Requests for Comment/Shut down the Horrible Music Wiki

Although this wiki is supposed to focus on critically panned songs, just like a majority of reception wikis, this wiki has been infamous for allegedly having several amounts of bias, and the worst offender about the wiki is that it a majority of the wiki focuses on songs that are although poorly recieved on music review sites still have a decent/good reception on music streaming sites and YouTube and from some music critics. Not to mention the worst offender is that the wiki itself also whimpered with Miraheze's reputation, considering that there is some drama happening on the wiki. Several of the songs and pages featured on the wiki list non-slur swearing or any mild NSFW as bad qualities, which makes the wiki sound borderline anti-NSFW. Also, pages about people are allowed on the wiki and some of them might sound biased and hateful which violated Miraheze's policies ("Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people."). Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 04:56, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposal 1: Shut down the wiki
This will result in the Horrible Music Wiki getting closed down, and it will be removed after a period of time just like a Miraheze wiki with lack of activity. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 04:56, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Abstain

 * 1)  I'm not sure what to say about it, but it is pretty much get rids of the archive of the wiki, and archiving is still important, especially to those who want to see the past. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 04:56, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) A good portion of this Request for Comments sounds like an editorial complaint versus something that is directly addressable by the global community. Your request would have more footing to stand on if you amplified what pages are 'biased and hateful' and which 'violate Miraheze's policies'. Otherwise, a Request for Comments filing a grievance requesting a wiki be closed due to local editorial decisions is likely to overwhelmingly fail per WP:SNOW. You may find the Content Policy and Code of Conduct helpful as a benchmark of what is not allowed or tolerated.  Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) * Thanks for the advice, I'll try my best to make this request for comment addressable to the global community as good as possible, and this is my first time making a request for comment, so don't expect it to be that good in the beginning. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 07:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposal 2: Shut down the wiki, but keep it as an archive
This will also close down the Horrible Music Wiki, but it will remain to exist as an archive. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 05:04, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  I think the wiki should remain closed but with it being still available to read, considering that there are some helpful pages on the wiki like Sasaengs, Toxic Fandoms and Hatedoms, and 6ix9ine. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 04:56, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) This is not an open RfC so I'm not permitted to vote, but I'm not sure what you mean by keep it as an archive. Do you mean exempt the wiki from inactivity? I'd also like to add that in the event that a wiki violates the Content Policy, the wiki would be taken down immediately. This also seems like a topic that would be best served by filing a complaint with a steward, as opposed to making this a global issue. Thanks - BrandonWM (talk • contributions • global • rights) 08:34, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) *If you know the Qualitipedia wikis, they are closed but won't be removed from the database, which makes them still exist and you can still read them, but you can't edit, make comments or anything else. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)