Requests for Comment/Changes to the Content Policy

I propose a big change about the content policy. One things is, the policy not not that strict, and therefore some wikis have been either deleted or have been marked private (see proof here). This shows that the Content Policy is incomplete in managing wikis. Fung ster (contribs - email - CA) 08:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposal 1
Leave everything as it is.

Proposal 2
The "Miraheze is permitted to re-distribute your content" section is removed from the policy.

Proposal 1
Leave everything as it is.

Proposal 2
Make the first section about not allowing ad wikis to be hosted on Miraheze more restrictive such as "Wikis used for advertising will be deleted as soon as they are discovered, and using a third party advertising network is solely prohibited on Miraheze."

Proposal 3
Wikis about harassment and/or vandalism will be immediately deleted without request from a witness or without prior notice.

Proposal 4
Wikis that have illegal content will be suspended immediately as they are discovered.

Proposal 5
If a wiki hosted by Miraheze violates the Content Policy, it shall only however be deleted only at the request of Stewards and the discretion of System administrators.

Proposal 1
After a wiki is found to be violating the Content Policy, it will be deleted immediately.

Proposal 2
After a wiki is found to be violating the Content Policy, it will be deleted after 7 days.

Proposal 3
After a wiki is found to be violating the Content Policy, it will be deleted after 14 days.

Proposal 4
Per the Dormancy Policy, wikis that are violating the Content Policy will not be deleted immediately, but will be closed if the wiki itself is already inactive.

Proposal 5
Wikis that are found to be violating the Content Policy should have a Steward contact the lead wiki bureaucrat to discuss improvements to the wiki. If the lead crat does not adhere to the Steward's guideline then the wiki should be deleted within 7 days.

Proposal 1
If the wiki bureaucrat states that the offending wiki is not against the Content Policy, but the wiki itself is deleted, Sysadmins may hold a discussion or a vote where all community members of that deleted wiki will make and state their opinions.

Proposal 2
Wikis that are found to be violating the Content Policy may not be restored under any condition.

My opinion
I think that the Content Policy is outdated following the closure of Horrid Reception Wikis Wiki. That means that the Content Policy needs to be more strict and stately. Fung ster (contribs - email - CA) 08:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)