Requests for Comment/Examknow appeal

Following Requests for Comment/Examknow and Requests for Comment/Examknow followup, Examknow would like to ask the community for appeal. The user asks that the community provides their, , or their for each proposal or agreed fact.

Agreed Fact #1

 * Examknow has improved his conduct since the closing of the previous RfC.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) I am happy that the issues I raised are no longer a problem and EK has improved.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) looks like this is the case, I have not seen any bad behavior. DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Agreed Fact #2

 * Examknow has improved his judgement in wiki creation since the closing of the previous RfC.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) I am happy that the issues I raised are no longer a problem and EK has improved.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Agreed Fact #3

 * Examknow has improved his competency in answering community questions.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) I am happy that the issues I raised are no longer a problem and EK has improved.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Agreed Fact #4

 * Examknow now steps back or asks for help when he is unsure of something.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) I believe that EK is working on the issues and is improving.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposals
Now that we have established some agreed facts, Examknow would like to propose the following actions. Once again the community is asked to provide their, , or their for each proposal.

Proposal #1

 * The community removes all restrictions and sanctions placed on Examknow.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) The time has been served, no longer needed or serving a useful purpose.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 3) DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

c) Abstain

 * 1) I have not monitored EK's behavior and, in any case, am not responsible for disciplining other members. But EK himself wrote this proposal for his own rehabilitation, structured as a four-part report card, on which if I assent to these "agreed facts," I seem to be obliged to grant him the remedy he seeks.  This is overtly manipulative.  By the way, is there anyone else on Miraheze who thinks EK's presence is so vital that he needs to be forgiven his past misconduct?   15:49 16-Apr-2020
 * I do not agree to the initial RfC that imposed the sanctions because I think when possible it is up to the administrators and other elected users to discipline users, not up to some general community vote. I think that a request for removal should be voted on, but not a general RfC saying "this user has done something". But because we have had the first rfc we must also have the second and I think users to deserve to be given second chances and to learn from their mistakes. DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposal #2

 * Examknow will have the RfC removed from his record.

a) Support

 * 1) As proposer -EK ● 📝 ● 🌎 14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

b) Oppose

 * 1) They were some valid issues raised, I see this more as a lesson that EK learnt, it had an impact.  ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 2) Are you kidding? Like editing other people's posts, this attempt to purge embarrassing episodes from one's past must not prevail!  If EK were to misbehave again, on what grounds should we be prevented from reading that he has a record of similar behavior?   15:40 16-Apr-2020
 * 3) From what I know on wikis, deleting and hiding discussions is not something that is done because of transparency. It might be bad for reputation but you cannot simply hide your past. DeeM28 (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2020 (UTC)