User talk:BrandonWM

 Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~ 

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Appealing your Discord sanction on multiple user talk pages of the same steward
Hi BlackWidowMovie0000Editor,

I understand and sympathize with your frustration of being banned on Discord related to your conduct; however, please note that PuppyKun is the legitimate alternate account of steward NDKilla. As you've already asked for a local reconsideration of your conduct-related Discord ban at User talk:NDKilla, which, I might add, is the correct place to ask for such reconsideration, asking multiple times, as you did at User talk:PuppyKun and User talk:Pup, makes a nuisance of yourself, and doesn't help your case. As such, I have now deleted those duplicate requests, and NDKilla will address your local appeal after a reasonable period of time. If, after, say, thirty calendar days (30) from today, you have not heard back, you may be able to appeal to the Code of Conduct Commission; however, I strongly recommend against trying sooner than that. Even if you do end up appealing, and are able to appeal, your sanction to the Commission, you would do well to address the problems that let to your sanction and, crucially, what steps you will take to remediate the problematic behaviour and what, if any, restrictions would serve you well to help enforce that.

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will wait. 23:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you also message me on Discord about this, not here? Also, my autoarchive is broken, can you maybe see why? 23:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. I had to message you on-wiki regarding this, as it was related to your Meta editing, sorry. As to your autoarchive settings, note that the bot only archives once per day at around midnight Pacific Standard Time (whatever that is in Korean Standard Time). I will take a look, though. Dmehus (talk) 23:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked
(This notice only concerns the Main namespace) Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 16:45, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I formatted a user's comment. I am allowed to do that. If I am wrong, please tell me, because I just fixed the formatting for a comment like does every single day.  16:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * To be clear, you did more than format another user's comment. Your act of formatting the comment per the indentation you changed made it appear as though expressed a supportive view when, in reality, he was replying to . That's not acceptable. Dmehus (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It certainly sounded like he was supporting it. 17:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That's up to him to change that. If you felt it seemed like a supportive vote, you should've replied to him, and asked him to clarify whether it was a sidebar reply to Zppix or an official vote without a voting template. Dmehus (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Editing others' comments is not allowed. While I see that Dmehus has done that on some occasions such as Special:Diff/140102, and I wish he would stop, editing others comments is not allowed on talk pages. In addition, Special:Diff/140865 was not just editing their comment but actually trying to force them into a support. Naleksuh (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, it should really be a question of common sense. While very minor edits like correcting clear typos or grammar issues aren't such a problem in my view, other edits, especially that change the meaning or the intention of the comment (as done in this case) are not acceptable and should not be done. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 18:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, well, Naleksuh is correct. If I am blocked for this, then typos are for the user in question to change. You can't tolerate one type, and then ban another. 19:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No, that's not correct, unfortunately. For one thing, the convention on Meta is that minor edits to others' talk page comments is acceptable, unless they tell you otherwise. This is WikiGnoming and, yes, it may be somewhat different than the convention on some Wikimedia wikis, and that's okay as we don't follow every Wikimedia convention. For another thing, your minor edit, together with your edit summary, was not, in any way, a "minor edit." You attempted to change DarkMatterMan4500's comment to be a show of support, rather than a sidebar comment to . You seem to be selectively picking out only parts of this discussion, rather than addressing the core problem here. Dmehus (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Did somebody page me? Even did was disruptive and rather deceptive, I still don't find it okay to try and make it look like they did something that they didn't do. That's technically defamation of character right there. DarkMatterMan4500 20:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That was so uncalled for to edit my comment like that. My advice is to probably think before editing like the way you did. I'm not really all that mad at you, but just a little surprised. DarkMatterMan4500 20:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)