Stewards' noticeboard

My restrictions.
I moved topic here. What's the status on the ban for another wiki creation? Thank you. SperosDurrell (talk) 06:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to appeal your ban on wiki requests, you should formally state that you are doing so. I would also highly suggest that while doing so, you state the details of the wiki you wish to request should your ban be lifted, and show that you have maintained activity on your other wiki(s). — Arcversin (talk) 07:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * OK but the wikis I have are dead sadly. Can you close them? Thanks. SperosDurrell (talk) 07:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You can take a backup of them and delete them if you want.  Anpang 📨 08:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * SperosDurrell, okay, so you're looking at your restriction on creating wikis. This is the issue, though. You request wiki, after wiki, after wiki, etc., make a few edits, post on community noticeboard for users to help you edit your wikis, then you lose interest, get bored of them, declare them dead, often requesting closure and/or deletion, then request a new wiki. I would just note you still haven't requested a personal private wiki for yourself, so you still have that option. Moreover, I would be inclined not to remove this restriction, at this stage, as I'm not seeing evidence of enough of a behavioural shift. I would, however, entertain one additional public wiki creation, by having you define, here, the sitename for your wiki, the subdomain for your wiki, and a clear purpose and scope for your wiki (a sentence or two should usually be sufficient. How's that? Dmehus (talk) 09:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds good 👍 thank you. SperosDurrell (talk) 14:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Soccer wiki, Sports, It will be about Soccer players old and current, teams, personnel, etc. Anywhere in the world. Statistics, Arenas (stadiums).
 * Sitename, World Footy Wiki. Public
 * Under category sports. Anything else you need, please add. Also I would like to say thank you Doug for possibly allowing this. SperosDurrell (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If accepted I will really try hard to contribute cause I love Footy!!! SperosDurrell (talk) 02:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * SperosDurrell, okay, I'm not comfortable removing your wiki creation restriction limiting you to one (1) public and one (1) private wiki. Nevertheless, I am comfortable with mediating your wiki request for you. Do you agree not to post more than one (1) thread on community noticeboard promoting your wiki and/or seeking potential volunteers to assist in any assistance you require, and, furthermore, do you agree not to spam users' user talk pages on Meta Wiki asking for help with your wiki? Also, please also specify your . Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 02:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I abide by these rules. Also subdomain footyworld.miraheze.org
 * Sincerely. SperosDurrell (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * SperosDurrell, ✅, per the above. Dmehus (talk) 09:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much Dmehus!!! (Doug)!!! 😊👍 SperosDurrell (talk) 03:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Please make sure you live up to the agreement, and that you stay focused on this wiki over the medium- and long-term. This will make loosening or removing your wiki creation and/or global user restrictions easier. Dmehus (talk) 04:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Request to remove Bureaucrat status for a resigned user
A bureaucrat who announced their resignation on Discord, who is on our wiki (, User:Catte) has been removing content they deem theirs, however when edits are undone, it disturbs a lot of edits others have made and so on. I made this individual a bureaucrat a month after the wiki was created almost three years ago. We would like to request this bureaucrat be removed as a bureaucrat on our wiki, and edits made from 3/2/2022 onward be reverted on our wiki. The individual can contact us separately and we will go back through and assess and remove this content so it doesn't harm the wiki itself or any other updates other users have made as far as templates. Thank you for your help. -- RuneTree (talk) 02:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * RuneTree, are you able to link me to the Discord thread on your Discord server where they resigned? Dmehus (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * RuneTree, having joined your wiki's public Discord server, linked from your wiki's main page at, and having verified Catte's resignation request in the Discord administrators' channel you temporarily provided me access to, this has now been ✅. I will let you remove the   permission, as the local bureaucrat on this wiki. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 02:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Can users stop disabling talk page access or emails whenever a user is blocked?
Most of the time, whenever a user is blocked forever, they actually get their talk page access and email disabled, despite the fact that those are both ways to be unblocked. MarioBobFan (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Is there something in particular you wish to address? If you wish to address this type of practice on a wiki, please raise it up with the local administrators. Meta does not control admins on other wikis. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This needs context. Some Qualitipedia administrators still follow poor administrator blocking practice. I would suggest raising this issue with the blocking administrator. If that fails, I would suggest bringing it up on the user talk page of a bureaucrat on the listed here. I suspect you will find at least one bureaucrat with a sympathetic ear, who will surely reply locally. Dmehus (talk) 06:00, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Can users please stop reverting errors?
A lot of users on these site actually infamously revert errors. https://loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Timmy_Turner_(Seasons_9_%26_10)&diff=78065&oldid=78022 MarioBobFan (talk) 05:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * This is an issue you should raise with the local community if you have a concern with it. Please remember that Miraheze Meta is not for resolving little issues like that as we don't control users nor do we manage any wiki. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * As per what Agent Isai said, I will just note that as an infrequent  patroller and page reviewer, I've locally endorsed your reasonable edit. Dmehus (talk) 05:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Rights to be bureaucrat on Cancelled Movies Wiki
https://cancelledmovies.miraheze.org/wiki/Cancelled_Movies_Wiki

Hello. Can I be granted Bureaucrat rights on Canceled Movies Wikis  https://awfulmovies.miraheze.org/wiki/Topic:Wr2bli0pbahhbtlw as seen from this topic, thanks Gilimaster69 (talk) 14:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'm going to follow up from what I advised within the topic. As an existing bureaucrat of the wiki in question I refuse the bureaucrat request here on the spot because a) you have no edits, b) I've advised you to make edits to demonstrate interest before requesting any rights in the wiki, and that was for sysop, not bureaucrat, and c) the wiki does not have a problem with bureaucrats or people in leadership positions; primarily it needs people to contribute, and just adding bureaucrats for the sake of it has never been a solution as demonstrated on the main line of QP wikis that we are both familiar with. I wish you'd taken my advisement within the thread, as now I have to refuse you outright. --Raidarr (talk) 14:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understand what you mean, you don't have to give Bureaucrat if I am not ready, Thanks. Gilimaster69 (talk) 15:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I could grant you a couple of rights, but not bureaucracy just yet. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:33, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Global lock for MirahezeBots
User:MirahezeBots's name is not in compliance with the username policy. Usernames containing "Miraheze" must have an official connection to Miraheze, which this account does not. It is run by a third-party group which was given 3 months (December 4th, 2021 - March 4th, 2022) to remove all Miraheze-related branding from their group, and this commitment was not met, in fact, zero progress has been made and there is no indication of any change. As such, this account needs to be locked for violating the username policy with no commitment on changing their username. Naleksuh (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)


 * One question: Wouldn't this pretty much screw anything relating to relaying messages up? Aside from that, the fact that you are bringing this up again pretty much begs the question of what the point was behind this request. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * To my knowledge it would not break anything (doesn't appear to have edited recently, nothing I know of relies on this account), but if it does that's not Miraheze's problem. The account is violating the username policy and they had three months to request a rename (most accounts in the username policy violation usually get just a few days). Naleksuh (talk) 20:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This is potentially a good avenue to pursue this, yes. However, MirahezeBots has had the implicit endorsement of Miraheze (SRE + Steward + Board) functionaries since its original name (ZppixBot). Indeed, Void even renamed it from ZppixBot. Thus, this would need either (a) consensus of Stewards or (b) a community discussion/RfC to see whether the community explicitly endorses that username, in my view. As well, this would only apply to the on-wiki account, not the IRC bots, so I'm not certain to what end this would accomplish, since the wiki account isn't even active globally. Dmehus (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, the IRC bot is being handled separately. This thread is just about the wiki account. It doesn't appear to need an RFC, especially when that is not how username policy violations are handled. The account is violating the username policy, but may be unlocked upon a successful rename. Naleksuh (talk) 20:24, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, yes re: the IRC bot, but in terms of global locks per Username Policy, an immediate lock would not be appropriate, as there's no evidence of bad faith. Because of the age of the account, and the fact its rename has been implicitly endorsed by the community, I would not be in favour of issuing a uw-username warning without at least consensus of Stewards to do so&mdash;that is to say, at least three of four Stewards agreeing that it's a Username Policy violation. Alternatively, consensus of Stewards may opt, on a non-binding and advisory basis, seek the community's feedback via a community discussion or RfC (probably the former) on whether MirahezeBots has the community's explicit endorsement to continue using the username it has implicitly endorsed in the intervening years. Dmehus (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Consider the above mentioned three of four Steward ratio compromised as I also consider the lock suggestion inappropriate, and frankly I think the basis of the request as well as other efforts to de-integrate the bot to be made in poor faith related to a larger, more murky background of grievance rather than a substantial community issue. --Raidarr (talk) 13:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * While I don't agree the Steward ratio to be "compromised" in any way, I do agree that the request by the requestor was likely made in poor/bad faith and completely agree that, given MirahezeBots has had the implied community support by virtue of no one, other than one user, raising a grievance, over the years, it should have a community discussion prior to having the account locked. Dmehus (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

I want to delete my account
I want to delete my Miraheze account, Deleted user 08:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Deleted user, by delete, do you mean rename and lock your own account, making it recoverable, later, or do you mean an irreversible anonymization? Dmehus (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I want to delete my account Deleted user 08:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleted user, accounts can't be deleted, per se, but the Trust and Safety team can initiate a process to fully anonymize your account, renaming it to a random username, and removing all PII from your account. Is that the process you wish to undertake, and do you reside within the European Economic Area (inclusive of the UK as well)? They will still honour your request, regardless of where you reside, but they have certain compliance obligations for users within that region. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes but which of the options? Agent Isai  Talk to me! 08:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleted user, a reply please? Dmehus (talk) 08:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Um. then what? Deleted user 08:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Deleted user, please confirm that you want the Trust and Safety team to irrevocably anonymize your account, and whether you reside within the European Economic Area + UK or not. Dmehus (talk) 08:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, saw your e-mail. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 08:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

2fa OATH
Hello, I have 2fa OATH on Miraheze. I would like to have on Wikimedia and testwiki.wiki, Is it activated if I have the same username there? Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * No, they are completely separate sites. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  13:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know, but I could put on my factor authentication program 2 same usernames from 2 different sites? Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think RhinosF1 may have misunderstood your question. It is indeed possible to a site external to Miraheze use the shared Miraheze consumer/token, as is done with MirahezeBots Phabricator using Miraheze Meta Wiki as the OAuth authentication mechanism. This, however, would require that the site owner request for a new OAuth consumer to be approved. Miraheze SRE would then need to review the new OAuth consumer request and provide a decision. Dmehus (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * OATH is 2FA. They are annoyingly similarly named. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, right, it's those two apps with the same spelling, but different capitalizations. :P Dmehus (talk) 15:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Most 2FA apps should allow you to store more than 1 account and differentiate by something other than username. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:28, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that is what I was just about to reply to next, as I suspect that's what they were asking about. For the record, I use, and prefer, Authy, as it allows syncing my keys across devices + works on desktop devices. Dmehus (talk) 15:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have Google authy. AlPaD (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Someone put a rude edit summary about me.
mh:loathsomecharacters:Special:Diff/84348 MarioBobFan (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * That's not really that rude, as far as I can tell. It's a bit uncivil. Both of you seem to be engaged in a content dispute. I've restored the status quo ante in my local capacity on that wiki, but I would suggest either of you request page protection and both of you discuss the dispute on the talk page. Dmehus (talk) 19:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Delete mcnbwiki
Could mcnb be deleted? I've got an xml dump and have put the pages in my private wiki.  Anpang 📨 04:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Anpang, ✅ per your well articulated request, with a note that you're the only contributor to this private wiki. Dmehus (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Crappy GachaTubers Wiki is using moderation again despite not a lot of admin activity
Crappy GachaTubers Wiki is using moderation again despite the fact that the only administrator, FranciscoLol2009, is not very active; although they did edit two days ago, that was their first time editing in a month and 16 days (I think that's it at least, I'm not the best at that kind of math). They are mainly semi-active, therefore it is unlikely that moderation could work easily. FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 00:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * It's a strange wiki, frankly. It has a variety of discretionary rules and Moderation seems to be his thing even if indeed the formula might not be sustainable. But I'd encourage contacting him to see what's up, since it's not preferable to intervene locally unless truly necessary with a clear global policy concern, and he has demonstrated the bare minimum activity to be sure he is around enough to exercise agency and make decisions. --Raidarr (talk) 15:12, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * FatBurn0000, I've taken a second look at this wiki again, and am not impressed with what I am seeing. What I am seeing is most of the pages are wholly negative attack pages meant to denigrate a particular YouTube personality. Compounding the problem, there are concerns with potentially libelous information about some of the said personalities. As well, the user's re-enabling of the Moderation extension without consensus to do so is also a bit problematic. Consensus is not required to enable extensions, but given several users have expressed problems with the extension, it should have it in this case. Moreover, former wiki creator SA 13 Bro expressed reservations about this wiki here, and yet former wiki creator Amanda Catherine approved it unquestionably without explanation as to being satisfied it would not be a Content Policy violation. As such, given the local bureaucrat's apparent unwillingness to make the necessary corrections, I'm favouring deletion of this wiki at this point. Dmehus (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Can someone please reopen this wiki?
https://fantasticlegosets.miraheze.org/. MarioBobFan (talk) 00:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅. --Raidarr (talk) 01:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * YAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!! MarioBobFan (talk) 03:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't expect this type of response from you, but good luck with the wiki. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Undeletion of miniescwiki
Per RequestWikiQueue/23425, please undelete miniescwiki. Pinging original requestor Thatnickperson. — Arcversin (talk) 21:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅. --Raidarr (talk) 23:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I tried to reopen the automatically closed zenbuddhismwiki. The page did not respond.
How should I do? Rdaido (talk) 05:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Can you elaborate on this? Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I see what you meant; I saw this a few minutes ago, checked, and noticed the 'closed' notice was a bit inconsistent. I tried to access it centrally (through Meta) and it appeared to be open. I went back to the wiki now and it appears to now be consistently open. I'd conclude that you encountered some sort of slowness in ManageWiki response and that it should work properly now, but do report to Phabricator if other changes take say, more than 10 minutes going forward. --Raidarr (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Checkuser request


Suspect action. Thanks! AlPaD (talk) 20:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * They are from different IPs. Silicona (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I reverted the test block of Platinum19 after testing. Silicona (talk) 14:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not see what was done here that merits CU investigation. --Raidarr (talk) 14:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your replies and sorry for my mistake. AlPaD (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Silicona, speaking as a Consul, please make sure you review this local policy and these policies more broadly with regard to test actions. Test blocks should be done on either (a) yourself, (b) your alternate account, or User:Example, or they should ideally have the consent of other users to test on them. I don't mind if you test on me, so long as you revert your test block immediately after and don't make it a regular habit. ;) Dmehus (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Exemption from Dormancy Policy
I would like to ask that My Wiki have the check box for Exemption from Dormancy Policy ticked. The wiki is a private, personal project/co-op with one other. The wiki is strictly for information to do with the project and will only be sporadically added to at this point. We have outlined the majority of the information that has been and will be added. Thank you. Ellohyin (talk) 01:31, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'll aim to review your request this weekend, as this needs more time. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I want my account to be renamed please. But don't delete it :(
Can I rename my account from FreakingGUYman to DHX Cookie Jar Fanatic? FreakingGUYman (talk) 16:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there, please read Changing username for help on requesting username changes. Username changes are not handled on the Stewards' noticeboard. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 19:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * DHX Cookie Jar Fanatic, as Agent Isai suggests above, you should request a global rename at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, articulating a clear reason for requesting a rename. That being said, I've ✅ this global rename for you here this time. Please note, though, that global renames should not be a frequent occurrence. This should be your new username permanently or, at least, for the very, very long term. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 05:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Exemption from dormancy - we're going through a lot right now.
Hello. My name is Bahçe and I'm part of a wiki called Geofiction. We do a lot of our work on Discord, but we use Miraheze as an archive for storing data about our nations.

We are currently trying to increase wiki membership and userbase, but we've been unsuccessful in the past, and in the last 2 months we all on the admin team have been on break due to life issues.

One of our users pointed out today that we are now listed as inactive, and as one of our Wiki admins is on break and another has quit the project, I'm requesting on behalf of the admin team to take us out of inactivity.

Thank you. Bahçe (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Bahçe, I've ✅ the wiki for you per this request. As to your request for an exemption to Dormancy Policy, based on my initial review, in terms of content, most of your wiki's pages are what I'd call sub-stub and a few are what I'd consider stub-class or emerging stub-class in terms of content length. As well, as a public wiki, your wiki is included as part of regular wikibackups that Reception123 does several times per here, which are hosted here. Dmehus (talk) 05:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

DarkMatterMan4500 can't take criticism
I made this post to call out DarkMatterMan4500 for his rudeness towards me, on his talk page I made a post calling him out when I was critcizing the Qualitipedias, I was just criticizing and giving arguments back then, nothing more, and yet he still gets mad when I critcize him when he was acting negative and his behaviour is a bad influence for the community. SuperSoul (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You are only making the situation even more worse, especially since you were not criticizing me at all, and sent out a personal attack on my talk page over a wiki being deleted, and about the content policies we added about banning pages on real life people. We made it our decision to ban pages on real people due to concerns of it being potentially libelous, and what really annoys me is that you labeled this thread as such in such a way that makes it lean towards personal attacks is unacceptable behavior, and therefore, will not be tolerated. Please stop with the persistent messages, especially when I made it clear to you that I won't be tolerating your bad behavior, and thus, this thread is worthy for a boomerang because of you holding a grudge against me for something that occurred about 2 months ago (which of course is still recent, given that it hasn't been 90 days as of this reply). Continuing this behavior is not helpful nor useful, and wastes everybody's time, including mine, that I have to read unpleasant or unwelcoming messages down this road. I am just asking you to please consider the comments you are writing, and be sure your comments are ACTUAL criticism, and not insulting or disparaging remarks. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:13, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That wasn't a personal attack nor about a deleted wiki, but still, I was busy with personal stuff not related with miraheze, thats why I talked about this too late but still, that message was made to make you improve your actittude since it is not really positive and is a bad influence for the community, also, the reception wikis have a rule that states that admins can't delete posts containing criticism of the wikis, but banning me for giving arguments is not tolerable and makes you look like a bad person. SuperSoul (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * While I do appreciate the criticism I receive from other users, yours in this case, came off as unhelpful, and feels more of a personal attack, to the point of leaning towards harassment, rather than criticizing me just for doing certain actions. You have a tendency to violate the Code of Conduct while doing so. Remember the warnings that and another user gave you on your user talk page. I feel as though you should be taking your own advice before doing an action here first, and recognize YOUR own misbehavior. In fairness, you were pretty much badgering me into responding to you on my own talk page. I can, and I will, revert any message that are either trolling, harassment, or is meant to cast aspersions without any evidence of some sort. Your messages you left me falls under number 2 in the category I mentioned here. You should REALLY drop the stick before I may proceed to contact an admin to block you for the harassment you sent me earlier today. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't believe how you think people giving advice to you on how to act civil is unhelpful or a personal attack!
 * I was rude before, I insulted you (because I really hate you), but this time I tried to be civil with you this time, yet you still get mad, because I don't like your behavior becuase you banned me for giving arguments (as seen here: https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Topic:Wozdy3axi60ufbhj).
 * I just want you to improve or more people would hate your rather than like you. SuperSoul (talk) 18:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * DarkMatterMan4500, SuperSoul is correct that his raising concerns about your cross-wiki behaviour is not a personal attack. Additionally, your continuing to edit war with SuperSoul, by reverting him and using Twinkle in that way was arguably an inappropriate use of Twinkle, rather than calmly trying to engage with him (whether on Meta Wiki, on a Qualitipedia wiki, or some other off-wiki venue). The edit warring must cease. That being said, SuperSoul, Administrators' noticeboard is not the correct venue to raise these issues. Additionally, I'm not satisfied that this requires Steward intervention. Are you blocked on said Qualitipedia wikis? Has your local user talk page(s) been revoked on said wikis? If the answer is 'no' to either of the above, then you should seek local resolution and/or mediation, probably here, as required. If the answer is 'yes' to both of the above, please identify, calmly, rationally, and objectively what steps you have attempted. Otherwise, I will consider this matter closed. Dmehus (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I need features
I made my wiki Custom Logos wiki but i want the same features as clg wiki so ppl can make pages. I clicked the request features button and i dont know how to use it. DHX Cookie Jar Fanatic (talk) 19:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You can change settings and add extensions to the wiki through the ManageWiki interface, which you can find under the "Administration" section in the wiki's sidebar. — Arcversin (talk) 20:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This page (ManageWiki) might be very useful to you in addition to --   Joseph  TB  CT  CA   20:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

User:JUST SAY YOU AND NO ONE ELSE IF YOU WANT ME TO STOP! global lock
Can stewards globally lock User:JUST SAY YOU AND NO ONE ELSE IF YOU WANT ME TO STOP! because of inappropriate username? The username has capitals as well as an exclamation mark at the end of username after "STOP". Silicona (talk) 15:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, thanks for reporting, this username has been globally blocked already by a Global Sysop --  Joseph  TB  CT  CA   15:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand the locking sysop's want for the long-term abuser to stop, but I'm disappointed that they resorted to troll feeding ("you and no one else"). Marxo Grouch (talk) 22:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * That's what I said. He shouldn't have done so, as the troll would've came back anyway. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't really see the harm considering the troll in question is sufficiently persistent that it doesn't really matter how they're locked, only that they are expediently. If he gets his amusement out of it, I'm not bothered. It shouldn't be a regular habit, of course. --Raidarr (talk) 09:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you're right. It doesn't really matter what the reason is. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 10:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The key difference I think is when the reason is inflammatory, unclear to reviewing users, or regularly doesn't attempt to be serious, at which point the reason does become an issue - just to clarify. It's a balance, I just think the balance is not annihilated by one-off tongue in cheek summaries. --Raidarr (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Marxo Grouch and Silicona, I agree with you and Raidarr that Global Sysops should avoid feeding the trolls by locking them as per their stated in the user's username, which is also, arguably, a Username Policy violation. I also agree with Raidarr, though, that this username is not so grossly offensive or derogatory, but, on the other hand, I do have my doubts as to whether the user will be so easily satisfied as to permanently stop their long-term abuse strictly because global functionaries did as they asked. On the contrary, this may actually embolden them. Therefore, I have ✅ them and globally hidden the username to not give them that satisfaction and make it as though they hadn't created this username/user account in the first place. Dmehus (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * In light of the unique persistence involved and the utter uselessness of the names created, I take the above as a precedence to hide further names of its type when they appear in the future. --Raidarr (talk) 12:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

I would like to add Auto Create Category Pages.
https://ysmwiki.miraheze.org/ I would like to add the extension Auto Create Category Pages to my site, but it is grayed out and I cannot add it. Can I add it, Mr. Steward? Kyou (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Kyou, this extension requires the  permission to enable, which requires Stewards to enable. Before I enable it, may I ask you what your purpose of wanting to auto-create category pages is? What categories do you want to auto-create? Dmehus (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I thought this extension would be convenient without having to manually create every single one.--Kyou (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Kyou, thank you for your reply. Could you give me some added detail on how this extension works, or how you'll configure it, once enabled, to auto-create category pages? How frequently do you anticipate the extension system user editing to create category pages? Dmehus (talk) 01:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not sure about the settings, so I can leave it as it is (initial state)?
 * How frequently do you anticipate the extension system user editing to create category pages?
 * I'm not sure what you mean by "How frequently do you anticipate the extension system user editing to create category pages?
 * Is it correct to say that I should edit the listings irregularly every day?
 * I'm using a translator, so my sentences are jumbled. Sorry. Kyou (talk) 04:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please configure it before enabling the extension. It's done via MediaWiki pages. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  08:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Old bureaucrat
Can someone remove the bureaucrat status for User:Etoisle on The Backrooms wiki? They haven't made any edits and I desysopped them yesterday. Sheep42 (talk) 14:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)