User talk:Amanda Catherine/Archive 2

Wasn't spam
Whenever I see a red link on my name, I add my information to it. Best, MarkDilley
 * Amanada was correct to tag it as such. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  05:44, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Why, can you point me to documentation on this policy? Best,  MarkDilley
 * There is no formal criteria / policy just a generally accepted understanding when it comes to most things on meta. We do not accept pages designed to advertise individual people. That can be classed as spam dependant on the content. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  06:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Response to your edit summary

 * 1) Will do
 * 2) I didn’t intend to be harsh
 * 3) Not my intended meaning and I hope he uses the wiki he now has.

Thanks, ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  21:20, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Requests for Comment/Meta Interface Admin Group
Please note that it would be preferable to include a section where users can vote on whether they believe the whole group to be useful or not, or else users have no way to demonstrate their possible objections to the very creation of this group. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 07:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, the group in question already exists (see Special:ListGroupRights) so we're not creating anything new here - just seeking approval for the usage of something preexisting. Amanda Catherine (talk) 12:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, my bad then, since we didn't have anyone in the group I didn't know it existed. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 12:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

VolcanonsandboxWiki
The purpose is not to test mediawiki functionality, but to save the article draft. --Volcanon (talk) 13:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)