User talk:SuperSoul

Warning
Please take it easy on your comments, or you may just violate the code of conduct. Calling people that name is not pleasant at all. We are instructed (actually, all users) to follow the policy. It is to avoid various problems. --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 21:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I can't believe how DarkMatterMan4500 defends literally everything that the Miraheze staff does no matter if they abuse of their power, he acts like a slave to them and refuses to understand that they have flaws. SuperSoul (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That's quite enough with the personal attacks and casting aspersions. They are not abusing their power for anything, as this type of action is done with community consensus. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I know this is an old topic, but back in September 2020 they closed the Toxic Fandoms and Hatedoms Wiki because they believed that wiki was made for harassment, defamate or insult people when in reality we were not harassing anyone, we always condemned harassment as we criticized people who harassed others like the Steven Universe fans who tried to make a fan artist to commit suicide, or the Star Wars fans who nearly made the actor who portrayed the infamous character Jar Jar Binks kill himself, or the persons who harassed the actress Laura Bailey because she voiced a character in the controversial video game "The Last of Us: Part II", back when I was an user in that wiki I didn't knew how to cite sources, but the Miraheze staff thinks that wiki was made to spread false rumors just because the users did not know how to cite sources when in reality that wiki was not spreading false rumors nor was made to harass people, some people can't distinguish between criticism and harassment,
 * at this point the Miraheze admins started to went mad whitout knowing the truth, but we can't do anything about this since that wiki was deleted months ago. SuperSoul (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Repeated incivility to users on Meta
Hello SuperSoul. I am here both as a user and after some discussions about your behavior. In particular I note this message to DarkMatterMan, this message when you are not getting your way in discussion on the SN, and calling another user an idiot on the same page over a disagreement. In your message to DarkMatterMan you express the need to call people for their mistakes. Let me call what I see here - you have a tendency to resort to insults and incivility in obvious violation of the platform's rather simple Code of Conduct, after which you cannot expect your points to be taken as seriously. More importantly, it's not behavior that will get you far on Meta in general. I advise dropping the insults if you wish to persuade people of your points as well as continue to discuss on Meta. Thank you for your consideration. --Raidarr (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The Miraheze staff is commiting mistakes here, you guys are no better than me. SuperSoul (talk) 22:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * He just accepts the policy and is not a "slave" or anything like that. These policies are to avoid any problems with the hosting service that is funded via donation. These comments only make you sink deeper instead of helping. Keep this in mind. --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 22:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * still not an excuse to ignore the flaws of Miraheze. SuperSoul (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * All of this is not an excuse to ignore the points raised here in pursuit of a narrative. Bear them in mind. If you heed them or not is, ultimately, up to you. --Raidarr (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Commiting what mistakes? Who? Staff (We don't have "staff")? You would get much much farther in your discussions if you maintained civility and didn't attack users left and right. I understand you want change here in Miraheze and as a community centric wiki farm, we allow for users to request and vote on proposals for change. That's why there are no complete "owners" of Miraheze, that's not how we work. Everything at Miraheze is done with community consensus in mind. Please remember to be civil and if you want to see change, you may continue arguing your points in a civil manner in community venues. If you want to propose something, I suggest you draft a well organized proposal with detailed points and see what others think, not just say "X should be changed in Miraheze policy but the owners are dumb and don't change it!!!" (do remember that any change to policy requires community consensus and a vote, it's not up to "Staff" (whoever you consider that to be) to change policies like the Content Policy without a community vote). Agent Isai  Talk to me! 22:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * and now @DarkMatterMan4500 has recently blocked me from using my talk page in other wiki JUST FOR REPEATING MY POINTS?! I was explaining something an user, nothing more, he also acts negative just because of how I act, just because I was a bit rude does not mean that my opinions are not valid. SuperSoul (talk) 14:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That's because you refused to drop it when asked to. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry I am not very active on Miraheze because I had personal problems that are unrelated to the topic recently, and I never tried to insult the Qualitipedia staff. SuperSoul (talk) 14:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, you basically did just that over a week or so ago. It's not such a good idea to use insults as a way to get your point across. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I called out people for their incompetence. SuperSoul (talk) 16:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ...in a manner which made you look incompetent. Please remember to maintain civility at all times and avoid calling people names. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 16:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, in response to that message of yours that says my thinking was dumb, we actually accept partial and truthful content of an encyclopedic nature. Criticism against someone little known is not accepted. --YellowFrogger  ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 17:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I was a bit confused around this time, but anyways, the qualitipedias were NEVER meant to harass, insult nor defamate people, we were criticizing very bad people, including those who have commited crimes. SuperSoul (talk) 04:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I can't say much because I didn't know this wiki. Therefore, it was mentioned that this wiki spoke of people without notoriety, which is already a reason to close: there are no reliable sources about it. --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 04:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * this time I was not talking about that deleted wiki but about why articles about people should be allowed in the negative reception wikis/qualitipedias, but I decided to talk about it because that wiki was not meant to harass people, we were criticizing people who harassed people over their opinions (this happens in every fandom/hatedom that exists), people who claim things like Pokemon or anime in general are satanic (there are plenty of articles about this on the internet; and those claims are ironic considering how some people who worked on the anime/manga industry are christians such as Yasuhiro Nightow, the creator of Trigun and Gungrave), people who even harassed the people who worked in media they hate like those who harassed Laura Bailey for voicing a character in the controversial video game The Last of Us Part II, we also criticized people who believe that diesases like AIDS or the Coronavirus do not exist or believe that the gobernment is responsible for school shootings and people who praise evil people like Adolf Hitler or even the Columbine shooters (yes, they actually exist), no one in their right minds would praise murderers.
 * Many people in that wiki didn't know how to put sources in articles, plus the reception wikis are dedicatd to criticize things unlike other websites like Wikipedia which only give information in the subjects, many users in that wiki did their researchs (including myself), we weren't making up anything, we also put links to websites that had real information, also some articles had mentions to Google+, a social network that closed on April 2, 2019 and many of its content has been lost, but as someone who has been on that social network I can confirm that there were hate communities in that social network. I feel so stupid for not being able to speak out with more detail before. SuperSoul (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop contacting me:
The reverts I did to your posts was supposed to be a sign that I do not want you contacting me, yet you keep persisting about it, with unwanted messages like these. Constantly sending messages like that in a form of a personal attack is considered harassment, and you need to please stop. And threads like these won't help anyone in this case. I am just asking you politely to stop messaging me and nothing me. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * So criticism is a form of harassment? If anything, those messages were made to call out you for your disgusting behaviour, you can't block someone from a wiki for giving criticism to the wikis, it makes you look bad, plus deleting those comments also makes you look unable to take criticism. SuperSoul (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No, you're missing the point. The messages you've left me on my talk page were NOT helpful, and was legitimately not criticism whatsoever, and comes off as disruptive behavior. Please do not continue this behavior any further. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * as I mentioned before, those messages were made to improve your behavior, as you banned nearly two months ago for giving my arguments on a wiki, which is just pathetic.
 * When someone criticizes Miraheze, please do not overreact nor act negatively, as it only makes the things worse. SuperSoul (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

 * ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c - 18:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thsose edits were NOT disruptive, I never intented to harass DarkMatterMan4500, he is the one who can't take criticism and I tried to make him change his behavior as he did suff like this: https://meta.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards%27_noticeboard&diff=next&oldid=231573&diffmode=source and this: https://qualitipedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Topic:Wozdy3axi60ufbhj to me back in January, being not able to take criticism is not good and blocking people who criticize the Miraheze stewards is not good.

Please unblock me, this time I tried to contribute positively to miraheze as he was acting rude towards me. SuperSoul (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * SuperSoul, as an uninvolved Meta administrator, I have reviewed the circumstances of your block. While there were indeed problems with your conduct (i.e., raising concerns, without substantiating them, towards and about another user in incorrect Meta Wiki-specific venues, without apparently having tried to seek local mediation from an uninvolved Qualitipedia administrator (Raidarr would be my personal recommendation). You also should not have posted on multiple users' talk pages and acted in a non-calm manner. That being said, DarkMatterMan4500's quick, one-click use of Twinkle, rather than offering to engage with you on Meta Wiki in some other venue, and edit warring was also inappropriate. Likewise, your edit warring was also not acceptable. Still, though, I do feel a warning for this instance would have been better. The indefinite block timeframe was also not appropriate, in this case. That being said, a block without a warning would have been acceptable, had it been either (a) a short edit warring block for both parties (i.e., you and DarkMatterMan4500) of between 1-3 days or (b) a two-way interaction ban (likely indefinite) partial block from each others' user talk pages. In consideration of the above, I have decided to ✅ your block appeal, provided that you discontinue the behaviour, and not engage with DarkMatterMan4500 on his Meta Wiki user talk page or any of the Meta Wiki noticeboards (whether local or global). If you have legitimate, substantiated concerns regarding DarkMatterMan4500's conduct as a local administrator on a Qualitipedia wiki, you may reach out to an uninvolved Qualitipedia administrator listed here. If your user talk page has been revoked there, I'll ask Raidarr to please restore it locally. If you have legitimate and substantiated global policy concerns regarding DarkMatterMan4500, you may raise those concerns here, on my user talk page, but do note that I will not consider frivolous and/or vexatious reports, and I will not respond to users not behaving calmly and rationally. Thank you for your understanding, and to moving forward in a positive and fruitful way. Dmehus (talk) 03:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)