User:Raidarr/Wiki request scenario

Wiki request pool
All requests that are in review, declined, or are not simulated yet as 'created' by the scenario.

Request #1

 * Sitename: Argent Dimension |
 * Requester: Floofofatooth
 * Language: en
 * Category: Gaming
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This is a wiki for a Minecraft server to post information about it

Comments
Provide more scope in 2-3 paragraphs to determine the content of your wiki, and whether it will follow any policies. Do not replace the existing text, in case it serves to consolidate, either. What information will be posted on that server, and its purposes, including from that server? --YellowFrogger

Request #2

 * Sitename: Beta Wiki Developers |
 * Requester: Raided Lemons
 * Language: en
 * Category: Community
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This will be a wiki for everyone to share and develop templates, css and javascript code for wikis. Anything wiki code and knowledge is on topic.Testing is permitted, but not the purpose of this wiki

Comments
You can use (publictestwiki.com), although it doesn't seem like much to apply in this case (if you want people to test, what do they have to test?). Also, "but not the purpose of this wiki", so what is the purpose of the wiki? You have to clarify the scope, not fill in, what will people develop with these CSS/JS codes? JS there are also enough dangerous malicious code. And, there is a wiki (not Miraheze) that has a name of BetaWiki, although it has nothing to do with the refusal (and the wiki is about software). Reopen the request and provide the wiki scope in 2-3 texts. --YellowFrogger

Request #3

 * Sitename: All The Tropes ES |
 * Requester: Floofofatooth
 * Language:es
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This is a spanish version of all the tropes wiki to document all tropes in media and pop culture

Comments
The scope detail isn't too bad, but the fact that it's another version of an existing wiki. While this doesn't seem like a bad thing, (and it's okay simply because the two wikis are in different languages), you could contact the AllTheTropes owners/staff to determine the domain and confirm it for them. There is also another way to ask for a review from them if they accept a wiki in another language, and in consequence of that adding the Extension:Translate to translate the pages in Spanish and in any other language without needing another site and another domain, although certainly I I don't really like this extension because it makes the page syntax difficult for beginner editors. I've seen reports like this, and it was answered like this. --YellowFrogger

Request #4

 * Sitename: Canada song contests |
 * Requester: Flamingbananaflamingoca
 * Language: en
 * Category: Eurovision-style song contest statistics tracking wiki
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: song contests coming in march

Comments
It doesn't have enough scope. What you have is just a statement. The only one it had was the ok-ish category itself, although I had never seen such a category before. If the category was a description I would accept it. --YellowFrogger

Request #5

 * Sitename: Awful Vimeos Wiki |
 * Requester: Flabbachessio
 * Language: en
 * Category: Encyclopedia (specialized)
 * Private? no About living people? yes
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This wiki will detail awful videos posted on Vimeo and include pages about unpopular creators. I know the content policy and all pages about creators will be sourced and moderated to be civil. Only factual pages will be allowed.

Comments
Decline — we don't allow content like that, as it is, it seems like a reception wiki to address this issue. A case like this happened recently with a deleted wiki and user complaining on CN. The worst part of it all is "talking about unpopular creators" — we usually don't have enough verifiable sources to make an encyclopedic article for unpopular creators, because they don't have notability, it could address lies and end up with libel lawsuit/e/ or slander (if it was with better-known creators, it would be less serious). Having a knowledge of the content policy doesn't comfort the problem, and, to quote the name "awful", that is controversial for people. --YellowFrogger

Request #6

 * Sitename: True Crime |
 * Requester: Truthofthebear1666
 * Language: zh
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? no. About living people? yes
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This wiki will document corruption of the state and show what is wrong with the big bear. We seek to tell the truth of affairs in China

Comments
Decline, first for lack of scope, but this wiki has an intent. Second, what "corruption" do you want to reveal? Reopen the request. --YellowFrogger

Request #7

 * Sitename: Rigor Mortis Fanfiction Hub |
 * Requester: Senkentor.Vaiii
 * Language: en
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? no. About living people? no.
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: This is a wiki to archive and discuss things seen in the Rigor Mortis fanfiction community. We include pages for fanfiction, to document (not harass) prolific creators, and include images and articles from time to time which may include IRC logs and other research.

Comments
Decline — this wiki seems to have good intentions, but unfortunately I did this because we don't have a user on Miraheze who always checks the contents of this wiki every day. I don't know what fanfiction is, but it's leading me to think he's trying to create a wiki that documents users in a community (as he cited IRC). That's why it wasn't accepted, because as mentioned above for "unpopular creators", we don't have sources for simple internet users due to lack of notability, which can lead to slander. There is a wiki about it (Note: Not hosted on Miraheze), which talks about communities, and it has quite dramatic content, of course. In addition, there is the Content Policy clause: "Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumors against a person or group of people". --YellowFrogger

Request #8

 * Sitename: Yepunzil Game |
 * Requester: Ranoutofnames
 * Language: ja
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? yes. About living people? no.
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: Hello, I would like to make a wiki on Miraheze for Yepunzil. We were on fandom, but unfortunately the Fandom wiki closed. It is an ecchi game for mobile that includes some graphic content which we will include tastefully from time to time. The wiki will be in Japanese and English. Thank you for reviewing, cheers

Comments
Hi! It has a lot of filling. What will this wiki say about this game? Reopen and speak in at least 1 sentence. --YellowFrogger

Request #11

 * Sitename: Agreelandball |
 * Requester: DarthPlaguesTheWise
 * Language: en
 * Category: Alternate history wiki
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: Agreelandball Wiki on FANDOM shut down and I am moving it to Miraheze. Current Miraheze wiki is dead, so I'm making a new one.

Comments
Lots of padding. You should explain the scope of the wiki instead, in at least 2—3 sentences. Also, how is he dead? You can reopen it in Special: ManageWiki/core. Please reopen and explain the scope. --YellowFrogger

Request #12

 * Sitename: Free Editors Wiki |
 * Requester: Freditweki
 * Language: en
 * Category: Community
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: A wiki where anyone can add what they wish in the vein of Wikipedia, but without that 'notability' stuff. No limits, just rules if we need them. People can ask for admin if they want. If you approve you can have admin too

Comments
please approve

Please provide what this wiki will document in the Comments tab by reopening the request. It's not clear yet, and speaking the scope is a form of confirmation for wiki creators. And, what's worrying is the "no rules", and "people edit what they want", which is worrying, and the least: are wikis that have a similar scope like FAMEPedia, for example.

Approved requests ('wiki created')
Note: the scenario manager (raidarr) will add to this section if entries are approved and technically valid (ie, would not be refused by CreateWiki). Movement does not preclude additional comments, but when moved here the status can no longer be changed.

Request #0

 * Sitename: Systestwiki |
 * Requester: Importantsysadminguy
 * Language: en
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? yes. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: Demonstration wiki with a sample description. This is not to assume this particular description should be approved, but from time to time wikis will be passively created for testing purposes by sufficiently authorized volunteers.

Comments
Sysadmin test for demonstration purposes, do not handle

Wiki created.

Additional comment to simulate the commenting process. Note that code and links won't work well in the actual comment boxes.

Request #9

 * Sitename: Tethmylios |
 * Requester: WizardEatsTheWorld
 * Language: de
 * Category: Worldbuilding
 * Private? yes. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: A wiki to build my world in

Comments
Accept — although the scope seems so small, I myself have a wiki of personal notes and there are several of them on Miraheze which are private and don't violate CP. --YellowFrogger

Wiki created.

Request #10

 * Sitename: Awesome Phones Wiki |
 * Requester: Floofofatooth
 * Language: en
 * Category: Unspecified
 * Private? no. About living people? no
 * Status:
 * Comment given by the wiki requester: A wiki to document the best mobile phones, how they work, and why they are awesome!

Comments
The wiki content style seems clear, it seems to have good intentions, and the request was very genuine. Approved. --YellowFrogger

Wiki created.

General commentary
Out of character, standard Meta-style conversation can take place here, including from anyone not directly in the scenario. --Raidarr (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the Q. I'll do it later on the monitor. Response time really doesn't matter much, the ideal is the quality of the responses, for the simple fact that it is not done intentionally. I will respond later. I'm going to rely especially on what is already done in Special:Log/farmer and, of course, with CP, even though I'm already seeing some difficult things here. --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 00:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * There are difficult elements even for standing Wiki Creators, as various prompts are adapted from ones with borderline or possibly even contentious approvals. Thus it really is a test of discretion, and even the farmer log is not necessarily ideal for each case. But again, any amount of questions or sought advice + time are available to sift through the details, as I've never seen more than two or three of these types of prompts come up at one time. --Raidarr (talk) 00:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm done, . It is seen that most are declines, actually this is not true about my personality in accepting the wiki. I simulated the recent ones in Log/farmer and most are accepted. Here, it was just on the way to being declined; it was natural. Which grade will you determine? --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ )
 * I do not believe in determining a grade here or yet, and instead letting the page stand for itself until the scenario is complete. Part two of this is simulating responses to the scores you've given, and offering updates that will give further information for you to come back on. I'll start by moving accepts to the other section, and offer more thorough responses later today. --Raidarr (talk)
 * Understood --YellowFrogger ( talk ) ( ✔ ) 17:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)