Talk:Requests for Comment/Allow exception to LP ban

I really enjoy the blog post. Great. fffdecbkdbdecack

Proposal 7
and others. I propose that stewards close proposal 7 as it does not affect Miraheze, it is just a suggestion made for the user not something that will actually be acted on. It could be integrated in another proposal but by itself it has no purpose. Reception123 (talk) ( contribs  ) 05:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ This is worse than proposal 2. Amanda (talk) 11:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not that it's worse, we can't close/remove a proposal because someone doesn't like it. I want it to be removed because it isn't a concrete proposal, and Miraheze cannot act on it in any way. Reception123 (talk) ( contribs  ) 11:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Why doesn't Amanda want to look at alternatives? She needs to be honest about her future and if she doesn't fit in, start making plans. We as a community should consider helping her find a solution for her, whether it involve self hosting or using another alternative.
 * Yes, the community should consider helping but it is unrelated to the topic of this RfC which is "Allow exception to LP ban" so that's why I don't see how this fits in as a proposal. Reception123 (talk) ( contribs  ) 12:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Phabricator
Per the closure of the RFC, I request that this Phabricator account be re-enabled. Amanda (talk) 11:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Account has been enabled. Southparkfan (talk) 12:36, 16 April 2017 (UTC)