User talk:DarkMatterMan4500

Post your messages below the other messages

A request
Could you please change mh:wretchedyoutubevideos:MediaWiki:Mainpage on Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki from Terrible YouTube Videos Wiki to Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki and delete the mh:wretchedyoutubevideos:Terrible YouTube Videos Wiki page? There's no need for two versions of the main page, and the original main page shows the full history. The reason why I'm requesting this here and not on WYTVW is because for some weird reason, there is an error on your talk page there. FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I tried fixing it, but I might need either or  assistance, as there are multiple errors that need to be fixed. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 22:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, there's something that needs to be done on mh:dreadfulbooks:Dreadful Literature Wiki. I took a look at these logs, and I have realised that this wiki is actually a migration of the Fandom version, and therefore, it contains the original main page at mh:dreadfulbooks:Dreadful Books Wiki and is older than I thought. However, Eiji deleted the page rather than deleting the automatically created new main page (which is the page that is usually deleted when a wiki migrates to another site). Could you please rename the main page to Dreadful Books Wiki, restore the deleted edits, and rename it back? The full history should be there. FatBurn0000 (talk) 08:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * They have been redirected to the Dreadful Literature Wiki main page. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the history still isn't there. FatBurn0000 (talk) 21:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * , please see w:WP:TALKREPLY. Thanks! --Magogre (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello? FatBurn0000 (talk) 07:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Apology
I would like to apologize for what I have done in the past. I will make a full apology blog explaining my side of the story, since I need to improve my reputation. I found out that I got mentioned on Kiwi Farms, so I need to put all of this behind me before things escalate any further. I really do not want any drama, all I wanted was to edit articles. I honestly wish there was some sort of Internet Police, so that bad websites like Kiwi Farms and Encyclopedia Dramatica would cease to exist. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Well, you should probably show that you're sorry. I mean, doing the right thing isn't hard to do, for one thing. And for another, that might take some time for other admins to forgive you. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 00:38, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I would, but I am blocked. First of all, it seems more like people are just misunderstanding what has been happening. I have seen people getting angry about me appealing my blocks here on Meta for some reason, even though they are not fair blocks as has been mentioned by me. You, Raidarr, and even Dmehus seem to agree that infinite cross-wiki blocks were unnecessary in this situation, since you yourself had said that cross-wiki blocks should only be applied to sockpuppet accounts, spam/vandalism accounts, and trolls, not just to users who were being disruptive on one wiki. I had said that in this case, a block on the Qualitipedia Meta wiki is justified, though since no disruption occurred on any other wiki, it is not necessary to be blocked there. And my block on Qualitipedia Meta should not be infinite, since even though I did do something disruptive, it hardly made any impact, and the blog was deleted relatively quickly, thus no real harm was done. When I am back on Qualitipedia Meta, I can suggest some changes to the blocking policy. This is not a situation that affects only me, though, and I think that the admins would be fine with unblocking me on the wikis where I was not acting disruptively and also changing my Qualitipedia Meta block to temporary. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:21, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I heavily disagree with this to be quite honest. Not many people would like the idea of you coming back after an indefinite QP global block, including the co-leader Blazikeye535, who says, along with me, that you have long gone past your last chance. It also doesn't help that you have been blocked indefinitely many, many times only be unblocked for no real explanation at times. Even if you are unblocked in general, I highly recommend keeping him blocked indefinitely on the QP Meta, due to much of your problematic editing and repetitive, tiring RFC requests, along with aggressively talking back when someone disagrees with you (Though I have seen this on the other wikis as well) were where much of your drama and reasons for blocking was. TigerBlazer (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would like to be unblocked on the wikis I did nothing wrong on. As for QP Meta, an indefinite block is not justified, however I think that a 3 month block (3 months from the original block on November 8) would be appropriate.
 * And there were no major instances of drama that you seem to think there were. Please stop exaggerating. All that happened was I overreacted to a joke that Raidarr made, and some of my RFCs have been disliked, the latter of which is not against the written rules. So to summarize, I should be unblocked on every wiki except for QP Meta, and my QP Meta block can be shortened to 3 months from the original block, so it will expire on February 8, 2022. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Bluba has received lots of blocks, and practically all of them have been indefinite. As a result, Bluba was never given an amount of time to think about their actions. Also keeping them blocked on Qualitipedia Meta indefinitely is a bad idea, because if users are going to contribute to Qualitipedia, then they should participate in Qualitipedia Meta. FatBurn0000 (talk) 04:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would have to agree with here. I feel like the problem has become bigger than it should've been. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly! In addition, my blocks seem to have been more out of grudges and intimidation rather than preventing disruption, which is why DarkMatterMan4500 unblocked me.
 * And I agree with both of you. The same problem happened when I was on FANDOM: Some minor inconveniences turned into full-blown drama due to being handled poorly. Somehow, complaining about positively received episodes on ScumBob Wiki escalated into my wiki getting invaded. I will probably go into further detail about my side of the story on everything that has happened to me on FANDOM and Miraheze in an entire blog post on another wiki, because it is a very long story. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have brought this up on Blazikeye's talk page for further discussion since he is the one who blocked me. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm also getting annoyed that people are getting mad at me for appealing my blocks on Meta even though I don't really have a choice. The only reason why I appeal here on Meta is because I keep getting blocked cross-wiki. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Your edits
Why your edits show me that red exclamation mark as if your edits aren't automatically patrolled? Because you are an autropatrolled. YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 20:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Not anymore. I had my autopatrolled right taken off by recently, because of the amount of questionable wiki requests I was approving at the time, and he said he'd review my wiki creator status by approval and declination ratio. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * And for the record, I won't be getting it back until after January 31st, 2022, but I'm choosing to get it back on February 21st, 2022. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 21:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest you remove the Autopatrolled box for now, so as not to confuse. YellowFrogger (✉ Talk  ✐ Edits ) 23:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have ✅ just that. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Could you please rename the main page of mh:dreadfulbooks:Dreadful Literature Wiki to Dreadful Books Wiki, restore the deleted edits, and rename it back? We need to see the full history. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, could you allow YouTubers on mh:wretchedyoutubevideos:Wretched YouTube Videos Wiki again, but forbid YouTubers with less than 100,000 subscribers? The content policy only states "Miraheze does not host wikis with the sole purpose of spreading unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people", and as long as the wiki does not have the sole purpose of doing those things, it will be fine, plus we're not trying to spread unsubstantiated insult, hate or rumours against a person or group of people anyway. In terms for the drama, it's less likely for them to find out about their page, we can delete the pages if they find out and even though users are saying it's not worth the risk, I don't think there was any drama back when RWW allowed users, so we should give it another try. FatBurn0000 (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The answer is no. Absolutely not. Main source of the problem stems down to unsourced pointers and libelous accusations. Still not going to happen, I'm afraid. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 23:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The wikis have enough trouble being credible about, well, everything they're allowed to post now. Per DMM's reply, allowing this merely regresses what progress has been made. And to top that I believe it would add justified fuel for critics. You think they wouldn't know, they will. And the image of Miraheze itself will be worse for it. --Raidarr (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I've been getting pretty annoyed with you bombarding my talk pages on other wikis recently, giving me these constant requests at a rapid rate, so could you please just slow down on those? I was okay with it at first, but you've been sending me requests after another in such a fashion that I could barely even keep up with them. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, there are just a lot of things that I would like done. Also, in terms for the YouTubers, couldn't we just forbid unsourced pages and make sure that all pages are about YouTubers who make bad content, not ones that are bad people themselves. FatBurn0000 (talk) 02:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but NO exceptions, at all. --DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, what about YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual user, but a channel that has a group of people who make videos on it or a channel that isn't owned by a specific person or group of people? FatBurn0000 (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No exceptions also means no YouTube channels that aren't owned by an individual. So the answer is still no. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, is it okay if the YouTuber themselves approves of the article? Also, you should make that more clear, and plus, if the channel isn't owned by a person or a group of people, chances are, there will be multiple people owning it and they are unlikely to care. However, if you are going to do this, you should probably delete the mh:rottenwebsites:WatchMojo and mh:rottenwebsites:Screen Rant pages on RWW, they're only allowed because they have a website, which probably won't change things. FatBurn0000 (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Still no exceptions. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Can I please get unblocked from all of these wikis?
Can I please get unblocked from all of these wikis? Why? Since Blaskieye blocked me from TTSW, BTSW, GMW, RWW, CGW, Awesome Games Wiki, Fresh Websites Wiki, Atrocious Gameplay Wiki, Worst Music & Songs Wiki, Awful Movies Wiki, Greatest Characters Wiki, and Loathsome Characters Wiki. I was trying to improve my edits, and I need to get unblocked. That's the thing. MarioBobFan (talk) 19:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Look at these type of edits:, . Even so, if I wasn't welcomed to a location, I wouldn't keep insisting on wanting it unlocked. If people don't want me there... I would contribute a wiki of the same (same) type elsewhere YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 21:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Even so, I would appeal to the website owner, as I see you have no bad intentions. And even blocked on wikis you've never edited. That's why receptions have such little bad reputation externally YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 21:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

OK. I wonder who created them (the wikis) MarioBobFan (talk) 22:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Created, what? YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 22:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not know. Talk to Bureaucrats, site administrators. Something like YellowFrogger</b> (✉ Talk </b> ✐ Edits </b>)</b> 00:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would like my talk page access and email access back and for someone to send this to Blaskieye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioBobFan (talk • contribs) 00:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @MarioBobFan He was the user who blocked you, that much I know. So how do you want me to talk to him? <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 04:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * About showing him this and asking him to unblock me. That's the things. MarioBobFan (talk) 04:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * But like, he locked you out so should you tell him to unlock you or something on your talk page and show the argument(s)? <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 04:56, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

I am not an inmature little kid and I am 14 years old. MarioBobFan (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I sent him a message and unfortunately he don't unlock you. I made two appeals, his message: "I’m not unblocking this user. Based on the way they still act (like constantly begging to get unblocked), it's clear that they're just some immature little kid. We've also given this user a ton of chances to improve, but they've blown each and every single chance.". I think you've already seen the message by not calling yourself an immature child, even though you are a teenager. Do you want me to send one more appeal to him?; or apologize? <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 02:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes. MarioBobFan (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * How do you want me to send it? speak here <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 03:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What the hell is going on here? I see people bickering on my talk page. Cut it out, both of you. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate Requests
Duplicate requests - Sorry I didn't meant to create duplicate requests. Just getting to grips with the system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillyJoeTakeAShaver (talk • contribs)
 * Your wiki request was not accepted. Add more description, eg I saw you are going to talk about Norm MacDonald - This wiki is intended for Norm Macdonald, including facts about his life, files, trivia and etc that anyone can edit freely,This wiki is not intended to violate and will follow the content policy. So maybe he accepts <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)


 * You don't really need to add any peanut gallery comments here, as I was just about to reply to BillyJoeTakeAShaver's message here. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This is not a comment by PEANUT. The user has no idea, as this is the first time, he may not even know that his request was not accepted. Also, his comment was unsigned. <b style="color: #1965e0;">YellowFrogger</b> <b style="color: #069404;">(<b style="color: #069404;">✉ Talk </b> <b style="color: #069404;">✐ Edits </b>)</b> 19:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * That part I appreciate, but your additional comment adds nothing here, and doesn't exactly help them become familiar with this big project. No offense. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Also
Can you unblock me on Great Characters Wiki and Loathsome Characters Wiki since I did nothing wrong there, you are an admin there, and since it is no longer a part of Qualitipedia it no longer has Qualitipedia's administration and thus you will not have to ask permission to unblock me. And I regret making that RfC, since it doesn't seem to be going anywhere productive and I feel that a more appropriate option might be to bring this up with Stewards. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)