User talk:The Super MarioBobFan Bros. Movie

Hello:
Hi, just wanted to let you know about this comment you left on the Stewards' noticeboard. In regards to that, I have reverted that, as it seemed unnecessary for you to get involved in something that has since been resolved with me apologizing to SuperSoul on his talk page on the. If I'm going to be honest, was right about one thing, that I almost drove the narrative of me "not handling criticism" whether or not it was true. The point that I am trying to make here is that I have since handled the apology to him on that said topic. (P.S. I know you meant well with the comment you posted on that said noticeboard.) DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:27, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hi MarioBobFan,

While I can appreciate you may be feeling targeted by Qualitipedia users, and some of it is, rightly, justified, your continuing to create a new thread every time on stewards' noticeboard creates clutter. You must attempt local resolution first. If local administrators don't respond in a very short period of time or respond punitively against you, then, by all means, feel free to request assistance, but I would strongly encourage you to make your request on my user talk page, so I (and my talk page watchers) can help guide you if your report has merit.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 23:50, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Frankly MarioBobFan, I hardly ever see you attempting local remediation. Bringing it directly to here, as stated above, doesn't help in any local way, perhaps even makes things worse by not having the wikis accountable to themselves and only to external pressure. --Raidarr (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Typing character by character at Stewards' noticeboard
Hi MarioBobFan,

I noticed you appeared to be trying to add a reply, by adding one character per edit. This is problematic, and may be reasonably be construed as unnecessary flooding. I'm assuming good faith by assuming you were lagged on Meta Wiki, but that's an argument for simply shelving your reply until later. Please consider this advisement going forward. :)

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * OK, and I did it so I could increase my edits. MarioBobFan (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * MarioBobFan, for your remarkable candor and honesty. That suggests you have both good intentions, good faith, and the capacity to learn, which is so critically important. Please note, though, it is edit quality, not quantity, which matters. Please have a read through of this MediaWiki help page on how to properly format replies to talk pages and user talk pages. Given this, and your reply, I am going to ✅ your   flag as it's clear your edits need, and would benefit from, additional patrolling by patrollers and administrators. It will likely be restored by an administrator, possibly me, when satisfied your edits no longer need patrolling. In terms of timeframes, it could take at least a couple weeks to a month, but it really depends on the contextual circumstances. Dmehus (talk) 22:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * OK and you're welcome. MarioBobFan (talk) 22:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅. This reply you just made is a great start to resolving at least one half of the outstanding issue and to restoring your . Please keep up the positive contributions. Dmehus (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

16 April 2022
Hi MarioBobFan,

I have ✅ for you two weeks on Meta Wiki for persistent disruptive editing, by continuing to edit letter by letter on noticeboards and talk pages to increase your edit count, despite being asked to curtail the practice and your pledging to do so. Given that, this probably should have been an indefinite block, as I really don't know, based on your edits here, that you'll actually cease this disruptive practice, but as with Reception123, I do dislike indefinite sitewide blocks on the first instance, so I'm willing to extend you a bit of courtesy and grace here.

As a reminder, as a blocked user, please remember your obligations with respect to user accounts policy here.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 16:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hi MarioBobFan,

Unfortunately, immediately following your two-week sitewide block expiring, since you proceeded to create this thread and this thread, which are entirely local matters with active local administration, it's clear to me you do not understand the purpose and scope of stewards' noticeboard and are unable, at least currently, to post questions there or raise issues there without some sort of community mediation or moderation to your requests, I have had to partially block you from stewards' noticeboard, as you would clearly benefit from having some sort of community mediation or moderation to your requests. If you have a question, or need to if a request is in scope of stewards, please start a a new thread at your user talk page, adding the template help me or admin help, as applicable, and a volunteer will either (a) answer your question here or (b) move your question to stewards' noticeboard.

As a reminder, as a blocked user, please remember your obligations with respect to user accounts policy here.

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Can I please be unblocked from editing the Stewards’ noticeboard?
It is because of the fact that I do understand the purpose and scope of stewards noticeboard, and I could do edits and make actual noticeboards on that page. Another reason is because of the fact that I never want to be blocked from any editing any wiki page from any wiki (that includes Fandom pages and Wikipedia pages and pages from other wikis as well) in the slightest. help me admin help MarioBobFan (talk) 22:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)


 * That statement does not really show an administrator that you know the scope of the Stewards’ noticeboard and the latter part of your appeal is also a rather weak reason to appeal a ban. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 22:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The former is unconvincing coming so soon and the latter can be replied to simply with 'well, if you don't want a block, don't do the things you were previously blocked for and were explicitly warned would elicit a block again'. That said, this is a gallery comment as I am not strictly a meta administrator and I defer to their input. --Raidarr (talk) 11:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

ShawnTehLogoBoi blocked me from the Loathsome Characters Wiki.
Today, ShawnTeiLogoBoi blocked me from the Loathsome Characters Wiki, and yet one of the users (Suppai) said he would not do it and I deserve a chance to be more constructive as my recent edits have shown. I have had a lot of constructive edits lately, and I would loved to be unblocked. I am mad at him now, and thanks ShawnTeiLogoBoi! 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡MarioBobFan (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)


 * That block he gave you was pretty much unnecessary, so I unblocked you, seeing as you haven't really been too much of an issue within the past couple of months. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

OK. MarioBobFan (talk) 23:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Could someone please restore this blog post?
https://loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Blog:Should_we_add_these_Fairly_OddParents_characters_to_the_Character_wikis%3F&action=edit&redlink=1. It is because of the fact that I loved the blog, and could add characters to it. Today, ShawnTeiLogoBoi deleted it said "No.", yet there are still a handful of blogs about characters that should be added to the character wikis. It's extremely mean spirited and sad that he deleted it, even to the point where he made me mad and cry. This is why it needs and should be restored. MarioBobFan (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)