User talk:Muhammad Alfarezal

Welcome
I Muhammad Alfarezal, and have 16 years old.

User:Diego Ledezma
I just global lock on Stewards' noticeboard and can't login the Wiki. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Please check Special:CentralAuth/Diego Ledezma if see global locked. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not global locked, it just on CLG Wiki. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 05:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Muhammad Alfarezal, Meta patroller HeartsDo alerted me to your question. I'm not sure I completely understand, though. Neither of those accounts are globally locked. One, or both, of your accounts is blocked on  for "adding fake logos." I'll go out on a bit of a limb here and deduce these are both your accounts, and the reason neither account can edit is because you're affected by an autoblock, which blocks the accounts' underlying shared IP address. I'm not seeing where you were either guided to the local wiki's style and editing conventions and warned not to continue this supposed practice, so I'd be happy to engage with local administration on your behalf to facilitate a local unblock, if requested. I would add that you should avoid editing there until this is resolved, in keeping with user accounts policy, one of our global policies on Miraheze. Let me know if further assistance or engagement from me is required. Dmehus (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It seems that a local appeal would be possible in this case as his talk page is not blocked there. --Raidarr (talk) 09:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Unnecessary edits:
Hi ,

I couldn't help but notice you making these unnecessary edits, which I might add might be leaning towards this type of behavior called gravedancing. Please do refrain from doing this in the future. Thank you. :) DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Diego Ledezma was indefinitely blocked?
Those CLG Wiki logos add 20th Century Fox fake logo. But, you have been indefinitely blocked on the CLG Wiki for the following reasons "adding fake logos". Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 06:30, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Adding Disney Channel logos by Diego Ledezma on CLG Wiki
Hello, and I'm uploading and adding Disney Channel logos by Diego Ledezma on CLG Wiki. But Diego Ledezma add Disney Channel logos on print logos on the CLG Wiki. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 23:29, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Make sandbox again?
Wait I'm editing info CLG Wiki and create Company Bumpers and Dream Logos by CLG Wiki. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 22:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

User has been unblocked
Your user has been unblocked by mh:closinglogosgroup:User:CooleyBoy10 and can edit again!!! Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 21:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Inappropriate edits
Hi. While your edits may very well be made in good faith, please note that your most recent edits to Meta (such as the ones where you archive recent threads or make edits that are not necessary) are not appropriate. Before making an edit you should think whether it is really necessary, rather than editing a page just because you can. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 04:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * To add to what Reception123 has said above, those archives shouldn't be touched by a non-administrator and if I'm not mistaken, shouldn't the archives be left to only Meta admins? (Do correct me if I'm wrong on that one.) DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:28, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Archiving can be handled by anyone who is proficient in how it works and say, if revbot is not archiving correctly; I don't see evidence of either being true here. I also find the lack of response while continuing to make odd, unnecessary or extremely minor edits without communication concerning. --Raidarr (talk) 01:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop:
Hi ,

As I have said above from this link, please do NOT make gravedancing edits like these, as it is not only unnecessary, but also didn't need to be there in the first place. Also, these types of edits aren't really necessary. I am asking you again to please stop with the unnecessary editing. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. :) DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 04:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Retiring
So I have temporary blocked and also the user on CLG Wiki has been blocked by CooleyBoy10. So, I'm retiring. Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 05:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

User accounts policy advisory
Hello Muhammad. Despite the notice of retirement above, I must bring up two alternate accounts you've created: Muhammad Alfarezal 2nd account and New Muhammad Alfarezal, the last one being created yesterday. I'm not sure what happened with the appeals after Doug became involved some days ago, but needless to say making accounts to circumvent the block in no way helps your case and puts you on the wrong side of global policy as well. Please desist from further account creations in the future - they won't help you get unblocked by any means, and it only fuels the local animosity on CLG. --Raidarr (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * And I see that you are still continuing to evade blocks despite being told to appeal your block on your main account. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:54, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , in spite of the above advisory you have created two further accounts to evade blocks in violation of the user accounts policy, as well as failed to communicate here in any meaningful way. You've clearly demonstrated that you read this page and take note when you have been sanctioned (ie, a meta block), and as such I must be blunt. If you decide not to attempt any reasonable form of appeal and instead continue to make accounts evading your block on Closing Logos Group wiki, all further socks and this master account will be locked until you have ceased the behavior and presented a satisfactory appeal to stewards@undefinedmiraheze.org. --Raidarr (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , due to your ignoring the advisory since my last message and taking into consideration the frankly deplorable approach used on Meta (especially on this page) and very limited beneficial activity elsewhere, also noting that you've simply come here after making a mess of things on Wikipedia in very similar fashion, you have overstayed your welcome and are now ✅ until successful appeal to stewards@undefinedmiraheze.org. Any further sockpuppets will be counted against and any appeal must address the issues raised here and show a change in approach, otherwise an appeal will not be granted. --Raidarr (talk) 11:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Block has been expired!
Yes! your user has been blocked expired! Yeah! I'm edit again!!!!!
 * To be clear this is an opportunity to make improved edits, not edit in the same way that resulted in block the last time. --Raidarr (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Recreation of Tech:Mediawiki
Hi. Despite having been told to refrain from making unnecessary edits and the fact that I deleted that page for being unnecessary you have decided to create it again. Please note that if you continue making unnecessary and unwanted edits to Meta you will be blocked again for a longer time for disrupting the project. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 05:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - 08:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)


 * That does not address the fact that you're still making changes without any discussion that seem to be based upon your personal opinion. Every page doesn't need an image or text in a certain format. Your behaviour is no different than before your first block. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  08:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

So I have blocked previously due to moving Tech:Mediawiki to Tech:MediaWiki appserver Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 14:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Administrators, please accept unblock right now!!!!!! Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Please accept unblock right now now now now now now now now now!!!! Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 21:35, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Can you accept unblock please? Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 22:59, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Quick deletion of User talk:TheTVFan
The page you wrote, User talk:TheTVFan, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add wait below the line QD and say why on the |talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Unblock now
I have now unblocked!!! I'm back! Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't have reviewed your own block. Nonetheless, I didn't feel this block was warranted here. I'm aiming to follow up with a long-term continuing solution that would see using only this account, not creating accounts to edit on wikis where blocked, and to reach out to a Steward where local administration is unwilling to consider reversion of potentially inappropriate local blocks, usually made in contravention of the Code of Conduct. I have to ask, though, will you please abstain from editing on the two wikis in question? I'm potentially willing to create your own closing logos wiki, where you can have a similar wiki, done differently. Would that work for you? Dmehus (talk) 00:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Yes!!! I'm back!!! Muhammad Alfarezal (talk) 01:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Can you please give me some sign that you understand what I am saying? Will you agree to approach myself, Raidarr, or any other Steward if you require assistance in liaising with local administrators to unblock you? Additionally, will you consider requesting a wiki, defining a clear purpose and topical scope for your wiki (it can have the same scope as an existing wiki, so long as you don't merely copy+paste pages from said wiki? As well, are you happy with your username, or would you like to request a global rename, perhaps to a username that is more of a pseudonym (assuming that is your real name)? Alternatively, if you feel that editing wikis is not for you and would like to request anonymization of your account(s) in accordance with the Data Request Process, please ping me, and I can handle this in my Trust and Safety capacity. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

User accounts policy warning
Hi Muhammad Alfarezal,

While I agree your original local blocks on  and   were extremely weak, at best, and may have been either (a) done contrary to policies not established by some sort of consensus-based decision-making process, whether that be community-based or administrator-based or (b) done contrary to the Code of Conduct and, additionally, that the practice of CooleyBoy10 of immediately revoking user talk page access with every block despite Hb1290 and Logohub adopting the local practice of not doing this is also problematic, you nonetheless must respect user accounts policy.

As your edits are good-faith, together with the fact that the block rationale CooleyBoy10 cited has not been consistently applied in that CLG and Company Bumpers wikis also copy logos from other sources without attribution and with dubious Fair Use/Fair Dealing rationales, following discussions with Raidarr, I have agreed to unlock alternate accounts and this main account somewhat conditionally, subject to the following conditions:


 * 1) You create any alternate accounts you require while logged in to your this main account using Special:CreateAccount;
 * 2) You avoid   and   until I, together with Raidarr, have worked out a solution with administrators on those wikis that may allow you to edit on those wikis. This could include a partial block allowing you to edit in one or more non-  namespaces and/or pairing you with a willing mentor on each wiki; and,
 * 3) If and when you are unblocked, you should use clear edit summaries indicating what are you trying to edit.

Additionally, you're encouraged to request your own wiki, including one having the same or similar purpose and scope to  and , provided you affirm that it will not contain pages copy+pasted from either of those wikis and will be done differently in some way (i.e., different logos, different sidebar, different page structure, etc.).

To help guide you to constructive behaviour, some back-end technical measures have been implemented that should limit you to your your main account.

Finally, I do agree a Meta Wiki block was necessary, but would've preferred a progressive discipline policy, whereby a Meta administrator increased your block length upon the previous block's expiration, rather than jumping immediately to a sitewide indefinite block. As well, as a Meta Wiki is a special wiki which controls global rename and wiki requests, I've also ✅ that any reblocks should be done as partial blocks from all namespaces.

As a final point, should you somehow manage to evade your existing local blocks by creating accounts while logged out, we will, however, be forced to lock your alternate accounts. A lock of your main account would only be done, though, if there is consensus of Stewards that it's needed. Nonetheless, we're likely a ways away from that, but do want to point to put that out there.

On the other hand, if at any time, you wish to request an anonymization and removal of your accounts in accordance with the GDPR, please ping me in my Trust and Safety capacity, or, alternatively, e-mail the team at.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Unnecessary edits
Hi Muhammad Alarezal, I have been noticing your recent contributions, especially this edit for example, were all unnecessary, and I kindly ask you to please not mess with those specific pages. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)