User talk:Zppix

Wiki created
Hello, I would like to tell you that I have created your wiki. You can now access it at https://proxybot.miraheze.org. You should automatically have been granted administrator and bureaucrat rights, if that's not the case then please leave a notice on Stewards' noticeboard so we can fix it immediately. Do not hesitate to ask questions if your question was not answered in our FAQ. Also, if you want a extension, gadget, or anything else, please ask us here. Thank you for choosing Miraheze, and we wish you good luck with your wiki! -- Void  Whispers 20:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

On wiki creation template
You don't need to post it on the requester's talk page anymore, because a notice will be generated to him/her automatically.-- 13:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Wiki request
Please reconsider your decision to decline my wiki request. While both your points are true, both the Gazetteer of wikis and Special:WikiDiscover exclude the number of pages a wiki has. Then users would have to go to Special:Statistics on the wiki to find out the number of pages of the wiki. Plus, the number of wikis on Miraheze is too big (nearly 5,000!) to list them all on one page, and to find a specific wiki, users would have to go through thousands of wikis on WikiDiscover to find the wiki they want. My proposed wiki would have accomplished everything that the Gazetteer and WikiDiscover would; additionally, it would list the number of pages on the wiki and provide easy access to wikis. Those are the reasons why my wiki should have been accepted. Sincerely, Tali64³ (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but my decision stands. I don't believe that your reasoning alone dictates a need for a wiki for a feature and a page that already exists. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 16:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I just noticed this as well. I'm commenting here because I have declined a similar request for a gazetteer of wikis (either before or after Zppix). As I said in my response, I think it's a decent idea in theory, but feel like something that should involve a community discussion at the community noticeboard, perhaps. As part of that discussion, I think the proposer needs to make clear how this would be better than simply adding the needed functionality (i.e., columns) in Special:WikiDiscover or, perhaps, parsing the data using the API into an automatically updated, webpage form. My biggest reservation with this proposed wiki is that, like the Gazetteer of wikis, it would grow quickly out of date due to lack of updates (i.e., we are approving, on average, 10-20 new wikis per day and could well be at 10,000 wikis by next fall). So, I do also stand by my decision as well. Dmehus (talk) 17:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, it would be neatly formatted, give the date the wiki was founded, and have a summary of the wiki. Also, it would also have a template that states whether a wiki has NSFW content or not. Tali64³ (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

My request and issues
Hey so how can I earn your trust back I want to change and what you said seems like ur never gonna support me for anything you cannot even see any good in me may I ask how I earn ur trust back ?? And earn ur support in the future ? I mostly want trust so I can fit in?? --Cocopuff2018 02:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Give it 3 months then I will re-evaluate your trustworthiness Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 02:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

So I can restore trust within 3 months and we can move on if I Don’t do anything else dumb or break code of conduct??--Cocopuff2018 02:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * yes Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 02:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Does my 3 months start today ? And I wanna earn trust back to Make up for what I did once I earn trust again I’m going to make sure to improve and follow code of conduct and etc --Cocopuff2018 03:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

thank you
Hi thank you for approving Seattle Wiki. It's a closed wiki(read-only) & should be very lightweight since Fandom is far astray from its original vision as Wikicities, when it was literally a wikipedia for other subjects. In other words, this is a tiny wiki, nothing huge. How do you feel about tiny, inactive Wikicities wikis being hosted as read-only archive (just to preserve the vision)? I don't want to look like I'm mad for power or anything -- I just wish 2000s Wikia/Wikicities would come back. A month ago I told someone else this. Thank you RMV2003 (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)