Stewards' noticeboard

Please help
I need people to hear my side of the story about what has been happening on Qualitipedia. I have been falsely accused of starting drama, and I am being treated unfairly even when I try to resolve the situation. Obviously nothing has been able to help. It really seems like things have gotten out of control. I can't lose Miraheze, it is all I have left. Every time I try to offer criticism, they act like I am trying to start drama. And everyone refuses to hear my side of the story and acts like I am the bad guy, and goes around spreading lies about me. There has been lots of drama surrounding me yet it was not caused by me. I have been the butt-monkey of both FANDOM and Miraheze for over a year now. I have been demoted, kicked around by trolls, blamed for starting drama, and blocked. I just want to contribute, and I don't want to cause drama. They blame me for being unable to take criticism when it seems like they can't take criticism either because every time I try to peacefully offer suggestions they just go and block me. I need Steward's help. I would hate for Qualitipedia to shut down but this CANNOT continue. I am tired of being the center of drama and I just want peace. Qualitipedia is all I have left. I have discussed this millions of times in countless blogs and posts, but it seems like people just fail to listen, start beating dead horses, and pushing me around whenever I try to do ANYTHING that goes outside of the status quo. I don't want to be the bad guy, I just wanted to have fun on Qualitipedia. I don't understand what I am doing wrong, all of the admins seem to hate me for no apparent reason. I will ping the involved users here because this has to stop ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

I do not want any drama, or any finger pointing. The Content Policy literally says that wikis cannot cause problems that make it difficult for other wikis. Please be civil, because I have tried to be. And do not spread lies about me. And please read the policies on the main page of every Qualitipedia wiki before you start accusing me of breaking rules, because I have been blocked for breaking non-existent rules. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * And this is not even a problem that just involves me. There is not a lot of problems with the content on the wikis, but the users are a different story. The content policy says that wikis cannot cause problems which make it difficult for other wikis. It literally talks about the wikis drawing negative attention to the farm which has sadly happened. Also, it says that wikis should not waste Steward's time, which has also sadly happened. I am the main person being targeted, but Qualitipedia right now seems to be in a bigger state of turmoil than ever before in the history of the Reception Wikis. But what is at the front and center of it all. Well, users constantly playing the blame game by trying to pin the blame on another person rather than accepting ANY criticism towards the wikis. I have now been blocked on every Qualitipedia wiki just for bringing up a suggestion on how to improve the wikis. It is time that Stewards intervene. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:20, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The Code of Conduct even says: “ A community where people feel uncomfortable or threatened is not a productive one.” It also says that wikis should not draw unwelcome attention to the farm.
 * There are no explicit Content Policy violations, but I feel like the Code of Conduct is being violated constantly with users spreading lies about me and constantly harassing me. I just want to have fun on Qualitipedia and instead I am being scapegoated for absolutely no reason, and mostly for past reasons which are months old and have long since been resolved.
 * I am not the only person who is having this problem. There is constant turmoil across the Reception Wikis. Whereas some of the wikis are more uneventful, a coup happened on Rotten Websites Wiki. Also, the Websites wikis are starting to become like The Outcast Network.
 * I really wish I had a lawyer or something, because this is just to stressful for me to have to deal with. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:27, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * So in summary:
 * I am being blocked for either things that are not against the written policy on the main page of each wiki or things that happened months ago and have since been resolved.
 * I cannot deal with this any longer, it has become much too stressful, and all I wanted to do was have fun on the wikis.
 * It has become clear that the Reception Wikis cannot take criticism, as I have been indefinitely blocked for trying to offer a suggestion on how to improve the wikis.
 * I think we can also safely say that MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge are abusing their power by blocking me cross-wiki and saying I violated non-existent rules. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * They even made a blog which is mostly just a one-sided attack blog against me, since most of the things on there are either old news, greatly exaggerated, or just plain false. So I would definitely recommend investigating MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge for a potential power abuse case.
 * They even threatened to get the global sysops against me. I just wish they would stop attacking me and I could live in peace on the Reception Wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:35, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * So I mostly request you to open an investigation into MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge, since they have clearly abused their power, and possibly have them both be desysopped. At least DuchessTheSponge since he has had it in for me before I even knew he existed.
 * Also they hate that I don't like swearing which is completely illogical since swearing is impolite and highly frowned upon, regardless of who is viewing the wiki. They call me an “anti-profanity SJW” which is literally just name-calling. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please don't lock my account, this is all I have left. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

The blog, for quick access and edification. I'm not sure about a fully user targeting blog, but it does make a case of its own for contrast here. --Raidarr (talk) 11:02, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * A lot of the things said in the blog happened months ago. Also, many of the bad things he said I did are not even that bad. They act like I am this evil drama causer who exists to cause chaos but that is not true, I want to contribute and help out, unlike what they think. But now I am banned from Qualitipedia for nothing. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, when I gave them suggestions and asked them to do things, they just ignored it. Rather than solving Qualitipedia's problems, the admins just sweep it under the rug and pretend like it doesn't exist. And they threaten to block me whenever I disagree with them. They have deleted my blogs and have attacked me constantly. Unlike MarioMario456, who isn't as hostile, Duchess has been hostile to me before we even met. Assuming good faith does not seem to exist on Qualitipedia, because the admins seem to make up their own rules and don't follow the policy listed on the main page of every wiki. Furthermore, they act like they own the wiki, when Dmehus himself said that nobody owns the wiki. Even if the content of the wikis seems good at first, behind the scenes it is utter chaos, with users arguing and playing the blame game. The fact that there was recently an attempted coup on Rotten Websites Wiki tells me that the wikis are clearly unstable and they need a leader, not a ruler. Believe me, I want to contribute to the wikis, but I can't contribute under constant fear of persecution. They even get mad at me for trying to appeal my block. Obviously Dmehus's suggestion of avoiding their talk pages did not work out, because they still attacked me. And unfortunately, since Duchess and Mario pretty much control the wiki, I have no choice but to go to them. Basically Qualitipedia's power structure is that MarioMario456, DuchessTheSponge, and DarkMatterMan4500 control the wikis. But it seems like MarioMario456 has ultimate authority since he seems to be the one calling the shots. There are other admins but they don't seem to be around very often. So yeah, I cannot contribute to the wikis if their ruler hates me. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And another problem is, I was blocked on the wikis where I usually contribute (Best Shows & Episodes Wiki and Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki, so that is mainly why I haven't been able to do much. The reason why I have been contributing to Crappy Games Wiki is because it seems to be the most active wiki. Since my block was unfair as I have not violated any of the policies on the main page of any of the wikis, my block was clearly unfair, but since there does not seem to be any way to locally resolve this since I will just get blocked again and I cannot get through to MarioMario456 or DuchessTheSponge, that is why Stewards need to get involved. I cannot continue to live in fear of persecution for speaking my mind. Ironically, even though they claim that profanity is free speech, they censor any criticism towards the wikis, which is a clear violation of free speech. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * We at Qualitipedia do take the critisisms we are given. For example, the admins listened when I pointed out the flaws of the wikis on the Crappy Games Wiki a month ago, and now they are trying the remove biased pages and make it look better. I just want to point that out. TigerBlazer (talk) 19:35, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well I suggested proposals and got blocked for it, so it seems more like MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge are targeting me specifically. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:58, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I really wish Dmehus was here so that he could solve this. The problem is that DuchessTheSponge and MarioMario456 won't listen to anything I say. I cannot live with them personally targeting and harassing me. And the worst part is they are trying to convince people that I am in the wrong when I am not. They think I am just playing the victim card. I cannot defend myself against their relentless attacks. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Why have stewards neglected this issue for so long. I NEED to be back on the reception wikis so that I can keep up with the rebrand. There is so much stuff I need to do.
 * Since it is obvious I will never be able to convince MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge to unblock me, I NEED help from stewards. But of course, no help, and now the rebrand is progressing. I have so many questions, like why did they move from Horrible Music & Songs Wiki to Worst Music & Songs Wiki? And I am being completely ignored. What is going on. Why is the entire universe against me?
 * I need answers.
 * The wikis were switched because the election was not moving fast enough for their tastes, from my observation. A large part of the issue here is that your issue is an incredibly deep web to unravel and cannot be subject to instant gratification. At worst it is being left alone to avoid conflict, but my good faith sense would indicate they are taking a more cautious and non-partisan approach for the sake of platform neutrality, as well as assessing the bigger picture of potential issue. Note that local communities are by rule intended to handle themselves, and an outlier will not be prioritized over the masses. This is something they must decide for themselves. Frankly the best option for you is to take a leave of absence and/or make good use of the platforms where you have every opportunity to do well. It's a waste of time to stick with something broken, when you have the resources to make something that works and prove others wrong if you really are correct. --Raidarr (talk) 00:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. The only thing is that I don't think that the wikis will change. Unfortunately, this can also not be resolved locally, as the other two admins might not respond. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And another problem is that MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge are completely ignoring me. When I asked why Worst Music & Songs Wiki was created instead of adopting Horrible Music & Songs Wiki, my edit just got reverted. No reply, just reverted. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Where are stewards, and why are they ignoring this. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Just popping in here to give a few thoughts. I personally don't follow the justification for the re-blocks. It feels like it mostly just dug up old stuff, and didn't really attempt to prove that the behavior after the unblocks warranted blocking. However, I am also not personally in a position as to say whether or not I think Blubabluba9990's behavior is welcome in the community. There seems to be a few comments from local users that it is not. However, the users of the Meta Wiki community only really seem to be finding issue in the long winded drama that accompanies the issue as a whole&mdash;not solely limited to Blubabluba9990. This is an issue I feel should be discussed by the local community, who so far seem rather unwilling to do so. My recommendation to the local admins is either to allow the user to edit, and see how well their behavior fits into the local community, or bounce the problem down to the local community, and allow them to discuss the issue. -- Void  Whispers 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I actually did file a power abuse complaint below about MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge below, but it got closed by Rhinos1. It has a decent amount of evidence, though most of the threads are deleted. Stewards however can see deleted contributions. Also, Mario and Duchess made a blog to lie about me, with users harassing me, so the average user does not seem to be on my side. I specifically requested that both Mario and Duchess be demoted cross-wiki, that I get unblocked, and that the blog gets deleted. After that, I can make another blog to clear my name. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm planning to unblock you and delete the blog later, don't worry. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok good. On every wiki that I am blocked on? Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Because I was just gonna make an adoption request for Best Episodes Wiki, but if I can go back to Best Shows & Episodes Wiki then I won't need to. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No, you're still remaining blocked on the dead wikis and please don't make a blog clearing your name because I don't think it's necessary. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. I am fine with being blocked on the dead wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If I add propsals, please do not use them to get the Prehibernation Week, The Lego Ninjago Movie, nor Encyclopedia SpongeBobia pages deleted though. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 23:38, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Fine. Can we at least rename Encyclopedia SpongeBobia back to Encyclopedia SpongeBobia (2007-2019, 2021-present), per our agreement. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok fine. Are you going to unblock me on the other Qualitipedia wikis?
 * Also can you restore all of my deleted user pages since deleting them wasn't necessary. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 23:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I feel like I should be unblocked on the wikis I intend to contribute to. I contribute mostly to the show, movies, and characters wikis, but I would like to be unblocked on the rebrand related wikis. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I want back in SephSpace
A month ago, I was banned from SephSpace because one of Inkster's sock accounts manipulated one of the admins into thinking I did some bad things that cost me my access to the wiki. However, I gave a full explanation on what I really did on the Reception Wikis, thus debunking Inkster's lies about me. Plus, that sock account of Inkster is banned now, so do you think you can convince the admins of SephSpace to let me back at that wiki? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, you should contact a local bureaucrats to unblock your account, but this may need steward intervention. —Bu kk it 19:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * As Bukkit pointed out, the local bureaucrats handle that, not the Stewards. Stewards cannot intercede for you with the bureaucrats on that wiki. With that being said, you'll have to build up a case on your own devices to convince the bureaucrats that those were lies spread about you, Stewards can't help with that. So sorry for the inconvenience. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 20:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I was also falsely banned too, mainly due to EijiZeBoi's bullshit. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Your best bet is to get in contact with the local administrators through a Meta talk page, I think. Unless you have their Discord/alternative contacts you know are easier. If you can't find them on any, perhaps a Steward (or, and preferably, an existing member) can drop a subtle pointer to see your case on Meta. --Raidarr (talk) 21:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * i can help i have acces to that wiki Gilimaster69 (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you know any SephSpace admin I can talk to via Meta? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 18:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I know seph and DuccesTheSponge Gilimaster69 (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ort maybe wage i will get him here @SpangusSus Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * let me try it again
 * @SpangusSus Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * can you give @SuperStreetKombat his rights back Gilimaster69 (talk) 01:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * they unblocked you and gave your rights back Gilimaster69 (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There appears to be a list of admins on the public main page of that wiki. You contact one of those users on meta to request an unblock. — Arcversin (talk) 01:51, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Checkuser request
Based on a similarity in edit style and subject preoccupation, we suspect a user who was recently perma-banned from All The Tropes, Cwf1997, is ban-evading under the user name Flowersnf. Could someone please run a Checkuser against them to confirm? Thank you. Looney Toons (talk) 01:46, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . I don't think there is enough information for the stewards to perform a CheckUser against Flowersnf. Please give more information/evidence about why do you think they might be the banned user. Thank you! ~ Mazzaz (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Could you explain what you mean? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hold on, I think I found some evidence of it. These edits are quite compelling to say the absolute least. They do seem quite suspicious to me. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * We've left several more edits of Flowersnf's in our moderation queue (along with at least one rejected edit in the history), which I can release for review if you like. In the mean time, Cwf1997 had a pre-occupation with the Marvel Cinematic Universe, spawning a dozen or so stub pages.  At the same time, though, he would create trope entries on these and other pages where the description of how the trope applies to the work had little to nothing to do with the definition of the trope; mods and users alike have had to clean up behind him.  Flowersnf's few edits so far have included attempts to create new subpages for works in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, along with trope examples on thoses pages and others that have little or nothing to do with what the tropes are actually about.  The edits that DarkMatterMan4500 has pointed to are a good case in point, but I will assemble more examples if they're necessary.  (Meanwhile, I'm confused; does Checkuser require a more extensive user history than Flowersnf has accumulated so far?  We have rejected edits of his to protect the wiki; are we going to have to let all his edits through and then undo the ones we'd've normally rejected just to generate sufficient data to run a checkuser?)  Thanks.  Looney Toons (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, has performed a CU on both of them, but not sure why he didn't do anything else afterwards. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I wonder how do you know, since Special:CheckUserLog is limited to be viewed only by CU's. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * It's logged on the User rights log. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 13:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Not too sure why this hadn't been responded to previously, but the technical link is fairly unlikely. No real comments on behavior, I guess that's up to you to decide. -- Void  Whispers 20:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Can you please lock my account?
I'd rather not use it anymore. It's been dead for a few months now. Goodbye to Miraheze! Trashanimal (talk) 01:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * We're sad to see you go! Regardless, to help accelerate the process, please specify if you want your account locked only (which disables it but can be recovered later on if you wish so by Stewards) or locked and vanished (which disables it and cannot be recovered later on). Thanks! Agent Isai  Talk to me! 02:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Locked and vanished please. Trashanimal (talk) 03:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Trashanimal Can you please clarify whether you want your personal information removed from your account, thus rendering your account unrecoverable, or if you just want your account to be renamed in an anonymized fashion and globally locked (technically still recoverable if you know your password or have a confirmed e-mail address)? Dmehus (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Trashanimal Is there still interest in this request? If so, your clarification is required. Dmehus (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That action is handled by Trust and Safety, I will make sure to forward this to them. Please allow a few days before any action is taken. Thank you. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 04:12, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

CheckUser request for MaisVocêYes SeJogaNO and MaisVocêFTW SeJogaFTL:
Welp, Encantadia Rules Est. 2016 came back with 2 sockpuppet accounts. Aside from the similarities in their usernames between those 2 accounts and MaisVocê Rules Est 2020, they won't stop messing with MariaJulia1718's sandbox, which was something that Encantadia Rules Est. 2016 has done previously, which was how she was blocked in the first place, and if you notice this account, and even this one in particular, you should see that they are exactly the same as what this particular edit from this locked account has. Not sure if this needs further examining, but do whatever it takes. You have my thanks. :) DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)


 * While I agree the above two users are likely related, the second has not edited on any wiki. Moreover, crucially, I don't see anything that suggests the first is likely related to the previously locked user. Moreover, the edit you linked is to the first of the two users, not to Encantadia Rules Est. 2016. :) Dmehus (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I actually expected this type of reply from you, and yeah, that was exactly what I saw. Meanwhile, you think you could look into Teen Titans Go! Rocks' edits? I know I'm double-barreling this for the second time today, but I do believe they should be looked at, as it's been sitting on the Stewards' noticeboard since it was posted, with only me replying. Remember when I mentioned that The something guy and DearMaster6 have inserted in "Its a rip-off of X" into articles? Well, Teen Titans Go! Rocks did exactly that, and it's strangely similar to this diff, as it's on the exact same page. Not sure if you want to look into it now, but I've been feeling like I've been getting some sort of bad luck around here lately. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: MaisVocêFTW SeJogaFTL has resorted to reverting 2 of my edits to the revision made by a previous sock of hers. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:47, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Socks get locked. -- Void  Whispers 21:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you so MUCH . Now for my unresolved CheckUser request that's been sitting there for days without anyone answering or saying a word about it. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

CheckUser
Hello stewards,

Can someone please lock the about 20 spambots ive blocked on meta over the last day and see if you can find any underlying IPs to block?

Ty, ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  14:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes please.
 * And please, post the IP ranges publicly. I am considering making my own DNSBL and include this spam network in it. this issue has been affecting so many MediaWiki operators which include Wikimedia and Wikifur lately, not just Miraheze. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I don’t think that’s really possible, as IP addresses are PII. —［ <span style="font-weight:800; padding:0.25em 0.5em;border-radius:.35em;background-color:#d2527f;background:background-image: linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -khtml-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228););color:rgba(255,255,255,1);text-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)">Bukkit  ］［ Talk  |  Contributions  |  Barnstars  15:42, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't know what "PII" mean, but the spammers use proxies like colocation and web hosting solution, so since this website already blocks the tor network and often cracks down on VPN abuse, then I don't see why that issue should be made less apparent. As a matter of fact, if you use a website called domain tools you can find their ranges and then range block them, so they cannot come back via another IP address. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the reason why I asked for their IP addresses was to blacklist them since they are not broadband addresses, they are proxies. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That is still sensitive information, and that would be an invasion of their privacy, so to speak. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This a proxy IP address, this is not their real address. How is that an invasion of privacy? Do you think open proxies like VPNs and the tor network are sensitive information too?
 * I got plenty of these spambots and absolutely all of them were coming from web hosts like ServerMania, B2NETSOLUTIONS and EONIX just to name a few examples.
 * Hell, some whataboutism, but what about all the IP addresses you block. You folks invade their privacy each time you let them edit here or whenever you block them for vandalism. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 12:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Just recently I got a spambot who used the VPN service IPvanish to spam on the wiki and I am not afraid to share the IP address because it is a Virtual Private Newtwork. https://whois.domaintools.com/209.107.204.182 You may want to check the IP here for more detailed information: https://ipinfo.info/html/ip_checker.php
 * I swear if I ever get reverted or blocked for posting the IP address belonging to an open proxy that's used exclusively used for vandalism or spam. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 12:48, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , from what I can tell you, per No open proxies policy, proxy addresses are generally blocked by CVT members whenever they discover any. So, if the CheckIUser shows that the IP used by those spambots (listed by RhinosF1) are proxies, stewards can take care of it. There is no need to publically post those IP's. And yes, IP address is still the personal identifiable information, one should not be asking users or anyone about it and only stewards, in case of miraheze, should have access to knowing IP and if it appears to be a proxy, they can block it. So, users like me and you should not be landing into someone's work. Yes, in your wiki if you encounter a proxy IP, better is to post here and ask a CVT member for the Global block, other than blocking locally. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 15:35, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, Mazzaz is right. A steward will never publicly link a user with an IP address regardless of what the user does, that is private information and that would be against global policy. It being a proxy doesn't matter, the fact is a user will not be identified by their IP if they are logged in. If they choose to edit logged out that is their choice and they should be aware that their IP will be visible. And yes, we publicly ban IP addresses but that's not explicitly identifying which user edited from which IP. I don't think it's necessary to continue pursuing this discussion, the point is: Stewards do CUs and globally block IPs as necessary but they will not tell you which IP belonged to which user. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 19:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

I was tricked by a user on the RequestWikiQueue:
A user in question made this request for a wiki on Nasty Food and Drinks Wiki, but when I approved it (unknowingly), it turned out to be a revival of the Atrocious YouTubers Wiki. Just look at the main page. Furthermore, I was under the impression that it was going to talk about nasty food and drinks, but was ultimately deceived by the wiki requester. Any comment on that? DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * A steward (I’m assuming) closed the wiki. Thanks!  —［ <span style="font-weight:800; padding:0.25em 0.5em;border-radius:.35em;background-color:#d2527f;background:background-image: linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -khtml-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228););color:rgba(255,255,255,1);text-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)">Bukkit  ］［ Talk  |  Contributions  |  Barnstars  15:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Not sure if there’s a policy for that, but they should be warned.  —［ <span style="font-weight:800; padding:0.25em 0.5em;border-radius:.35em;background-color:#d2527f;background:background-image: linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -khtml-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228););color:rgba(255,255,255,1);text-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)">Bukkit  ］［ Talk  |  Contributions  |  Barnstars  15:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ignore the above message. “Please be advised that if your wiki deviates too much from this approval, remedial action can be taken by a Steward, if necessary”.  —［ <span style="font-weight:800; padding:0.25em 0.5em;border-radius:.35em;background-color:#d2527f;background:background-image: linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -o-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228); background-image: -khtml-linear-gradient(45deg,#CF121F,#F83A0C,#F83A0C,#FF6347,#FFD228););color:rgba(255,255,255,1);text-shadow:0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2)">Bukkit  ］［ Talk  |  Contributions  |  Barnstars  15:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ballsy little bugger, wasn't he... --Raidarr (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * DarkMatterMan4500 Please be careful in approving wikis too quickly, particularly where the subdomain,  does not match the sitename and/or description. That being said, this requesting user was quite duplicitous in requesting this wiki with the deliberate attempt to deceive a wiki creator into creating the wiki. Though no content was restored, the fact that this was so flagrant and blatant as stated on the wiki's Main Page and since the user, perhaps in response to this report or to your local user talk page advisory on the wiki, closed the wiki, I'm willing to assume good faith the user realized the error in their ways. Nevertheless, there's no need to keep this, so this has been ✅. Dmehus (talk) 23:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I will be extra careful from here on out. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:06, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks, and sounds good. :) Dmehus (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This month's kind of been shit for me on Miraheze, mainly due to a lot of stupid stuff happening. Your absence kinda did worry me for quite a while until a certain thing stopped me. Sorry if I sound snobbish or feel like a broken record at this point, and for possibly disturbing you while you were away for a while. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

I accidentally made 2 extra accounts while creating my account
I accidentally made 2 extra accounts while creating this account, as I wasn't redirected while making the first 2, which was something I thought was going to happen. I thought maybe the usernames were already taken and that's why I hadn't been redirected. The 2 accounts are (Jakess) and (Jakesmithispiff) Jakes (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , it's ok! You can use one of them for testing administrative tools on Public Test Wiki. And leave the other one as it is. :) ~ Mazzaz (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Jakes As you created Jakess and Jakesmithispiff while logged out, without you posting a reply here from each of those two accounts stating they're your legitimate alternate accounts and whether you prefer they be merged into your main account or globally locked, there's not much we can do here. If, however, you login and post said confirmation edits from each and state your intention clearly, then there a couple options here. As to your latter point, that's perhaps something we should see if an interface message exists to redirect the user away from Special:CreateAccount after creating an account, then we could deploy that interface message globally. Dmehus (talk) 23:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Qualitipedia power abuse case
As I have discussed before, two of Qualitipedia's admins, MarioMario456 and DuchessTheSponge, have been abusing their powers to attack me.

First we will start with DuchessTheSponge. We will not include what he did to me on FANDOM since that is off-site, but I will discuss what has happened here. Here is everything that Duchess has done against me:
 * Back in December, he blocked me on a bunch of different wikis when I appealed my block on his talk page on my wiki, The Wow House Wiki. The talk page has since been deleted due to containing profanity.
 * He has repeatedly reverted my edits. Take a look at his talk page here (User talk:DuchessTheSponge). If you look at the history you can see a while ago I apologized to him twice but he just reverted the edit. He also reverted my edit on the SpongeBob SquarePants page on Best Shows & Episodes Wiki (see here: mh:besttvshows:SpongeBob SquarePants (Seasons 1-5, 9-present). In the history of that page I added Prehibernation Week to the list of good episodes because it seems to have positive reception. However, he reverted my edit, while again using profanity in the edit summary. Also, when I asked why Worst Music & Songs Wiki was created rather than continuing the election on Horrible Music & Songs Wiki, he just reverted my edit. See here: mh:worstmusicandsongs:Talk:Worst Music & Songs Wiki (see the history), and blocked me there despite me not having done anything wrong there.
 * He has falsely warned me several times:
 * He warned me for reverting his edit which didn't really make sense at the time, apparently that is considered "vandalism". See here: mh:freshwebsites:User talk:Blubabluba9990.
 * On Terrible Shows & Episodes Wiki, he warned me for marking the Prehibernation Week page on that wiki for deletion since at the time I felt it had majority positive reception. However, when I told him that the warning was invalid, he blocked me (see here: mh:terribletvshows:User talk:Blubabluba9990.
 * He even warned by friend BookFandumb1 just for defending me (see here: mh:crappygames:User talk:BookFandumb1.
 * Duchess also deleted a bunch of my blog posts and messages on Crappy Games Wiki for no apparent reason (see my deleted user contributions on that wiki).
 * He has repeatedly deleted BookFandumb1's comments defending me on an attack blog he made.
 * As mentioned above, him and MarioMario456 both made a blog dedicated to spreading lies about me, and trying to turn everybody against me (which is linked in an above discussion).
 * He has deleted several of my user pages on almost every Qualitipedia wiki.
 * And to top it all off, he is constantly defending ESB and acts like it is the best thing since sliced bread, ignoring the horrors I experienced there and shoehorning his personal opinions onto the page instead.
 * He betrayed our agreement that the Encyclopedia SpongeBobia page would be called Encyclopedia SpongeBobia (2007–2019, 2021–present), since when I was blocked he moved it back to just Encyclopedia SpongeBobia. See the page's history on Fresh Websites Wiki: mh:freshwebsites:Encyclopedia SpongeBobia, and see his talk page on that wiki for the discussion: mh:freshwebsites:User talk:DuchessTheSponge.

Now on to MarioMario456. He has not committed as egregious power abuse as Duchess, but recently he has also had his faults:
 * He rages at me a lot when I try to ask him questions. See his talk page here on Meta. Pretty much any discussion I have with him ends with him raging.
 * He has blocked me repeatedly for the same reasons as Duchess: Random minor things which are not against the rules on any Qualitipedia wiki. To add to that, they have both blocked me on wikis I have either never contributed to, and some of them I never intended to contribute, I just visited the wiki briefly.
 * When I asked him to do some things on Crappy Games Wiki, he gave me a warning and raged at me. Also, in the deletion summary for the discussion me and Duchess had about proposals, he raged that Encyclopedia SpongeBobia has not gone downhill, even though it has. He also acted like me saying that was some sort of crime even though it is never mentioned in the rules that you can't state opinions. And as I said, he deleted the discussion, rather than even replying to it. You can see my deleted user contributions on Crappy Games Wiki.
 * He pretty much sides with Duchess.

In summary, this is not okay and is long–term abuse, at least in Duchess's case since the first time he blocked me cross wiki was in December. I would request a desysopping of both users across Miraheze or at least a warning. I would also recommend you delete the attack blog against me on Crappy Games Wiki. And I also need to be unblocked on every wiki I am blocked on. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, it looks like either Duchess or one of the other admins deleted my messages for some reason. You can look at my deleted user contributions on those wikis for proof. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You have made this case in good part already, I suggest this be about the last lengthy comment and to keep the contents to one place, as posting literally everywhere in slightly different statements seems a lot like drama fishing. That said this makes specific claims that can be addressed, which could be of possible use as long as it's kept clean and consistent. I would suggest using/creating internet archive pages of content you want to use as evidence so it cannot be removed from here on out, though the Stewards can probably just look into specific things anyways so long as they have a link. Lack of specific references for evidence has probably been your greatest weakness so far. This has been a highly partisan back-and-forth saga and I have to imagine some people are a touch tired of seeing it play out. As much as some might have a full tin of popcorn as well. The use of links here is a good start, but again. Shoot for brevity, avoid making the same point multiple times and concentrate the evidence. --Raidarr (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * One problem, it is too late to make internet archives. Stewards can view deleted contributions though. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 21:24, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Lock these spambots

 * StellaDowden
 * AnthonySroka

If you need the proof:

 torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * AnthonySroka *  AnthonySroka が Keuntungan Akses Permainan Slots Online Lewat Gadget で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 1 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細)  torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * AnthonySroka *  AnthonySroka が Keuntungan Akses Permainan Slots Online Lewat Gadget で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 2 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細)  torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が The Ease Given Through The Very Best On-line Wagering Webinternet Web Sites In Participating In Is Actually Our Principal Target で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 1 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細)  torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が The Ease Given Through The Very Best On-line Wagering Webinternet Web Sites In Participating In Is Actually Our Principal Target で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 2 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細)  torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が 3 Cara Langkah Untuk Mendapati Jekpot Poker Online で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 1 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細)  torunitaranwiki * 特別:Log/abusefilter hit * StellaDowden *  StellaDowden が 3 Cara Langkah Untuk Mendapati Jekpot Poker Online で「edit」操作を行い、 フィルター 2 が作動しました. 対処操作: 警告 (詳細) —Mario Mario 456 23:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reporting it here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. I would like to note however that unless spambots are spamming logs quite a bit individually there's not a huge need to individually report them. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 11:04, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

ManageWiki problem
Hello, there is a problem at https://xen.miraheze.org/w/. Some rights that only administrators have are all users. Can you see it? Thanks! Fffv7787 (talk) 08:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , yeah. If you are the bureaucrat there you need to go to mh:xen:Special:ManageWiki/permissions/* (direct link) and remove those administrative rights form the users (*) user group. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 09:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, yes but I'm not bureaucrat in this wiki. Fffv7787 (talk) 09:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , see this log. Maybe those rights were intentionally added to the * user group. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 09:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know, I just asked for help by stewards because I'm not a bureaucrat. Thanks! Fffv7787 (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. But have a look at wikipedia:WP:THREAD to see how to intent comments on discussion pages. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Fffv7787 (talk) 10:26, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Broadly that's a local admin issue would only become a Steward one if they are unable to fix + inactive (actually at that point a Global Sysop might be good here). Unfortunately the local administrator (Bedriczwaleta) appears to have 2 edits on his own wiki and has not done squat in a long time, so this may be a case of disappeared admin. He did customize his permissions from the looks of it, so it's entirely possible something was screwed up. If you can make a list of what is specifically off, someone acting as a Global sysop might be able to fix it. Also, it's all about the colons; you can see how the indents work if you view page source (such as how I've just started a new section). --Raidarr (talk) 10:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Fffv7787 (talk) 11:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Dormancy Policy exemption
Hi. Is there any way Dormancy Policy exemption for wiki.aridia.space, it's small wiki with no need often edits and we still use it for or community. Thank you. Aridiaspace (talk) 12:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

I feel Violated by MarioMario456
He asked for my IP on Awesome Games Wiki, please global him. I have done nothing wrong on the wiki. I am crying and scared in rl, I feel like he's going to doxx me if I send it to him. Proof is here: ibb.co/nkzZC4P Captain (talk) 01:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * I have no interest in doxxing you. By behavior alone, it seems similar that you are Willg8686. He gives IPs in public which are confirmed to be VPNs. I redact IPs from public for privacy reasons —<span style="color:red;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#f00,#c04);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#808,#40c);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#20d,#00f);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">456 01:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No you clearly wanted to doxx me sir. And if I gave you my IP, you would have done something bad with it. Captain (talk) 01:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Just because someone asks for someone's IP doesn't mean they want to dox them. It's starting to get obvious that you're a lock evasion of Willg8686, so I'll ping for locking. —<span style="color:red;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#f00,#c04);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#808,#40c);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#20d,#00f);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">456  02:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ... I just told you that I am not giving my IP to you since are sus. And Void is not going to block me unless he checks my IP. In which it will not be same as that user. Captain (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And you might get locked instead so... Captain (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And Also DarkMatterMan4500 is a admin abuser, he is falsely blocking people. I just joined Miraheze to check out the wikis, and he was a rude person. Captain (talk) 02:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * And he is also impersonating as a Steward too Captain (talk) 02:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Technical evidence here is inconclusive. It might also just be me, but the behavioral evidence seems a bit shaky too. In any case, I'm going to leave this to local administrators to determine whether or not the user's behavior/edits are welcome or not on any particular wiki. Oh, and can we please not ask users for their IP addresses. It's still private information, and access to it should be limited accordingly. --  Void  Whispers 20:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry to interrupt here, but last night, when here was blocked, he resorted to telling me to grow up, in quite a rude manner on Awful Movies Wiki. And I apologize on behalf of MarioMario456, as I told him several times to not do stuff like this. That should also be looked at too. And even after that, he resorted to stalking me on a few more wikis by throwing random foe requests at me over me blocking him. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:47, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Can I have a word with you? probably on Discord or somewhere related. Ugochimobi (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Feel free to DM anytime. -- Void  Whispers 21:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: Captain and Scifi are now ✅ for obvious abuse of multiple accounts. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Dormancy Policy exemption for the KBP Universe wiki
KBOS/Cuddly Rainbow Guardian lost her internet access, and the inactivity warning has started showing up on her KBP universe wiki. It is unknown when she'll come back, and I think it'd be a shame if she were to come back just to find out the wiki shut down. -Typh00nCycl0ned (talk) 06:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Enable features on my wiki
Can you enable the feature to change the Logo/Favicon to my wiki? I have a new logo for it FranciscoLol2009 (talk) 09:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This is changeable via ManageWiki's Additional Settings in the Styling tab. You should be able to access it as the local bureaucrat. --Raidarr (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! FranciscoLol2009 (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Global lock
Hey Stewards, please Global lock those account. I created These are for test Regards --MdsShakil (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) User:ক
 * 2) User:খ
 * 3) User:গ
 * 4) User:ঘ
 * 5) User:ঙ
 * 6) User:চ

Possible checkuser request for possible sockpuppets:

 * Jonesgotswag
 * Foodisgood

I'm concerned that these 2 might be the same person, as Jones321 was locked as a vandalism-only account. I do know that they have a habit of blanking multiple pages on multiple wikis, and another thing that I've noticed is that both Foodisgood and Jonesgotswag were created a couple of minutes from each other before Jones321 was created. This makes me want to ask this question: If they were being constructive at first, then why resort to vandalism later on? I'm not sure if this needs an investigation, but please do look into them if necessary. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * And yes, the page blanking could be anyone, but then again, it depends. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, Jonesgotswag has been ✅, but will still wait for from a Steward if possible DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Please delete my wiki
My wiki URL is: https://toyritprivate.miraheze.org/

Thanks. Toyrit (talk) 06:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Toyrit ✅. Dmehus (talk) 02:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

My new logo doesn't show
Hello Stewards, i changed the logo for my wiki, but the logo doesn't show up, i have been waiting for like 4 hours and it still won't show up FranciscoLol2009 (talk) 10:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * There has been a bug causing images to not update to their latest version, and currently, the problem is being tracked and worked on. Follow this task on Phabricator up Ugochimobi (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I see FranciscoLol2009 (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is crappygachatuberswiki, the problem is actually that you don't want to set the logo to the file page in MediaWiki. You need to open up the actual image in a new tab (in this case, the URL is: https://static.miraheze.org/crappygachatuberswikiwiki/4/43/Crappy_GachaTubers_Wiki.png, and set that as the logo. Also, the logo probably won't display properly unless it is 135x135px. Cheers -- Void  Whispers 20:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Global lock request 07/23

 * User:不発弾の閃光
 * User:扇町グロシアは不発の閃光弾

Vandalism only account. These accounts are also vandalizing on the loginwiki, so please delete their user pages as soon as possible. Schwarz ・ Talk /  ウソペディア  13:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Accounts were ✅ by Reception123. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Import from Fandom
Hello, I can't import pages from Fandom. Can you help me? Thanks! Fffv7787 (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , what specific problem are you facing! Can you give more details. ~ Mazzaz (talk) 13:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. I tried to import pages from my wiki in Fandom to this one in Miraheze but instead I imported from MediaWiki the Fandom page. Fffv7787 (talk) 13:29, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello there!
 * Importing your wiki from fandom to Miraheze is so easy, All you need to do is Exporting the DataDump of the Fandom wiki (you probably know how to do that), then Import it to your Miraheze wiki using the Special:Import on the MH wiki in question.
 * If the data dump seems too large or you cannot import it yourself, then a Steward can help you import it to your Miraheze wiki, or you could also file a Phabricator task, requesting the import (only when you have the DataDump of the fandom wiki already).
 * Hope this helps. Ugochimobi (talk) 13:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Fffv7787 (talk) 14:03, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * What is the DataDump? Fffv7787 (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please specify the Fandom wiki and the Miraheze wiki... Ugochimobi (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I am not sure what the actual problem is. But it should work well when you go to Special:Export on your fandom wiki and download the pages you want to import and upload them at the Special:Import on your wiki. And all this should work well. If you still face any issue, then consider opening a phabricator task! ~ Mazzaz (talk)  14:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * and It's OK. Thank you! Fffv7787 (talk) 15:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

I need your help.
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * Steward attention does not seem to be required. Note that there's no monopoly on Reception wikis, and you're always free to request a fork wiki, sharing the same topic, provided it is (a) not a substantial copy/paste of an existing wiki and that it has (b) a clear purpose, scope, and a topic. Dmehus (talk) 23:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

The Reception Wikis' mods are BY GOD, CORRUPT. I keep telling them over and over again that positive/negative reception doesn't make a movie automatically good/bad, and I even tried to prove my point by threatening to add Cuties - FUCKING Cuties - to GMW as it was praised by critics. A gun to the head, for the right reasons. To put an end to the spread of ignorance. And guess what? Every time I try to explain to them, THEY WON'T FUCKING LISTEN. They unfairly permanently banned me from the wikis, and demonized me. When all I was trying to do was make sure people understand that the Lion King sequels are objectively pieces of shit.

Can you help me, Miraheze mods? Please? I've been telling them over and over again that they're corrupt, and they won't listen.

(If you read any profanity in the link... I was PISSED. I was fed up. I had to convey my anger. I had to lash out since they wouldn't listen.) FreezingTNT (talk) 19:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * It seems to me like your response was not very mature. There was no 'better man' in the discourse and attempting that controversial move as a 'gun to the head' should have obviously not worked well. But more concerning is how much pulling teeth it seems to take to make any progress or civil exchange, and the absolute poor state of leadership. To that end and in response to one of the QP admin's requests for feedback, I produced a blog which I think effectively summarizes the core issues with how the wikis are run. They are severe to the extent an eye from above may be needed. Consensus is incredibly difficult to achieve or even begin seeking and requires a bit of flame-stirring to even get an issue to attention. --Raidarr (talk) 19:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

So... what is your plan for the Lion King sequels' articles and my original pointers? And what do you think of, well... "The reception doesn't dictate whether the movie or whatever is actually good/bad on its own"? [Sigh of tiredness after months of drama and stress.] All I ever wanted... was for people to understand that the films weren't really perfect. That they should consider my viewpoints and criticisms in mind and acknowledge them, not ignore them, not discard them, and certainly not throw them away like garbage.

FreezingTNT (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


 * This seems like something a hearty 'alternative opinion' (ie, the bad qualities) section could take in mind, even if the policy defers to a general reception (the reasonable apparent sum of audience opinions). But how this works and how the exceptions work is something that should be reasonably discussed locally. That's the angle that would merit Steward action. The actual judgement and resolution, not really their business. The tools of civil discussion just need to be there. --Raidarr (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There's a few things I would like to note, in response. The "[positive/negative term] [genre or medium or entertainment] Wiki" implies it's less about the reception and more about whether it, by itself, is actually good or bad. Detractors/haters would show up on our wikis and explain why [insert good/bad quality] is wrong or misinterprets the movie/whatever... and the mods wouldn't remove that from the WIR/WIS/GQ/BQ section since, as you said, it's apparently about the general audience opinion/consensus, regardless of whether the good/bad quality is either valid or misinterprets the movie (like, for example, if Last Jedi defenders show up on the Awful Movies Wiki and explain why the article for The Last Jedi is wrong or misinterprets the movie and the mods in this specific scenario would refuse to take it down because "it's what the public believes"). As I mentioned, I'm just trying to cleanse away some ignorance — at one point, because of their policy, I considered that, if I get a YouTube channel and it becomes very popular and then I make reviews of the respective Lion King sequels and if they become popular enough or whatever, it would become the general reception and my intended goal would be achieved.
 * The film/game/show/episode/whatever, by itself, is usually the source for reviews, so positives or negatives usually based on what actually happens in the work itself can't be reception-based. My problems are indeed opinions, but they are well-reasoned and so is other criticisms or praises of media — they're all backed up by what actually happens in the movie/whatever itself. Art is subjective — whether a movie/whatever is good or bad is up to your own personal feelings, but stuff such as plot holes and contrivances... ugh, just read this Reddit post to see what I'm trying to say here. (A character being unlikable or annoying isn't necessarily objective fact, but there's always reasons that make it more likely people will find it annoying or unlikable — like the Holocaust, it objectively happened but the fact Hitler's actions took the lives of innocent people and traumatized those who personally knew those Jews made it more likely people would hate the Holocaust, if you know what I mean.)
 * FreezingTNT (talk) 00:20, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you acknowledge this or point this out in your Qualitipedia response on the New Reception Wiki? In one final attempt for the users to understand my viewpoints? FreezingTNT (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

Delete Encyclopedia Conpactia/Naveria
The conpact wiki went inactive and the focus of its "successor" has been dissolved. I no longer have any interest in running it. ConpactCasper (talk) 03:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * ConpactCasper ✅. Dmehus (talk) 23:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

MarioMario456 power abuse case
<div class="boilerplate metadata discussion-archived" style="background-color: #F2F4FC; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa">
 * The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
 * We do not need to hear this daily. Stewards need time to look into things. If you have more to raise, drama on meta isn't needed. Please take this to a private venue now. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  18:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

There is a problem with MarioMario456 on Qualitipedia. He has continuously blocked me, and rages at me whenever I do something. He also constantly acts like he owns Qualitipedia and refuses to assume good faith. Whereas DuchessTheSponge has improved and has stopped attacking me for the most part, the trouble continues with MarioMario456. Here is what he has done: Honestly, I can tolerate Duchess. While he has accused me of things, at least he is a very active admin and is easier to contact. Also, Duchess has replied on several of these threads saying that he would unblock me and seems more forgiving. Even though Duchess blocked me cross-wiki, he said "Sorry Blubabluba9990 but this is for the best", implying that he is somewhat sympathetic. MarioMario456, on the other hand, definitely deserves a cross-wiki desysopping. Mario hasn't even been here that long, he has only been on Miraheze since September of last year and I am not sure when he became an admin. Duchess, on the other hand, has been here since March or April. I genuinely want to help Qualitipedia. And I have made several helpful edits to many of the Qualitipedia wikis. But I cannot contribute when I am in fear of being blocked. So I request a global desysopping of MarioMario456, or at least a warning. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Recently he blocked me for talking about a user on FANDOM who had harassed me. He warned me for falsely accusing a user and demanded I find proof while I did not want to bring up my old FANDOM drama. I even deleted the comment, but he blocked me anyway, even when I asked him not to block me. Proof: mh:crappygames:User talk:MarioMario456. He has never even been to Encyclopedia SpongeBobia, so how would he know. At least Duchess has actually been to Encyclopedia SpongeBobia and contributed there.
 * 2) He has raged at me multiple times for trying to explain myself and gotten mad even when I just wanted to peacefully talk. Such can be found in several discussions here on Meta, including on his talk page: User talk:MarioMario456
 * 3) When I asked him to do some things, he raged at me and told me to stop bothering him. Such proof can also be found on my talk page on Crappy Games Wiki.
 * 4) He created an attack blog against me which is full of false information. He also restored the blog without permission from other admins, including DuchessTheSponge, who co-created the blog. Which brings me to my next point.
 * 5) He constantly acts like he is in charge of Qualitipedia. He always talks about trying to restore Qualitipedia's reputation, but he really hasn't helped out much. Also, Duchess is the one calling most of the shots.
 * 6) He got butthurt when people tried to say that if something has positive reception that does not mean it is good and vice versa. It can be found in one of his blogs on Crappy Games Wiki, I don't remember the name.
 * 7) He seems physically incapable of assuming good faith. He has blocked me several times for minor things which I have discussed in the past. He doesn't even consult the other admins.
 * 8) The last time MarioMario456 blocked me, DarkMatterMan unblocked me, and in the unblock summary he commented "this is pretty petty".
 * 9) While Duchess sometimes changes his mind, and has unblocked me and is somewhat forgiving, MarioMario456 seems incapable of forgiveness. He is constantly like "This is your last chance".
 * 10) He also says I am only on the wikis to cause drama when that is not true at all. I have made several useful edits on many of the Qualitipedia wikis, mostly the shows wikis, movies wikis, and characters wikis. Just check my contributions on those wikis.
 * 11) He has also deleted my userpages on many Qualitipedia wikis for no reason at all.

[https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Stewards%27_noticeboard#I_need_your_help. You're not the only one struggling with the mods here.] FreezingTNT (talk) 17:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah. Honestly I can tolerate the other admins. MarioMario456 hasn't even been on Qualitipedia that long yet he constantly acts like he owns the place. I also forgot to mention that MarioMario456 says that I am playing the victim card when I am not. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section

Recent spambots detected on our Qualitipedia wikis:


Please check our recent abuse logs on our wikis. Look for the ones that have the spambot whipper abuse log as it's really been sufficient ever since I activated it. Feel free to also nuke more from here as well. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:59, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Excuse me if I am confused but I have a question. Why is it necessary for these accounts to be locked? Unless I am wrong (I only looked at 3 of them) they have not been able to edit once as they have been prohibited by the Abuse Filter so why do they need to be locked? --DeeM28 (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Simple: Because they have been triggering the abuse logs more than 3 times, and there's a reason why they need to be locked, and that reason is exactly why. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Even if the abuse filter catches them, they are outed as accounts explicitly made for spam. They would be blocked to a) clean up logs and perhaps reduce server access by their logged-in spams, and b) ensure they cannot 'wisen up' and use a method that counters the filter. Better eliminated without quarter than allowed to be smart. --Raidarr (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In theory your arguments make sense, spambots need to be locked so they can not continue to spam. In practice however I do not think this argument works based on the evidence. I have looked at the Abuse Logs for a few of these spambots and I have not seen a single one that has attempted to spam after the initial attempt. To me it looks like the spambots try to spam once and afterwards they stop. I understand that locking may be useful as a precautionary measure but my personal opinion is that with Stewards not being very active lately it would be more useful for them to focus on other tasks (for example there are a few Dormancy Policy requests that are unhandled) rather than to focus on proactive measures for something that is very unlikely to happen based on the current abuse patters of the spambots that I have observed. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * My argument is not a matter of them spamming after the initial attempt. It is the basic principle that an account created exclusively for spam has no need to remain available. This is humoring based on a will to help you understand what is already a standard procedure executed (in good time) by global staff and has been for quite some time. Naturally it is not the highest priority, but neither is it in any way particularly difficult to do when they have a spare moment or would like distraction. It takes considerably more review and thought to consider one's Adoption request than to snipe a routine list. All said, you make a good case why we should have more Stewards or Global Sysops in general, even if I do not feel I am yet appropriate for the task personally. --Raidarr (talk) 12:38, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 17:28, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand your points but I still think that if Stewards had to lock every single spambot then they would not have time for anything else so then why lock these random ones? Anyway this matter is not worthy of an argument of any sort so if Stewards or Global Sysops think it is necessary to do this I am fine with that. --DeeM28 (talk) 17:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ideally this is where we get more Global Sysops in. It's best practice to perform the task, but obviously the current resources are a little strained. --Raidarr (talk) 20:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

CU
I think that User:Il nonciclopediano divertente is a sock of User:Il nonciclopediano umoristico because they have almost the same nick umoristico=divertente. They created vandalism pages. And they don't edit at the same moment.--Angelo Pisani (talk) 15:50, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


 * To add to what has said, this user seems to have a habit of blanking articles, not to mention their first edit was on their user page, which is kinda suspicious, similar to a locked user with a trolling message that has since been deleted by Reception123, making nonsense pages, strangely similar to not only this log right here, but also this type of nonsense. Oddly enough, these strange edits seem pretty odd to me. One thing that caught my eye was this strange blanking of the page. I think this should be investigated too. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 16:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All 3 of them are now ✅ by MrJaroslavik. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Global Ban and Checkuser request for cross-wiki abusers

 * Special:CentralAuth/반달 바이러스
 * Special:CentralAuth/대왕사마귀
 * Special:CentralAuth/전광훈 목사님께서 정권을 잡아야 한다
 * Special:CentralAuth/이 사용자는 노무현 대통령을 영원히 기억하고자 합니다

Here are some names of vandal which show similar patterns. All of these accounts have appeared in mh:libertygame: and mh:osaindex:, showing dozens of documents being replaced with specific content by each account. Please ban on all three accounts globally before damaging other wikis, and checkuser considering the similar behavior patterns of each user. 재미재미 (talk) 09:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Wow, THAT is suspicious. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The first one was already locked by Dmehus. I've locked the other 3 as VOAs. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 11:00, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Merge user on nonciclopedia.org
Maybe I'm late for request merge account as other user after Nonciclopedia move from wikia to Miraheze. 8 years ago, I was using User:Bhenry1990 at old Nonciclopedia and other Uncyclopedias hosted by Wikia. Then I quitted for several years. Now I return to Uncyclopedias. I cannot login as Bhenry1990 here, nor create account as Bhenry1990 at Miraheze. I guess my old account was created here when Nonciclopedia moved, but community says someone has used it here on Miraheze. I need Steward's help to merge my old account into my new account then rename back to Bhenry1990, if the old account is actually not in use. Thanks. Bhenry2021 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Apologies for the delay, I'll take a look at doing this tomorrow. For clarification of process, we'll merge the old username into the new username (to preserve the login information), and then rename the new name to be the same as the old name. -- Void  Whispers 00:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

"I confirm the identity and that he/she had an account within Nonciclopedia… I also had the same problem ;)"--Executive2 (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

I'd like request for a Global Block
Excuse me, I'd like request for a Global Block on Special:CentralAuth/取るに足らない, who are for vandalism, adding  and. Regards. 閲覧者 (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Already ✅ by Reception123. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Can you deal with YukariWayne?
YukariWayne has been pestering me with private messages full of false accusations of the so-called "wrongdoings" of DuchesstheSponge and MarioMario456 on Awesome Games Wiki, and the admins there (except for Allistayrian, sort of) can't do a thing to stop him, so I was wondering since not only is he blocked on AGW, BTSW, and (possibly) RWW for 6 months, but was also giving me shit with his accusations, can you do something about this, like, maybe, global him or something? SuperStreetKombat (talk) 21:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Private messages do not exist on MH unless you are talking about private wikis. As for messages on your user profile, you can tell him to stop and if he does not he can be subject to local moderation action. There is no cause for a global block and the crime of irritating the Qualitipedia administrators is not grounds for a global block unless it is an account with a clear intent exclusively for vandalism or the like. In short, just about nothing for the Stewards to deal with. --Raidarr (talk) 22:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * There is no reason for him to be globalled unless he uses sockpuppets or is a sockpuppet of someone else. I've cross-wiki blocked him indefinitely due to his hate blogs on me on BS&EW, his heavy disrespecting of the dead and heavily annoying you with my "wrongdoings". —<span style="color:red;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#f00,#c04);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#808,#40c);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">Mario <span style="color:purple;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#20d,#00f);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">456 12:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Global lock request 07/28

 * 取るに足りない

Cross-wiki abuse. Schwarz ・ Talk /  ウソペディア  23:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 05:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

CheckUser request for 2 accounts:

 * CaillouRocks
 * DiaperFan

Okay, I am requesting a CheckUser on these 2 accounts for the following reasons: I've noticed they've uploaded the exact same NSFW pictures on 2 wikis, with CaillouRocks doing it on the Garbage Roblox Games Wiki, and DiaperFan doing it on the Perfection Roblox Games Wiki. I also noticed that one of the files on 2 wikis that were uploaded by 2 users are exactly the same as the one that CaillouRocks has uploaded on the Garbage Roblox Games Wiki. These logs and the amount of overwhelming evidence was enough to convince me that they are the same person, and I'd like to request a Steward to perform a CheckUser on those 2 accounts. Thanks for reading this. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * or Void could maybe look as they're both active. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:38, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Dmehus (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, also there is also another case to look into, but I'll put that on another thread. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Dormancy policy exemption
We kindly request that you exempt the following wiki from the Dormancy Policy. Thank you in advance!

Wiki: repository.archiopedia.org (or archiopedia.miraheze.org).

Reason: The wiki is an encyclopedia and a database; this means that it may not be edited for long periods of time, but it should remain active continuously in order for our readers to be always able to access it and use the materials that have already been uploaded. Publisher (Archiopedia) (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Spambot in Nonciclopedia
Hello could you please ban Osso.Buco? Angelo Pisani (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't call that a spam-bot, but rather a vandalism-only account. I'm still trying to get in touch with the Stewards like to investigate this. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * no, he's clearly a spambot. He spams his products and website...--Angelo Pisani (talk) 23:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Regardless of classification, blocked and reverted. -- Void  Whispers 00:12, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but however, there was more today. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 18:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Encuesta anual Miraheze 2021 / Miraheze 2021 annual survey
Hola. A mediados del mes de julio respondí la encuesta anual de Miraheze. En ella respondí que me agradaría que establezcan contacto conmigo para tratar dos temas. Aún no he recibido mensajes vía correo electrónico. Consulto: Desde ya, muchas gracias. Saludos cordiales. Hugo Ar (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ¿Recibieron mis respuestas?
 * ¿Establecerán comunicación?

Translated by Google Translator

Hello. In mid-July, I responded to the annual Miraheze survey. In it I replied that I would like to be contacted to discuss two issues. I have not received any messages via email yet. I consult: From already thank you very much. Kind regards. Hugo Ar (talk) 03:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you received my answers?
 * Will they establish communication?
 * ¡Hola! Yo también respondí la encuesta y ya se han comunicado conmigo. Es posible que el correo electrónico conteniendo la respuesta a tus preguntas se haya ido a la carpeta spam de tu cliente de correo electrónico, trata de revisar allí. También es posible que los que estén respondiendo a las preguntas de la encuesta estén muy ocupados. Los resultados de la encuesta ya fueron publicados aquí (en Inglés). Si no lo encuentras por ningún lado y si te sientes cómodo, puedes tratar de preguntar aquí y alguien le dará respuesta a tus preguntas/seguimiento a cualquier sugerencia. Gracias! Agent Isai  Talk to me! 03:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * (translation) Hello! I also replied to the survey and have received a reply back. It's possible that the email containing the answer to your questions may have ended up in the spam folder of your email client, try checking there. It's also possible that the people who are replying to the surveys are currently very busy. The results to the survey were published here. If you still can't find it and if you feel comfortable, you can ask here and someone will answer your question/follow up on your suggestions. Thanks!


 * Muchas gracias Agent Isai por la amable respuesta y el enlace a los resultados de la encuesta.
 * Respondí la encuesta a través de mh:wikifrases:especial:MirahezeSurvey. ¿Estaré incluido en los resultados finales de la encuesta?
 * Entre los comentarios que acabo de leer no aparecen los temas que he planteado. De los que leí allí, estoy de acuerdo con el lento almacenamiento en caché de las actualizaciones.
 * Mi propuesta es mejorar el posicionamiento SEO. Similares páginas wiki de otras granjas están mejor posicionadas que las de Miraheze en los motores de búsqueda. En mi experiencia, las páginas se indexan más rápidamente a los motores de búsqueda introduciendo las URL en Google Console, por ejemplo. Es una labor bastante tediosa porque hay que hacerlo manualmente porque las wikis no tienen sitemap para que el motor indexe las páginas desde allí.
 * Y esa es mi solicitud: añadir la extensión sitemap: mw:Extension:AutoSitemap en ManageWiki para tener la oportunidad de que los motores de búsqueda rastreen las páginas directamente desde cada sitemap, en vez de hacerlo manualmente página por página. ¿Se podrá hacer? Gracias. Saludos cordiales. Hugo Ar (talk) 04:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Translated by Google Translator


 * Thank you very much Agent Isai for the kind response and the link to the survey results.
 * I answered the survey through mh:wikifrases:special:MirahezeSurvey. Will I be included in the final results of the survey?
 * Among the comments I have just read, the issues I have raised do not appear. From the ones I read there, I agree with the slow caching of updates.
 * My proposal is to improve SEO positioning. Similar wiki pages from other farms rank higher than Miraheze's in search engines. In my experience, pages are indexed faster by search engines by entering the URLs in the Google Console, for example. It is quite a tedious task because you have to do it manually because wikis do not have a sitemap for the engine to index the pages from there.
 * And that's my request: add the extension sitemap: mw:Extension:AutoSitemap in ManageWiki to have the opportunity for search engines to crawl pages directly from each sitemap, instead of manually page by page. Can it be done? Thanks. Kind regards. Hugo Ar (talk) 04:13, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Miraheze ofrece sitemaps automaticos, por ejemplo, este es el sitemap de este wiki (Miraheze Meta). El sitemap está incluido en el robots.txt de tu wiki y debería ser detectado automáticamente por Google. Si no lo es, simplemente ve a /robots.txt en tu wiki (p. ej. https://miwiki.miraheze.org/robots.txt) y encontrarás un enlace a el sitemap. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 05:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * (translation) Miraheze offers automatic sitemaps, for example, this is this wiki (Miraheze Meta)'s sitemap. The sitemap is included in your wikis robots.txt and should be automatically detected by Google. If it isn't, simply go to /robots.txt on your wiki (e.g. https://mywiki.miraheze.org/robots.txt) and you will find a link to the sitemap.


 * Gracias por el enlace, Agent Isai. Me refiero a un «sitemap» con todas las páginas URL del wiki para que el motor de búsqueda rastree desde allí todas las páginas. Google console enseña cómo hacerlo, pero se requiere de una página .xml y la inserción de cada URL es manual. ¿O hay algo que no entiendo bien? Hugo Ar (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Translated by Google Translator
 * Thanks for the link, Agent Isai. I mean a «sitemap» with all the URL pages of the wiki so that the search engine crawls all the pages from there. The Google console teaches how to do it, but it requires an .xml page and the insertion of each URL is manual. Or is there something that I am not understanding well? Hugo Ar (talk) 07:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Si, el enlace al que me refiero a es un archivo .xml. El enlace que incluí en mi último mensaje era el enlace para el sitemap de este wiki, Miraheze Meta, en forma de pagina .xml. Si tienes problemas localizando el sitemap de tu wiki, puedes dejar el enlace a tu wiki aquí y yo te daré el enlace para el sitemap en forma .xml. Gracias. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 22:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * (translation) Yes, the link which I am referring to is an .xml file. The link which I included in my last message was the link to the sitemap of this wiki, Miraheze Meta, in .xml format. If you have trouble finding the sitemap to your wiki, you can leave a link to your wiki here and I will link the .xml sitemap file for you. Thank you.


 * Hola Agent Isai, he leido en tu página de usuario que conoces muy bien el idioma español. Intentaré explayarme un poco más sobre el asunto.
 * Sí, pude comprobar los enlaces que me pasaste. Uno es .txt y el otro es xml. Pero lo que encuentro allí no es el sitemap con todas las páginas del wiki, sino solo la página principal.
 * A los pocos días de la creación del wiki que administro activé´a través de ManageWiki la extensión WikiSEO. Luego, mediante la configuración auxiliar, agregué la clave de verificación para Google y Yandex (lamentablmente aún no logro conseguir una clave para Bing). En uno o dos días la página principal del wiki ya aparecía en esos motores de búsqueda. Aguardé varios días más para ver si las restantes páginas se iban añadiendo a los buscadores, pero no ocurría. Decidí, pues, ingresarlas una a una a trevés de Google Console y de Yandex Webmaster.
 * En muy poco tiempo las páginas comenzaron a aparecer. Como comprobación de que la aparición en los buscadores no es automática, sino que es a través del pedido de indexado página por página, dejé muchas páginas sin añadir, a fin de ver si el motor de búsqueda las añade por sí mismo (aunque sea más tardíamente). Hasta este momento (luego de tres meses) no hay caso: solo aparecen en el motor de búsqueda aquellas páginas de las que solicité la indexación.
 * Aquí puedes ver:
 * 100 resultados en Google (todos indexados por mí desde Google Console, excepto la página principal).
 * Para no lidiar con la indexación manual de cada página del wiki solicito que se tenga en cuenta incorporar la extensión mw:Extension: AutoSitemap. «La extensión AutoSitemap crea automáticamente un archivo "sitemap.xml" en cada evento de creación / edición / eliminación de página. El archivo de mapa del sitio ayuda a los motores de búsqueda a observar las páginas de su sitio. Esta extensión se basa en la extensión ManualSitemap.»
 * Miraheze podría aparecer mejor posicionada en los buscadores si se implementara esta extensión, ya que ahora, si comprobamos cualquier wiki, incluso este (que es el principal) no tiene todas sus páginas indexadas. Con esto no pretendo que cada vez que se cree una página aparezca de inmediato el resultado en cada motor de búsquesa, pero sí, aunque sea, al cabo de tres, cuatro o cinco días. Si las páginas no aparecen en los buscadores, nadie las podrá encontrar. De allí mi interés por este tema. Un cordial saludo. Hugo Ar (talk) 08:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Translated by Google Translator
 * Hello Agent Isai, I have read on your user page that you know the Spanish language very well. I will try to elaborate a little more on the matter.
 * Yes, I was able to check the links you passed me. One is .txt and the other is xml. But what I find there is not the sitemap with all the wiki pages, but only the main page.
 * A few days after the creation of the wiki that I manage, I activated the WikiSEO extension through ManageWiki. Then, using the helper settings, I added the verification key for Google and Yandex (unfortunately I still can't get a key for Bing). Within a day or two, the main page of the wiki was already appearing on those search engines. I waited several more days to see if the remaining pages were added to the search engines, but it did not happen. So I decided to enter them one by one through Google Console and Yandex Webmaster.
 * In no time the pages began to appear. As a check that the appearance in the search engines is not automatic, but is through the page-by-page indexing order, I left many pages without adding, in order to see if the search engine adds them by itself (even if it is more belatedly). Until now (after three months) there is no case: only those pages from which I requested indexing appear in the search engine.
 * Here you can see:
 * 100 results in Google (all indexed by me from the Google Console, except the main page).
 * In order not to deal with the manual indexing of each wiki page, I request that you consider incorporating the extension mw:Extension: AutoSitemap. The AutoSitemap extension automatically creates a "sitemap.xml" file on each page create / edit / delete event. The sitemap file helps search engines look at the pages of your site. This extension is based on the ManualSitemap extension.
 * Miraheze could appear better positioned in the search engines if this extension were implemented, since now, if we check any wiki, even this one (which is the main one) does not have all its pages indexed. With this I do not pretend that every time a page is created the result will appear immediately in each search engine, but yes, even after three, four or five days. If the pages do not appear in the search engines, nobody will be able to find them. Hence my interest in this topic. Cordial greeting. Hugo Ar (talk) 08:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

CheckUser request for recent vandals on Nonciclopedia:

 * Da Nonciclopedia, l'enciclopedia liberalizzata (ma solo in Olanda).
 * Roberta Guidi
 * Osso.Buco
 * Federica Chiarullo
 * ALIK 54 BETF

It's come to my attention that all 5 of these accounts were involved in some vandalism, and some examples like these are pretty suspicious, as these diffs are almost exactly the same edits compared to these following diffs from this guy in question. Could a Steward please have a look into this too? I know I'm sounding like a broken record at this point, but at the very least it should be looked into more. Thanks for reading. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:42, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Spam accounts that needs locking:

 * (This one has been persistent here this week)
 * (This one has been persistent here this week)

If anybody's around, please lock these spambots. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)