User talk:Bobbyandbandit

Wiki Request 13787
Hi Bobbyandbandit,

Regarding your above-captioned wiki request, in accordance with Content Policy, we require all wikis to have a clear purpose, scope, and topic to them. This enables us to assess whether there may be potential problems with the wiki in terms of potential contraventions of the aforementioned policy. So, occasionally, we have to request additional information from requestors where the provided description is either null or inadequate.

Please avoid resubmitting, tendentiously, wiki requests with little to no change(s) from your original request when a wiki creator has called for more information, as you did with your edit to the above request. If you continue to resubmit this request again with little to no improvement, you may find your account temporarily restricted from editing on Meta to prevent further disruption to our wiki creator team's workflow.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and happy editing! :)

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hi Bobbyandbandit,

Despite my firm and final warning above not to continuously resubmit the same wiki request with no or very minimal improvement or you may be blocked on Meta Wiki for disruptive and non-communicative behaviour, you apparently saw fit to request a duplicate wiki request and to resubmit the existing wiki request tendentiously. This comes on top of prior warnings in the existing wiki request.

Thus, unfortunately, because of your failure to communicate with Meta administrators and wiki creators, I have no choice but to block you indefinitely on Meta to mitigate and prevent further disruption. Please note that indefinite blocks are not permanent&mdash;it just means that there's no prescribed end time. As a blocked user, though, you should know that you should not attempt to evade this block by creating an alternate account, as that would contravene user accounts policy.

To request an appeal, please follow the instructions at unblock.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * UNBLOCK ME NOW Bobbyandbandit (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * UNBLOCK ME NOW OR ELSE Bobbyandbandit (talk) 01:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ This is definitely not the way to formulate an a proper appeal. Please consider your actions carefully, and remember, as a blocked user, you must abide by user accounts policy with respect to current or future alternate user accounts, including editing while logged out, for the duration of your block. Dmehus (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Dude, I'm sorry for that. Bobbyandbandit (talk) 01:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry Bobbyandbandit (talk) 01:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'M DIED BECAUSE OF DOUG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyandbandit (talk • contribs) 01:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Bobbyandbandit While your good-faith apologies (#1, #2) are appreciated, edits like this don't help your case. I'm willing to ignore that edit, though, but I need to know you will not (a) submit duplicate requests for the same wiki being requested and that you will not (b) submit the same request tendentiously, with little to no improvement in the requested information. Dmehus (talk) 02:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * @Dmehus. I'm now sorry for those spamming things. I was trying to create a another wiki. But Only One. So Doug. I now neutral to you. And I was returning because I got a break on Fandom. Plus Doug. Those were a joke by me. So don't take them seriously. I was getting very angry about it, so you know I'm not doing those spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, legal threats; and repeated things I ever done in my life. So, just now. I hope I will get unblocked just for posting this message. Bobbyandbandit (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bobbyandbandit Though your reply is more about making apologies than showing me how you've understood your disruption and, crucially, how to prevent said disruption from recurring, in your case, as one of the problems related to being non-communicative, I'm going to accept your appeal, with your confirmation by way of a correctly formatted reply to this message, conditionally on the basis that you not create duplicate requests and that you answer follow up questions fully wiki creators may have, asking pertinent, specific questions where you are unsure. Okay? Dmehus (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, Doug. I don't want to get banned forever, that will make me sad. Bobbyandbandit (talk) 02:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bobbyandbandit That really isn't as an explicit confirmation of your acceptance of the unblocking terms as I'd prefer. Nevertheless, I'm willing to infer that you accepted the unblocking terms unconditionally and without reservation(s) or qualification(s). As such, you are conditionally unblocked with the understanding that you will not (a) submit wiki requests that duplicate previously submitted wiki requests (i.e., you should use the Special:RequestWikiQueue search tool to search for your prior wiki requests) and (b) tendentiously resubmit wiki requests with little to no improvement. If you violate any of these conditions, any administrator may reblock you in their discretion. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 03:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)