User talk:Justarandomamerican

Interested in volunteering as a Meta
Hi Justarandomliberal,

It's good to see you more active again of late on Meta Wiki. Notwithstanding your good-faith, well meaning, but duplicative recent community proposal at community noticeboard, your reports have been great, and you seem to have good judgment, based on my observations of your contributions here on Meta and, in particular, of your contributions on TestWiki. I've been thinking about seeing if you'd be interested in volunteering as a Meta  on Meta for the past couple of weeks, as you have expressed an interest in volunteering on Meta in the past. Your recent report, together with R4356th's, of blatant spam and vandalism, at Category:Global policies reaffirms my thesis that you'd be a good fit. Please review the patroller guidelines, and ping me if interested.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm interested. Justarandomliberal (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Justarandomliberal Okay, ✅. I'll post the granting guidelines message for you to review while I prepare my log summary and grant rights. Dmehus (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Patroller granted - 2021-01-9
Hi, Justarandomliberal. An administrator on Meta has granted you the  user group permission, which gives you the ability to   recent changes and new pages of other Miraheze users (both registered and anonymous) who are  not either autopatrolled or an administrator. In addition, this group also means that your edits are, so other patrollers or administrators don't have to patrol your edits. You should also be aware that the granting of this user group is at the discretion of Meta administrators, so different administrators will have slightly different criteria for granting. Likewise, just as it is a discretionary appointment, revocation is also at the discretion of Meta administrators and, again, each will have their own criteria for revocation.

In the medium-term, plans are in the works to develop a Meta Patrollers School, likely led by one or two active administrators, that will provide a comprehensive set of guidelines for patrollers and answers to commonly asked questions.

Nevertheless, the following are some of the main guidelines for patrolling. If you follow these guidelines completely, it is unlikely your patroller user group should ever be revoked. In technical terms, even when you find content that requires deletion by an administrator or otherwise requires remediation, undoing, reverting, or rolling back (if you are also a, of course), you should always first mark as patrolled any revisions regardless of whether that content is destined to remain extant to the page or even on Meta entirely.


 * 1) When patrolling talk pages, user talk pages, and noticeboards (in Main and Meta namespaces), you should first check to see whether the user properly signed their posts using four tildes . If they have not, you should add unsigned by substitution, where username is the user's username or IP address and the timestamp is the full timestamp from the diff page. As a best practice, you should also link to the diff in your edit summary, so other administrators and patrollers can easily tie your modification to the original edit being modified. To speed up this process, you can copy the   user script from line 5 of this page into either your (a) common.js or (b) global.js page (the latter applying globally on all Miraheze wikis);
 * 2) When patrolling the noticeboards, ask yourself whether this topic is on the correct noticeboard. If it is not, you should move it to the correct noticeboard, by either undoing the edit or manually removing the topic (if there have been intervening edits), again linking to the original noticeboard of the topic and the new noticeboard where it was moved in your edit summary. On the new noticeboard, you would simply paste in the topic (including the section header), linking to the diff page as in the first step. An example edit summary might be , where  ######  represents the numeric revision ID of the originally posted topic;
 * 3) Also when patrolling the noticeboards and talk pages (including user talk pages), as a best practice, take care to kindly fix any formatting mistakes (such as excess line breaks or incorrect wiki code), per WP:LISTGAP;
 * 4) If something requires deletion, you can add delete to the top of the page in question, taking care to follow the instructions on that template page;
 * 5) If you come across a user who repeatedly makes the same mistakes, send them a guidance note on their user talk page, informing of the steps need to edit and post constructively on Meta; and, finally,
 * 6) If in doubt whether something requires remediation or not, patrol it, and then ask any administrator via their user talk page or at Administrators' noticeboard if any further action needs to be taken.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you! --Dmehus (talk) 18:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

For-Test Wiki
Hello Justarandomamerican,

I believe For-Test Wiki is currently down. Do you know if this is intentional maintenance, or an error? LC Developer (talk) 16:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)