User talk:Quarter1VCS

Lock this account. Quarter1VCS (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You're confirming that you are the alternate account of, right? Dmehus (talk) 20:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I do not confirm that, I confirm I want a lock of this account. Quarter1VCS (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That's not what's been confirmed on Discord, Marvel Cinematic Universe Discord server by the wiki verified account of Discord user BlackWidowMovie0. In addition, you told to lock this account as a "spam only account." Now you are attempting to deceive. Not a good look, I will say. You should come clean. Dmehus (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't confirm this is an alt on here because it is already confirmed on Discord. Yes, this account was created a while ago. You know why this was created. I am requesting a lock on this account for known reasons to you. Quarter1VCS (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I have nothing further to say other than to say you've, again, contravened user accounts policy. Dmehus (talk) 20:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Not really, this account was created months ago, I forgot about it, I remembered, I am trying to not shout this to the world, so I asked for a lock of this quietly. Where in that have I violated user accounts policy? Quarter1VCS (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * When you created the alternate account doesn't matter so much as the fact you created a user page/user talk page in violation of your Meta block. That is the violation, and NDKilla did give you what I thought was a very clear warning on the matter. You also then attempted to deceive Reception123 and I. That is not okay. Dmehus (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Again, this was NOT what I was trying to achieve here. I never deceived you, it's explained clearly in Discord. I created a talk page to request the lock on the account, and the userpage because I hate redlinks. Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you just lock this account and we can continue this conversation in Discord? Where it's the tiniest bit more confidential? Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Why the need for more confidentiality? You've attempted to abuse the community's trust, again, by presenting to your wiki's community this user account as a new  and a different person. You did also tell  in  that this was a spam only account. Dmehus (talk) 21:07, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ALL EXPLAINED IN DISCORD. It's laid out perfectly. When I had my bans removed, I was going to seek a fresh start. I requested a lock on this account because I created another one, to be used when bans were removed. You knew this. I asked Reception to lock it, as it was technically an unused account, and therefore should be locked to prevent abuse, my mistake in my choice of words. Now, I can't seek a fresh start with this account, because you've announced to the whole world that this is my account. Great job, Dmehus. Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * A clean start means correcting your previous problematic behaviour. If you wanted to do that, though, why claim this was a spam only account lock? Additionally, why create a user talk page while you are still blocked on Meta? He can't do that. Clean starts don't mean clean starts from existing sanctions against you as a person. Dmehus (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That's what you suggested to me, on IRC, and I heeded that advice. This is a future account. To. Be. Used. Why is that so hard to understand? Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Why create the user talk page, or even the global user page, in violation of your Meta block, though? Why lie and request it as a spam only account lock? Dmehus (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

First, because redlinks annoy me, so I created the global userpage, which technically is allowed, as I'm not blocked on loginwiki. I created the talk page because again, redlinks annoy me. I said it was a spam-only account because I didn't want most people to know. I've answered these questions at least 3 times. Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No, you're not blocked on Loginwiki, but there was no need for you to create a user talk page for this account on Meta to avoid redlinks. As a user account that has never edited, there would've been no redlinks (until now, of course). I'm unsatisfied with your explanation about the spam only account report. Deception is deception, and that shows you're, frankly, not trustworthy. You should've not reported it in at all, and waited for Reception123 or I to reply to your direct messages regarding the lock, then there'd not be a user accounts policy violation. Dmehus (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Fine. Sorry. I shouldn't have reported it. I am not trustworthy. Great. I literally asked someone to lock an account. BTW, it's not deception, as I informed Reception what was going on right after I requested the lock on this account. Quarter1VCS (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2020 (UTC)