Requests for reopening wikis/Archive 7

__NOINDEX__

venkon.miraheze.org
Samanaslietuvas (talk) 20:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: venkon.miraheze.org
 * Username: Samanaslietuvas
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: This wiki has been closed due to inactivity and I wish to revitalize it. Also, a question in case this request does get approved - would it be possible to remove bureaucrat rights from the old bureaucrats of the wiki, considering the fact that they haven't frequented the wiki in a long time?
 * ❌ as I'm afraid this has been superceded by the wiki being reopened, and thus not eligible for adoption, and now ✅. Additionally, I was also not satisfied with your reason provided for wanting to adopt what appears to be a personal wiki of the wiki's sole contributor. Feel free to request a new wiki, though, taking care to define a clear purpose, scope, and topic(s) for your wiki. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 23:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

meme.miraheze.org
Wiki JS 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: meme.miraheze.org
 * Username: WikiJS
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The wiki never even got edited, and I really like memes, so this wiki will not be inactive for a very long time.
 * WikiJS Looking at this wiki, it looks like more of a good-faith idea that never really got off the ground. As well, I note the wiki uses the WikiBase extension, which suggests it is intended to be more of a meme database repository than an encyclopedic wiki with written prose. Additionally, the original wiki request was a bit vague and unclear. Please note that the wiki adoption process is not a quick process, and does typically take several weeks to assess quantity and quality of your contributions, so if you could please advise if you wish to proceed with this adoption request, or if you wish to request a similar wiki with a different subdomain, taking care to define a clear purpose, scope, and topic(s) for your wiki, that'd be much appreciated. Dmehus (talk) 19:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I will request a similar wiki instead. Thanks for the help!  Wiki JS  19:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please make sure you define a clear purpose, scope, and topic(s) for your wiki. Please define clearly all topics your broad wiki will propose to write about and what sort of sourcing policies your wiki will have. Dmehus (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you link me to my wiki request? I forgot to change the category to humor/satire. Wiki JS  19:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WikiJS I've already approved the wiki, so it's been sent to our  server. Once it's created, you can change your wiki's category in Special:ManageWiki on your wiki. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh alright, thanks again! :) Wiki JS  20:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem again. I've messaged Reception123 to pause an import to  temporarily and execute the   maintenance script on   to clear the heavy job backlog. Once that's done, your wiki should be created. Dmehus (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

crazypedia.miraheze.org

 * Wiki: crazypedia.miraheze.org
 * Username: TheNino
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
 * Reason: This wiki I want because it is good, the owner abandoned it, its last edition was October 2020.

I would ask for a new wiki, but that name is already good for me TheNino (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * TheNino This wiki does not seem to have more than a handful of content pages, and I'm not even certain it was approved with a clear enough purpose and scope for the wiki. Nevertheless, setting that aside, the requests for adoption is not a quick process as it does typically take several weeks to assess the requestor's contributions to the wiki. Your better option would be to request a new wiki, taking care to articulate a clear purpose for your wiki, define its scope, and describe the type of content/topic(s) your wiki will contain. When this wiki is deleted per Dormancy Policy and the database dropped, you can then file a Phabricator request to rename your wiki's database name and subdomain (see above similar request). Please advise if you still prefer to adopt this wiki, or will go that route. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 17:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

poetry.miraheze.org

 * Wiki: poetry.miraheze.org
 * Username: Nyl
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The wiki has been closed to the public and there seems to be no visible activity going on. As I see it, the subdomain is being used for something meant to be much more general/wide. I would like to takeover the wiki and continue its purpose as a subdomain/repository of poetry. It would be a waste to let the subdomain remain closed whilst also not receiving any care/updates. Nyl (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Nyl Yeah, it's too bad that wiki was approved on that general of a subdomain for what is a private wiki containing, presumably, poems that wiki requestor has either collected or authored. Unfortunately, as it's a private wiki and you were neither a  or   at the time of closure, it cannot be adopted at requests for adoption. What I'd suggest instead is wait until this wiki is deleted per Dormancy Policy and the database dropped shortly thereafter, then request a wiki on this subdomain. Alternatively, you can request a different subdomain and, when this wiki has been deleted per Dormancy Policy and the database name/subdomain subsequently made available, you can file a Phabricator ticket to rename your wiki's subdomain and database name to this database name and subdomain. Note that your wiki's old database name and subdomain would then be made available. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Very unfortunate, but oh well. Nyl (talk) 06:07, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

worsttvnetworks.miraheze.org
Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: worsttvnetworks.miraheze.org
 * Username: Blubabluba9990
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: This wiki has potential, and since Waldo already has a pending adoption request for its sister wiki (Terrific TV Networks Wiki), I decided to make an adoption request for this one.


 * I need it to be re-opened though so that I can make some edits. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What is the difference between this wiki and the other wiki? 20:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Terrific TV Networks Wiki is about good television networks, while Worst TV Networks Wiki is about bad television networks. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Oops, yes, apologies for not noticing that earlier. A Steward will get to this request soon. 20:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 20:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Blubabluba9990 This ✅ as the wiki was not manually closed by a local, so the wiki has been reopened for you to contribute actively over the next week or two, after which a steward will assess your activity and conclude this request accordingly. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 22:05, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok. There is still one problem though. Turns out the network wikis will be merged with the larger Terrible TV Shows wiki and Best TV Shows Wiki as a rebrand for the Reception Wikis, so until then I can keep this wiki up. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 12:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Blubabluba9990 I looked through your contributions thus far, and, other than some improvements to the Main Page, I'm not seeing very many edits. Please advise if you are still working on this wiki and interested in adopting it. Pro tip: Writing a few full content pages would be very helpful to a successful adoption. Dmehus (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah the wiki is probably getting merged with Terrible TV Shows Wiki as part of a rebrand they are doing there so that is why. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 12:52, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Blubabluba9990 I'm closing this as ❌ per your above comments that the intent is to merge this wiki with another wiki. If you wish for this wiki to be deleted once it's fully merged, please hold a local discussion on the local wiki with any participating local users and request Stewards to assess your local discussion for wiki deletion at stewards' noticeboard. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok Blubabluba9990 (talk) 18:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

pokemon.miraheze.org
PokeMyth (talk) 12:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: pokemon.miraheze.org
 * Username: PokeMyth
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: It's abandoned without ever being used and I would like to make something of it.
 * PokeMyth This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 14:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you unlock the main page for edition for now? If possible. PokeMyth (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * PokeMyth This is a reasonable request, so I've lowered the edit protection level of Main Page on the given wiki to  as a Steward action on a wiki without any active administrators (and bureaucrats, for that matter). Additionally, so you don't have to make at least ten (10) edits and wait four (4) calendar days, I've ✅ you temporary   permissions on the wiki, so you can edit the main page. Dmehus (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ PokeMyth, there hasn't been any contributions to this wiki, other than a single file upload, in nearly a month since reopening, so I've closed this as not done. Should the wiki ever need to be reopened again and local bureaucrats are not active, please advise Stewards at stewards' noticeboard. Additionally, you can always contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, which Stewards can be called upon (via the same venue above) to assess in absence of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

foodsharinghamburg.miraheze.org
Foodsaver1 (talk) 23:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: foodsharinghamburg.miraheze.org
 * Username: Foodsaver1
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: We're a large community and I'm one of the editors of this wiki. Unfortunately there were no logs in the last 2 months, so it was closed. We need to reopen it.
 * Foodsaver1 This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Foodsaver1 Since you haven't made any contributions to this wiki since it was reopened nearly three weeks ago, I'm going to assume you were just looking for the wiki to be reopened, which has been ✅ above, and will still instead close this request as ❌. If you require local permissions on the wiki and bureaucrats are not active, you may hold a local election, and request Stewards to assess it at stewards' noticeboard in their stead. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * We've made minor changes to the wiki since then. Will the foodsharinghamburg wiki stay open? We're a community of volunteer workers and look for simple solutions. As long as we can edit existing articles or add new ones, we're happy with it. Foodsaver1 (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Foodsaver1 It will stay active as long as someone makes an edit or logged action on the wiki once every forty five days. If the existing  is not active on the wiki, you can hold a local election on the wiki, and then request Stewards to assess your local election, promoting a new bureaucrat in line with the local community's consensus-based discussion. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

cogitopédie.miraheze.org
PERCE-NEIGE (talk) 07:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Hello. I created a wiki, but I think it has been deleted. Should I recreate it, or maybe it's still somewhere? The name is Cogitopédie. Thank you.
 * Wiki: cogitopédie.miraheze.org
 * Username: PERCE-NEIGE
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): yes, I created it.
 * Reason: I don't know if it still exist. I need to get it back.
 * ❌ PERCE-NEIGE Hi, your wiki was effectively deleted per Dormancy Policy but not dropped yet as it is still on Special:DeletedWikis. Anyway, this is not the place for ask for this. You can request a steward to undelete your wiki on Stewards' noticeboard :). Thanks you. HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 07:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've ✅ your deleted wiki for you, PERCE-NEIGE. Please make sure you make one recent change on your wiki before tomorrow to prevent your wiki from being reclosed per Dormancy Policy. If your wiki is reclosed, you can reopen it in Special:ManageWiki on your wiki. In future, if your wiki is ever deleted in the future, as HeartsDo says above, please make the request for undeletion at stewards' noticeboard. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

mwapwe.miraheze.org
Billerooni (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: mwapwe.miraheze.org
 * Username: Billerooni
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The creator the wiki seems to have lost interest in this project, so I want to reopen the wiki for it to continue to be edited.


 * Ignore this it has now been done Billerooni (talk) 11:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing this as ✅. HeartsDo (Talk / Global / Wiki Creator) 12:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

unbooks.miraheze.org
Matttest (talk) 13:35, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: unbooks.miraheze.org
 * Username: Matttest
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: Unbooks is one of the sister wikis of the Chinese Uncyclopedia community that may be closed due to inactivity. I would like to save the wiki from its deletion.
 * Matttest This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Matttest Your contributions LGTM, and so this is ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

reachaverse.miraheze.org
Jakeukalane (talk) 19:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: reachaverse.miraheze.org
 * Username: Jakeukalane
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: I want to improve this wiki and continue writing the topics.
 * Jakeukalane This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ and ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Jakeukalane Your contributions LGTM, and so this is ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 00:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

sentile.miraheze.org
Voval17 (talk) 22:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: sentile.miraheze.org
 * Username: Voval17
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): yes
 * Reason: I want to continue my page
 * Voval17 As you're a  on this wiki, please go into Special:ManageWiki, uncheck the "closed" and any "inactive" boxes, and then hit "submit." Once you've done that, please let me know, so I can close this request. If you haven't reopened the wiki by tomorrow, I'll do it for you. Dmehus (talk) 22:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Voval17 Though you are a  on this wiki and it would be better for you to reopen the wiki yourself so you know how to do this for the next time, I've ✅ the wiki for you to close this request as I would hate to see your wiki eventually deleted per Dormancy Policy and you'd requested it be reopened. Should your wiki become closed again in the future, all you need to do is go into Special:ManageWiki on your wiki and uncheck the "closed" box to reopen it. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

undictionary.miraheze.org
$10^2$ 4279  計算過程  09:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: undictionary.miraheze.org
 * Username: TEntEn4279
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: Undictionary is one of the three sister wikis of Chinese Uncyclopedia that have been closed due to being inactive. For Undictionary, I would like to give it a try and save the wiki from its deletion.


 * TEntEn4279 Apologies for the delay in responding to this. This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ There hasn't been any contributions to this wiki, other than a single edit, in nearly a month since reopening, so I've closed this as not done. Should the wiki ever need to be reopened again and local bureaucrats are not active, please advise Stewards at stewards' noticeboard. Additionally, you can always contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, which Stewards can be called upon (via the same venue above) to assess in absence of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

darkboom.miraheze.org
Yoxall (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: darkboom.miraheze.org
 * Username: Yoxall
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
 * Reason: I want to keep this wiki alive for future editing.
 * Yoxall This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ No contributions to the wiki since reopening a month ago, so I've closed this as not done. Should the wiki ever need to be reopened again and local bureaucrats are not active, please advise Stewards at stewards' noticeboard. Additionally, you can always contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, which Stewards can be called upon (via the same venue above) to assess in absence of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

battlecats.miraheze.org
Uzakky（talk／log／MWpedia（my cite）） 10:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: battlecats.miraheze.org
 * Username: うざっきー
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: Nyanko Great War is a very popular game in Japan, so this site is also very useful. So it's a waste to be closed. Therefore, please adopt the site.
 * Uzakky This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 21:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * understood. thanks you. Uzakky（talk／log／MWpedia（my cite）） 01:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ No contributions to the wiki in nearly a month since it was reopened, so I've closed this as not done. Should the wiki ever need to be reopened again and local bureaucrats are not active, please advise Stewards at stewards' noticeboard. Additionally, you can always contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, which Stewards can be called upon (via the same venue above) to assess in absence of local bureaucrats. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

nomenber.miraheze.org
Amaezone (talk) 17:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: nomenber.miraheze.org
 * Username: Amaezone
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: nomenber is a yearly initiative to highlight women and gender minorities' works in movies, music, books and all kinds of arts. It's coming back this november ! There is still a lot of artists and works to add to the wiki (the previous owner forgot there was an automatic expiration date when the wiki was inactive)
 * Amaezone This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. In looking at your existing local wiki contributions, it looks like you've already made forty (40) edits to the wiki. Please try and write at least a couple articles (ideally start class) for the wiki in the next several weeks, in order for   and   rights to be added to your account. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Amaezone Though you've not made very many contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, as you have made the second most contributions to the wiki (after the existing, and currently inactive, bureaucrat and administrator), I'm satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 02:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

battlefordreamisland.miraheze.org
Lé Gunfish (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: battlefordreamisland.miraheze.org
 * Username: Lé Gunfish
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: Good youtube show wiki on miraheze, should still be active
 * Lé Gunfish This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * As there's been zero contributions in more than ten (10) calendar days since this wiki was reopened, I'm going to close this as ❌. Please be advised that you can always hold a local election, following these guidelines, and request a Steward assess your election after at least 5-7 calendar days have elapsed by placing a request at stewards' noticeboard. Dmehus (talk) 02:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

duovision.miraheze.org
Sugaryoof (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: duovision.miraheze.org
 * Username: Sugaryoof
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: I would like to adopt this wiki because, it's my friend's contest wiki which got abandoned and I want to ensure all the info is up to date. He probably hasn't noticed this, so this is why I request to adopt it, to prevent the wiki from being deleted.
 * Sugaryoof This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and  and   user groups may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Relisted. Dmehus (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Sugaryoof Similar to this successful adoption request, looking though you've not made very many contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, the most active contributors to the wiki have only made 37 and 13 edits, respectively, the latter of whom is the incumbent  and  . Additionally, as a song contest wiki, they frequently have only a few pages, and your few edit(s) that you have made have substantial contribution(s) in terms of byte size and page length, I'm thus satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with   and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 23:12, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

atrociousyoutubers.miraheze.org
RyanTheInkling (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: atrociousyoutubers.miraheze.org
 * Username: RyanTheInkling
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The original owners of the wiki have effectively abandoned the wiki, and it is very close to deletion. One of the owners, MeMeGuYWasLost, has deleted all of his online accounts, and I cannot contact him for permission to gain ownership of the wiki. Because of that, I am requesting for ownership of this wiki.
 * This, unfortunately, ❌ as the wiki in question is a private wiki, and you hold neither  nor   rights with   access to the wiki. Dmehus (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

spongebob.miraheze.org
DuchessTheSponge (talk) 16:34, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: spongebob.miraheze.org
 * Username: DuchessTheSponge
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Are you a bureaucrat on the wiki? No
 * Reason: is inactive from this wiki and this wiki could be helpful in the near by future.


 * DuchessTheSponge This, unfortunately, ❌ as the wiki is not closed per Dormancy Policy. However, since you were previously a bureaucrat and sysop on the wiki, I suspect Cocopuff2018 would reinstate your permissions as they only removed them per "inactivity." I've notified of them of your request, and if they don't reply soon, you can start a local election on the wiki, then Stewards can be requested to assess your election. Dmehus (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. DuchessTheSponge (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Dmehus (talk) 19:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I decided to regrant admin to duchess sponge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocopuff2018 (talk • contribs) 05:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * . That's great. Dmehus (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

newmicronational.miraheze.org
Summi Imperatoris (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: newmicronational.miraheze.org
 * Username: Summi Imperatoris
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: I am an administrator on the wiki and wish to adopt the wiki. The original owner abandoned this wiki and project.
 * Summi Imperatoris This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. In looking at your existing local wiki contributions, it looks like you've already made the most editing contributions to this wiki, as far as I can tell. Please try and make a few more edits within the next several weeks in order for rights to be added to your account. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Summi Imperatoris Similar to this successful adoption request, looking though you've not made recent contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, you are the largest contributor to this wiki, having made more than 98% of all contributions to this wiki, demonstrating you're both respected and trusted by this wiki's community. Equally important, I'm thus satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, particularly as this wiki only has one fairly inactive local, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with   and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 22:16, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

marveloustvshowepisodes.miraheze.org
MarioMario456 (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: marveloustvshowepisodes.miraheze.org
 * Username: MarioMario456
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: This is the sister wiki to Horrible TV Show Episodes Wiki. It was closed due to inactivity.
 * MarioMario456 This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Dmehus (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * MarioMario456 Though your contributions to this wiki are generally fairly minor editors, you've nonetheless made it up for it, I think, in terms of quantity. In particular, you've done a lot of good work improving this wiki's categorization scheme, page titling, and will make good use of local tools (i.e.,  and , I suspect). As such, I'm satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as one of its custodians/caretakers, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with   and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

monolith.miraheze.org
ArcOfDream (talk) 08:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: monolith.miraheze.org
 * Username: ArcOfDream
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: Hi, I'm one of the developers of the game this wiki is related to, and wanted to take over to provide some templates and help sort of reboot the effort for others who would want to help contribute.
 * ArcOfDream This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, it looks like we've got contact with the original bureaucrat of the wiki so I'll likely not need to take over anymore! ArcOfDream (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ArcOfDream Oh, that's great to hear. You might want to consider asking them to elevate your permissions to, so you can assist them with managing the wiki. Dmehus (talk) 14:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ArcOfDream It looks like TenderGnat, the local  on   promoted you to  . Is this sufficient, or are you still looking to adopt this wiki and become a co- ? If the former, please let me know so I can close this request as withdrawn. Dmehus (talk) 22:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * This is sufficient for me, thank you for looking into this! ArcOfDream (talk) 11:12, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks, I'm going to close this as ✅, with TenderGnat locally assigning you the  permission. . Dmehus (talk) 11:18, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

atrociousyoutubers.miraheze.org
FinesseFinnish (talk) 04:11, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: atrociousyoutubers.miraheze.org
 * Username: FinesseFinnish
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: I (should) have member rights to this wiki since I was active when it was not closed, and none of the bureaucrats appear to be active anymore, so I, a former contributor, would like to be able to take this wiki into my own hands, especially since it weirdly hasn't been autodeleted, despite the fact that 6 months from the last time the wiki was active would've been March, and it is now May.
 * ❌ as the wiki was closed by Stewards for systemic, remediated Content Policy and Code of Conduct violations. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

ukps.miraheze.org
KeevoWiki (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: ukps.miraheze.org
 * Username: KeevoWiki
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: I previously contributed a lot to this Wiki and would like to use it again for a future project.
 * KeevoWiki This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * KeevoWiki I'm closing this as ❌ as there's been been zero contributions on the wiki since it was reopened over a month ago. Nonetheless, the wiki is open, and you're free to contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, to which Stewards can be engaged to assess in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 23:27, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

tinyd10.miraheze.org
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moletom (talk • contribs) 13:22, 2 May 2021‎ (UTC)
 * Wiki: tinyd10.miraheze.org
 * Username: Moletom
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: I like Tinyd10 and I think there is potential for the game.
 * Moletom This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 14:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Moletom Looking through your contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, though many of your edits are minor in nature, you are the only recently active contributor to this wiki, I'm thus satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, particularly as this wiki only has one fairly inactive local, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with   and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

corejourneywiki.miraheze.org
Donutjonut (talk) 13:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: corejourneywiki.miraheze.org
 * Username: Donutjonut
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: The wiki is inactive, and I am a prominent member of the community that the wiki is supposed to be serving.
 * Donutjonut This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Donutjonut I'm closing this as ❌ as there's been been zero contributions on the wiki since it was reopened over a month ago. Nonetheless, the wiki is open, and you're free to contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, to which Stewards can be engaged to assess in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 23:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

pullbackcars.miraheze.org
DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: pullbackcars.miraheze.org
 * Username: DarkMatterMan4500
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No.
 * Reason: The founder is no longer around, but I'd like to maintain and take good care of the wiki, while at the same time change some stuff around so it doesn't look bland or boring as it is.


 * DarkMatterMan4500 When I invited you to hold a local election, as the preferred way to take over management of this wiki and continue building it, you said you weren't really interested. The reason I ask is because it is far quicker and more efficient to simply begin contributing to a wiki and hold a local election than to go through an adoption request process, which typically will take at least two weeks (depending on your contributions). Before I reopen this wiki, can you tell me why, in your own words, you are now interested in this wiki, and what your plans are for this wiki? What sort of content and topics will you propose to write about? Dmehus (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * That was then, this is now. And if you look at the wiki, it's entirely inactive. And as for your other question: It was intended to be about cars and such, so I don't intend to change any of what it was intended to be. While yes, I wasn't entirely interested at the time, but I've changed my mind about that. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * DarkMatterMan4500 Thank you for the reply, but was this wiki even ever closed per Dormancy Policy? I'm showing that it was never reopened by a Steward, so I tend to think it may have just gone inactive, if it even went inactive at all. Nonetheless, since it was never closed, procedurally this ❌. You can, however, contribute to the wiki and hold a local election, following these guidelines, then request a Steward to assess your election after approximately 5-7 calendar days by posting a request at stewards' noticeboard. Dmehus (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

youtube.miraheze.org
 Bukkit &emsp;•&emsp;  Talk &emsp;•&emsp;  Contribs 12:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: youtube.miraheze.org
 * Username: Bukkit
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: This Wiki seems to be unused, and this seems like a good idea to try to grow. I am extremely into YouTube.


 * Bukkit Thank you for your request. Since this wiki is completely unused and since the original wiki request was quite unclear in terms of the wiki's intended purpose and scope, before I reopen this wiki, can you give me a few more details on the purpose of this wiki, define the scope you intend to have for the wiki, and explain the type of content it will contain? Will the wiki propose to write articles on YouTubers, or strictly just encyclopedic content on YouTube as a platform and company, with some focus on the channels and genres of videos it'll contain? Dmehus (talk) 23:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It would talk about YouTubers and videos. It would be kinda like Wikitubia. Buk kit  (talk) ( C ) 12:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

goldenmemes.miraheze.org
SPEEDYBEAVER (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: goldenmemes.miraheze.org
 * Username: SPEEDYBEAVER
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: A wiki about good memes. It was closed for unknown reasons.
 * SPEEDYBEAVER This wiki was manually ✅ by SporeShroom2007, presumably following a community discussion or discussion among the wiki's collective administration team, so I'm going to mark this as ❌. I'd recommend reaching out to them on their user talk page and see if they'd consider reopening the wiki. Dmehus (talk) 17:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

excelletdiscordservers.miraheze.org
SPEEDYBEAVER (talk) 19:31, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: excelletdiscordservers.miraheze.org
 * Username: SPEEDYBEAVER
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The sister site of Horrendeous Discord Servers Wiki. It was closed because of inactivity.

freewiki.miraheze.org
Seodaemungu Student (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: freewiki.miraheze.org
 * Username: Seodaemungu Student
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: I like to adopt this wiki because it is no edits for 60 days and I want to save this wiki for the proverb(속담)

wretchedyoutubevideos.miraheze.org
WindowsViennaFish2010 (talk) 08:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: wretchedyoutubevideos.miraheze.org
 * Username: WindowsViennaFish2010
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: The wiki is closed so I need to reopen it.
 * WindowsViennaFish2010 As this wiki was manually closed by a local, ostensibly as part of an on-wiki or off-wiki discussion with other bureaucrats and/or the community, the prevailing Steward custom or practice of at least two other Stewards is that Stewards do not reopen manually closed wikis, so I'm closing this as ❌. However, if this is an alternate account of a pre-existing account where you were either (a) a significant contributor or (b) a previous or current bureaucrat or sysop on this wiki and you can reply from that account that this account is your confirmed alternate account, I'm willing to reevaluate this request, particularly if this closure was not done in line with a fulsome discussion of all significant contributors to the wiki. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

hypixel.miraheze.org
~ Ronja  (u • t • c) 14:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: hypixel.miraheze.org
 * Username: Ronjapatch
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: Wiki is inactive and no edits have been made to the Wiki itself, hence why I am requesting to adopt it.
 * Ronjapatch Thank you for your request. Unfortunately, this ❌ as the wiki is not closed per Dormancy Policy. I'd instead you visit the local bureaucrat's user talk page, offer to contribute to the wiki, and request any rights you require (i.e.,,   etc.) to help do that. If you don't receive a response within a week or so, you can hold a local election on the wiki, following these guidelines, then request a Steward assess your local election after a further calendar week. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

lockhartsmindscape.miraheze.org
Beatrice Lockhart 2001 (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: lockhartsmindscape.miraheze.org
 * Username: Beatrice Lockhart 2001
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes
 * Reason: I want to edit that wiki again.
 * ✅ by the requesting . Dmehus (talk) 05:11, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

tssu.miraheze.org
NeverthelesS (talk) 00:47, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: tssu.miraheze.org
 * Username: NeverthelesS
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): Yes
 * Reason: The old project it was used for fell through with everyone getting busy but know we're all available (hopefully for a while) again and I wanna try to remake the wiki again.
 * NeverthelesS Unfortunately, this ❌ as the wiki database was dropped in here in this batch. Nevertheless, I've recreated your original wiki, selecting an appropriate category and purpose for your wiki, and requested an XML import be done from Reception123's  on  . Please follow along here. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 05:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

villains.miraheze.org
SPEEDYBEAVER (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: villains.miraheze.org
 * Username: SPEEDYBEAVER
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: The Miraheze version of the Fandom wiki of the same name. It was closed because of inactivity.

bfdi.miraheze.org
Zocktersrat (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: bfdi.miraheze.org
 * Username: Zocktersrat
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): no
 * Reason: inactive wiki
 * Zocktersrat Unfortunately, this ❌ as the wiki is not closed per Dormancy Policy. What you can do, however, is hold a local election. Since it seems like this wiki has no active bureaucrats, I would recommend you hold a local election, taking care to take into account the local wiki's permissions elections policies. Assuming your wiki has no local permissions request policies or other election rules, you would follow global customs and conventions for such requests, which see you create an election page on that wiki, on a prominent page, stating the number and type of position(s) you're running for (i.e., administrator, bureaucrat), the name(s) of the candidate(s) running, how long the election shall run for (best practice for 5-7 calendar days), the minimum support ratio required for a successful election, and whether an election can be declared successful after the minimum timeframe if no one expresses a view (i.e., election by acclamation). Once your process has concluded (recommended to last for at least 5-7 calendar days), return to stewards' noticeboard and, in a new thread, state the wiki address, local location of the election, and a steward will assess your local election in absence of a local bureaucrat. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

senkan.miraheze.org

 * Wiki: senkan.miraheze.org
 * Username: Stinky The Skunk
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no):
 * Reason: I'd like to adopt the wiki page Senkan, as the owner of the page has left it entirely unused and dormant 2 times now, and has no intentions of returning to it. It's a project me and my friends much enjoyed and we wish to continue it Stinky The Skunk (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Stinky The Skunk Apologies for the delay in responding. This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ❌ Zero local contributions in more than a week since the wiki was reopened. Nevertheless, the wiki has been reopened, so users can edit it again. Dmehus (talk) 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

mymelopedia.miraheze.org
Sophiebun (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: mymelopedia.miraheze.org
 * Username: Sophiebun
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: Soon after starting up work on the wiki, I suffered a hard drive failure, leaving me unable to really get started. Since recovering from it, attempts to access my existing account have been fruitless - as I was not aware that I had to enable password reset emails, and my password was lost as it was saved to my laptop's hard drive. I now wish and intend to go all in on this wiki now that I'm back in a position to do so. Thank you.
 * Sophiebun This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks.
 * As an alternative to the above, you may wish to create a local election page somewhere on the wiki, following the guidelines in the linked page, and then after 5-7 calendar days, ping me here to assess your election. The process is usually procedurally much quicker than an adoption process. Dmehus (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Sophiebun Looking though your local contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, you have already made the most editing contributions to the wiki in both number of edits and likely by page byte size as well. Additionally, the user with the second most contributions is your stated, though unconfirmed, original account. While we cannot use that for the purposes of restoring access to your original account, I also have no reason to doubt you, either, so on that basis, it could also be said you're likely the only contributor to this wiki. In any case, I'm thus satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

linguapedia.miraheze.org
Reason: The founder is no longer around, but I'd like to maintain and take good care of the wiki. Penarc1 (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: linguapedia.miraheze.org
 * Username: Penarc1
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No.
 * Penarc1 This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Penarc1 Your local contributions alone show me your commitment level to maintaining and serving as an important caretaker for ; however, your work on Lingua Franca Nova demonstrate you understand this wiki's scope and, combined with your impressive, well-documented cross-wiki contributions, further demonstrate you will be a trusted steward of and for this wiki. As such, this LGTM and is thus ✅, with   and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 18:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As a side note, I was particularly impressed with the way in which you incorporated a link to a completely unaffiliated content page on another Miraheze-hosted wiki as you did here, as this is something rarely seen on Miraheze. Nicely done! Dmehus (talk) 18:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

myshc.miraheze.org
Pdr0011 (talk) 06:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: myshc.miraheze.org
 * Username: Pdr0011
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: This wiki is no longer being edited. I want to adopt this wiki.
 * Pdr0011 This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. After several weeks, your contributions to the wiki will be assessed by Stewards, and the  user group may be added to your account at that time. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Pdr0011 Looking though your local contributions to this wiki since it was reopened, though quite minor, you have already made the second most editing contributions to the wiki in terms of number of edits. Additionally, this is a non-English language wiki. I'm thus satisfied of your commitment level to continue contributing to the wiki and to serving as its custodian/caretaker, so this LGTM and is thus ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello... I accidentally removed the bureaucrat rating while checking the settings. Could you make a bureaucrat group again? Pdr0011 (talk) 14:53, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Pdr0011 I see that you have deleted your  user group, but I also noted you removed the   flag from the existing bureaucrat & sysop, Csam10398, and blocked that user for no apparent reason. As I did provide you a helpful reminder above that local wikis are not owned by any one person, and are run according to the consensus will of the local wiki community, I'm not seeing any sort of consensus of the community to proceed with those changes. Moreover, there can always be more than one bureaucrat on a wiki, and, indeed, this is a recommended best practice. Another recommended best practice which is strongly encouraged is to leave the ManageWiki permissions such that only Stewards can remove the   bit from users (requested at stewards' noticeboard). I'll recreate your   group following the default permissions for the group, but will you commit to keeping in place that recommended best practice and to unblocking that user and restoring their   bit should they return? Dmehus (talk) 17:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Well noted. Then I will commit those items. Well... could you recreate the bureaucrat group? Pdr0011 (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Additionally, Csam10398 have not edited this wiki for a long time, so I think he left the wiki for now. But I'm planning to wait for him coming back to wiki to give sysop bit and bureaucrat. Pdr0011 (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a bit fair, but my preference would be to restore at least the  user group, then you could perhaps make a dummy log action to note that the user's   group would be restored once the user returns to the wiki. Dmehus (talk) 00:14, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * But I already removed the actual group 'bureaucrat', also I cannot access the ManageWiki screen which is available for bureaucrat. Pdr0011 (talk) 04:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll recreate the group, then if bureaucrat needs to be re-added, you can do that, and also unblock them. Dmehus (talk) 04:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * OK I wanna do bureaucrat again... Pdr0011 (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Pdr0011 ✅ (#1 and #2), with  re-added to you and Csam10398. You can now unblock Csam10398 locally. As a recommended best practice, I recommend not giving local bureaucrats the ability to remove the bureaucrat bit from other bureaucrats and instead request Stewards remove the bit. It's a really good security practice. Dmehus (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I have unblocked Csam10398. And then I will wait for him coming back to this Wiki. Pdr0011 (talk) 04:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * For the  rights? Yeah, that sounds good. Thanks. :) Dmehus (talk) 04:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

amongus.miraheze.org
Zocktersrat (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: amongus.miraheze.org
 * Username: Zocktersrat
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): NO
 * Reason: because I need to do something with this wiki and contribute to it so I could keep it educational.
 * Zocktersrat As I see that  is a wiki of Cocopuff2018, I've instead notified them to this request to locally reopen the wiki and consider granting you any rights you may require (i.e.,   and, potentially,  ) as this will be much quicker than proceeding with a full adoption request. If they've not reopened the wiki by tomorrow, I'll reopen it, and we can proceed with the adoption request. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello I have reopened and granted admin sorry for late reply --Cocopuff2018 (talk) 17:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Zocktersrat Per Cocopuff2018's reply, above, the wiki has been ✅ and you've been locally ✅  permissions on the wiki. As such, I'm closing this request as locally handled. Feel free to request any additional permissions you require locally. Thank you. Dmehus (talk) 17:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

veg.miraheze.org
MarijusV (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: veg.miraheze.org
 * Username: MarijusV
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): yes
 * Reason:

criminals.miraheze.org
Sperosdurell (talk) 12:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Wiki: criminals.miraheze.org
 * Username: Sperosdurell
 * Are you a bureaucrat? (yes/no): No
 * Reason: Activities are possible.
 * Sperosdurell This LGTM, as the wiki was not manually closed by a local bureaucrat, so I've ✅ in lieu of locally active bureaucrats. Additionally, as you are so clearly the same user as the founding bureaucrat/original wiki requestor, based on overwhelming cross-wiki behavioural evidence supplemented by your own self-acknowledgement, this is thus ✅, with  and   rights added to your account. As a helpful reminder, local wikis are run according locally developed guidelines, rules, and other practices developed by the consensus formed from local wikis' communities. Dmehus (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you Doug. Sperosdurell (talk) 23:15, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Dmehus (talk) 23:16, 1 July 2021 (UTC)