User talk:Bukkit

Your signature
Hello your signature contains an unclosed tag. You must add  at the end of your signature. Angelo Pisani (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Ah, that’s the issue that I was having. Thanks!  —［ <span style="font-weight:800; padding:0.25em 0.5em;border-radius:.35em;background-color:#d2527f;background:background-image: linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -khtml-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228););color:rgba(255,255,255,1);text-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)">Bukkit  ］［ Talk  |  Contributions  |  Barnstars  18:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Bongo Cat
Hello Bukkit, since User:Bongo Cat claims to be the User:WikiJS (evident from looking at their userpage) which was your alternative account. Do you have any connection with it? If you have, a small note on the userpage will be appreciated. Because you probably use this username on Wikimedia, it may be a case of impersonation. Thanks :) --Mazzaz (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I got it! --Mazzaz (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Patroller granted - 2021-11-29
Hi, Bukkit. An administrator on Meta has granted you the  user group permission, which gives you the ability to   recent changes and new pages of other Miraheze users (both registered and anonymous) who are  not either autopatrolled or an administrator. In addition, this group also means that your edits are, so other patrollers or administrators don't have to patrol your edits. You should also be aware that the granting of this user group is at the discretion of Meta administrators, so different administrators will have slightly different criteria for granting. Likewise, just as it is a discretionary appointment, revocation is also at the discretion of Meta administrators and, again, each will have their own criteria for revocation.

In the medium-term, plans are in the works to develop a Meta Patrollers School, likely led by one or two active administrators, that will provide a comprehensive set of guidelines for patrollers and answers to commonly asked questions.

Nevertheless, the following are some of the main guidelines for patrolling. If you follow these guidelines completely, it is unlikely your patroller user group should ever be revoked. In technical terms, even when you find content that requires deletion by an administrator or otherwise requires remediation, undoing, reverting, or rolling back (if you are also a, of course), you should always first mark as patrolled any revisions regardless of whether that content is destined to remain extant to the page or even on Meta entirely.


 * 1) When patrolling talk pages, user talk pages, and noticeboards (in Main and Meta namespaces), you should first check to see whether the user properly signed their posts using four tildes . If they have not, you should add unsigned by substitution, where username is the user's username or IP address and the timestamp is the full timestamp from the diff page. As a best practice, you should also link to the diff in your edit summary, so other administrators and patrollers can easily tie your modification to the original edit being modified. To speed up this process, you can copy the   user script from line 5 of this page into either your (a) common.js or (b) global.js page (the latter applying globally on all Miraheze wikis);
 * 2) When patrolling the noticeboards, ask yourself whether this topic is on the correct noticeboard. If it is not, you should move it to the correct noticeboard, by either undoing the edit or manually removing the topic (if there have been intervening edits), again linking to the original noticeboard of the topic and the new noticeboard where it was moved in your edit summary. On the new noticeboard, you would simply paste in the topic (including the section header), linking to the diff page as in the first step. An example edit summary might be , where  ######  represents the numeric revision ID of the originally posted topic;
 * 3) Also when patrolling the noticeboards and talk pages (including user talk pages), as a best practice, take care to kindly fix any formatting mistakes (such as excess line breaks or incorrect wiki code), per WP:LISTGAP;
 * 4) If something requires deletion, you can add delete to the top of the page in question, taking care to follow the instructions on that template page;
 * 5) If you come across a user who repeatedly makes the same mistakes, send them a guidance note on their user talk page, informing of the steps need to edit and post constructively on Meta; and, finally,
 * 6) If in doubt whether something requires remediation or not, patrol it, and then ask any administrator via their user talk page or at Administrators' noticeboard if any further action needs to be taken.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you! --Dmehus (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * for granting me patroller -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 15:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Welcome :) Ugochimobi (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. Please see my reply for this point. Thanks. :) Dmehus (talk) 08:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Moving threads from one noticeboard to another
Hi Bukkit,

Thank you for your patrolling on Meta. I noticed that you moved this thread from Talk:Miraheze, a general Miraheze support talk page similar to community noticeboard, to stewards' noticeboard. While this ended up being handled by the Trust and Safety team, you wouldn't have known this, so that noticeboard is indeed the best venue given the circumstances and available information at the time. However, I initially wondered how that thread appeared on stewards' noticeboard as the signature was dated after the this log action. This is likely a MediaWiki anomaly between localised signature timestamps and logged action timestamps. Nevertheless, the difficulty encountered was from your lack of sufficiently detailed edit summaries. Thus, when moving threads between noticeboards, if you could please link to the source diff and the source noticeboard on the destination noticeboard, as well as well the source diff on the source noticeboard, that would be very helpful and very much appreciated. :)

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 08:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * . -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 22:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Calm
Calm down, man. I noticed that you are desperately making several edits here on Meta, many being silly or unnecessary:,. And that's only after you added a request in RfP, and I voted oppose because you contributed little in Meta. But you don't need that, you just have to wait a while here, or answer (translate) basic questions in the CN or SN, or do something more useful, but not in a hurry. YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 18:05, 5 December 2021 (UTC)


 * First one, it's a twinkle edit. Twinkle is designed for wikipedia, so you'd see some broken templates added by twinkle. Second one, its either another twinkle mistake, he didn't notice that it was used in a SN archive, or he put it to deletion because it's only used in a SN archive. Anpang   Talk   Stuff  02:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

About something
There is no need for your Disappointing Apps Wiki and Awesome Apps Wiki, because there is already Crappy Software Wiki and Good Software Wiki. FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)