki was already appearing on those search engines. I waited several more days to see if the remaining pages were added to the search engines, but it did not happen. So I decided to enter them one by one through Google Console and Yandex Webmaster.
In no time the pages began to appear. As a check that the appearance in the search engines is not automatic, but is through the page-by-page indexing order, I left many pages without adding, in order to see if the search engine adds them by itself (even if it is more belatedly). Until now (after three months) there is no case: only those pages from which I requested indexing appear in the search engine.
Here you can see:
In order not to deal with the manual indexing of each wiki page, I request that you consider incorporating the extension mw:Extension: AutoSitemap. The AutoSitemap extension automatically creates a "sitemap.xml" file on each page create / edit / delete event. The sitemap file helps search engines look at the pages of your site. This extension is based on the ManualSitemap extension.
Miraheze could appear better positioned in the search engines if this extension were implemented, since now, if we check any wiki, even this one (which is the main one) does not have all its pages indexed. With this I do not pretend that every time a page is created the result will appear immediately in each search engine, but yes, even after three, four or five days. If the pages do not appear in the search engines, nobody will be able to find them. Hence my interest in this topic. Cordial greeting. Hugo Ar (talk) 08:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser request for recent vandals on Nonciclopedia:

It's come to my attention that all 5 of these accounts were involved in some vandalism, and some examples like these are pretty suspicious, as these diffs are almost exactly the same edits compared to these following diffs from this guy in question. Could a Steward please have a look into this too? I know I'm sounding like a broken record at this point, but at the very least it should be looked into more. Thanks for reading. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spam accounts that needs locking:

If anybody's around, please lock these spambots. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Locked, --MrJaroslavik (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser required on FAMEPedia

Hello stewards a sockpuppet investigation case on FAMEPedia requires the CheckUser to check a possible sockpuppetry. More details can be seen on the investigation page. Thanks!

On behalf of FAMEPedia SPI clerks,
~ Mazzaz (talk)
17:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done as a CheckUser is not required here for what are obvious alternate accounts. Speaking as a local sysop, I don't feel the original block was justified, and should be reviewed and discussed locally. Speaking as a Steward, this is thus procedurally out of place, so is X mark.svg not done for the reasons articulated herein. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser request on suspicious users:

To Void or anyone with the Steward rights, listen closely: I am requesting a CheckUser on both of these 2 accounts, mainly because I have noticed that Bling-Bling Boy was replacing content with nonsense like this one, and while the other one, "Mrs. Puff", blanked out this page and even going as far as to replace some sections of content with complete nonsense here. I have a feeling that these 2 accounts were created with the intention of targeting specific articles like the Johnny Test pages on both the Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki and the Best Shows & Episodes Wiki, and 2 SpongeBob movies on the Greatest Movies Wiki, with similar edit summaries, and the way they make their marks. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you usurp my old and new account?

I had to make an new account because my password was not working, can you please combine my old account s contributions on all the wikis I visited please, this is really important Gilimaster69 2.0 (talk) 20:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He confirmed on his Discord that Gilimaster69 and this account ARE the same master. MarioMario456 22:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok but but what about all of my contributions. Gilimaster69 2.0 (talk) 23:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
also can you do the same thing you did to gust Gilimaster69 2.0 (talk) 01:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wait never mind about me from getting my password i just got my account back but keep gilimaster699 2.0 for emails (talk)

What is an "interwiki prefix"?

Hello. I want to import pages from this wiki to this wiki. my problem about importing is that if I submit an XML file without entering an interwiki prefix, I get a message saying:

"Import failed: * Loss of session data. You might have been logged out. Please verify that you're still logged in and try again. If it still does not work, try logging out and logging back in, and check that your browser allows cookies from this site. * No interwiki prefix was supplied"

Please help me. SPEEDYBEAVER (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You want wikia:reverse-terrible-tv-shows putting in that box :) ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     online) 15:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
RhinosF1 Sorry to barge in here, but it just so happens that I have downloaded the necessary files to import to that wiki, so maybe I could help him. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDYBEAVER I've managed to do this trick: "wikia:reverse-terrible-tv-shows", and it had no issues there. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even then, I see another message saying "Import failed: Expected <mediawiki> tag, got". SPEEDYBEAVER (talk) 15:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That means the file is broken. Maybe DMM can try? ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - (     online) 15:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request

I'm a bureaucrat on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki. I would want Celebdumb to be deleted, it failed and must die, it turned into a celebrity-shaming page. The problem is that it requires bigdelete. Can someone do it? MarioMario456 02:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MarioMario456 Ordinarily, I'd probably prefer to double-check with DuchessTheSponge, but seeing as they are currently blocked on Meta Wiki together with the fact that you're both bureaucrats and administrators on that wiki whose visions, generally speaking, seem to be frequently in sync with each other as well as the fact that their most recent edit summary (i.e., "this page is useless for now") seemed to confirm that they either (a) agreed with deletion or (b) did not object to it. Accordingly, this has been Yes check.svg done. Dmehus (talk) 20:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reopen Ficreation

Hi, I'm a user among others on Ficreation who was not warned that it would be hastily closed with none of the pages loading, this was done by the user MBL because of some petty infighting among the admins, could you please have MBL undo what he has done, or do so yourselves, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Freighttrain: Hello, this does appear to be a local dispute; Stewards generally let these be resolved by the community. If I recall well, Ficreation had various bureaucrats, any of them can reopen the wiki at Special:ManageWiki/core. However, should bureaucrats not respond to community calls to reopen the wiki and if it is community consensus that the wiki be reopened, you all can hold an election where users of the wiki can vote and decide if the wiki should be reopened. If you gain a majority, Stewards will reopen ther wiki. Thank you. Agent Isai Talk to me! 05:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sock that needs checking:

I'm going to list a bunch of things that might be an indication that DearMaster6 might be behind this:

In conclusion, I can safely conclude that DearMaster6 is abusing multiple accounts, and has been suspected of using 2 other accounts prior to locking, like Teen Titans Go! Rocks and The something guy mainly due to both those accounts, and DearMaster6 using the "It's a rip-off of X" claim onto pages. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:16, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there are some similarities, but why was Mr. Namless Thing blocked other than for suspicion of abusing multiple accounts? Given how long ago DearMaster6 was blocked, if you don't have a legitimate reason for locally blocking Mr. Namless Thing, I'd rather prefer to see you unblock them, welcome them to your wikis, and do point them towards each local wiki's rules as well as our global policies. Dmehus (talk) 00:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good question: DearMaster6 was originally blocked for inserting gibberish into pages. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please unblock me in many wikis.

I am very regretted my past action in 2020. because i want to change it to the better. i want to move on from now and forget my past wrongdoings. can you blocked me from these wikis i listed above? i want to be a block free user because i am matured enough. please tell me that i am an innocent person right now. QwertyMan'65 (talk) 17:09, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@QwertyMan'65: Stewards cannot assist in this unfortunately. Please contact the administrators of that wiki to appeal your bans. Thank you for your understanding. Agent Isai Talk to me! 17:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I might be able to unblock him on most of the wikis he is mentioning since I happen to be an admin on those wikis except for the Internet Villains Wiki. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's happening? Why can't I edit in this wiki?

What's going on? Why can't I read or edit any of these pages? Is there something I did wrong? I don't understand this. I was just visiting this wiki, checking out some pages that I could read, and edit my own pages. But's what's happening in here. Is there a stop to this? Let me know, I want to be on this wiki again. The Posthumous (talk) 01:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Posthumous: What errors are you getting? Agent Isai Talk to me! 01:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you talking about the Incredible Characters Wiki & the Loathsome Characters Wiki? If so, we closed them due to changes in the Qualitipedia re-branding process. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for asking agent isai, I Was just visiting to read some pages. And edit a few mistakes. But I suddenly I could this page says permission error, I didn't know what was going on? Isaiah, there a way to fix this permission error thing? The Posthumous (talk) 04:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Posthumous: As DarkMatterMan4500 has pointed out, this was done because of Quailipedia rebranding. I believe it'll reopen based on those comments. Agent Isai Talk to me! 04:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the Greatest and Loathsome Characters Wikis?

What happened to the Greatest and Loathsome Characters Wikis? I was going to go on it, but then it was closed and is private. What happened? That is the things. MarioBobFan (talk) 03:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]