User talk:Bukkit

Final warning regarding duplicitous abuse of multiple accounts
Hi Bukkit,

Regrettably, I've had to ✅ your undisclosed alternate account, 29TB. The behavioural evidence was particularly compelling, with your requesting an IP block exemption. Indeed, this very act of doing so, with or without identifying Bukkit as your master account, was a serious breach of user accounts policy. However, you even agreed that only your main account, being Bukkit, shall request an IP block exemption of some sort. Given 29TB also repeated the same same pattern of editing in violation of Bukkit's local block, I contemplated locking your main account, but that seems a bit bureaucratic to require you to appeal and place you under a global user restriction.

Accordingly, you are now ✅ from/to:


 * 1) Creating alternate accounts logged out. Any alternate accounts must be created while logged in to your main account, ideally on Meta Wiki; and,
 * 2) Using open proxies/VPNs/Tor on Miraheze, without prior consent from Stewards

As an aside, perhaps most troublingly, as 29TB, you apparently expressed interest in becoming an SRE MediaWiki Engineer volunteer, something you also expressed interest in as Bukkit. This lack of forthright disclosure for the most trusted role on Miraheze is particularly troubling.

Thanks,

Dmehus (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 23:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * when would a good time to appeal the restrictions? -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 20:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * When would you want to create accounts while logged out or use open proxies/VPN/TOR? Naleksuh (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m actually contemplating locking my alts (except for my public account), but I’ll do TOR possibly within the next few months. -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 20:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Bukkit, thank you for the ping, which I've only seen just now by coincidence of clerking one of your self-requests for deletion. With regard to removal of the arguably minimal global user restrictions, given that this occurred only a few weeks ago, I would personally not be willing to consider a full removal of the restrictions requiring you to publicly log any alternate account creations while logged into your main account for a minimum of at least three (3) months. I don't think it's a significant hardship for you to create any alternate accounts you require for your purposes, ideally on Meta Wiki. Hope that helps. Dmehus (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Tip regarding Twinkle
Hi Bukkit,

Noticing this edit, I thought I'd point out a potentially helpful tip regarding the Twinkle gadget. If you navigate to your Twinkle preferences, you actually have the option of disabling notifications to user talk pages of the original page creating user, if you wish. Alternatively, I believe you can also simply uncheck the box to notify a given user talk page when tagging a page for deletion (this is particularly helpful with nominating your own page creations for deletion).

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 00:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * , I forgot about how Twinkle works, since on WP I used RedWarn, and I rarely used Twinkle on Meta. -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 00:41, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem. Do you go by the same username on English Wikipedia? I've never used RedWarn, but it looks quite decent. I don't personally use Twinkle, but do use BrandonXLF's Restorer user script. Dmehus (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, I’m Bongo Cat -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 00:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, cool. Thanks. Dmehus (talk) 00:52, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Question
Hi Bukkit,

Looking through your main account's contributions, as well as those of your alternate account, I noticed that you have chiefly adopted using your alternate account and ceased using your main account, and was just wondering if you could share any insight on why that seems to be the case? Noting that your alternate account is named per the cross-platform convention that it is (a) to be used less than one's main account and (b) in locations that are considered less secure (i.e., Internet cafés [do those still exist?], public wifi hotspots, and airport lounges). Noting that the timestamp of the apparent switch to your alternate account was closely in line with the imposition of an indefinite global user restriction, my concern here would be with regarding to evade scrutiny. While your restriction did not limit you to using only one account, globally or on Meta Wiki, on Miraheze, as it only prohibited you from using VPNs/open proxies and to creating alternate accounts logged out or in an otherwise non-transparent process, if I were to get the sense that this were the case (i.e., to evade scrutiny), this restriction would be expanded.

Thank you for your understanding, and for your attention to this message. :)

Cheers,

Dmehus (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey,
 * I've been using my alt account recently during school-hours, however I have decided to make a new project whilst on a break, and I have not migrated it to my Bukkit account. The sudden change with accounts had nothing to do with avoiding scrutiny at all. Thank you for reach out to me regarding this apparent change of accounts, and I would like to wish you an amazing day. -- Cheers, Bukkit(Public) ( Talk • Contribs ) 17:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Bukkit, thank you for your quick response. That is helpful. When you say you "decided to make a new project whilst on [...] break," is this something I can assist with you with, by transferring or adding any local rights originally assigned to your alternate account to your main account, so you can resume using your main account? Additonally, noting you've replied from your main account, would you mind replying from your main account to provide a confirmation edit, so I know you still have access? Dmehus (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, thank you for asking, however my project is my alts global.js, and I can put it in my main. Again, thank you for asking. -- Cheers, Bukkit ( Talk • All Contribs ) 17:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * for the confirmation edit. Dmehus (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Dump files
I noticed that you have got some dump files of the Qualitipedia wikis. What do you plan on doing with them? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 21:00, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Make them readily available to the general public, might locally host the wikis as well. -- Bukkit  [ cetacean needed ] 21:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh okay. If you do import them somewhere, could you please import them with all revisions copied and all edits assigned to users if they exist locally? Also, what will happen with RWW and FWW? FatBurn0000 (sandbox | CentralAuth) 23:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

A question
Are you actually going to host the wikis independently, since FatBurn0000 said that you are. If so, that is a relief because I thought the wikis would be gone altogether, but they will just be off of Miraheze. Since there are still other Reception Wikis here on Miraheze I will stay here as well. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 23:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

An explanation
Let me explain everything. I am not obsessed. And I just like Miraheze and Qualitipedia. It is not against Qualitipedia policy to like Qualitipedia. Besides, Qualitipedia will be gone in three days. And where else will I discuss my plans for a revival. Here? I guess I have no choice but to make a new reception wiki central wiki. But I can't gather users there. Please. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I would dare say you have an unhealthy obsession with Qualitipedia. It's 100% true that there's nothing wrong in liking a project and being passionate about it but your messages have worried various community members as you exhibit excessive attachment and obsession with the wikis. You need a wikibreak. Agent Isai  Talk to me! 20:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no excessive attachment or unhealthy obsession. This is all a reckless exaggeration. People are worried for no reason. Also there is barely any local administration to begin with. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Blubabluba9990 You have to surrender the Qualitipedia as these wikis are about to close anyway due to numerous problems with these wikis described on this RfC and you actually having unhealthy obsession with reception wikis in general (frankly a bad idea) despite his global user page and comments says otherwise. TF3RDL (talk &#124; contribs &#124; FANDOM &#124; Wikipedia) 00:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Original block vote was almost entirely unanimous (one oppose) and most concerns expressed are regarding your obsessiveness. I've been there before, trust me when I say you're lying to yourself. You're trying to convince staff, and yourself, that you aren't obsessed merely to be unblocked. It's very much needed in order to keep your mental health intact, we've done this multiple times on the discord server, and given that it's needed on-wiki, we've done it this time as well. I'm sorry, but it's going to stay. -- Bukkit  [ cetacean needed ] 01:10, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The facts are simple. You don't think you're obsessed. Pretty much everyone else thinks you are with a long history to point to. Everyone else outweighs your statements unless you bring something genuinely new. Therefore you should let go until a later time. By replying now you are only wasting everyone's time. --Raidarr (talk) 13:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no obsessiveness! Blubabluba9990 (talk) 01:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you hear that? Denying with nothing to back it up doesn’t help anyone, if you want us not to think you’re obsessed, tell us why other than the generic "I’m not obsessed because I say so!" -- Bukkit  [ cetacean needed ] 05:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I have said numerous times why I am not obsessed, and explaining what I said and that it does not make me obsessed. Blubabluba9990 (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)