Meta:Requests for permissions

__NEWSECTIONLINK__

Archives:
 * Archive 1 (10 Auguest 2015 - 15 May 2016)
 * Archive 2 (15 May 2016 - 8 May 2017)

Joaquinito01 (sysop)
User: Joaquinito01 ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log ) Group: sysop Reason: Syspop

Additional comments: Please become a Syspop.

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  user is not active here. MacFan4000 (talk) 20:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  Per Above. —Alvaro Molina  (✉  - ✔ ) 23:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  I believe this request is silly and is simply caused by a lust for power. Meta sysops are administrators on the most important wiki on Miraheze and should be trusted and active on Meta. As Joaquinito01 is not active I oppose this proposal. &#32;  Miraheze Logo.svg CnocBride | Talk | Contribs  10:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  Per above. Videojeux4 (talk) 17:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

DrewBiebs (sysop)
User: DrewBiebs ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log ) Group: sysop Reason: To help in what you can most: create wikis, be on the lookout for any edition, among other things. I would like to be a volunteer, because I think, well, I know I can help in different things, maybe I do not know everything, it's clear, and I may have failures, but that would be voluntary, right? I will do my best. And, there's a lot I can help with, right? I hope to be at the level if they accept me. I have been using wikis here for more than a year because it considers that Miraheze is the most reliable, it has been growing a lot, the truth is, when I knew this, only 150 wikis had been created! It's a crazy.
 * 1)  You have not made edits that demonstrate the need for administrator permission in Meta. The user just came back to edit a few days ago. —Alvaro Molina  (✉  - ✔ ) 21:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  per above. MacFan4000 Talk Contribs 22:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Revibot (Bot (Additional task))
User: Revibot ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log ) Group: Bot (Additional task) Reason: Revibot is authorized to do Autoarchive, but I would like to seek an authorization to do general housekeeping like cleaning up Special:BrokenRedirects, Special:DoubleRedirects, subst'ing subst-only templates, etc etc.

Additional comments: Note to closer: Remember to put the discussion closed template below the  part. Autoarchive can't/won't support the closing mark above. And both special pages are empty, for now.&mdash; revi  09:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  Experienced user. No concerns. —Alvaro Molina (✉ -  ✔ ) 16:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) No concerns here either.  However, Revi has asked me to stop using a SUBST:nosubst signature template for technical reasons, and I pushed back, as it is a widespread way to achieve personalization, notably also on Wikipedia where it is supposedly prohibited.  I would not want this request, plus the statement above of how he intends to use the 'bot, interpreted as permission for the 'bot to modify my signatures.   16:33 9-Dec-2017
 * For clarification, I do not intend to subst your sign, unless you say yes, or the community has a policy on sign prohibiting it. &mdash; revi  16:48, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  Automatic maintenance is something that would be nice. Reception123  (talk) ('C' ) 16:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) per above. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 17:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  I think it would be helpful, and would allow editors to do other things on Meta or their own wikis. CoolieCoolster (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Zppix (sysop)
User: Zppix ( contributions &bull; CA &bull; blocks log &bull; rights log &bull; global rights log ) Group: sysop Reason: To increase my ability to help others, and to help fight LTAs

Additional comments:

Other users feel free to support/oppose/abstain from this RfP but please state your reasoning below.
 * Comments/Questions
 * 1)  I've had helpful conversations with him in IRC Rsterbal (talk) 22:04, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 2)  - Despite having joined six months ago, it appears that they have not edited actively on Meta, and have not used their wiki creator permission very much. CoolieCoolster (talk) 06:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 3)  Per above. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 12:15, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 4)  Maybe if it was a little more active. —Alvaro Molina</b> (<b style="color: #137500;">✉</b> -  ✔ ) 12:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment I do maintain Proxybot as well, and am active on IRC alot. Zppix (talk) 13:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The statments are based around the ammount of contributions from your account, and the number of log actions from your account. MacFan4000 (Talk Contribs) 16:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)