Talk:Board/NDAs

Possible Formatting Issue
In the Signatures section, there is this Wikitext which is producing a list- " " I think this was probably added by mistake since there is no apparent need of a list there. Could this be fixed, please? R4356th (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Is a copy of the non-disclosure agreement available?
Is the agreement that people are asked to sign made available? Rsterbal (talk) 18:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Up to now, it hasn't been made public outside of those who have signed it. I see no reason why the template can't be shared but that would be 's call. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  18:15, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Examknow
– a globally banned user for ToU violations still appears on the Signatures section. Are banned users removed from the list or kept. Personally, I see no reason for banned users to appear on the NDA. --Magogre (talk) 16:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It looks like there's no precedent for removal (names have only ever been added—never removed), and presumably, Miraheze NDAs are indefinite as far as the information these people have had access to. Of course, removal of Examknow would likely be non-controversial, however, I don't believe there is any actual reason for removal from the list. I believe this matter ultimately comes down to the judgement of, though. dross  (t • c • g) 06:07, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Startus, thank you for your question. I believe dross has explained this perfectly. Board/NDAs is a record of users who have signed non-disclosure agreements with Miraheze Limited, and, as such, serves as a public record for SRE, Trust and Safety, and Stewards of users who have signed such agreements. As such, I personally do not see a reason to discontinue removing users, regardless of their global account status, from this public record, in much the same way we don't remove or hide log entries for users. Doug (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)