User talk:DarkMatterMan4500

Post your messages below the other messages

Hey
Could you please rename the main page of mh:dreadfulbooks:Dreadful Literature Wiki to Dreadful Books Wiki, restore the deleted edits, and rename it back? We need to see the full history. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, could you allow YouTubers on mh:wretchedyoutubevideos:Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki again, but forbid YouTubers with less than 100,000 subscribers? The content policy only states "Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose of spreading unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people", and as long as the wiki does not have the sole purpose of doing those things, it will be fine, plus we're not trying to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people anyway. In terms for the drama, it's less likely for them to find out about their page, we can delete the pages if they find out and even though users are saying it's not worth the risk, I don't think there was any drama back when RWW allowed users, so we should give it another try. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The answer is no. Absolutely not. Main source of the problem stems down to unsourced pointers and libelous accusations. Still not going to happen, I'm afraid. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The wikis have enough trouble being credible about, well, everything they're allowed to post now. Per DMM's reply, allowing this merely regresses what progress has been made. And to top that I believe it would add justified fuel for critics. You think they wouldn't know, they will. And the image of Miraheze itself will be worse for it. --Raidarr (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I've been getting pretty annoyed with you bombarding my talk pages on other wikis recently, giving me these constant requests at a rapid rate, so could you please just slow down on those? I was okay with it at first, but you've been sending me requests after another in such a fashion that I could barely even keep up with them. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, there are just a lot of things that I would like done. Also, in terms for the YouTubers, couldn't we just forbid unsourced pages and make sure that all pages are about YouTubers who make bad content, not ones that are bad people themselves. FatBurn0000 (talk) 02:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but NO exceptions, at all. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, what about YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual user, but a channel that has a group of people who make videos on it or a channel that isn't owned by a specific person or group of people? FatBurn0000 (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No exceptions also means no YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual. So the answer is still no. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, is it okay if the YouTuber themselves approves of the article? Also, you should make that more clear, and plus, if the channel isn't owned by a person or a group of people, chances are, there will be multiple people owning it and they are unlikely to care. However, if you are going to do this, you should probably delete the mh:rottenwebsites:WatchMojo and mh:rottenwebsites:Screen Rant pages on RWW, they're only allowed because they have a website, which probably won't change things. FatBurn0000 (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Still no exceptions. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Can I please get unblocked from all of these wikis?
Can I please get unblocked from all of these wikis? Why? Since Blaskieye blocked me from TTSW, BTSW, GMW, RWW, CGW, Awesome Games Wiki, Fresh Websites Wiki, Atrocious Gameplay Wiki, Worst Music & Songs Wiki, Awful Movies Wiki, Greatest Characters Wiki, and Loathsome Characters Wiki. I was trying to improve my edits, and I need to get unblocked. That's the thing. MarioBobFan (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Look at these type of edits:, . Even so, if I wasn't welcomed to a location, I wouldn't keep insisting on wanting it unlocked. If people don't want me there... I would contribute a wiki of the same (same) type elsewhere YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 21:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Even so, I would appeal to the website owner, as I see you have no bad intentions. And even blocked on wikis you've never edited. That's why receptions have such little bad reputation externally YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 21:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

OK. I wonder who created them (the wikis) MarioBobFan (talk) 22:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Created, what? YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 22:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not know. Talk to Bureaucrats, site administrators. Something like YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 00:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would like my talk page access and email access back and for someone to send this to Blaskieye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioBobFan (talk • contribs) 00:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @MarioBobFan He was the user who blocked you, that much I know. So how do you want me to talk to him? YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 04:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * About showing him this and asking him to unblock me. That's the things. MarioBobFan (talk) 04:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * But like, he locked you out so should you tell him to unlock you or something on your talk page and show the argument(s)? YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 04:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I am not an inmature little kid and I am 14 years old. MarioBobFan (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I sent him a message and unfortunately he don't unlock you. I made two appeals, his message: "I’m not unblocking this user. Based on the way they still act (like constantly begging to get unblocked), it's clear that they're just some immature little kid. We've also given this user a ton of chances to improve, but they've blown each and every single chance.". I think you've already seen the message by not calling yourself an immature child, even though you are a teenager. Do you want me to send one more appeal to him?; or apologize? <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 02:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes. MarioBobFan (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * How do you want me to send it? speak here <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 03:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What the hell is going on here? I see people bickering on my talk page. Cut it out, both of you. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate Requests
Duplicate requests - Sorry I didn't meant to create duplicate requests. Just getting to grips with the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyJoeTakeAShaver (talk • contribs)
 * Your wiki request was not accepted. Add more description, eg I saw you are going to talk about Norm MacDonald - This wiki is intended for Norm Macdonald, including facts about his life, files, trivia and etc that anyone can edit freely,This wiki is not intended to violate and will follow the content policy. So maybe he accepts <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * You don't really need to add any peanut gallery comments here, as I was just about to reply to BillyJoeTakeAShaver's message here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This is not a comment by PEANUT. The user has no idea, as this is the first time, he may not even know that his request was not accepted. Also, his comment was unsigned. <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * That part I appreciate, but your additional comment adds nothing here, and doesn't exactly help them become familiar with this big project. No offense. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Also
Can you unblock me on Great Characters Wiki and Loathsome Characters Wiki since I did nothing wrong there, you are an admin there, and since it is no longer a part of Qualitipedia it no longer has Qualitipedia's administration and thus you will not have to ask permission to unblock me. And I regret making that RfC, since it doesn't seem to be going anywhere productive and I feel that a more appropriate option might be to bring this up with Stewards. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I'll do that, as you haven't done anything on those 2 wikis. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 15:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * His case is very and very similar to MarioBobFan, and run by the same guy, Blazikeye. I don't know what happens on these reception wikis. I saw your contributions on the wiki that you edited most, Awful Movies, and I didn't see reversed edits, and the block summary just boils down to which admin gave you a "second chance" and you wasted <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * A great deal of controversy, which is a difficult story to put in a concise way. Bottom line is that I would say the blocking rationale is generally weak, largely based on the user's unpopularity among the active editing and administrating core of users. --Raidarr (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Re: #22006
Hi DMM, I believe the scope and purpose were clear enough. They said that they'll write about the history and other things (mentioned in the description) related to Inverclyde, a council area in Scotland. The description was fine in my view after they updated the request and hence I chose the "perfect option". --Magogre (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)