User talk:AXNHamilton

User accounts policy reminder
Hi AXNHamilton,

I have amended the lock reason for your AndNoOneElse alternate account that was locked globally in good faith by Reception123 as it followed a similar username pattern to long term abuse case (though, behaviourally, your pattern of edits had less similarity), but not unlocked it as it was an illegitimate sockpuppet account apparently created in violation of your block of Fr00tFX. That being said, I assume good-faith that you created the account because the blocking local administrator had revoked your local user talk page access without, thereby providing you with no local avenue for appeal. Personally, I disapprove of this practice for this very reason, and will continue to urge the Qualitipedia wikis to adopt administrator blocking policies that include guidance on when and under what conditions user talk page access should be revoked. By virtue of this ping, hopefully Allistayrian can reinstate your user talk page access locally, but if he does not, you may contact him at his Meta user talk page. With that in mind, I would strongly advise you to:


 * 1) Review user accounts policy, a global policy, governing acceptable and unacceptable uses of multiple accounts;
 * 2) Consider creating any alternate accounts while logged into your main account for transparency reasons; and,
 * 3) Use edit summaries that explain BOLD or potentially controversial edits, to CYA in the event you are locally blocked by an administrator.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 17:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I'll note as a local authority for QP that appeals, especially for blocks that are made across QP wikis (but not exclusively) will also be humored on the Qualitipedia central wiki, where the bureaucrats of the wiki also hold position on other member wikis. While talk page revocation is usually inappropriate without demonstrated abuse, if it does occur then the central wiki is even less subject to locked talk page, and I can directly catch and remedy it if someone does make an inappropriate talk page block on there as well. Seeing the contributions of Fr00tFX and the fact a block was made across QP for actions on one wiki, I would be inclined to humor the appeal. --Raidarr (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)