User talk:Hrvcfr

Excessively requesting assistance on your wikis
Hi Hrvcfr,

I know you mean well in your requests for assistance with your wiki(s), but please do not keep asking other users to assist with your wiki on their user talk pages, as you did here (and elsewhere) or you may end up partially blocked from user talk namespace to mitigate the disruption.

You've already asked on Discord and on community noticeboard. You may relist your community noticeboard thread before two weeks are up, to prevent it from being archived, but now you just need to work on your wiki. The reality is most of our users work on their wikis entirely by themselves, in isolation. Wiki creation is a very solitary activity for most cases. Once you have substantial useful content, you can ask for help promoting your wiki, but in all honesty, if it's a solid wiki, the content will bring the traffic and the users. :)

Hope this helps,

Dmehus (talk) 16:19, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the trouble Dmehus. Hrvcfr (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. I just wanted to gently advise you of our best practices and customs on Meta, before anyone got too annoyed. Learning from mistakes is awesome; not learning from mistakes is usually problematic. Dmehus (talk) 18:39, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Requesting too many wikis and creating user talk pages with users for which you've had no prior interaction
Hi Hrvcfr,

Regrettably, I have had to decline this wiki request, as this would've been your third approved wiki request in as many days and your second approved wiki request today. As I said in my decline note, building one wiki is a lot of work, and takes considerable effort and time. Given your very low level of global contributions, while I do assume good faith, obviously, I do question whether you are indeed just requesting wikis for the sake of collecting hats.

Moreover, I noticed you seem to be monitoring the wiki request queue, which is fine, but your creating the user talk page of the requesting user was unnecessary. I'd suggest you instead wait until the wiki has been approved and created, then reach out to the user on the newly created wiki's local user talk page if you want to help out.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No I'm not trying to collect hats... Ty for having faith. I'm just excited. Hrvcfr (talk) 22:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's great. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 22:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Help me?
I need help with a travel guide miraheze I want to ask for request. Hrvcfr (talk) 23:20, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * As I stated on my user talk page, I would suggest try asking on Discord. Regarding your travel guide, I would strongly recommend against it. You do seem to be creating wikis for the sake of creating wikis. A wiki with no or little content is hardly a wiki. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 13:44, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikis and doug
Doug won't let me create a travel guide wiki. And no one contributions to my wikis. Hrvcfr (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please note that I have moved your discussion from k6ka's user talk page to your user talk page, as your question concerned, entirely, your wanting to request a third wiki in less than a week. While I am not opposed to you creating a third wiki as a travel guide, as I stated in this friendly warning message, you should not contact users randomly with on their user talk pages with questions about wiki requests or requesting volunteers for your wiki. Wiki creation and building is often a solitary activity and, as it stands, you have 10 edits on your first wiki and 15 edits on your second wiki. Instead of making it a month, how about this? When you have written at least 25 content pages on each of your two wikis and made at least 100 edits on each wiki, you can request a travel guide wiki? How does that sound? Dmehus (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sounds fair, but I need helpers. Hrvcfr (talk) 20:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It is the other way round, . You want something to write down and then you create your wiki. When you ask a technical question, you will get help for that specific question, but nobody will contribute many edits to your wiki. Look into miraheze, how many wikis have been abandoned, and how many wikis exist where not even the main page has been edited. Creating a wiki and hoping that there will be contributors is not the way. Lily (Lilypond Wiki · talk and I will listen · my little garden ) 13:14, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, if wikis you create keep on with the same pattern restrictions could be put in place against you personally. Also randomly pinging on discord and contacting users can be seen as a form of disruptive behaviour and could lead to a ban and/or block. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 13:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Request 14867
Hi Hrvcfr,

I have declined the above-captioned wiki request for a couple reasons, namely that or per:
 * 1) Content Policy criterion, "a wiki must not create problems which make it difficult for other wikis." As I'm pretty certain we have one, or perhaps more than one, Simple English Wikipedia content fork wiki, your would almost certainly invite potential Content Policy issues requiring steward mediation; and,
 * 2) Your currently in-force and agreed to voluntary Meta editing restriction restricting you from requesting additional wikis for at least thirty days.

You have three wikis already, all or most of which you've barely touched. You should work on those wikis, and show us that you aren't simply collecting local hats or making a nuisance of yourself by demonstrating that you are simply not hearing the message(s) that have been expressed to you for the duration of your short Meta editing restriction. When the restriction has elapsed, you may request an additional wiki.

I strongly advise you to consider your next steps carefully.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 19:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)