Requests for Comment/Community Directors

Following Incorporation, The community are able to conduct elections to nominate Community Appointed Directors. This RfC is to debate the proposed policy. You will be able to vote on each section and may if needed propose to amend various parts of the text. It is very important you express your opinion as the people appointed can have a massive impact.
 * RfC Opened: 19:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 1: Opening

 * The first paragraph of Community_Directors is approved.

Support
--EK ● contribs 19:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 1a: Scope

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Support
--EK ● contribs 19:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 1b: Appointment_of_a_commissioner

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Proposal 1c: Revocation

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Support
However I think that the voting must stay open for at least one week (7 days) --EK ● contribs 19:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 2: Nomination of Directors

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Proposal 3: Revocation (Directors)

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Proposal 4: Eligibility to vote

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Proposal 5: Length of director related votes & elections

 * Community_Directors is approved.

Comments

 * Section 6 and 7, Community_Directors and Community_Directors, do not need to be approved due to technical and/or legal reasons. If you wish to amend them, please discuss it below and I will attempt to clarify it for you and/or propose your changes. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  21:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Section 8, Community_Directors, is also required by law under CC-BY-SA-4.0 - I do not see any reason to remove this or adapt it but am open to suggestions that meet legal requirements. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  21:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Some thoughts from Examknow
Hello everyone. While I think this process is a great idea, I do have some ways to improve it. For starters there must be a section for Eligibility to nominate. There are good rules in place for who can vote mainly to prevent sockpuppetry and meatpuppetry. However, in the means of preventing hat collecting or simply to prevent users from signing up for something they don't necessarily have a chance with, I propose setting the following requirements prior to nomination:
 * 1) The user must have at minimum 60 global edits or log actions (I am open to changing the numbers a bit)
 * 2) The user's global (SUL) account must be at least 6 months old (again open to higher/lower limits)
 * 3) The user must not have any outstanding CoCC violations
 * 4) The user must have demonstrated a reasonable amount of activity that is acceptable by the community

Also as for the appointment process, I propose that the voting must have been open for voting for at least one week's time and can be extended by a steward if needed. --EK ● contribs 19:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)