Meta:Administrators' noticeboard

User:SolidBlock - Request for autopatrolled
I'd like to request that SolidBlock, with 255 edits on Meta and more than 1,200 global edits spanning over three and a half years, be granted  by any administrator. Looked briefly through the past ten discussion contributions on Meta, spanning nearly two years, and noted no unsigned, missed signatures. User clearly knows Meta's scope, so I have no concerns. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ by per this request on Administrators' noticeboard, and per no apparent need to patrol. Dmehus (talk) 21:05, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Colby Russell - Request for autopatrolled and confirmed
I'd like to request for any administrator to please grant Colby Russell autopatrolled indefinitely and, on a temporary basis of between 3-12 months confirmed user status, so the user can edit semi-protected pages. In my discussions with Colby on various talk pages on Meta, it's clear to me that the two most important criteria for these user group rights, that the user (a) remembers to sign and date their discussion contributions and (b) knows the scope and purpose of Meta are met. As well, the user is a  and   on the Triple Scripts Wiki, where he has already made nearly 300 edits. Further, the user is active on the Wikimedia wikis, especially MediaWiki. Together with the user's status as a developer, I am very confident in the user's abilities, and would've requested these user group rights sooner, but wanted to wait at least thirty days. My reason for requesting  temporarily is because it is a duplication of , so once the user is autopromoted to that group, it won't be required. Looking at Special:ListUsers/confirmed, we do have a few  users on Meta who are active on other Miraheze-hosted wikis, so there's definitely precedent for this, and this is such a strong use case. Dmehus (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ for autopatrolled / ❌ for confirmed - already is autoconfirmed user.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 18:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That's great, thanks. At the time I submitted this request, the user wasn't yet autoconfirmed, but I did suggest to the user to make only six more edits on Meta to be autopromoted (at Talk:Custom domains), so it seems that's what he did. Nonetheless, thanks again. Dmehus (talk) 18:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages - Request for history merge to Category:Indefinitely semi-protected pages and delete
Could any administrator kindly perform a history merge of Category:Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages to Category:Indefinitely semi-protected pages, the latter of which had already existed but as an empty category with no history. Now that I have corrected Module:Protection banner/config used by pp-template, there is such a strong use case to history merge in my revision(s) from the former into the latter, after which the former can be swiftly deleted. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

When will extension Score be working again?
It has been a while that I get an error message, in my wiki in German: ''LilyPond konnte nicht ausgeführt werden: /dev/null ist eine nicht ausführbare Datei. Es muss sichergestellt sein, dass $wgScoreLilyPond in der Konfigurationsdatei richtig eingestellt wurde.'' Will the extension Score ever work again? Lily (Lilypond Wiki talk and I will listen) 05:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * We were made aware of a security issue so we switched it off. As soon as they fixed that, they found another. Sorry, ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  05:13, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks for the info, Lily (Lilypond Wiki · talk and I will listen · my little garden ) 08:38, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

User:InspecterAbdel - Request for autopatrolled
InspecterAbdel has more than 100 edits on Meta, which, in and of itself, is not necessarily enough for ; however, the user is helpful on the noticeboards, has demonstrated they know Meta's scope and limitations, and understands the purpose of each noticeboard. My only concern was the user's forgetting to sign their posts, with my having to add unsigned as recently as a week ago. However, separately, I had the user really make a concerted effort over the past week, and agreed to nominate them for  on 1 August 2020 when I was satisfied that the improvement had been met. I'm now satisfied, particularly with the user also adding unsigned signatures correctly to other users' posts, and because I haven't had to add unsigned to the user's signatures for (roughly) the past week. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, thank you for requesting this! I appreciate it a lot! InspecterAbdel (talk) 18:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * for his great work, and being helpful, although the only concern is that he kinda forgot to sign posts. CircleyDoesExtracter  ( Circley Talk  |  Global   |  Email the Cloud ) 19:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Okay.--MrJaroslavik (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Request for version invisibility
Please make this difference invisible.thinks.--松•Matsu (talk) 23:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Void  Whispers 01:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--松•Matsu (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)