Stewards' noticeboard/Archive 24

__NOINDEX__

Having trouble adding. Video to my sandbox
I am making a page on CGW. I’m trying to add a video. I put the video I’d and the video displays but I get a playback droid when I try to hit play. JonnyDavidson2005 (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * You should ask this to an admin on a wiki instead of a steward. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

rename
Hello could you please rename my account the nick that i want is アンジェロ先輩 Angelo Pisani (talk) 23:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Please use Special:GlobalRenameRequest ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  09:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * thank you. Angelo Pisani (talk) 13:56, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

MarioMario456 called me a Idiot while I was appealing on AGW
Proof: awesomegames.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Wfitosn7ip0fsw6v SpiderManDude (talk) 01:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * That's not cool. Sorry. I left a message on your talk page. Sperosdurell (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There was no evidence of MarioMario456 calling him an idiot. I wasn't originally going to comment on here, but I am just here to tell you that what he is saying isn't true whatsoever. I shall leave this discussion at the hands of other administrators. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Ohh... I felt sorry. No evidence, okay apologies. Sperosdurell (talk) 02:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * no he said "I don't take bribes, I D I O T. I have fixed my message." SpiderManDude (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * image proof of the comment: ibb.co/B4kGQDY SpiderManDude (talk) 02:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , it is not good to ask admins to give them money to get unblocked. I wouldn't comment on what said but you were probably blocked because of sockpuppetry. If you are not a sockpuppet and you believe the block was made in error, then simply call on for a review of your block without talking about money. Giving/taking money is not the way we operate here. --Mazzaz (talk)  04:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * SpiderManDude While MarioMario456 has been cautioned in the past to adhere to both the letter and spirit of Code of Conduct, a global policy to which all Miraheze users are obliged to follow in terms of his approach to dealing with other users (namely, civility and assuming good faith), and he is indeed firmly cautioned again, I will remind you that you also are obliged to follow another global policy, user accounts policy. If you wish to engage on Miraheze, I would strongly suggest you e-mail stewards at, explain on what wiki(s) you intend to focus on (with a strong recommendation from me to avoid the type of wikis you've been gravitating toward and which has found you locked more times than I can count on my two hands and two feet), and whether you will focus on your own wiki. Continuing the same behaviour is neither constructive nor useful and wastes everyone's time. Accordingly, with that, your remaining accounts will be ✅ in due course. Dmehus (talk) 18:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

I'm gone. Please lock my account forever.
Hello stewards!

I no longer want to be part of Miraheze. I have joined it since July 2020, but following the drama that went over time, I request for my account to be locked. Thanks!

Goodbye everyone! EoflaOE (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


 * So sorry to see you go. Also about the drama, that was mostly from people disagreeing with one thing or another. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to see you go as well. I've locked the account now. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 17:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

User blocked at ATT for attempted SQL injection
User:Gani has just been permanently blocked at All The Tropes for (unsuccessfully) attempting to add SQL that would collect personally-identifying information without notification, which if it had worked would have been a violation of GDPR. This was the first edit that this user submitted to All The Tropes, so it was caught in the Moderation queue before being committed.

We see from CentralAuth that this user is an admin at two other Miraheze wikis. Robkelk (talk) 12:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will look into it. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 17:48, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * I just had the contents of the query passed to me by T&S and it is simply VoteNY's schema. The chance of an SQLi working is extremely low but in no way did this at any point attempt to violate GDPR or put users privacy at risk. Data wouldn't have been populated without enabling VoteNY and it's known and documented that it collects this information which we store appropiately. RhinosF1 (Miraheze) (talk) 18:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I've relayed this to the bureaucrats at ATT, and we'll discuss what action to take next. --Robkelk (talk) 19:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The bureaucrats and a few others have discussed this, and we have decided to treat this as an apparent penetration test. The permanent block on this user stands. --Robkelk (talk) 13:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

A user called Greatestmoviesfan might be abusing multiple accounts.
A user on Awful Movies Wiki known as Greatestmoviesfan has another account called Greatestmoviesfan189 which has the same type of behavior and comments as his main account: https://awfulmovies.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=comments&user=Greatestmoviesfan189&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter= and because of this, I think Greatestmoviesfan created that account to evade his ban, which is obviously against Miraheze's rules, so I think he should blocked across all wikis. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Never mind. Greatestmoviesfan wasn't trying to ban evade, so he's innocent. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 19:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

I can’t read the loathesome and incredible characters, how can I read the character miraheze again, Stewards’ noticeboard?
2600:1700:1243:E220:591C:3AED:E5BF:FDE0 22:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Unless you are in the Member, Bureaucrat or Administrator roles, you can't. The community decided to close down those wikis themselves. HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The community consensus was not properly gathered, so the topic is valid for Steward review in my estimation. --Raidarr (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Are you going to Reopen the Loathsome Characters and Incredible Characters wikis?
Are you going to reopen the Loathsome and Incredible Characters wikis? Andrewgtv05 (talk) 04:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * They are talking about that on the qualitipedia meta Gilimaster69 (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you please reopen the character wikis?
Please reopen the all the mirahaze wikis Qqqqqqqq (talk) 16:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * That type of title with a demanding tone isn't going to really help matters very much. Which wikis are you talking about? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Qqqqqqqq was talking about the character wikis (Incredible Characters Wiki and Loathsome Characters Wiki). Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah Please reopen it Andrewgtv05 (talk) 04:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Although I've seen requests like these many times, I'd like to see where this goes. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * DarkMatterMan4500, as far as I can tell, DuchessTheSponge closed down the character wikis almost a month ago, and at first, we agreed that closing the character wikis was a good idea. But then, we realized what we had done, and thus decided to talk about bringing back the character wikis. Then, many people started to agree with us. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 11:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I was there when it happened when it came to voting. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 12:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, you were. And now that many people are voting and asking for the character wikis to come back, it looks like the character wikis are going to be reopened by the stewards. But here's the thing I want to tell you: Once they reopen, they will no longer be associated with Qualitipedia. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Why will they not be associated with Qualitipedia? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The reason they will no longer be associated with Quailtipedia is because there will be no Qualitipedia admins, and instead, there will be a new team of admins running the wikis, which includes me, Shawn the Logo Boy. The wikis will still hold the same concept as the Qualitipedia Wikis, however. Oh, and nice to meet you, Blubabluba9990. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 19:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Can I be one of the admins too. I plan on creating another network of wikis, since I own Lousy Vehicles Wiki and co-own Lovable Vehicles Wiki, and I also have plans for reception wikis about stores, and Musicismylife has a bunch of other ideas for reception wikis. Both wikis do not have any Qualitipedia admins. I also own Absurd Shows & Episodes Wiki, a future part of The Weirdness Network, a network of wikis about weird media which has been temporarily put on hold due to my situation on Qualitipedia. I own two other wikis, The Wow House Wiki and The Fowl House Wiki, which discuss good episodes/characters and bad episodes/characters in The Loud House, respectively. Both of those wikis are independent, based on FANDOM versions (The Fowl House Wiki's FANDOM counterpart is closed), and do not follow the format of the Reception Wikis, instead being inspired by ScumBob Wiki and Anti-ScumBob Wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, Blubabluba9990! You can be an admin of the character wikis (LCW and ICW), and I'm sure you can help us out with both wikis. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 20:39, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * But here's the catch: I will only unblock you on the character wikis, and if you screw up even once, I will revoke your admin rights. Got it, Bluba? Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. Wait are you an admin now? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I am becoming an admin on both Loathsome Characters Wiki and Incredible Characters Wiki, and both you and I be part of the new team of the admins, so once they reopen, we need to cooperate with each other in order to keep both wikis running! Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Have you visited my other wikis yet. If you have knowledge about automobile reception I can promote you on the vehicle reception wikis. Musicismylife also has a few other ideas for future reception wikis not associated with Qualitipedia. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:27, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I haven't visited your other wikis yet, and I really don't have knowledge about automoblie reception. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 17:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. I do have other ideas about reception wikis. Perhaps my wikis can stay independent alongside the characters wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure. Your wikis can stay independent alongside the character wikis. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Also why specifically did you not want the characters wikis to be associated with Qualitipedia? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * These wikis were agreed to not remain part of QP so they could exist in some form, even if the dedicated QP administrators do not want to manage them. So, making them unassociated is the way they are able to survive. --Raidarr (talk) 10:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, shouldn't the stewards have noticed this by now. Kingjorbs (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The vote was improper, being called after less than a half dozen comments and before the (clearly numerous) oppositions or input were able to be made. So this is for sure in the cards, now that the Website wiki crisis is handled. --Raidarr (talk) Raidarr (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I hope we'll do the same for the Character Wikis crisis, which we need to handle. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 16:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm of two minds here. From my first mind, I'm not seeing where there was a discussion, ideally on-wiki though a public non-invitation only Discord server (or similar) discussion could be considered. Raidarr mentions that there was a vote or discussion somewhere, so if he could point me to that so I can assess its breadth, depth, and procedural validity, that'd be great. From my second mind, these two wikis in particular cause the most problems for Stewards in terms of Content Policy and user conduct issues. As a rebuttal to my second mind, there does seem to have been a clear surrendering of rights, so reopening these wikis would provide an opportunity to have a proper discussion in terms of providing guidance to the reconstituted wikis' local communities. Additionally, a subsequent discussion would need to be held prior to any rights being granted. In any case, until I know when, where, and under what circumstances local discussions (if any) were held, this can't be progressed. Dmehus (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Here is the discussion. Other discussions: . Mr. Jay 641 (talk) 22:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * In addition to above, there was a blog that was the spark for the character wiki's removal. It was unfortunately removed to leave no record, but I doubt that will stop the oversight of a Steward. Section "Can you please reopen 2 wikis?" below on the board offers as much case for recent discussion as there exists (mainly the same that I replied to). QP tends to operate through blog posts seeking inquiry, meaning there tend to be multiple blogs on a similar topic and a touch of confusion as far as aggregate opinion (especially since the discussions could not be held on the native wiki in question, instead in small part through CGW and through the QP meta linked above). --Raidarr (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Raidarr, for that, and, Mr. Jay 641, for the links you provided. What I'm particularly interested in is any discussion(s) as may exist on Qualitipedia Meta in terms of rationale for closure and breadth and depth of the discussion. Dmehus (talk) 01:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Aside from the assorted blogs (which is typically 'how things are done' with the strengths and weaknesses that come with it) there is not an organized discussion (talk page, StructuredDiscussions) to this effect, only the layered responses that lead to new blogs and culminating in a few users agreeing to lead and largely being given 'consent by default' from leading bureaucrats on QP. So the depth is about what is linked.
 * It was only closed by a few supports and the instinct decision of a bureaucrat after reviewing the (now deleted) original post, and incidental 'wait this isn't right' commentary has cropped up various times on CGW and QP meta ever since. The most substantive of these comments are linked by blog. There do exist assorted individual complaints that were raised in the meantime, by comments and I vaguely recall by very short lived SD posts. It's also worth noting that immediately after the closure, a number of regulars attempted to 'snowball' the issue with the effect of 'they were terrible anyways', likely in an effort to simply drop it and move on. Some of those users have since changed tune for the above linked blogs or otherwise let it go.
 * Perhaps to establish clarity for the future, issues of this gravity might be given a separate structure to vote and leave opinions (resembling how MH meta handles it or operating through the SD extension) if that would be more structurally compliant for what you're looking for. --Raidarr (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah. This now brings up the larger problem of the non-existent consensus on Qualitipedia, with the bureaucrats making all of the decisions, and even when consensus is brought up, it is done by one of the bureaucrats rather than a regular member of the community. That is a whole other problem, however, and goes deeper than the Characters Wikis crisis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If that's being done on the Qualitipedia wikis, we have all the policies and conventions we need here. It just needs to be addressed to Stewards, citing applicable evidence, and we can be asked to determine if there was consensus or revert to the status quo in absence of that. Dmehus (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. There is hardly ever consensus for anything though, and I am unsure if there was consensus to shut down the Characters wikis. Furthermore, the admins agreed that closing both wikis was a bad decision, and there is a lot of talk here on Steward's noticeboard about re-opening them. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * This discussion and the ones mentioned cite various talk and qp meta discussion to reopen, and the rationale for closure is already noted as being faulty. --Raidarr (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Unlock a wiki
Unlock a wiki

Please can you unlock the wiki 'Radley Physics' rcpd.miraheze.org

Many thanks! Acn (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * If you're bureaucrat of the wiki, go to Special:ManageWiki/core and uncheck "Closed". This will reopen your wiki. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 13:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think I'm bureaucrat of the wiki (though if I can be made such that would be grand!) - I don't seem to be able to uncheck that 'Closed' box...! Acn (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are a member of the wiki and it was not manually closed by a wiki bureaucrat, you may add an entry at Requests for adoption. Otherwise unless there is additional context I'm afraid there is nothing that can be done on the Stewards' noticeboard. If the two stipulations don't apply (either of them), I'm afraid there is also not much we can do. --Raidarr (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Bring the loathsome character wiki back
I want to know why the LCW has permission error even I'm not log that website in. 119.172.110.92 10:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * This wiki was closed and made private by a local bureaucrat. The other bureaucrats have consented to letting a new core of admins take over, and they should make a request on this noticeboard soon. --Raidarr (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Why is the Rotten Websites Wiki closed all of a sudden?
The heading says that it's been closed because no one's edited the wiki in the last 60 days, but I am certain that there were edits as recent as yesterday.

Unless this is because of the wiki exceeding some kind of boundary that warranted shutting it down, I'm very confused here. NoJustNo84 (talk) 06:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That's the standard message you get when a bureaucrat manually closes a wiki. It seems that the local admins decided to close the wiki, you'll need to talk to them for more info. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 06:39, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Same Issue with its sister site on the Fresh Websites wiki, I don't know the recall the exact usernames of the local admins so I wouldn't be able to contact them elsewhere, this might be an issue with all of the new Reception wikis, could you find out what is going on there, thank you. Freighttrain (talk) 07:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I asked DarkMatterMan4500 on Discord if he could help clarify this. Hope to hear from him soon. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 07:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Nevermind I've just messaged MarioMario456 about it. Freighttrain (talk) 07:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The admins didn't like how the content worked. One of them anyways, with others simply following along. If the Character wikis are any indication, it is next to useless to discuss it unless they show a change of heart. --Raidarr (talk) 12:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * That all sounds a bit arbitrary, also no prior notice was given either, is there any discussion you can link to that says more about what has happened? Freighttrain (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there was no consensus on whether to close them at all. It was abruptly closed without reason. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No discussion was had, the details came out live - including the latest regarding the admin who instigated it. Other admins are not agreeing to the closure. --Raidarr (talk) 16:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * NoJustNo84 As per my comments elsewhere, please note I have reopened each of the two wikis. Additionally, as I could find no indication where a community discussion was had locally on each wiki to modify the default  permissions to allow local bureaucrats to remove the   bit from other bureaucrats, I have reset that to the default setting. This will ensure that local bureaucrats must either request a Steward to ensure any request for removal of this group is done in line with any community-established policies governing such removals or have a local discussion to duly delegate this authority to local bureaucrats, though on the point about the local permissions additions and removals, I noted a lack of any sort community-established process in this regard. Additionally, given the obvious lack of local community consultation with regard to the closure and the lack of any community-established process governing permissions additions or removals (looking at the respective Special:Log/rights logs on each wikis), it seems to have been done very ad hoc, often with wheel-warring occurring over rights additions and removals, which itself suggests a complete lack of community consultation, I don't feel it is appropriate for Stewards to restore any permissions. In any case, the most important role for Stewards has been done here, which is to reopen both wikis to allow one or more substantive community discussions to occur on the respective wikis discussing (a) the future of the wikis and, if the wikis are to continue to remain open, to discussing (b) the process by which the advanced permissions are granted or removed. Once those community consultative processes have concluded, please post a note here, ideally in a new thread and linking to this thread in some way, for Stewards to assess those local consensus processes and effect the community's desired outcomes. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 05:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Two wikis in our network got shutdown without any consensus.
So Rotten Websites Wiki and Fresh Websites Wiki got closed by one of our bureaucrats, claiming that "a lot of people wanted these wikis gone". However, there is no evidence of any sort of agreement or consensus among the other admins or the community about this decision. All the other bureaucrats got demoted from those wikis, so is it okay if one of you guys can give me bureaucrat and admin rights on those two wikis (I was a former bureaucrat on those wikis BTW) so I can undo the closing and demotions? Blazikeye535 (talk) 15:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I definitely didn't agree to the closure of both of those wikis. There's some funny business going around here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This was done by a rogue admin who is being handled on other associated wikis as a preventative measure; on this wiki all other staff were apparently demoted including DMM ^. This issue needs to be investigated. It was done with zero support from the community, but more importantly it overruled other admins and bureaucrats, including the designated leaders. Thus it was a coup, and I believe fully in scope for the Stewards to interfere (I'd hope, at least). --Raidarr (talk) 16:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I was demoted too. I'll see what Doug and Void have to say about this, considering this close was against community consensus. —Mario Mario 456 16:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I also got demoted too, but I want my page back (all of the source code) and my files. - AlvaroNovaes-BR (talk) 18:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * So did I. BookFandumb1 (talk) 01:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This was wrong, especially since we have made a complete effort now to make a consensus. Sure, I wanted them gone too, but it came out of nowhere. At least when I wanted to close the character wikis, I wanted a discussion. TigerBlazer (talk) 21:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Literally nothing was wrong with the wikis. At least the character wikis somewhat had a reason, but the website wikis' closure were abrupt. DuchessTheSponge didn't even think about what other people thought, he just closed the wikis, like when he just removed Season 6 & 8 of SpongeBob SquarePants on Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki, even though Season 6 and 8 were hated by many, just like he combined all seasons of the original Johnny Test onto Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki, even though a lot of people considered the first three seasons to be good. I made a blog post about it, which didn't even bash him, and I got a two week block on TSEW. That's when I started to strongly dislike him. I'm glad he's demoted now. SleepParalysisDemon (talk) 21:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If there are no comments objecting to this, I will reopen both wikis by this time tomorrow. It is clear, by the messages currently left on this noticeboard, that the action taken was not and is not supported by the community or other administration of these wikis. -- Void  Whispers 21:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That's awesome. Yeah, DuchessTheSponge clearly didn't think this through at all, but as long as the demotions are restored, that's all that matters. I doubt there will be any objections, but they'll more than likely be weaker in comparison to the upcoming votes to re-open the wikis. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Can we also place the character wikis up for adoption given the half a dozen users that have complained here and on the CN about their closure and given that the discussion was:
 * Incredibly brief (less than a day)
 * Done without a site notice for most of that day
 * Done on a different wiki
 * I fully understand if the administrators wish to walk away from a wiki and want it disassociated from their other wikis. However, I don't think they should be able to dictate that what would be an entirely separate wiki on Miraheze should not exist especially given that the content policy has an explicit clause allowing for forks. ~ El Komodos Drago (talk to me) 19:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this should be taken up in a dedicated topic on the Qualitipedia hub once this issue with the website wikis is straightened out (one at a time). From what I can tell the top shot callers are willing to have a conversation, and the linked wiki is in a better position than before to have the conversation instead of throwing yet another QP topic onto Miraheze meta. --Raidarr (talk) 19:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * FUCK! I GOT DEMOTED TOO! This is to the point I requested a wiki for PETA. It failed. I really want it back. jrStudios (talk) 21:55, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not to worry, they should be re-opened by tomorrow. Peace will be restored by then. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * And a new entity is coming… The Animal Rights Database jrStudios (talk) 01:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, my rights on RWW were also gone. Didn't notice that untill right now. TigerBlazer (talk) 15:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Blazikeye535 Please see my comments in the above thread. The wikis have been reopened to allow local community discussions to take place on each wiki discussing (a) the future of the wikis and (b) the process by which community members may request advanced permissions, or have them removed. Dmehus (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like Doug has reopened the wikis before I've been able to get around to it. I have now followed up by restoring permissions, as this state was the previous status quo. -- Void  Whispers 21:04, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Don't mean to sound impatient, but is there any updates on whether or not the wikis are going to be reopened or not? --Blazikeye535 (talk) 17:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. Two wikis should be opened by yesterday but didn't happen, so are they really gonna be opened by either today, tomorrow, or so? Btw I already got plenty of more evidence/reasons coming up to expose People for "Ethical" Treatment of Animals for its article at Rotten Websites Wiki. Gjlewis (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Please be patient. I'm sure Void will get it done sooner or later. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay gotcha. Sorry for my impatience. Tbh I wanna say that keeping both wikis closed is unfair, especially that we got every evidence to expose the atrocity of far-left communities (mainly PETA and the Social Justice Warriors). Gjlewis (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * well jrstudios is makaing a wiki to expose peta Gilimaster69 (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * https://crappygames.miraheze.org/wiki/Blog:The_Animal_Rights_Database-_Keeping_a_watchful_eye_on_Pet_Shelters,_SCPAs_and_the_Animal_Rights_Movement Gilimaster69 (talk) 19:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * You mind helping out a bit here? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:29, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm preparing a proposed response, but currently dealing with a couple more pressing issues in both Steward and Trust and Safety capacities, but I will propose a solution. Dmehus (talk) 22:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey?
Where did the Rotten Websites and Fresh Websites Wikis go. Can they be reopened? Also DuchessTheSponge should have been blocked. The wikis has nothing that would warrant it's closure. MountWario (yell at me here) 22:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, Void said he'd re-open the wikis by tomorrow, eventually. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:51, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

I Think we should re-open this wiki soon since it was closed abruptly for an invalid reason. --Vince the Wikipedian 2018 (talk) 05:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Eventually, they'll be re-opened. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't get it. Why did that guy close them anyway? Fridericus M (talk) 00:04, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

But, it need to be reopened because DuchessTheSponge was closing this without permission and there is clearly no evidence why he close it.--Vince the Wikipedian 2018 (talk) 05:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * This appears to have slipped by Void a little, but it appears set to reopen anyways. If is not a question, just when. --Raidarr (talk) 08:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * It said it was closed Vince the Wikipedian 2018 (talk) 04:43, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Deletion request of a harassment blog on CGW
Stewards, I would like you to remove a page only created for harassment of another user. Here's the link:

https://crappygames.miraheze.org/wiki/Blog%3ABlubabluba9990%27s_Drama_Featuring_Encyclopedia_SpongeBobia Tanawat2002 (talk) 06:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * It’s a controversy page. Leave it alone jrStudios (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll be removing that blog post immediately. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Normally I don't care for outright deletions, but I agree with this one. --Raidarr (talk) 10:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. It's making us look bad. TigerBlazer (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

I've already deleted the blog as it was entirely outdated and unnecessary. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

request of a mass purge of every single edit made by me
Hi, I'm the owner of the EijiZeBoi and TanjirosEarrings accounts. I'm making this thread to request the mass purging of all content I made using these accounts, from blog posts to talk pages, etc., especially on the Qualitipedia wikis. The reason is because I don't want my name to be associated with this wikifarm anymore due to its godawful reputation among outsiders. Thank you. EijiZeBoi (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. Unfortunately, this can't be done for the simple reason that we don't have any proof that you are indeed these two accounts. If we allowed such a request then anyone could claim they are X user and demand the same thing. As regards to the farm's reputation, Miraheze is not responsible for the content that the Reception wikis create so if people see Miraheze negatively because of them that is not correct. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 07:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Eiji reached out to me on Discord earlier this morning, so I honored his request just like how I honored Grust's request last week to block him for dignity and as a self-request. So, I deleted his blogs on both  and on the  . DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Delete my wiki
I'd like my wiki  to be deleted. I will now focus on other stuff. BenIsEditing (talk) 15:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * BenIsEditing Firstly, please note that I have ✅ the subdomain in your wikilink. MirahezeMagic pseudo-interwiki wikilinks use subdomains, rather than database names, though typically you will see me and others use the database name in the displayed text (piped text) of such wikilinks. Secondly, in terms of your request, as the only contributor to your wiki, this is ✅ per your request. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 18:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you delete the NSFW and NSFL templates?
I think these need to be removed from the Reception Wikis because the page don't show any pornographic content, the templates clutter the pages, they get added to the pages for no reason, and they often cause other users to engage in edit wars, so I think it's time both of the pages were deleted from the Reception Wikis. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree. I want them gone too. TigerBlazer (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * what Bout actual NSFL stuff Gilimaster69 (talk) 20:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Why not discuss this on the Qualitipedia meta? That's a more fitting place for this discussion. --Blazikeye535 (talk) 20:13, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you leave a link to that? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * QP Meta. I confirm and concur that this subject has no place on the Stewards' noticeboard, and has nothing to do with global admins. I'm baffled why two local admins from the QP wikis would think otherwise. --Raidarr (talk) 20:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Technically, I thought these templates would apply with all wikis; not just Qualitipedia. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No, QP has those templates of its own accord. It is up to each wiki to decide how it wants to handle the content, within reason and Content policy. --Raidarr (talk) 22:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm in 100% agreement with Raidarr here. Meta Miraheze follows its own set of rules. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

delete "hurticulture" wiki
I've been hanging onto the Hurticulture Wiki for a while but I realize I can't dedicate enough time to use it effectively. I'd rather it not be put up for adoption because this wiki was made with my own OCs, worldbuilding, and creative ideas in mind - not a single other person would be fit to contribute to the wiki. Hurticulturist (talk) 22:47, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hurticulturist As the only contributor to this wiki, this has now been ✅ per your request. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 18:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Please globally block Harry2003
He's been causing a lot of trouble on the Reception Wikis, such as spamming comments and topics, vandalizing pages, as well as sending death threats to another user on Best TV Shows Wiki, all of which got him blocked on a few Reception Wikis, including the games ones. He even promised not to do any of those things again, but broke his promise not to spam comments, and now he's pretty much crossed the line by writing off-topic comments and topics on a wiki that has nothing to do with the other. Plus, he's been blocked too many times and I even warned him not to cause anymore trouble ever again, but is still doing so, so his time on Qualitipedia is up. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 23:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Death threats and the like would go right into code of conduct violations, thus in my opinion warrant the global action. --Raidarr (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree. He has been bothering us for many months now and he should be globaled. He made himself unwelcome and crossed the line over and over again. TigerBlazer (talk) 15:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Should we block him from the wikis where he isn't blocked for the time being, or can we not do that? —Marxo Grouch (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That would certainly be the right of local admins if there's a solid case. --Raidarr (talk) 19:36, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think I'll do that right away. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, you should just global Harry, because I can't seem to block him on the Books Wikis or the Music Wikis. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Or can he not be globalled? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 00:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Please lock my account
I've been through a lot of drama on Qualitipedia before and Different History Wiki is being moved to FANDOM meaning I'm now gonna be a FANDOM user rather than a Miraheze user, thanks. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 18:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry to see you go, I've now locked your account as requested. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 18:35, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry to see you leave Miraheze. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Goodbye, Duchess. 😔 SuperStreetKombat (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Bye Duchess. I hope I didn't do anything to make you leave. TigerBlazer (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * goodbye Gilimaster69 (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I can assure you that I am indeed saddened by this. Like I always say to well-known departing users, fare thee well. —Marxo Grouch (talk) 21:21, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Please delete my wiki
https://platinumtennis.miraheze.org/wiki/Main_Page - Please can you delete my Wiki, I have come to a similar junction as I have before where I can't continue this wiki in the same vein. I do have another project that I'll be requesting to pursue though if thats ok. PlatinumYellow (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Not a steward, but if it's a proper request I'm sure you can ask for another even now. With no other staff and no signs of recent contribution from any other users I'm sure this one will be closed soon. Unfortunately I get it when you have a project that just won't work out, and where it's better to just let it end. --Raidarr (talk) 16:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

you can delete or can be rename inkagames fanon please
It happens that I cannot rename, since I had made a mistake and I am missing the word wiki because I wanted to name a wiki called inkagames fanon wiki and also I have to replace fandom, please
 * You can change the wiki name at Special:ManageWiki/core. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Can you please reopen 2 wikis?
Hey, so Loathsome Characters Wiki and Great Characters Wiki have been closed, and we actually have a discussion on reopening them, and everyone seemed to agree, and nobody objected to this, and several admins like MarioMario456, Blazikeye, and DarkMatterMan4500, admitted this was a dumb idea and supported this decision, as seen in here, and here. Also, TigerBlazer, the one who made the decision to close them down, actually regretted it, and stated that "he felt like an asshole for making that blog". Also, the vote was improper as there were less than a dozen votes, and before the (clearly numerous) oppositions or input were able to be made. Also can you give me, TheAnimeLover, Shawn The Logo Boy, and Mr. Jay 641 administrator rights per TigerBlazer suggestions as seen in the same discussion.Kingjorbs (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, I regret wanting them closed. I thought that would be the best decision when disassociating them from QP would have been better. Genuine regret here. TigerBlazer (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes! We should reopen the two wikis! I loved those wikis. DoubleD346 (talk) 03:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I regretted hating them after they closed, and I agree with everybody that I want those two wikis to be reopened. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

When will the Characters Wiki reopen? Because I want them to be reopened. --Vince the Wikipedian 2018 (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I do hope they get reopened. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Lets spread this throughout Qualitipedia to get more people to agree. Kingjorbs (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I hope the character wikis reopen too, Blubabluba9990. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Can we reopen those characters wikis? --Vince the Wikipedian 2018 (talk) 06:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we should reopen them, but we should turn it into a wiki about characters with bad personalities instead of ones that got bad reception since basing them on reception doesn't really make sense. Musicismylife (talk) 08:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, Musicismylife. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Wait, what do you mean, "basing them on reception doesn't make sense"? There is character reception. You can find tier lists online for characters from different shows.
 * And, please don't do that. Base them on reception. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, Bluba. I should base them on reception after all. And, I have to agree with what Bluba said: There is character reception. You can find tier lists online for characters from different shows. So I would suggest basing them on reception, not personality. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, but I think some should be based on personality as well. Characters who have bad personalities also deserve a spot on the wiki. Musicismylife (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * That's absolutely a discussion suitable for an appropriate talk page on the wiki if it is reopened. Raidarr, can you point me to some sort of discussion, whether locally or on Qualitipedia Meta, to shut down the wiki (if such exists)? I'm reluctant to reopen the wiki until I've seen that. You've pointed me to existing discussions calling for it to be reopened and have indicated there was some discussion, somewhere, to shut it down, but suggested that discussion was procedurally flawed. That is what I've yet to see. Dmehus (talk) 21:36, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually,, I'll point it out. Shortly after the character wikis closed wrote a discussion about the closure of the character wikis, "Why I Think The Character Wikis Should Be Deleted". However, he soon regretted this and deleted the blog. Later, he made a discussion about the character wikis and what we should do to keep them alive: https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Blog%3AThe_Character_Wikis Kingjorbs suggested that the character wikis stay on Miraheze. Then, I came up with this idea: reopen the character wikis, but delete any opinionated pages (Mr. Krabs., Cheese from FHFIF, Boa Hancock, etc.) Two days later, Kingjorbs told the stewards to reopen the character wikis, and have himself, TheAnimeLover, myself, and Mr. Jay 641 be admins of those wikis. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Shawn has provided an abridged background. As far as the direct catalyst for wiki closure, I believe you actually looked at it (via undelete and redelete of the linked blog post). The action was taken exactly at the time of Duchess's first reply in that blog after a couple of supporting replies before. There was really no more than that to establish closure, and iirc it was all done within the same day. --Raidarr (talk) 23:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Raidarr and Shawn the Logo Boy. Indeed, I did look at the deleted blog post by TigerBlazer and the page in question. Both point to allowing these wikis to be reopened. I was mainly concerned with whether there was a discussion to close them or split them off from the Qualitipedia wikis. It seems that's not the case, so I'll reopen them, and initiate a discussion locally for those to participate in. Dmehus (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, Dmehus. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 23:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * BTW, I'm marking some stuff on Loathsome Character Wiki as candidates for deletion. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 23:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll check those candidates for deletion in a few days and delete them if no one objects (i.e., reverts your tagging), in absence of local administration. Dmehus (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Globally lock this user.
A user sent me a message that threatens to rape me just for removing an NSFL template from a page, and he should be banned from this site for threatening to assault me. Here's the message for proof: https://terribletvshows.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserBoard&user=SuperStreetKombat&conv=Isaiahrichmon367 SuperStreetKombat (talk) 21:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Never mind, he apologized. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Is it really impossible to global this user? Has he really won? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't feel as any action here is necessary. People say things they don't mean or intend to carry out in the heat of passionate arguments. You said yourself they apologized. Remind them of Code of Conduct and move forward. Dmehus (talk) 19:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, he did apologize, but then falsely accused me of breaking the wiki's rules, and said that I'm no better than he is, even though what he said to me is way worse than what I did. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 21:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Nonetheless, assume good faith, advise them of Code of Conduct, and move forward. Closing as ❌. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 22:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I doubt I can get through to this user, but I'll try. If I can't, then I'll just have to keep him indefinitely blocked. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Close easypedia, quotes wikis
I want to work on travel guides, creating one soon. quotes, easypedia, close please or inactive. Thank you. Sperosdurell (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC) Sperosdurell (talk) 11:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Revert, keep both. Sperosdurell (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Could you add this to the global title blacklist
.*uglydolls.* .*darkmatter.* .*long-term abuse.* .*no reason specified.* .*recepti0n123.*
 * LTA

This should deter -abigblueworld-. —Mario Mario 456 14:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I agree with what you said, MarioMario456. Shawn the Logo Boy (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Maybe so, but -abigblueworld- has used usernames that don't align with what you just listed (such as this one) so there's no telling if this will actually work. Plus they might catch on and begin using variety in their usernames. Though I could be wrong. We'll see. —Marxo Grouch (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Can do once food is all eaten ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * As written, I'm inclined to say this would be too broad and have too much potential for false positives for many of those. Besides, they'll invariably just move on to adopting new verbiage. One could argue swiftly locking and blocking them, not providing a custom lock reason as they want, is the better course of action. Otherwise, they may pause and dramatically shift tactics, in which case we'll have to wait for a new behavioural pattern to form. Dmehus (talk) 16:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Please keep this wiki active
Can this wiki be exempted from the 2-month inactivity rule?

Mahmoud Refaat Wiki is a work site for the European Institute for International Law and International Relations (EIIR). EIIR people won't always have time to update the wiki every 2 months, but nevertheless it has some online books that shouldn't be taken offline, since this wiki is designed to be like Wikibooks or Wikisource. Cushitic (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

I think the Horrible TV Show Episodes Wiki and the Atrocious Youtubers Wiki should be reopened.

 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * Answered by SuperStreetKombat below. Dmehus (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

I think the Horrible TV Show Episodes Wiki and the Atrocious Youtubers Wiki should be reopened. Why? Because they should, and I like those wikis. That's the thing. MarioBobFan (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Horrible TV Show Episodes Wiki already merged with Terrible TV Shows Wiki, and Atrocious YouTubers Wiki will never come back, because it was a failed wiki full of drama and harassment (plus it violated the CoC) and almost everyone hated it. SuperStreetKombat (talk) 03:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

I need to reclaim Chromeball wiki back to the original staff
This wiki is inactive, the admin and bureaucrat called "ThatDudeRightHere" have abandoned it, hasn't made a single edit, and doesn't give the former Chromeball wiki staff their right. I together with a user called "IndividualistMax" (he used to be in the original staff) are the only 2 editors there. I'm unable to contact with ThatDudeRightHere since I can't find his Discord and Fandom account. I need the Miraheze Stewards to demote ThatDudeRightHere so I and Max can reclaim this wiki and complete my revamp plan. I also contacted all the old users of the former Chromeball wiki on Fandom (It was closed by Fandom). I believe this is a fresh start for a wiki that has the potential to surpass its old Fandom-version. PercyUK also said that the wiki needs a bureaucrat with access to enable services, and he recommended applying for adoption and explaining the need for rights. Here is what PercyUK told me: https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Community_noticeboard#Infobox_template_glitch

SchizoACC (talk) 05:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * So, all I can suggest is you hold a local election on, following my guidelines on the linked page and after about 5-7 calendar days, you would return to this thread and request a Steward assess your election in absence of the local bureaucrat, or request a different Chromeball Wiki on a different subdomain, defining a clear purpose, scope and topic for your wiki. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 05:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I was informed that ThatDudeRightHere's Discord is ThatDudeRightHere#4066. He is also active on the Polandball Wiki. Try asking him there. Thanks! Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

I've been disenfranchised by the edit filter.
When I tested the edit filter on my wiki, it was triggered and all my permissions were taken.

There is no bureaucrat on this wiki except me, and I can't manage it.

Can you please grant me a bureaucrat on that wiki? ko yo  mi  ya  5438   07:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

I can't manage this wiki. Please deal with it as soon as possible.--  ko  yo  mi  ya  5438   11:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * You should now be all set, but do be sure to be careful about abuse filters, particularly those that remove users from their groups. -- Void  Whispers 12:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand. I will be careful in the future.  ko  yo  mi  ya  5438   12:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Could you global my account
I've had enough of this shit. After various warnings of violations of non-existent rules by Miraheze T&S, I've lost all faith on being on Miraheze. —Mario Mario 456 12:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * In case I want to come back my public contact email is realmariomario456(at)gmail(dot)com. —Mario Mario 456 12:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * And also, if a steward is reading, I would want you to delete or close the wikis that I founded. —<span style="color:red;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#f00,#c04);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#808,#40c);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#20d,#00f);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">456 12:39, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Whoa whoa whoa, hold on there. What if I wanted to take care of the wikis you founded? I'd like to take care of them, and I'm terribly sorry to see you go. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 12:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, then this is withdrawn temporarily. Stuff is done. Now you can safely global my account. —<span style="color:red;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#f00,#c04);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#808,#40c);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#20d,#00f);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">456 12:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Just because you don't know or prefer to ignore the rules does not mean they are non existent. Also, founding a wiki and it having a community or fellow bureaucrats does not mean it can be arbitrarily closed, even by its founder, if the story with Duchess was any clue. --Raidarr (talk) 13:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)