Talk:Mental health resources

Is this page necessary?
I don't think that this should be in this website at all. OwenFung87 12:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Because mental health is important and the users need to be protected?
 * It is very irresponsible to claim that mental health resources shouldn't be on this site 193.253.205.88 12:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * We currently lack in the support we provide to users massively despite issues we’ve had with some horrid trolls. We should be doing everything we can to keep users safe. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  13:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Misuse of this website does not mean we need to decide whether it is the result of a psychological problem, nor catalog the agencies that might minister to such problems, least of all advertise "LGBTQIA support" in Australia. Show causation, or this is merely an advertisement!  If someone were to shoot up Headquarters, we would not have to take an opinion on gun ownership nor post lists of resources on the website.  Above all, Anon, it is not "very irresponsible" to hold such an opinion.   21:40 23-Feb-2020
 * I don’t know of any major “social” site that doesn’t provide some level of outreach to users. This is the most basic support we can provide on a site that has it’s fair share of issues. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  21:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * What you say might be true, but OwenFung87 has a point if this list remains to be a mere copy of that of WMF; a redirect would be enough. Besides, we can simply google to find such numbers if necessary.-- 09:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, this is a wiki site where anyone (or any admins, even if fully protected) should be allowed to edit, and I can't find any reasons that everything should be directed to you like this. In some cases, I believe local/native speakers know better about this topic than you or non-native WMF members (that draw your current standard).-- 09:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Over time as we develop a proper addition criteria and have better handling of issues, the resources and processes will move further apart from that of the Wikimedia Foundation. I’m currently pushing an initative to look after and improve our community more. ~ RhinosF1 - (chat)· acc· c -  15:13, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think perhaps a community discussion into whether we should keep this is warranted considering the opposition. But at the same time, I don't see how the presence of these pages on Meta can hurt anyone, it definitely would do more good than bad in my opinion. As for the WMF argument, I would like to add that after all the Wikimedia Foundation is a trusted foundation and we rely on them for countless things as they are the ones who work on developing MediaWiki, so I think by this standard the sites they choose for mental health support must be vetted by them and therefore trusted. Reception123 (talk) ( C ) 15:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)