Meta:Requests for permissions/Archive 3

__NOINDEX__

MacFan4000 (sysop)
User: MacFan4000 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: I would like to help out here on meta. I have done some translation work, am online when I am able. My time zone is EST, and I am uasually online between 6:30 AM and 10 PM EST.

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  The user has been actively collaborating with the project for less than a month. It is necessary to collaborate for a longer time and to be involved in habitual areas of the administrators in Meta (like to revert vandalism and mark pages for deletion). I know the work of this user in other projects and I have no doubt that in the future he will be a good administrator! — Alvaro Molina  ( ✉  -  ✔ ) 00:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * My account has existed since the beginning of October. I have been active here for longer than a month. I mean to work with translations, delete spam pages, help out with the wiki etc. When I was active here last year, I did some of that, and just the other day, I notified a steward of some spam pages. MacFan4000 (talk) 00:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * 1)  This user has just recently come back, has been contributing actively but I have had to undo their edits a couple of times (including blanking their talkpage), which makes me think they are not capable of being a sysop at this time. For translations, I'd say if you think it is necessary translation administrator could work, rather than full sysop. Reception123  (talk) ( 'C' ) 05:12, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * MacFan4000 (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hersitede (translation)
User: Hersitede ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: translationadmin

Reason: To translate new developments in Turkish language I have done before. Thanks. -- Hersitede (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions

Joaquinito01 (Wiki Creator)
User: Joaquinito01 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: Wiki Creator

Reason: Please become a Wiki Creator!

Additional comments: Thank You! (Joaquinito01)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * The user has not been here long enough to become a wiki creator. — Alvaro Molina ( ✉  -  ✔ ) 15:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The user wrongly declined on es publictestwiki. MacFan4000 (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Tiger (Translator)
User: Tiger ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: Translator

Reason: I would like to help translate/update translations on meta.(From English to Chinese(Simplified))

Additional comments:
 * Since there doesn't have to be a vote for the translator permission, granted. Reception123 (talk) ( 'C' ) 12:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions

MacFan4000 (translationadmin)
User: MacFan4000 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: translationadmin

Reason: (Following https://github.com/miraheze/mw-config/pull/1673#issuecomment-328136211 ) I have been doing plenty with translations (including the fact that I have translationadmin rights on mw.org. It would be nice if I could mark pages for translation. I am experienced with translation markup. MacFan4000 (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Since this is a more specific request, and I see that you know how translations work, this would be a good idea. Reception123  (talk) ( 'C' ) 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  Not that you don't have them, but I don't think there's much need for qualifications here. --  Void  Whispers 18:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  Just making a fuss about all of this. I have rethought about this and even though the rank isn't a priority it still would be helpful to have it. &#32;  Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs  20:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  — Alvaro Molina  ( ✉  -  ✔ ) 00:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  Per my comment below. &#32;  Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs  11:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Discussion/Comments
Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.


 * My Github comment: I don't know if MacFan4000 is still pushing for this and I am kind of in the middle of it. On one hand, Reception is one of the best sysops for merging pull requests and doing all that kind of things (approving translations). On the other hand we all have to sleep (even Reception!) and thus the community goes slightly quiet. I find that changes made from 12AM GMT and 6AM GMT take the longest to be approved as most people are either in bed (there're exceptions of course). So, yes there is a need in times for a translation admin, however, I do not think that delays are large enough to cause much disruption. I aren't opposing this request I just don't think there is a huge need for such a position at this moment in time, thus I will abstain from this vote. &#32; Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs  11:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)


 * This I am wondering what opinions people have on this? MacFan4000 (talk) 01:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

MacFan4000 (sysop)
User: MacFan4000 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: I have been active for about 2 months now. I am currently a wiki creator and am autopatrolled. I have done some translation work here and plan to do more, but haven't done it yet because it would be tedious to do it without the pagetranslation permission. I have marked pretty much anything I see that doesn't belong here for deletion. I currently run my own mediawiki server, so I am experienced with the permissions. I hope to make meta a better place. MacFan4000 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  I support. Good work. -- Hersitede (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  Unfortunately, my comments on the request you made a month and a half ago still stand. I still believe that sometimes you tend to take rash decisions, which would not be a good thing in an administrator role. The translation part should not be a reason to request sysop, if you need that you can request translation administrator, and if supported the permission can be created. There are currently 5 Meta sysops, and any deletions/protections/etc. have been done quickly, so I don't see a need for an extra person currently. Also, running a MediaWiki server is also different to being a wiki administrator. Reception123  (talk) ( 'C' ) 17:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I learn as I go basically. I eventually get better and better. At least 2 or 3 of the current sysops are not very active right now. I run the server and I have sysop rights on the wiki itself. MacFan4000 (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  I have not dealt with you until this morning, when you reached into my userspace and deleted Category:Miraheze help from my working copy of FAQ.  (The evidence is gone, and the problem is gone too, as the page is deleted and NDKilla installed most of my edits in the real copy.)  This suggests a zeal to clean up the wiki rather than figure out exactly what is going on (or ask me).  Based on my work at Wikia Uncyclopedia dealing with newbies whose eagerness to acquire power to do a job overtakes the need for the job to be done (and who rebut each ballot cast), I'll support Reception123.   00:48 20-Oct-2017
 * For the record, he removed the category so that a draft page wouldn't be used in a category for help pages. I noticed this and understood the point and that's why I re-added it when I put the edits into FAQ. Wasn't upset with MacFan4000. -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 13:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
 * MacFan4000 (talk) 01:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Joaquinito01 (sysop)
User: Joaquinito01 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: Syspop

Additional comments: Please become a Syspop.

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  user is not active here. MacFan4000 (talk) 20:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  Per Above. — Alvaro Molina  ( ✉  -  ✔ ) 23:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  I believe this request is silly and is simply caused by a lust for power. Meta sysops are administrators on the most important wiki on Miraheze and should be trusted and active on Meta. As Joaquinito01 is not active I oppose this proposal. &#32;  Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs  10:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  Per above. Videojeux4 (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

DrewBiebs (sysop)
User: DrewBiebs ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: To help in what you can most: create wikis, be on the lookout for any edition, among other things. I would like to be a volunteer, because I think, well, I know I can help in different things, maybe I do not know everything, it's clear, and I may have failures, but that would be voluntary, right? I will do my best. And, there's a lot I can help with, right? I hope to be at the level if they accept me. I have been using wikis here for more than a year because it considers that Miraheze is the most reliable, it has been growing a lot, the truth is, when I knew this, only 150 wikis had been created! It's a crazy.
 * 1)  You have not made edits that demonstrate the need for administrator permission in Meta. The user just came back to edit a few days ago. — Alvaro Molina  ( ✉  -  ✔ ) 21:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  per above. MacFan4000 Talk Contribs 22:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Zppix (sysop)
User: Zppix ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: To increase my ability to help others, and to help fight LTAs

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  I've had helpful conversations with him in IRC Rsterbal (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  - Despite having joined six months ago, it appears that they have not edited actively on Meta, and have not used their wiki creator permission very much. CoolieCoolster (talk) 06:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  Per above. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  Maybe if it was a little more active. —Alvaro Molina (✉ -  ✔ ) 12:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I do maintain Proxybot as well, and am active on IRC alot. Zppix (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The statments are based around the ammount of contributions from your account, and the number of log actions from your account. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 16:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Revibot (Bot (Additional task))
User: Revibot ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: Bot (Additional task)

Reason: Revibot is authorized to do Autoarchive, but I would like to seek an authorization to do general housekeeping like cleaning up Special:BrokenRedirects, Special:DoubleRedirects, subst'ing subst-only templates, etc etc.

Additional comments: Note to closer: Remember to put the discussion closed template below the  part. Autoarchive can't/won't support the closing mark above. And both special pages are empty, for now.&mdash; revi  09:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  Experienced user. No concerns. —Alvaro Molina (✉ -  ✔ ) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) No concerns here either.  However, Revi has asked me to stop using a SUBST:nosubst signature template for technical reasons, and I pushed back, as it is a widespread way to achieve personalization, notably also on Wikipedia where it is supposedly prohibited.  I would not want this request, plus the statement above of how he intends to use the 'bot, interpreted as permission for the 'bot to modify my signatures.   16:33 9-Dec-2017
 * For clarification, I do not intend to subst your sign, unless you say yes, or the community has a policy on sign prohibiting it. &mdash; revi  16:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  Automatic maintenance is something that would be nice. Reception123  (talk) ( 'C' ) 16:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) per above. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 17:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  I think it would be helpful, and would allow editors to do other things on Meta or their own wikis. CoolieCoolster (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

MacFan4000 (sysop)

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * ✅ John (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

User: MacFan4000 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: sysop

Reason: I sometimes find myself wanting to take an admin action here, but even though I have the permissions through global rights, I can’t use them as I am not a local sysop. For this reason, I would like to request Meta sysop. Currently, every sysop here is a sysadmin. Only 2 of the current sysops have been activly performing admin actions. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 22:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Additional comments: None

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions/Votes
 * Do not mention the reasons for my support, knowing that you are a sysadmin GOTILON - Talk  - Contributions  16:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I believe that MacFan4000 has been here for long enough and has shown a sufficient level of dedication to Miraheze to become a sysop on Meta. CoolieCoolster (talk) 19:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

開拓者 (translation administrator)
User: 開拓者 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: translation administrator

Reason: I found out that I can't add translation in some pages and/or sections (such as Phabricator/ja, which is not 100% translated but says so), while I was working to translate some pages into Japanese. It seems that I need this permission to modify sections of translation to an appropriate manner (not just editing the tags).

Additional comments: If I'm granted, I'd like to complete the translation works into Japanese. I might also work on other languages, if possible.--開拓者 (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * Found out that I should've posted a request on this page instead. Therefore I will move the request. For additional comments on this topic, please use the Admins' noticeboard from now on.--開拓者 (talk) 09:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)modded the link.--開拓者 (talk) 09:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Fair0002 (steward)
User: Fair0002 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: steward

Reason: to gain CheckUser privilege on my wiki

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * With no global reason provided, and given the fact that you haven't made enough global contributions (not even enough to be granted as autopatrolled), I cannot agree. I guess the reason you want to become a steward is just because you want to have the CheckUser permission on your wiki, but I can't agree with that idea either, seeing this kind of behavior.-- 04:00, 5 July 2018 (UTC)modded.-- 04:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Sau226 (Rollbacker)
User: Sau226 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: Rollbacker

Reason: Recent spam could have been easily dealt with by use of the rollback right. I'm therefore requesting rollback for dealing with obvious spam only and if the community decides I can accept the role on the condition that it is revoked if it is not stuff normally in the CVT's scope on other wikis.

Additional comments: Please leave any comments below. Regards --Sau226 (talk) 11:24, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  Considering that Meta is currently out of scope of CVT, it would be useful to be able to help here too. —AlvaroMolina (✉ -  ✔ ) 11:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

AlvaroMolina (Rollbacker)
User: AlvaroMolina ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log )

Group: Rollbacker

Reason: Hi, I would like to request the rollbacker permission for have the ability to use this tool here because Meta is outside scope of CVT. Thanks. —AlvaroMolina</b> (✉</b> - ✔ ) 16:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions