Requests for Comment/Change to Steward Policies

Steward appointment policy changes
Hi all! I'm GFN. I wanted to propose this RfC today to make it easier (since there's not that much community involvement on Miraheze stewardship appointments at this state) to lax the Steward appointments so Stewards can appoint another steward if there is a clear need for this to happen. Here's how I propose we go about this:


 * Current volunteers (of any shape or form; i.e the people see on this page) can vote in a maximum of 2 stewards per time of need, for a community imposed time length. This means temporary stewardships as well as permanent (unless removed by vote of no-confidence per current policy) would both be possible; however, this can only be possible in a time where both of these criterion apply: There's not enough stewards to get things done, and there's not a high enough amount of active RfS contributors, or a high enough success-rate to get stewards appointed via RfS.


 * The second option, of course, is to not implement these changes.