Requests for Comment/Community imposed ban on User:Lawrence-Prairies

Reasoning for this request
This user, who has gone by several different names across all of Miraheze, has been under the scrutiny of several staff members and normal users over the past 1-2 months. If you've commented on a recent Requests for Comment you're probably aware of the user, at least in the vaguest of senses.

Some information:
 * Their global account information indicates they have 219 edits on this wiki as of writing, nearly 200 edits on their own wiki about the elements of the periodic table, 5 edits on a test wiki made for their own username, 5 edits on mine and User:Reception123's test wiki, and 1 edit or less on all other edits where their local account exists.
 * They are indefinitely blocked on Mine and Reception's test wiki for failure to follow the few local policies we have, including actions like undoing a block designated as a CheckUser block where the user had no knowledge of the circumstances regarding the block and 'couldn't see contribs;' unblocked a locked account where this may not have made much difference, if the target is ever unlocked they should remain blocked on testwiki; and then blocked me, the founder of the site, for 'being annoying'
 * This user likes to repeatedly block various miraheze users and staff from their wiki, then reduce the block duration or remove the block completely with indications that they are 'being nice' by doing this
 * Although this is allowed by global and local policy, it seems rude and disrespectful to the users blocked, especially because it essentially does nothing. Most of the blocked users have 0 contributions there, so blocking them isn't really doing anything besides adding to an ongoing dispute
 * The user also likes to delete things a lot
 * Again, allowed by global and local policy, but I have serious concerns about them requesting access to advanced tools that would give them access to private information, where the only thing they might do with it is just suppress 'accidental edits' instead of normal deletion, or even more standard, keeping them there..
 * The user has started two different requests for comment in a very close policy on what is arguably the same matter
 * Additionally the user created a third similar but more unique request regarding global user groups.
 * All three of these RfCs came after a personal request for CheckUser on that wiki was denied
 * The Stewards policy, which is a community approved global policy regarding the scope of responsibility of Stewards, says that these rights may be delegated to other users if a need arise(s), yet no user (LP or otherwise) has demonstrated to a Steward that the Steward body is incapable of handling these requests in a timely manner.
 * The user has repeatedly tried to have Miraheze install extensions that 1) bypass our security model 2) allow said user to break global user accounts.
 * Not going to find links/diffs for all of these, but there's several (closed) phabricator tasks on the matter.
 * The user has used our issue tracker to create personal events, and then hid those events from Phabricator admins
 * This is, obviously, my opinion but the user seems to think that they are always right and that they should have full control. Examples include saying things like 'granting access to oversight doesn't violate the privacy policy!' (don't remember the diff, pls edit in) when it infact does. Oversight/suppression is the highest level of on-wiki deletion, and up until now (testwiki being an exception) it has only been used to hide personal information. They also disregard most things regarding security concerns in extensions or policies, and continuously argue for similar things anyways
 * The user has repeatedly modified comments by other users, sometimes entirely removing opposing comments.
 * The user has a suspicious background, such as using User:AmandaNP's name as "her sister's," using the User:DeltaQuad account name, who holds elevated rights on the English Wikipedia, and sharing an IP address with someone indefinitely blocked on enwp for long term abuse
 * The user has also used their elevated wiki creator permissions to 'close' and reopen their wiki at their own convenience, when this does things besides prevent editing, and an extension that protects all pages was installed at their request
 * See the global lock log of 8 Dec - 9 Dec for locked accounts controlled by LP.

Proposal 1

 * Lawrence-Prairies is to be globally locked, along with any other accounts (such as the one she created while logged in even though their other accounts were locked and their IP is globally blocked (anon only).
 * Their Phabricator account may be disabled now or any time in the future, completely at the discretion of system administrators. If disabled, all tasks assigned to them shall be orphaned
 * Their GitHub account will not be blocked immediately, but will be blocked at the first sign of abuse or disruption (up to system administrator discretion)
 * Their IP address should be globally hardblocked

Comments

 * The only downside to this I see is losing a wiki creator. -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 02:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * as proposer -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 02:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposal 2

 * Their currently unlocked global accounts and all external accounts shall not be locked/blocked/disabled, but the user agrees to acknowledge this ban and not edit any sites on Miraheze unless they have been given express permission to perform said edits.

Comments

 * does "not edit any sites on Miraheze" include my own wiki? --- Lawrence-Prairies  (talk contribs email), 02:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Hate to say it, but opposing this in favor of above, or support if this proposal would pass and the above would fail. As the user who unlocked the DeltaQuad (at the time) account, I'm sad to say I'm just really tired of dealing with this. -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 02:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)