Community Directors/Election Commission/2019 Election/Vote

Welcome to the community vote for the election of the 2019-2021 Community Directors Election Commission. Listed below are the 4 nominees from the community. There are a maximum of 3 seats on the commission. This page will be used for voting for a members seat. For more information on the election please visit here.

When does this vote end
This vote ends when:
 * Option 1:
 * It has been more than 7 days
 * 3 Candidates have been passing for more than 48 hours and remained there continually with the other candidate not reaching a passing rate during that time.
 * Option 2:
 * It has been more than 28 days (7 Jan 2020 16:30)

The winners

 * The 3 candidates with the most support will be elected.
 * To be elected the candidate must:
 * Have more than 60% support.
 * Have more than 20 users voted either support or oppose for them.

Reception123

 * 1)  Good work on staff. Long time member. No issues here. --EK ● c ● g 17:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  Excellent help creating the policy and with MH in general.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  friendly and experienced editor, willing to help. Hispano76 (talk) 18:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  I don't know this user personally, and I want to insure my preferred candidates get in since there are only three seats. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)  as candidate. For what its worth, I do believe the Commission should be a position in which it is without influence of the organization which it assists in process. To me, this would mean that staff members should feel obliged to recuse from such duties so long as they are responsible for other operative portions of Miraheze. Ultimately, this may just be my vision, but it is important to me.  dross  (t • c • g) 22:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 6)  He is nice, friendly and always help people with MediaWiki Inven (talk) 02:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 7) A long time and experienced member of our community. S/he has been helpful in many ways as well.-- 03:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 8) Good user and your work is good too. Gustave London (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 9)  Intelligent person, ressourceful as well. He gets my support. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 10) I can't see why not Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 11) would be an excellent choice. Bertie (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 12) s/he has both experience and knowledge. REIWA (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 13) I have seen that this user is capable of handling such things so why not. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

RhinosF1

 * 1)  Although I feel that the user has made some useful contributions to Miraheze, however the user has expressed his inability to be active on Miraheze on a regular basis and is stepping down from staff in 4 days time. Additionally I have some issues with the way that the user handled Requests for Comment/Examknow and Requests for Comment/Examknow followup. For these resaons I am voting my oppose. --EK ● c ● g 17:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  Vote of confidence, willing to help. Hispano76 (talk) 18:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  Understands how the board of director works and knows all current directors which will be useful in this role. Reception123  (talk) ('C' ) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  One of the most insightful and hardworking users I have ever known. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)   per above – Aνδρέας  talk&#124;contributions 21:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 6)  work on your health. – Aνδρέας  talk&#124;contributions 21:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 7)  as candidate. See comments above. Additional concerns of impartiality and finality of community decision, especially per Examknow.  dross  (t • c • g) 22:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 8) While I do trust this user and know all the contributions s/he's done so far, I still think his/her health issue is a concern.-- 03:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 9)  I don't know if I should support him or not, he may be a ressourceful person, but he acts very childish at times and the consensus is not in his favor to begin with. The first oppose says he is not active enough. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 10)  Eager to help on discord and seems friendly.  Citronhat (talk) 10:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 11)  Reading the concerns above I don't think that is important to this role and his relation with the board and knowledge is what will be helpful for his role. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Revi

 * I do not feel comfortable with supporting a user that is "semi-retired" on meta and I would need to see some more activity. --EK ● c ● g 17:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * 1)  The user is active, I just have never been around to see them. --EK ● c ● g 17:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  a whiz with the code of conduct elections so come join us here. :)  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 3)  Experienced editor and active enough. I have nothing more to add Hispano76 (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  Has prior experience with organizing elections (CoCC for example) so I have no doubt that they will be able in this role. Reception123  (talk) ('C' ) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)  Plenty of experience running these sorts of elections, and I'm glad to see them aboard! :D &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 6) Experienced in organizing elections including the CoCC election here on Miraheze.-- 03:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 7)  – Aνδρέας  talk&#124;contributions 21:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 8)  Intelligent person, he gets my support. He can help the website. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 9) Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 10) Bertie (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 11) そらたこ (talk) 13:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 12) Have also seen this user around on the WMF projects and I am sure his great experience with management will help him. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Dross

 * 1) I do not really know this user too well so I probably shouldn't vote. --EK ● c ● g 17:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 2) no issue but we've only got 3 seats and I'd like myself to get in :)  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  17:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't know about this user.  17:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 4)  I consider this nomination very soon. I would expect more experience and more interaction with the community before voting in favor.  Hispano76 (talk) 18:16, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 5)  While Dross has been very helpful around Meta, I feel like the commissioner role is different and that the three other candidates are more able to deal with it at the time, as they have more experience in these matters. Reception123  (talk) ('C' ) 18:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 6)  I don't know this user personally, and I want to insure my preferred candidates get in since there are only three seats. &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 7) One of the problems of Miraheze, IMO, is that certain users tend to have multiple powers at a time, and thus the powers aren't fully separated. I think having a non-staff/admin member on the commission is a good way to change this.-- 03:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 8)  Same as @sig. He is pretty active too and I saw him on a few website-wide rules elections and he always had an agreeable and honest opinion. That being said, he could be a little more active. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 14:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 9) I do not know this user that well. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 20:58, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 10) I think it is great that Dross is helping out on Miraheze, and that is why I do not want to discourage them with an oppose vote. But, I think it is too early to take on such a role and perhaps there is also not enough knowledge about how things work on Miraheze. --DeeM28 (talk) 09:56, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Voting Eligibility
the following section is used to confirm a user is eligible to vote. This section may only be used by stewards, staff (including the board).
 * Examknow - checked by ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  17:55, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Paperclip - checked by  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  18:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hispano76 - checked by ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  18:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * RhinosF1 - checked by 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * MJL - checked by 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Inven - checked by 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Reception123 - checked by 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * -andreas (renamed from Apap04) This user should be eligible (according to the registration date), but because of the rename, CA tells me that this account on login wiki was created on "19:59, 10 December 2019." However, his/her contributions there shows that s/he has edits on September, and my conclusion is that s/he is indeed ✅.-- 16:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * MarioSuperstar77 - checked by 14:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * 開拓者 (The Pioneer) - checked by Reception123 (talk) ('C' ) 19:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Zppix - checked by 12:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Bertie - checked by 12:42, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * DekuPH2006AJHalili - checked by 12:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * REIWA - checked by 12:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Citronhat - checked by 12:33, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
 * そらたこ - Checked by Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 23:43, 20 December 2019 (UTC)