User talk:Labster

The Finance page is awesome!

Do you have any preferences for naming the Facebook group?

Some options:
 * Miraheze
 * Miraheze supporters
 * Friends of Miraheze


 * Although the decision for the name is not up to me, I'm just clarifying, is it a page or a group? A group could probably be any of these (but I'm personally liking 'Friends of Miraheze'), but if it's a page we should just use "Miraheze" -- Cheers, NDKilla ( Talk • Contribs ) 11:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

There is a page here:
 * https://www.facebook.com/miraheze

alanpedia

 * Hillo,my wiki not done?--Msnhinet8 (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * How can I do?--Msnhinet8 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "not done". Are you talking about your request? Reception123  (talk) ( contribs  ) 18:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * yes,不過已經完成,sorry I can little English,I from to Taiwan.--Msnhinet8 (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

SyntaxHighlight
Hi!

Thanks for enable this plugin on my wiki

https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight

https://pascalscada.miraheze.org

I don't know what happens, my pascal codes are not highlighted. Do you have a example? It has another syntax on Miraheze?

Privacy Policies
Please take a look at:

https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Meta_talk:Privacy_policy

Please set up a checklist for the process of adapting a policy and a date for a first policy.

Thanks!

What constitutes a system change?
[08:33]  When the upgrade to 1.28 happened the response in channel was that you had tested it [08:34]  I think not having a test server is not working [08:34] <+SPF|Cloud> The only MediaWiki upgrade done by me was MW 1.26 iirc [08:34]  The sysadmins need training on how the system works [08:35]  Who tested the 1.28 update? [08:35]  maybe a ticket to show everyone is approving an upgrade is a good idea? [08:35] <+SPF|Cloud> I have no idea. [08:35]  You should be documenting major system changes [08:36]  you should have notices of non system issues like expired certificates moved to another channel [08:36] <+SPF|Cloud> There was no major system change. [08:36] <+SPF|Cloud> At least, no infrastructure change [08:36]  an upgrade of the mediawiki software is a major system change [08:37]  I'm not sure why you would think otherwise [08:38]  You do not have robust discussion of your decisions [08:38]  an IRC channel isn't very accessible to many of your users [08:38] <+SPF|Cloud> 14:37:31 <+ SPF|Cloud> The changes (code-wise and database-wise) were not that major. [08:39] <+SPF|Cloud> In case that wasn't send, irccloud failed to send that [08:39]  I'll see if Brent agrees [08:39] <+SPF|Cloud> Sent* hopefully I fixed that now. [08:39]  then I'll be done Oh, hey. It's in our advertising that we run the latest stable version of Mediawiki, so not upgrading is a major change? Meh, maybe not. I think we always intend to keep upgrading, so there isn't really a need to keep polling everyone. It's part of our makeup, and on the front page of miraheze.org. So I don't think we need community approval because y'all signed up for it.

I... don't really have a strong opinion about upgrade notification, except that it needs to be done at some point, and we need people to help look out for modules that break. This time we let Extension:MassEditRegex slip through the cracks (and so did its maintainers). I'm a little more worried about what happens if a skin doesn't work and we just break things. But again this is not really something that is important to me personally. Labster (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

I think the point I'm making is that you need to reach out to your users differently than your system administrators. Rsterbal (talk) 06:25, 7 January 2017 (UTC)