Requests for Comment/User close policy

NOTE: This Request for Comment is a local RfC and only affects Meta

This RfC obviously references Wikipedia's Not now information page, however this RfC is to propose a policy to prevent wasting user's time. If you look at several requests pages (notably Requests for Stewardship and its archive) you will see a large number of very new users who request Stewardship either because they don't understand what it does or for trolling reasons. The issue is that currently only a Steward can close any requests and these ridiculous requests waste everyone's time as everyone votes to oppose these evidently unsuccessful nominations just because users don't have the right to close them. It has also been shown in other former RfCs that users don't want Stewards to have minimum edits or something. So that's why I am proposing a policy that allows users to use common sense and be able to close any nominations that are obviously unfit. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 1

 * Autoconfirmed and confirmed users are allowed to close any request for permissions as unsuccessful (global rights and local rights) if it is clear to them that the request is being made too early by a largely inexperienced user. In case of any doubt or an unclear case they should leave it up to a Steward.

Support

 * 1) proposer. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 2

 * Stewards may overturn any user closes if they believe that they are made in error.

Support

 * 1) proposer. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 3

 * If a user closes too many requests in error, Stewards may choose to deny them the right to close requests in the future.

Support

 * 1) proposer. --DeeM28 (talk) 10:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)