Stewards' noticeboard

= CheckUser = {{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| If you suspect sockpuppetry, please compile evidence for this. Include as many links to similar behavior as possible such as overlaps in editing styles, grammar, edit summaries, or even SocialProfile data. Failure to do this may result in delays or a decline.

To make a request, place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:

Username@ wiki
}}

AkiGoto@tabemonowiki
--虎之介 (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no relation to きじゅはレスバ大将. I am absolutely innocent. I now have only one account registered. Please investigate. AkiGoto (talk) 06:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 虎之介, perhaps you should explain the meanings of the name "きじゅはレスバ大将". The name is too difficult for the people other than native Japanese. AkiGoto (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * agree because I have doubts about AKIGoto(日本語訳AKIGotoさんに疑いがあるため賛成します)--パンダ会長 (talk) 12:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * パンダ会長, votes of majority is not relevant to this kind of issues. But what reasons for your doubt about me? AkiGoto (talk) 19:43, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This user(AkiGoto) seems like Vandal. by Buel ·Talk·e-mail 14:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Buel, if you want to demonize me, try spawning dedicated topics. This topic is whether me and きじゅはレスバ大将 are related or not. Not directly related to whether I am vandal or not. --AkiGoto (talk) 23:48, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Do you understand why 虎之介 mada a request for checkuser?You told us that you're not related to きじゅはレスバ大将.You don't have to oppose about this CU request if so. by Buel ·Talk·e-mail 07:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I do understand what have been said. I do not know what have not been said. --AkiGoto (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * (back)I assure English-speaking people that "きじゅはレスバ大将" is a derogatory name for a particular user. If you translate it into plain English,「 Kiju is a guy who always many replies(I don't like)」.
 * It may be translated to "Kiju is the disputer king". --AkiGoto (talk) 00:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

I doubt the relationship between the two accounts that were active late at night when most Japanese were not active. In this case, the parties' counterarguments are irrelevant.Please check user. If there is nothing to do with the two accounts, there is no problem at all.--虎之介 (talk) 05:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Good. --AkiGoto (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Note: I have just created the second account User:AkiGotoBot now. The purpose of it is for automation by using API from scripts. --AkiGoto (talk) 04:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

= Requests for (un)(b)locks = {{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Please use this section to request global locks (including self-locks), blocks, or their rescindment. If reporting vandalism-only accounts, make sure they fit the global standard definition for vandalism only accounts: there must be no or almost no constructive editing behaviour and, additionally, this behaviour should be occurring on multiple wikis.

If requesting a global lock, place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:

Username

 * Include your reason here ~
 * Include your reason here ~

If you're including multiple accounts in your report, format it as follows

Username

 * Include your reason here ~

}}

きじゅはレスバ大将

 * Vandalism across the wikis. 1108-Kiju /Talk 17:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The name of this account very looks like Kiju's one.('きじゅ' means 'Kiju' in Japanese)Account was created only to hate to him. by Buel ·Talk·e-mail 17:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Already blocked on some wikis,but still not locked. by Buel ·Talk·e-mail 19:25, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * by Buel ·Talk·e-mail 04:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, apologies for the delay. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, apologies for the delay. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

とぅさーつじゃないから恥じゃないもん

 * Vandalism across the wikis. 1108-Kiju /Talk 10:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, apologies for the delay. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

関越斗宇沙津街道

 * Vandalism across the wikis.
 * This account was created in June 2021, and after vandalizing the newusopediawiki, it stopped contributing, but has now returned and has been spamming multiple wikis. 1108-Kiju /Talk 10:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, apologies for the delay. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

20230102

 * newusopediawiki・chakuwikiwiki vandalizing.	--富士見野男 (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

2023/0108

 * mwpedia&chizunet　vandalizing.--虎之介 (talk) 11:09, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

miss--虎之介 (talk) 11:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * revision. --1108-Kiju /Talk 11:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


 * ✅ by Agent Isai. --1108-Kiju /Talk 11:30, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

= Permissions =

Administrator/Bureaucrat access
{{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Use this section to request Stewards grant you local administrator or bureaucrat on a wiki without active/any bureaucrats (or unwilling bureaucrats if they refuse to certify a successful vote) following a local election. We normally don't grant permissions without a local election for advanced rights like this so you'll need to make a local election unless you accidentally demoted yourself.

If you accidentally removed your own permissions, you can also use this section to request readdition.

Please place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:

Username@ wiki
Include any comments here ~ }}

Eliann Kai@thehoardofeliannkaiwiki
So basically, after restoring the wikis, there was a problem with my wiki. I tried to edit it but it won't let me because I'm not a member or administrator, even though I'm the owner and since it's a private wiki, the only member and administrator. So yeah, any advice, suggestion or smth, please?? Eliann Kai (talk) 05:51, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pinging @Agent Isai or @Reception123 for permissions assistance, see above.
 * Wiki URL: --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 06:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. For future reference, requests pertaining to permissions belong here, on the Stewards' noticeboard. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 00:59, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank u so much!! And sorry for posting here, but I'm grateful you helped me (and for telling me for future references)!! Have a great day, amigo!! Eliann Kai (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Spyro@spyromerchandisewiki
I have the same issue as above. Since my wiki was lost completely, all of my permissions have vanished. Spyro (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. For future reference, requests pertaining to permissions belong here, on the Stewards' noticeboard. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 01:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Robbiescott@rlifewiki
I've just had the 'rlife' wiki created. I'm the only member but cannot edit anything as I don't seem to have the correct permissions. Either I'm being stupid (I'm a total MediaWiki novice) or something has gone wrong. Can someone help? Robbiescott (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅. For future reference, requests pertaining to permissions belong here, on the Stewards' noticeboard. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 01:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Rex00@enstarswiki
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rex00 (User talk:Rex00 • Special:Contributions/Rex00)
 * Have you tried sending the bureaucrat a message on their talk page here on Meta or an email via Special:EmailUser? For you to obtain rights, you must undergo a local election first as wikis are run on a democratic model. If you haven't been able to contact the bureaucrat and need help setting up an election, let us know. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 08:19, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Archlamps@wineandsongwiki
My wiki was affected by the recent data outage, and while it's been restored, i've been demoted to a viewer. Since it's a private wiki, I can't even access any of the pages to look at them. I appreciate any help! Archlamps (talk) 12:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Should be fixed, apologies for the issue. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 08:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Dc1017@ttdversewiki
Approximately a month ago I created a private wiki so I could map out world building for a fictional world I'm creating. Since the db141 outage has been remedied I've been unable to log onto my wiki or any of its pages. The only thing I can access is an incomplete main page that gives me the same permission error prompt when I attempt to edit this. I checked on here and saw that I wasn't the only one having this issue, but I'm unable to find these questions or a solution to my problem so I figure I would ask on here. Any help would be appreciated, thank you :) Dc1017 (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * This appears to be a permissions issue. Go to the Stewards' noticeboard to request that you be repromoted to administrator and bureaucrat on your wiki. Tali64³ (talk) 02:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I have moved your request here to the Stewards' noticeboard. For reference, issues pertaining to user rights belong on this specific section of the noticeboard. Anyhow, I have ✅ you to bureaucrat and sysop. Apologies for the issue. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 02:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

OrangeStar@emulationwiki

 * ✅ Agent Isai  Talk to me! 22:40, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Other access
{{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Use this section to request Stewards grant you minor local access such as autopatrolled, confirmed, and rollbacker on wikis without active/any bureaucrats.

Please place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:

Username@ wiki
Include any comments here ~ }}

Removal
{{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Use this section to request Stewards remove rights from a user (such as bureaucrat) following a local revocation or resignation. You can also use this section to request bureaucrats remove your own rights on a wiki or on all wikis.

Please place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:

Username@ wiki
Include any comments here ~ }}

Pérola Maniaco@destriupediawiki
Bem, um amigo meu me deu status Burocrata na Destruipedia, mas eu não desejo ter uma responsabilidade tão alta assim, apesar que eu ainda possa ser sysop apenas para moderação f&%$k. Infelizmente não consigo remover eu mesmo o status de burocrata, algum staff global poderia remover isso para mim?

Translation: Well, a friend of mine gave me Bureaucrat status in Destruipedia, but I don't want to have such a high responsibility, although i can still be sysop just for f&%$k moderation. Unfortunately I can't remove the bureaucrat status myself, could some global staff remove it for me? Pérola Maniaco (talk) 23:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm still waiting for a response from someone. Pérola Maniaco (talk) 13:11, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved to the Stewards noticeboard. AN is reserved for activities on Meta. This page (Stewards' noticeboard) typically is for things that require Steward intervention. --Blad  (talk • contribs • global) 16:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I did not know that. Thank you very much for the move and the warning. Now it's just waiting for a response, but I feel that it will be easy to solve my case, since I'm only asking for the removal of my "tool". Pérola Maniaco (talk) 14:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

'''Where are the Staff to judge my request? Are you on vacation by any chance?''' Pérola Maniaco (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Probably, granted it's around the holidays. Rest assured, they will eventually tackle this request. --Blad  (talk • contribs • global) 15:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:15, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

= Wiki (un)deletion = {{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Use this section to request Stewards undelete a wiki if it was deleted for inactivity (not if it's 'closed' (i.e. uneditable but still online) in which case you must use Requests for reopening wikis).

To request a wiki deletion, if your wiki has multiple contributors, you must hold a local discussion beforehand and consensus must be in favor of the wiki closing. If your wiki is a small/personal one where you are the sole contributor, no discussion is needed.

Please place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:


}}

Chouverse Wiki

 * ✅ Agent Isai  Talk to me! 08:11, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

= Restricted setting change requests = {{Hidden|Instructions/Read before making a request| Use this section to request Stewards change a setting which is restricted and cannot be changed by bureaucrats, including extensions which require a Steward to enable them (such as Cargo, Semantic MediaWiki).

Please place the following at the very bottom of this section. Replace every section as needed:


}}

Unreal_Neo Encyclopedia

 * Additional reasons, Content on the wiki is read by people. Thanks! Sucrose Fans Rosalina129 16:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Wiki brought back from original db141 so closing as moot. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
 * So your mean is Wiki's Dormancy still effective?(I am that wiki's manager,In the private communication with the applicant, I think the applicant did not understand your meaning, so I need to confirm it here) BJ99 (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * However, I see Dormancy Policy/Exemptions has (Unreal_Neo Encyclopedia) dormancy exemptions...
 * Are you sure to checked this Exemptions's Queues?
 * (I don't think I fully understood what you meant by that. I thought that the dormancy exemption policy was cancelled automatically for special reasons...) Sucrose Fans Rosalina129 15:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Twisted Wonderland Wiki

 * This wiki was restored from db141 so closing as moot. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:23, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Lhmnwiki

 * ✅ Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 11:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

chakurikiwiki

 * If I understand correctly, this wiki is used to discuss among members of the chakuwiki community whenever there's issues with the main wiki? If so I'm not convinced that would be something that would be eligible for a Dormancy Policy exemption as it doesn't seem the content of such a wiki would be valuable to be 'read by users' if it's sort of a backup wiki. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 21:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Enable Cargo on The Secret of Cerulean Sand wiki

 * ✅ Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Ucronias Wiki

 * ✅ Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Reception123, no, it is not enabled --Hispano76 (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

MTG Card Wiki

 * ✅ Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Fiction Wiki

 * This extension is no longer supported and is pending removal, as revision compression is necessary for continued platform stability.
 * While less convenient, the MassEditRegex extension has been proposed as a more-powerful alternative and has been used successfully by a few who previously relied on ReplaceText. --NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 22:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
 * MassEditRegex does not work for me. Darkrai18 (talk) 22:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

The Space Between Wiki

 * Hi there, please login or have the wiki's bureaucrat request this. Thanks! Agent Isai  Talk to me! 08:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, apologies, hadn't realized I wasn't logged in. C: V2nguard (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

= Wiki reports =

Real Life Villains Wiki Potential Content Policy Violations?
At least 95% of the pages on there, do not have a source for reference. Considering that this wiki also features Internet users, I believe the wikis need to be warned for not having references to what they did wrong (EX: News report, or Wikipedia info) and they should delete pages that do not have sources. Nidoking (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Moved to wiki reports. --Blad  (talk • contribs • global) 20:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with Nidoking, there are some pages throwing the kind of accusations you don't want to throw without solid references. Some sanction is in order. OrangeStar (talk) 21:27, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some examples? Agent Isai  Talk to me! 00:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There are various pages on there that don't have any references at all, like this page for example https://reallifevillains.miraheze.org/wiki/Jake_Martin and https://reallifevillains.miraheze.org/wiki/Heather_Martin Nidoking (talk) 11:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Any update? Nidoking (talk) 14:41, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * All the wiki really. When it covers relatively unknown living people being accused of stuff like child abuse, murder, and all that, it shouldn't assume that these are common knowledge, they should include solid references for such claims. OrangeStar (talk) 19:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe at this juncture it would be ideal to raise the idea locally and see how receptive local managers are to cleaning up sources. Seeing how willing they are on this in public could give Stewards some ground to raise this topic as a priority if their intervention is required. --Raidarr (talk) 15:42, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll give that a try. OrangeStar (talk) 19:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Listen, what the wikis say will be heard of, and people will use that as their source much more than anything else.
 * If you're gonna go out of your way to get a wiki meant to educate people about real life villains and why people should not be them, then that means you are enabling bad people. RoboticBloxxer (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The concern raised here is that the wiki is mostly unsourced. Given that it has many articles dealing with people, this could be a potential violation of CP 3 (and anyway, ignoring whatever the policy may say, it's best to include sources for the claims in any article whenever it's dealing with real life stuff, be it living people or other things). It's not our intention to enable bad people. OrangeStar (talk) 17:58, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * To be honest it looks like you missed a few words and that muddles the point you were making but I assume you are implying that people trying to hold the wiki accountable are enabling bad people.
 * The problem with 'what the wikis say will be heard of' is that 'heard of' is literally hearsay. I can make up whatever crap I want and put it on the wiki. As long as it's obscure or I can whip out minority arguments/political buzzwords to support it, it's good and with the right timing it probably won't be challenged. If there wasn't a wide internet with thorough and better backed up information that demonstrates why people are 'bad' (between more objective sources as Wikipedia with a deliberate neutral tone, and blogs/journalism going into the nasty details), perhaps your implication of social benefit would hold more value. But it doesn't. The wiki brings little overall benefit and even less so if it's too lazy to back itself up and it's a sludge of what people think or remember. Your post enables and excuses lazy writing that can just as well enable harassment. That is the concern involved here.
 * If 'look just google it' is what you are implying as the reason to sustain the wiki then you've failed to even demonstrate why the wiki should exist. If arbitrary 'oh I heard about it' is good enough to sustain the wiki content then it might as well be closed now. I'd rethink this approach.
 * I'm probably going to be gone by the time you reply, so this is my final 2c on the matter. I don't even think the wiki is quite that much of a problem to warrant closure or direct intervention but your "defense" here does a disservice. --Raidarr (talk) 13:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
 * That wiki must be closed due to lack of management and any other problems. Also there already Wikipedia which had more accurate information. Nirmanyu9 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

= Discussion closure =

= Miscellaneous =

Bureaucrats permission issue
Hello, when i started to tweak and edit my wiki, i removed the bureaucrats cuz i thought it was a decoration/example group rather than actually being a group that gave me almost every permission on my wiki which i deleted in my wiki and i can't modify proprely anymore.

Is it possible to revert this action or to restore to default settings in my wiki please?

My wiki Minecraft Inescapable Prison Community ( i barely started it and im new so...)

https://mipc.miraheze.org

Thanks - TheArchitect 23:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)TheArchitectMC


 * I'm not sure why you thought bureaucrat was an example group. It is one of the default groups of MediaWiki, and it gives you access to ManageWiki. If you do decide to delete the bureaucrat group in the future, make sure you create another group with  rights and assign yourself to that group first. Tali64³ (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ by Agent Isai. --Blad  (talk • contribs • global) 14:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

A Little Help
So my Tamagotchi Fanon Wiki had everything deleted ever since it got dropped from the db141 outage despite not originally being on that disk so why is everything gone all of a sudden? I'm just wondering. Snorunt (talk) 21:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Please see Tech:SRE_noticeboard for more details.--NotAracham (talk • contribs • global) 00:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Okay. Thanks! Snorunt (talk) 06:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

VisualEditor Problems
Can I ask Stewards to help me adjust the VisualEditor's options?

In my Wiki VisualEditor extension, no matter how I set the Settings, there is always only an Edit Source button in the upper function bar. The Edit button that normally enters VisualEdit Mode does not appear. This is a terrible problem. Because of this problem, it is very inconvenient to edit (currently only appended after the address bar  to enter visual editor mode normally. This is a tricky process.)

Maybe there's something wrong with the extension Settings? I tried to re-add the extension and adjust the Settings in the parameter Settings, but the "visual Editor Mode" Edit Button did not appear properly.

If can, can Stewards help adjust it to display the Edit and Edit Source buttons properly?

Thank you very much! Sucrose Fans Rosalina129 14:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC)


 * 2023.1.7 19:14 (GMT+08:00) Update
 * The problem with Gadgets that could not display both "Edit" and "Edit Source" with the addition of the "Gadgets" extension was solved. So the request has been automatically rescinded. Anyway, thanks to Miraheze for the service! Sucrose Fans Rosalina129 11:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Scope change request
Hi, I'd like to make this into a more public maps wiki, as I have previously requested. Is that okay? Thanks for your help! Firestar464 (talk) 09:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * That's perfectly fine. I have noted your new scope. Thanks for informing us! Agent Isai  Talk to me! 06:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Issue with the AMYTW staff
On mh:amazingyoutubers:Amazing YouTubers Wiki, the staff are, in my opinion, rather lacking in competence and are not very reasonable. To be specific on this story, when Qualitipedia was on the verge of closing, DuchesstheSponge, a bureaucrat who had not contributed to the wiki in a year, attempted to close the wiki. After two failed attempts, he, for whatever reason, decided to abandon his plan to shut down the wiki and started legitimately contributing to it - however, I can't say the moderating has been particularly legitimate. Not long after returning to contributing, he edited the SMG4 page and removed "War of the Fat Italians 2021" from the list of good episodes and moved it to the list of bad episodes without any good explanation - he just said "fuck WOTFI 2021". When a user reverted this, he reverted them and gave no further reasoning to his actions. In addition to this, he also created a page on the SML video "Jeffy's 18th Birthday," which I put up for deletion because I felt it would fit better on Terrible SML Videos Wiki. However, Duchess reverted my edit with no explanation. I then created a topic on his talk page, questioning these two edits along with his apparent rule about the necessity of plainlinks, but he ignored me for a while, before eventually deleting the topic because it was "making him uncomfortable," which, to me, is just pure ignorance.

Meanwhile, thePCGamer, an administrator, is another staff member who has shown a lack of competence. Before DuchesstheSponge even closed the thread mentioned above, they marked the thread as resolved before Duchess could even answer, even though it was not their concern what was going on. Although I cannot prove exactly what they said due to Duchess deleting the topic, I believe their reasoning for closing the thread was that I was "annoying everyone," even though I was asking Duchess questions I believe are important. When I added a second topic about Duchess' behaviour due to his previous complete ignorance, thePCGamer again closed it, questioning why I had to keep asking questions when Duchess doesn't want to reply, and my reasoning why I have to do that is because there is no good reason he doesn't want to reply - it is realistically laziness. After a while, they blocked me because I am asking questions that "nobody seems to care about". When another user questioned this, they claimed that I stalked someone with no evidence, and also used many of the same lazy excuses they and Duchess constantly use. Raidarr and other users thankfully defended me, though thePCGamer has not yet ended their tactics, as they have again closed a thread unrelated to them since.

Pacsonic9000, the owner of AMYTW, although not as bad as Duchess and thePCGamer, still has their issues. They added me to the admin blacklist because I was "annoying" and thought that links and images don't qualify as evidence (which I have reasons for, also I never said links don't qualify as evidence), and also later said I had stalked Duchess (which again, there is no evidence of) and "made him uncomfortable" (which is quite pathetic) and also criticised me for adding Duchess' rant to the New Reception Wiki, which proves that they cannot handle people criticising Duchess, and also called me out on trying to revive Qualitipedia even though the RFC did not directly prevent people from doing that, nor did it necessarily attempt to do so. They also deleted a topic on their talk page questioning their actions, and marked a thread as resolved because I was "annoying," even though the thread was months ago anyway.

I am reporting this here because I have not been able to make any negotiations with the staff, and therefore I now see the only option is reporting it here. Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 00:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I should also note I opened a discussion regarding their rights (this), but that has generated little discussion, despite a topic notice being posted on PCGamer and Duchess' talk page. --<span style="font-weight: bold; background:linear-gradient(#ff00ff,#c800c8,purple,#c800c8,#ff00ff);; -webkit-background-clip:text !important; -webkit-text-fill-color:transparent; font-family:monospace">Blad  (talk • contribs • global) 20:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Please shut down Mixed Receptions TV Shows Wiki.
This wiki needs to be shut down, as it is a horrible mess full of vandalism and biased pages. Plus, I fear that people will move pages from the Terrible and Best TV Shows wikis to this wiki. ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) 00:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * A couple of things:
 * Being a mess does not mean it should be closed. It can be cleaned up.
 * If people move pages from those wikis, then you can put them up for deletion.
 * Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 02:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * But Money12123, the wiki's current state is far from salvageable. There is so much vandalism and biased pages, and the current owner of this wiki, PATRICKSTARSEVEN is inactive. It's best if we get rid of this dumpster fire. ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) 03:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some examples of vandalism which went unfixed for a long period of time? Bias is subjective and can't be actioned by Stewards. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 06:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * One example of vandalism that went unfixed for a long period of time is Noggin, a page that consists of nothing but vandalism. Another example is Warner Bros. Home Entertainment, a page that has nothing to do with the scope of Mixed Reception TV Shows Wiki. ShawnTehLogoBoi (talk) 13:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * How could it be "far from salvageable"? Just go through every page and fix them or put them up for deletion. Money12123 (contribs | CentralAuth) 03:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Vandalism alone isn't enough to close a wiki, in my opinion. As anyone can edit wikis, anyone can revert vandalism in those wikis. imo, there's only a few select instances when vandalism would warrant closing a wiki, for example when it's a persistent vandal, when just reverting edits is a waste of time, and the admins are inactive and thus unable to block vandals, but even then you could probably get a Global Sysop to block them and could get a local election going if there are still active editors in order to replace the inactive admins. OrangeStar (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Indeed, vandalism by itself isn't a reason to close a wiki. The Content Policy however states that "Wiki administrators are also expected to know this policy and are responsible for ensuring that their wikis do not fall outside the bounds of these rules." so if administrators are inactive or unwilling to stop vandalism and the wiki becomes toxic (§5) or effectively has no leadership or no rules (§4) then it would have to be closed as a Content Policy violation. That being said, when reporting a wiki links to pages must be provided as Stewards can't be expected to go through every page hoping to find what is being reported. Also general statements like "there's vandalism" or "it's biased" aren't very helpful. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 21:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)