User talk:Zppix

Wiki created
Hello, I would like to tell you that I have created your wiki. You can now access it at https://proxybot.miraheze.org. You should automatically have been granted administrator and bureaucrat rights, if that's not the case then please leave a notice on Stewards' noticeboard so we can fix it immediately. Do not hesitate to ask questions if your question was not answered in our FAQ. Also, if you want a extension, gadget, or anything else, please ask us here. Thank you for choosing Miraheze, and we wish you good luck with your wiki! -- Void  Whispers 20:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

On wiki creation template
You don't need to post it on the requester's talk page anymore, because a notice will be generated to him/her automatically.-- 13:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

NordVPN
Please fix/reformat this RfC! Your (signed) responses appear directly underneath my (unsigned) bullet points. The reader will be baffled to figure out which words are mine and which are yours! Duplicate my signature if you must. 19:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

My username is not working
Hello!

My user Anton is not working. When I try to log in, the login reads There seems to be a problem with your current session; this feature has been canceled as a precaution to prevent session Capture. Resubmit the form. What problem? --Anton 08:19, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki request
Please reconsider your decision to decline my wiki request. While both your points are true, both the Gazetteer of wikis and Special:WikiDiscover exclude the number of pages a wiki has. Then users would have to go to Special:Statistics on the wiki to find out the number of pages of the wiki. Plus, the number of wikis on Miraheze is too big (nearly 5,000!) to list them all on one page, and to find a specific wiki, users would have to go through thousands of wikis on WikiDiscover to find the wiki they want. My proposed wiki would have accomplished everything that the Gazetteer and WikiDiscover would; additionally, it would list the number of pages on the wiki and provide easy access to wikis. Those are the reasons why my wiki should have been accepted. Sincerely, Tali64³ (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but my decision stands. I don't believe that your reasoning alone dictates a need for a wiki for a feature and a page that already exists. Zppix (Meta &#124; CVT Member &#124; talk to me) 16:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I just noticed this as well. I'm commenting here because I have declined a similar request for a gazetteer of wikis (either before or after Zppix). As I said in my response, I think it's a decent idea in theory, but feel like something that should involve a community discussion at the community noticeboard, perhaps. As part of that discussion, I think the proposer needs to make clear how this would be better than simply adding the needed functionality (i.e., columns) in Special:WikiDiscover or, perhaps, parsing the data using the API into an automatically updated, webpage form. My biggest reservation with this proposed wiki is that, like the Gazetteer of wikis, it would grow quickly out of date due to lack of updates (i.e., we are approving, on average, 10-20 new wikis per day and could well be at 10,000 wikis by next fall). So, I do also stand by my decision as well. Dmehus (talk) 17:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, it would be neatly formatted, give the date the wiki was founded, and have a summary of the wiki. Also, it would also have a template that states whether a wiki has NSFW content or not. Tali64³ (talk) 20:27, 16 July 2020 (UTC)