User talk:HeartsDo

Archives:

2017: HERE

2018: HERE

Userpage
Salut Julien

Je te propose une correction pour ta page utilisateur:

Hello, my name is Julien, I i am a member of Miraheze and a contributor of French Wikipedia. This user is a Miraheze wiki creator. (verify)

I have a other another username for to protect my other peusdo: Jul545454 (used on WMF Project) --PERCE-NEIGE (talk) 07:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * @PERCE-NEIGE Merci, j'ai encore beaucoup à apprendre pour maîtriser mon Anglais ^^ HeartsDo/Videojeux4 (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 17:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Moi aussi! Je pense que tu peux mettre aussi "contributor to".

--PERCE-NEIGE (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Jagueman wiki request
Sorry, is the first time here, has just given a wrong description, but by chance has a description that is something related to the content that a wiki will address?--Jegueman (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * @Jegueman Hi, thanks for editing your wiki request, is now approved, enjoy :) HeartsDo/Videojeux4 (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 16:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Discussion notifications
As you have probably noticed by now, Site updates have not been sent/updated for a while. The main reason for this is the fact that there was not an interest in it, and there was not enough information that was worth sending to users monthly.

I am sending this message to the Site updates list because I would like to propose a trying out a different type of notice sent to users. Instead of monthly updates of a limited number of statistics (which can be consulted by users anyway), staff would instead notify interested users if there is an interesting discussion (on Community noticeboard or Stewards' noticeboard) or if there is a local vote on Meta. Currently, there is no incentive for many users to visit Meta and check recent changes to see if there is anything they would be interested in, so this system would fix that and notify users of that so they can join in the discussion whenever there is one.

In order to subscribe to these notifications, please add your name in the same format to Discussion notifications/List, and you will start being notified on your talkpage. If there is interest in these notifications, they will be continued.

Also, please note that at least for the time being Site updates will be discontinued (since all the statistics are available anyway).

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Reception123, Miraheze System Administrator

Wiki Request 14010 and Meta translation administrator
Hi HeartsDo,

We've interacted a bit on Meta and on Public Test Wiki, so it's nice to finally be introduced. Anyway, regarding your above-captioned wiki request, it's been created. Perfect purpose, scope, and topic for your French language wiki (not that I'm surprised by this, given you are an experienced wiki creator). I should also let you know that RhinosF1 did tell me when I asked him that, as wiki creators, we can just create our wiki(s) directly using Special:CreateWiki, if we wish, or we can use Special:RequestWiki, as you've done, if we prefer or want another wiki creator to peer review our request. Either option, though, is completely fine, so just wanted to make sure I advised you about that as you may not have been aware.

Separately, it's wonderful to see you on active patrolling duty here on Meta again and, in particular, noted your actively translating existing Meta pages. Meta currently has no translation administrators, which isn't necessarily a big deal actually since those tools are incorporated into the administrator toolkit. Nevertheless, that role provides access to useful translation administration tools and, as part of my outreach efforts as a Meta administrator, am currently reaching out to our most active translators who seem to be experienced with the Translate extension doing translations. It will, among other things, allow you to mark updated content pages for translation, and it will also allow you to prepare untranslated pages for translation using various special pages. It won't allow you to delete translated subpages or mark/prepare pages protected at administrator level of page protection, but is nonetheless useful.

If you're interested, let me know by way of a reply to this message and ping me to grab my attention, and I'll grant that user right to you. If you do end up taking me up on the offer, a couple guidelines that I used when I was a translation administrator:
 * 1) Check Special:Contributions/FuzzyBot after marking an updated page for translation or preparing a page for translation, to see when the system maintenance bot account has completed your request, so as not to add too many requests for the   to process; and,
 * 2) Don't mark the noticeboards or talk pages for translation, given how frequently they are updated.

Anyway, thanks again, and look forward to hearing back from you, particularly on the latter. :)

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, about your proposition for the translation administrator group, I am interested !
 * PS: Is good to known that is ok to create a wiki directly without pass the process of requesting, but I prefer pass it for have a second opinion :p
 * HeartsDo (Talk || Global || Wiki Creator) 15:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅. Oh, that's great to hear you volunteer to help with translation administration, since you're so active there. By the way, and I formalizing a guidance essay on guidelines for new patrollers, and you will be among the first (if not the first) patroller added to the new group. We just want to have our guidelines and notification template in place first. Dmehus (talk) 16:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Patroller granted - 2020-08-31
Hi, HeartsDo. An administrator on Meta has granted you the  user group permission, which gives you the ability to   recent changes and new pages of other Miraheze users (both registered and anonymous) who are  not either autopatrolled or an administrator. In addition, this group also means that your edits are, so other patrollers or administrators don't have to patrol your edits. You should also be aware that the granting of this user group is at the discretion of Meta administrators, so different administrators will have slightly different criteria for granting. Likewise, just as it is a discretionary appointment, revocation is also at the discretion of Meta administrators and, again, each will have their own criteria for revocation.

In the medium-term, plans are in the works to develop a Meta Patrollers School, likely led by one or two active administrators, that will provide a comprehensive set of guidelines for patrollers and answers to commonly asked questions.

Nevertheless, the following are some of the main guidelines for patrolling. If you follow these guidelines completely, it is unlikely your patroller user group should ever be revoked. In technical terms, even when you find content that requires deletion by an administrator or otherwise requires remediation, undoing, reverting, or rolling back (if you are also a, of course), you should always first mark as patrolled any revisions regardless of whether that content is destined to remain extant to the page or even on Meta entirely.


 * 1) When patrolling talk pages, user talk pages, and noticeboards (in Main and Meta namespaces), you should first check to see whether the user properly signed their posts using four tildes . If they have not, you should add unsigned by substitution, where username is the user's username or IP address and the timestamp is the full timestamp from the diff page). As a best practice, you should also link to the diff in your edit summary, so other administrators and patrollers can easily tie your modification to the original edit being modified. To speed up this process, you can copy the   user script from line 5 of this page into either your (a) common.js or (b) global.js page (the latter applying globally on all Miraheze wikis);
 * 2) When patrolling the noticeboards, ask yourself whether this topic is on the correct noticeboard. If it is not, you should move it to the correct noticeboard, by either undoing the edit or manually removing the topic (if there have been intervening edits), again linking to the original noticeboard of the topic and the new noticeboard where it was moved in your edit summary. On the new noticeboard, you would simply paste in the topic (including the section header), linking to the diff page as in the first step. An example edit summary might be , where  ######  represents the numeric revision ID of the originally posted topic;
 * 3) Also when patrolling the noticeboards and talk pages (including user talk pages), as a best practice, take care to kindly fix any formatting mistakes (such as excess line breaks or incorrect wiki code), per WP:LISTGAP;
 * 4) If something requires deletion, you can add delete to the top of the page in question, taking care to follow the instructions on that template page;
 * 5) If you come across a user who repeatedly makes the same mistakes, send them a guidance note on their user talk page, informing of the steps need to edit and post constructively on Meta; and, finally,
 * 6) If in doubt whether something requires remediation or not, patrol it, and then ask any administrator via their user talk page or at Administrators' noticeboard if any further action needs to be taken.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out. Thank you! --Dmehus (talk) 04:45, 31 August 2020 (UTC)