Talk:Global bans/List

Should the "Banned by Code of Conduct Commission" section be removed? The Code of Conduct Commission no longer exists, and there shouldn't be a need to keep it there to list historical bans either given there aren't any. Since there are no bans and never will be the section can just be removed. Any objections? Naleksuh (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2021 (UTC)


 * While the Code of Conduct Commission no longer exists, the Code of Conduct does and Stewards fulfill the responsibilities previously held by the Code of Conduct Commission. Nevertheless, it's an empty section, so I have no objections to this, and will do so. Dmehus (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Dmehus (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * And,, you could change "details not available" in Banned by Trust and Safety from Mago Mágico to "vandalism". He did almost exactly that (I was the one who asked for him to be blocked on the Stewards noticeboard) and I think it would be better than a lost, standardized description. If you don't want to do that, that's fine, or even better because I don't know 100% the meaning of cross-wiki vandalism and he did several vandalisms in just on one wiki. --YellowFrogger (Talk — ✐) 21:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * YellowFrogger, no Trust and Safety would never ban someone for "vandalism." Crosswiki vandalism and abuse is a community lock reason. The details cannot be released as that is the current practice of the Trust and Safety team. Hope that clarifies. :) Dmehus (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)