User talk:Money12123

How to create wikis
Here's the link if you want to create a wiki. https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWiki-- Iron Sword 23 (talk) 22:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That special page doesn't exist. Musicismylife (talk) 01:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Here. https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWiki Iron Sword 23 (talk) 02:02, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Iron Sword 23 just included the  without a space following the link, so the link did not work. Dmehus (talk) 02:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your wiki ideas
I noticed your blog about other Reception Wikis. I have plans to create two wikis for stores, however I have temporarily halted my future plans until I get unblocked from Qualitipedia and until the rebrand is complete. For reference, I will link your blog here: mh:crappygames:Blog:Uncreated/unknown wikis. I also noticed that you trimmed it down. I would like to create a new network so that we can lump a bunch of the non-Qualitipedia wikis together into their own network. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * In addition to that, I'd like the wikis to specifically be called Hateable Shops & Products Wiki and Adorable Shops & Products Wiki because I think "Shops & Products" sounds and looks better than "Products & Shops". I'm not 100% sure why I feel this way, probably because Shops is a shorter word than Products so Shops should go first. Also, about the new network, I think that it would be a good idea to make a network focused on reception related to real life rather than media. To be specific, wikis like the school wikis, the shops and products wikis and the action wikis (which is another idea I have) could go on the network. To avoid drama though, the Godawful Schools Wiki will only contain closed schools and the Decent Schools Wiki will have a rule saying that you should NOT add your own school to the wiki for your own safety. Musicismylife (talk) 08:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Musicismylife (talk) 09:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Sign your comments
Hello Musicismylife. I am Mazzaz. Please don't forget to sign your posts on the discussion pages by adding ~ at the end of your comment. Thanks! --Mazzaz (talk) 16:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Mazzaz My apologies for not signing before, I already know that you have to do that, I just kept forgetting. Musicismylife (talk) 22:28, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quick deletion of User:Bluetigerelevenblue
The page you wrote, User:Bluetigerelevenblue, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add wait below the line QD and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. --Magogre (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

WP:2RE
Hello FatBurn0000, I am Magogre and I wanted to leave a note here about the page where you've reverted my edits. Presently, MediaWiki software doesn't follow the double redirects and user's aren't to encouraged to make ones. Double redirects are fixed by bots on other projects. But we don't have bots to do this task here, we sometimes put the effort to fix these. But it looks like you don't want us to fix a certain page because you like that, that way. Please see w:WP:2RE for information on double redirects and let me fix that page. Thank you. Ma͡gogre (talk) 05:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Can confirm that there is zero functional purpose for a page to redirect twice, in fact only inconvenience. I'm sure would agree. --Raidarr (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * No idea why my opinion is needed but yes what you've not said is fine. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  11:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Regarding discussions
I have reverted an edit on DarkMatterMan's talk page via this edit for two reasons; one, because it is entirely incorrect by established conventions of Meta which you frankly should have seen by now across the noticeboards and even the above conversation and 2, because it disrupted my own reply and the reply to me that were following the far better established conventions that Meta uses. I ask that you do not enforce or continue to use an arbitrary spacing standard for discussions when in practice that is clearly not how it is typically used. If you need more rationale how the responses reply to each other, thus go down a chain of replies in a way similar to reddit format, I can explain for the conversation in question. Thank you. --Raidarr (talk) 23:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Right, but according to WP:TALKREPLY, that is how it is supposed to be. FatBurn0000 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello
I apologise for my actions, I did not know I was not allowed to do what I did. Could I please be unblocked? FatBurn0000 (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It will have to wait until Trust & Safety decide whether to take any action or refer back to the community. If they choose to leave it up to the community, that would depend on why you thought it okay and whether I think it was an accident or deliberate outing. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  09:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't realise that it was a personal thing. I just thought that it was odd to not rename someone's talk page when they're renamed. Also, if it's a personal thing, then I just want to mention that by looking at the history and difference between revisions, it was still pretty clear that they were the same account, so the talk page should be deleted if anything. FatBurn0000 (talk) 09:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes the talk page probably should be removed alongside the userpage (which should have been when the account was deleted) but that's up to T&S to do. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  09:21, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What's going on now? FatBurn0000 (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Doug to read his IRC PM ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Could I please be unblocked now? FatBurn0000 (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Still same situation. I've asked to check his PM multiple times.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  10:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no objections to FatBurn0000 being unblocked. I personally preferred a time-limited block of a week or two, if a block was required at all. This was a good-faith mistake, but one which was misguided. Dmehus (talk) 19:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Finally unblocked based on the above. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  19:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * RhinosF1, ✅. A quick comment re: your log summary, though I can see your rationale for consulting with the Trust and Safety team on this, per the guidance I received from Owen that this was not a Trust and Safety matter, it is really a local/global community decision on whether it's appropriate to link or not to link former anonymized, renamed, and locked user accounts that were otherwise ineligible to to consent to the legal user agreement with the apparent new user accounts that are now otherwise eligible/presumed to be eligible. While I suppose I could've made a comment from Doug, stating that Trust and Safety has no interest in expressing a view in this thread, I was replying mainly in a Meta administrator capacity since you pinged me for my opinion on the block/potential unblock. Dmehus (talk) 20:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't expect you to take 11 days to answer my PM asking you to put that in an email. I was well aware of that 11 days ago but I wanted it somewhere documented so if anyone asked in future I knew where it was. IRC logs are messy and hard to search. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  20:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Signature test
FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)