User talk:DarkMatterMan4500/Archive 3

__NOINDEX__

Your edits
Why your edits show me that red exclamation mark as if your edits aren't automatically patrolled? Because you are an autropatrolled. YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 20:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Not anymore. I had my autopatrolled right taken off by recently, because of the amount of questionable wiki requests I was approving at the time, and he said he'd review my wiki creator status by approval and declination ratio. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * And for the record, I won't be getting it back until after January 31st, 2022, but I'm choosing to get it back on February 21st, 2022. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest you remove the Autopatrolled box for now, so as not to confuse. YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 23:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have ✅ just that. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Could you please rename the main page of mh:dreadfulbooks:Dreadful Literature Wiki to Dreadful Books Wiki, restore the deleted edits, and rename it back? We need to see the full history. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, could you allow YouTubers on mh:wretchedyoutubevideos:Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki again, but forbid YouTubers with less than 100,000 subscribers? The content policy only states "Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose of spreading unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people", and as long as the wiki does not have the sole purpose of doing those things, it will be fine, plus we're not trying to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people anyway. In terms for the drama, it's less likely for them to find out about their page, we can delete the pages if they find out and even though users are saying it's not worth the risk, I don't think there was any drama back when RWW allowed users, so we should give it another try. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The answer is no. Absolutely not. Main source of the problem stems down to unsourced pointers and libelous accusations. Still not going to happen, I'm afraid. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The wikis have enough trouble being credible about, well, everything they're allowed to post now. Per DMM's reply, allowing this merely regresses what progress has been made. And to top that I believe it would add justified fuel for critics. You think they wouldn't know, they will. And the image of Miraheze itself will be worse for it. --Raidarr (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I've been getting pretty annoyed with you bombarding my talk pages on other wikis recently, giving me these constant requests at a rapid rate, so could you please just slow down on those? I was okay with it at first, but you've been sending me requests after another in such a fashion that I could barely even keep up with them. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, there are just a lot of things that I would like done. Also, in terms for the YouTubers, couldn't we just forbid unsourced pages and make sure that all pages are about YouTubers who make bad content, not ones that are bad people themselves. FatBurn0000 (talk) 02:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but NO exceptions, at all. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, what about YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual user, but a channel that has a group of people who make videos on it or a channel that isn't owned by a specific person or group of people? FatBurn0000 (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No exceptions also means no YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual. So the answer is still no. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, is it okay if the YouTuber themselves approves of the article? Also, you should make that more clear, and plus, if the channel isn't owned by a person or a group of people, chances are, there will be multiple people owning it and they are unlikely to care. However, if you are going to do this, you should probably delete the mh:rottenwebsites:WatchMojo and mh:rottenwebsites:Screen Rant pages on RWW, they're only allowed because they have a website, which probably won't change things. FatBurn0000 (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Still no exceptions. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate Requests
Duplicate requests - Sorry I didn't meant to create duplicate requests. Just getting to grips with the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyJoeTakeAShaver (talk • contribs)
 * Your wiki request was not accepted. Add more description, eg I saw you are going to talk about Norm MacDonald - This wiki is intended for Norm Macdonald, including facts about his life, files, trivia and etc that anyone can edit freely,This wiki is not intended to violate and will follow the content policy. So maybe he accepts YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * You don't really need to add any peanut gallery comments here, as I was just about to reply to BillyJoeTakeAShaver's message here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This is not a comment by PEANUT. The user has no idea, as this is the first time, he may not even know that his request was not accepted. Also, his comment was unsigned. YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * That part I appreciate, but your additional comment adds nothing here, and doesn't exactly help them become familiar with this big project. No offense. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)